⚡ Szybki werdykt:
- Wycena: Make starts at $9/month. Flowith starts at $17.91/month. Both have a free plan.
- Najlepiej dla: Make for app-to-app business automatyzacja. Flowith for AI research and content work on a canvas.
- Kluczowa różnica: Make moves data between 2,000+ apps. Flowith runs AI agents inside its own workspace.
- Nasz wybór: Make for most people. It costs less and handles real biznes workflows end to end.
Make vs Flowith both promise to automate tasks with AI.
Ale nie są one stworzone do tego samego zadania.
Make connects your favorite apps and moves data between them.
Flowith gives you an AI agent and an infinite canvas for thinking work.
Picking the wrong one wastes money and weeks of setup.
Przegląd
Przejrzeliśmy dokumentację, strony z cenami i opinie użytkowników dotyczące obu narzędzi.
Nasi autorzy spędzili także trochę czasu osobiście z każdym z nich.
Notatki te znajdują się poniżej w sekcjach „Co zauważył nasz zespół”.
We cover key features, pricing plans, ease of use, and who each tool suits.
Want to dig deeper? Each CTA box links to our full reviews.
Czym jest Make?
Make is a no code automation platform.
It was called Integromat before its rebrand.
You build workflows by linking app modules on a visual canvas.
Each workflow is called a scenario.
It lets you automate workflows across various applications.
It handles everything from simple workflows to complex automation with branches and loops.
Freelancerzy, małe firmy, and large enterprises all use it.
Here’s a quick video walkthrough of how Make works.
🏆 Winner: Make
Connect over 2,000 apps without writing code. Build branching scenarios on a visual canvas. Start free and upgrade only when you need more.
Ustalanie cen
Make uses an operations-based pricing model. Each step a scenario runs counts toward your monthly limit.
| Plan | Cena | Najlepsze dla |
|---|---|---|
| Bezpłatny | 0 zł miesięcznie | Learning and testing basic features |
| Rdzeń | 9 dolarów miesięcznie | Solo users with steady workflows |
| Zawodowiec | 16 dolarów miesięcznie | Zaawansowani użytkownicy potrzebujący zaawansowanych funkcji |
| Zespoły | 29 dolarów miesięcznie | Teams sharing scenarios |
| Przedsiębiorstwo | Niestandardowe ceny | Large enterprises with bezpieczeństwo wymagania |
Pricing verified October 2026.
Bezpłatny okres próbny: No separate trial. The free plan works as a permanent trial, and no card is needed.
Gwarancja zwrotu pieniędzy: No default refunds. Make reviews refund requests case by case.
📌 Notatka: The prices above are for annual billing. Monthly billing costs $10.59 for Core, $18.82 for Pro, and $34.12 for Teams.
⚠️ Ostrzeżenie: Operations add up fast. Looping over 500 rows in Google Sheets can burn 500+ operations per run. Watch your usage dashboard to avoid surprise upgrades.
Key Benefits of Make
Here’s what makes Make worth a look:
- Extensive integration capabilities: Make links over 2,000 apps. You can chain as many apps as you like in a single scenario.
- Visual workflow builder: You see every step as a bubble on a canvas. That visual approach makes data flow easy to follow.
- Advanced logic tools: Iterators, aggregators, routers, and filters come built in. You get conditional logic without writing code.
- Custom API calls: Can’t find an app? The HTTP module sends http requests to almost any service.
- Cost effective plans: Most paid plans sit between $9 and $29. That’s cheaper than many automation platforms.
- Strong community: Make has deep documentation, tutorials, and an active forum. Help is easy to find when you’re stuck.
Co zauważył nasz zespół
Nasz pisarz signed up for Make and built scenarios for real content and lead tasks. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Make Pros & Cons
✅ Zalety
- Connects over 2,000 apps in one platform
- Drag and drop interface shows every step visually
- Routers, filters, and error handling built in
- Paid plans start at just $9 per month
- HTTP module covers apps without a native connector
❌ Wady
- Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
- Operations count can climb quickly on loops
- No refunds by default
Czym jest Flowith?
Flowith is an AI creation and workflow tool.
It swaps the usual chat window for an infinite canvas.
You can run many AI threads side by side on that canvas.
Its AI agent, Agent Neo, handles long multi-step jobs for you.
It also stores your notes as a searchable second brain.
Creators, researchers, and developers are its main audience.
Its whole poziom is better productivity through AI.
This video shows the Flowith canvas in action.
Runner Up: Flowith
Research, write, and create on one infinite canvas. Agent Neo runs long tasks for you. Try it with 1,000 free credits.
Cennik Flowith
Flowith charges in unified credits. One credit pool covers tekst, image, and video models.
| Plan | Cena | Najlepsze dla |
|---|---|---|
| Rozrusznik | 0 zł/miesiąc | Trying basic models and Agent Neo |
| Zawodowiec | $17.91/month | Individual creators and students |
| Ostateczny | $44.91/month | Heavy daily research and content generation |
| Nieskończony | $399.92/month | Studios and teams with huge credit needs |
Pricing verified October 2026.
Bezpłatny okