⚡ Veredito rápido:
- Preços: Make starts at $9/month. Flowith starts at $17.91/month. Both have a free plan.
- Ideal para: Make for app-to-app business automação. Flowith for AI research and content work on a canvas.
- Principal diferença: Make moves data between 2,000+ apps. Flowith runs AI agents inside its own workspace.
- Nossa escolha: Make for most people. It costs less and handles real negócios workflows end to end.
Make vs Flowith both promise to automate tasks with AI.
Mas eles não foram projetados para a mesma função.
Make connects your favorite apps and moves data between them.
Flowith gives you an AI agent and an infinite canvas for thinking work.
Picking the wrong one wastes money and weeks of setup.
Visão geral
Analisamos a documentação, as páginas de preços e as avaliações dos usuários para ambas as ferramentas.
Nossos redatores também passaram um tempo interagindo pessoalmente com cada um deles.
Essas observações aparecem nas seções "O que nossa equipe notou" abaixo.
We cover key features, pricing plans, ease of use, and who each tool suits.
Want to dig deeper? Each CTA box links to our full reviews.
O que é Make?
Make is a no code automation platform.
It was called Integromat before its rebrand.
You build workflows by linking app modules on a visual canvas.
Each workflow is called a scenario.
It lets you automate workflows across various applications.
It handles everything from simple workflows to complex automation with branches and loops.
Freelancers, pequenas empresas, and large enterprises all use it.
Here’s a quick video walkthrough of how Make works.
🏆 Winner: Make
Connect over 2,000 apps without writing code. Build branching scenarios on a visual canvas. Start free and upgrade only when you need more.
Defina os preços
Make uses an operations-based pricing model. Each step a scenario runs counts toward your monthly limit.
| Plano | Preço | Ideal para |
|---|---|---|
| Livre | $ 0 por mês | Learning and testing basic features |
| Essencial | US$ 9 por mês | Solo users with steady workflows |
| Pró | US$ 16 por mês | Usuários avançados que precisam de recursos avançados |
| Equipes | US$ 29 por mês | Teams sharing scenarios |
| Empresa | Preços personalizados | Large enterprises with segurança precisa |
Pricing verified October 2026.
Teste grátis: No separate trial. The free plan works as a permanent trial, and no card is needed.
Garantia de reembolso: No default refunds. Make reviews refund requests case by case.
📌 Observação: The prices above are for annual billing. Monthly billing costs $10.59 for Core, $18.82 for Pro, and $34.12 for Teams.
⚠️ Aviso: Operations add up fast. Looping over 500 rows in Google Sheets can burn 500+ operations per run. Watch your usage dashboard to avoid surprise upgrades.
Key Benefits of Make
Here’s what makes Make worth a look:
- Extensive integration capabilities: Make links over 2,000 apps. You can chain as many apps as you like in a single scenario.
- Visual workflow builder: You see every step as a bubble on a canvas. That visual approach makes data flow easy to follow.
- Advanced logic tools: Iterators, aggregators, routers, and filters come built in. You get conditional logic without writing code.
- Custom API calls: Can’t find an app? The HTTP module sends http requests to almost any service.
- Cost effective plans: Most paid plans sit between $9 and $29. That’s cheaper than many automation platforms.
- Strong community: Make has deep documentation, tutorials, and an active forum. Help is easy to find when you’re stuck.
O que nossa equipe observou
Nosso escritor signed up for Make and built scenarios for real content and lead tasks. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Make Pros & Cons
✅ Prós
- Connects over 2,000 apps in one platform
- Drag and drop interface shows every step visually
- Routers, filters, and error handling built in
- Paid plans start at just $9 per month
- HTTP module covers apps without a native connector
❌ Contras
- Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
- Operations count can climb quickly on loops
- No refunds by default
O que é Flowwith?
Flowith is an AI creation and workflow tool.
It swaps the usual chat window for an infinite canvas.
You can run many AI threads side by side on that canvas.
Its AI agent, Agent Neo, handles long multi-step jobs for you.
It also stores your notes as a searchable second brain.
Creators, researchers, and developers are its main audience.
Its whole tom is better productivity through AI.
This video shows the Flowith canvas in action.
Runner Up: Flowith
Research, write, and create on one infinite canvas. Agent Neo runs long tasks for you. Try it with 1,000 free credits.
Preços da Flowith
Flowith charges in unified credits. One credit pool covers texto, image, and video models.
| Plano | Preço | Ideal para |
|---|---|---|
| Iniciante | $ 0/mês | Trying basic models and Agent Neo |
| Pró | $17.91/month | Individual creators and students |
| Final | $44.91/month | Heavy daily research and content generation |
| Infinito | $399.92/month | Studios and teams with huge credit needs |
Pricing verified October 2026.
Teste grátis: The forever-free Starter plan gives 1,000 one-time credits. It includes basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo.
Garantia de reembolso: We couldn’t confirm a standard refund window. Check the billing terms before you upgrade.
📌 Observação: Paid plans refresh credits every month. You can top up anytime if you run short.
⚠️ Aviso: Unused credits expire at the end of each monthly cycle. They don’t roll over, so size your plan carefully.
Key Benefits of Flowith
Here’s where Flowith earns its place:
- Intuitive canvas: Ideas branch out visually instead of scrolling away. Big projects stay easy to navigate.
- Agente Neo: This AI agent runs multi-step creative tasks. Flowith says it works without context limits.
- Oracle mode: It breaks a big job into subtasks. Then it pulls the right tools for each part.
- Many models, one place: You pick different AI models for different content tasks. No tab-switching between apps.
- Jardim do Conhecimento: Flowith stores and links your info automatically. You skip manual tagging and still find things later.
- Live collaboration: Team members can work on the same canvas at the same time.
O que nossa equipe observou
Our writer signed up for Flowith and used it for research and draft outlines. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Flowith Pros & Cons
✅ Prós
- Infinite canvas keeps research threads organized
- Agent Neo handles long, multi-step jobs
- One credit pool for text, image, and video
- Real-time collaboration on shared canvases
❌ Contras
- Some reviewers call it pricey for what it does
- Weak for scripting or negociação tarefas
- Unused credits expire each month
- Few direct app integrations
Comparação de recursos
Make is an automation tool. Flowith is an AI workspace. Below, we compare ten areas so you can see where each one fits.
| Recurso | Fazer | Flowith |
|---|---|---|
| Preço inicial | US$ 9 por mês | $17.91/month |
| Plano Gratuito | ✅ | ✅ (1,000 one-time credits) |
| Agentes de IA | ✅ | ✅ Agent Neo |
| Visual Builder / Canvas | ✅ Scenario canvas | ✅ Infinite canvas |
| Mais de 2.000 integrações de aplicativos | ✅ | ❌ |
| Custom API Calls (HTTP) | ✅ | ❌ |
| Image & Video Creation | ❌ (via third party services) | ✅ |
| Base de conhecimento | ❌ | ✅ Jardim do Conhecimento |
| Colaboração em tempo real | Teams plan | ✅ |
| Ideal para | Business workflows | AI research and content |
1. AI Agents
Fazer: Make AI Agents sit inside your scenarios. They decide which step to run next based on goals you set. Because they live in a workflow, they can act on real apps and data.
Fluxo: Agent Neo is the star here. It’s built for limitless creative and research jobs that run across many steps. You give it a goal, and it keeps completing steps without hitting context limits.
2. Visual Builder and Interface
Fazer: The workflow builder is a drag-and-drop canvas of connected modules. You can watch data move through each bubble as a scenario runs. It’s clear, but it takes time to learn.
Fluxo: Flowith calls its layout a smart framework for deep work. Each idea becomes a node you can branch from. The goal is fewer distractions and more time in a flow state.
3. Integrations and API Access
Fazer: This is Make’s home turf. It supports over 2,000 apps, from Google Sheets to CRMs and e-commerce stores. The HTTP module handles API integrations for any tool that offers one.
Fluxo: Flowith connects AI models, not business apps. You won’t find triggers for Slack, Gmail, or Shopify here. Its strength stays inside its own canvas.
⚠️ Aviso: If you need syncing data between apps in real time, Flowith can’t do that job. Make can.
4. Complex Logic and Error Handling
Fazer: Routers split paths. Filters stop bad data. Iterators and aggregators handle lists. Error handlers catch failures and show clear error messages. One broken step doesn’t kill the whole run.
Fluxo: Oracle mode handles complexity in a different way. It splits a big request into subtasks and picks tools for each. You steer with prompts, not with if-then rules.
5. Geração de Conteúdo
Fazer: Make doesn’t write content itself. It calls aplicativos de IA like OpenAI and then posts the output. mídias sociais automation is a common use, such as drafting and scheduling posts.
Fluxo: The Flowith Composer is built for writing. You can draft long pieces with several models in one view.
It also has an AI-powered photo editor for quick visuals.
https://fahimai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ai-powered-photo-editor-980×532.pngv
Video generation runs on the same credit pool.
6. Business Process Automation
Fazer: Make shines at repetitive tasks across departments. Lead capture, contract routing, and invoice processing are all common scenarios. Marketing, inventory, and customer support teams use it too.
Contract workflows can send, sign, and file documents without manual steps.
Invoice scenarios pull numbers from emails and push them into contabilidade ferramentas.
Fluxo: Flowith isn’t built for back-office work. It can plan a process or write a report about it. But it won’t move a record from one system to another.
7. Knowledge and Research
Fazer: Make has no built-in note system. You can pipe research into Noção or a database. But the storage and search happen in another tool.
Fluxo: The Knowledge Garden turns your files into a searchable base. It links ideas without manual tagging. Some reports claim up to 40% faster task completion and 78% faster retrieval. Treat those numbers as claims, not guarantees.
8. Templates and Community
Fazer: The Templates Gallery gives you ready-made scenarios to copy. A large forum and tutorial library back it up. That makes creating automations easier cedo in your automation journey.
Fluxo: Flowith has an Agent Community where people share agents. Its Knowledge Market lets creators trade knowledge bases.
Here’s a look at the Knowledge Market.
9. Facilidade de uso
Fazer: Simple tasks take minutes. But more complex workflows bring a steep learning curve around APIs and data mapping. Expect some trial and error before you build workflows with confidence.
Fluxo: If you can type a prompt, you can use Flowith. Reviewers praise how its interface supports deep work. The canvas does take a short adjustment if you’re used to chat apps.
💡 Dica profissional: New to Make? Copy a template first. Editing a working scenario teaches faster than starting from a blank canvas.
10. Preços e Custos
| Nível | Fazer | Flowith |
|---|---|---|
| Livre | Free: $0 per month | Starter: $0/month |
| Entrada | Core: $9 per month | Pro: $17.91/month |
| Meio | Pro: $16 per month | Ultimate: $44.91/month |
| Team / Top | Teams: $29 per month | Infinite: $399.92/month |
| Empresa | Preços personalizados | ❌ |
Fazer: Make is the cheaper paid plan at every step. Its operations-based pricing has no hidden fees, but heavy loops raise your bill. It’s priced below Zapier for similar volume.
Fluxo: Credits work across every model, which keeps things simple. The catch is expiry. Credits you don’t spend vanish at the end of each cycle.
Diferentes cenários
| Se você precisar | Escolher | Por que |
|---|---|---|
| Orçamento apertado | Fazer | Paid plans start at $9 |
| Connect business apps | Fazer | 2,000+ integrations |
| AI research and writing | Flowith | Canvas plus Composer |
| Long autônomo AI jobs | Flowith | Agent Neo |
| Custom API calls | Fazer | HTTP module |
| Fast start for beginners | Flowith | Prompt-driven, no mapping |
💰 Seu orçamento
Make’s paid plan costs about half of Flowith’s entry plan. If money is tight, Make gives more for less.
🔌 Seu conjunto de tecnologias
Already run on Google Sheets, a CRM, and email? Make ties them together, while Flowith stays a separate workspace.
📝 Seu estilo de trabalho
Writers and researchers who think visually will feel at home in Flowith. Ops people who think in steps will prefer Make.
🎓 Seu nível de experiência
Flowith needs no coding expertise or setup. Make needs some patience, but you never have to touch code.
🆓 Testes e demonstrações grátis
Both have a free plan, so test with a real task. Make’s free tier never ends, while Flowith’s credits are one-time.
🛟 Opções de suporte
Make has a big forum, docs, and video guides. Flowith’s community is smaller and newer, so answers can take longer.
Guia de Troca
Já utiliza alguma dessas ferramentas? Veja o que esperar se você mudar.
🔄 Switching from Make to Flowith?
✅ O que você vai ganhar:
- An infinite canvas for research and brainstorming
- Built-in image and video creation
- A searchable knowledge base for your notes
❌ O que você perderá:
- Triggers and actions across 2,000+ apps
- Routers, filters, and scheduled scenarios
- Custom HTTP and API connections
📋 Como mudar:
- List which Make scenarios are content or research jobs
- Create a free Flowith account and test those jobs
- Keep Make running for anything that moves app data
🔄 Switching from Flowith to Make?
✅ O que você vai ganhar:
- Real automation between your business apps
- planos pagos mais baratos
- Detailed error handling and run history
❌ O que você perderá:
- The visual research canvas
- Agent Neo’s long-running AI tasks
- Built-in image and video tools
📋 Como mudar:
- Export your Flowith notes and outputs
- Sign up for Make’s free plan
- Rebuild repeat jobs from a template and connect your apps
O que nossa avaliação não abordou
This comparison focused on solo users and small teams. We didn’t test Make’s Enterprise plan or Flowith’s $399.92 Infinite tier. We also didn’t build a mobile app with either tool. Searched “make app” hoping to build one? Try AI or no-code app construtores instead. They suit beginners and fast prototypes.
Veredicto final
| Categoria | Ganhador |
|---|---|
| 💰 Preços | Fazer |
| 🔌 Integrações | Fazer |
| 🧠 Complex Logic | Fazer |
| 🤖 Agentes de IA | Flowith |
| ✍️ Geração de Conteúdo | Flowith |
| 📚 Modelos e Comunidade | Fazer |
| 👶 Facilidade de uso | Flowith |
| 🏆 Vencedor Geral | Fazer |
🏆 WINNER: MAKE
Make wins 4 out of 7 categories.
Ideal para: Business automation, app syncing, budget-conscious teams
Make is a powerful automation platform for moving work between apps. It costs less and gives you tight control over every step.
Flowith is a strong pick for research, writing, and AI-heavy creative work. Its canvas and Agent Neo do things Make simply wasn’t built for.
For most readers, the job is cutting manual work across tools. That’s why Make takes the win. Many people will happily use both.
More of Make Compared
Weighing both Zapier and Make? Start with the first card below.
Obtenha vitórias em: Lower prices for similar volume, branching routers, and finer control over data parsing.
Zapier vence em: A larger app library, a simpler linear setup, and a faster start for beginners.
Make vs n8n
Obtenha vitórias em: Fully hosted setup, friendlier for non-coders, and more ready-made app modules.
n8n vence em: Self-hosting, custom code nodes, and source-available licensing.
Make vs Pabbly Conectar
Obtenha vitórias em: Deeper logic tools, a bigger app catalog, and built-in AI agents.
Pabblely Connect wins on: Lifetime-deal pricing, free internal steps, and lower long-term cost.
Make vs Gumloop
Obtenha vitórias em: Wider app support, mature error handling, and cheaper entry plans.
Gumloop vence em: AI-first nodes, built-in web scraping, and LLM steps without your own API key.
More of Flowith Compared
Here’s how Flowith compares with other AI workspaces:
Flowith vs Notion
Flowith wins on: Multi-model AI on a canvas, autônomo agent tasks, and auto-linked knowledge.
Notion vence em: Docs and databases, mature team wikis, and wider app connections.
Flowwith vs. MindStudio
Flowith wins on: Free-form research canvas, image and video creation, and a personal knowledge base.
MindStudio wins on: Building custom AI apps, sharing agents with clients, and structured agent workflows.
Flowith wins on: Visual thinking space, long-running Agent Neo jobs, and built-in note storage.
Gumloop vence em: App integrations, scheduled automations, and web scraping nodes.
Perguntas frequentes
Para que serve o Make.com?
It connects apps and automates workflows without code. Common uses include lead capture, invoices, and social posts. It also syncs records between Google Sheets and a CRM.
O Make é melhor que o Zapier?
For complex logic and lower cost, yes. Zapier is simpler and has more apps. Unlike Zapier’s linear steps, Make supports branching paths and loops.
O flowith.io é gratuito?
Yes, partly. The Starter plan is free forever with 1,000 one-time credits. It includes basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo. Paid plans start at $17.91/month.
O Flowwith pode ser integrado a outros aplicativos?
Only in a limited way. It connects many AI models inside one interface. For moving data between business apps, a tool like Make is the better fit.
Qual IA é a melhor para automação?
For app-to-app automation, Make offers the best value here. For research and content tasks run by an AI agent, Flowith is the stronger choice.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 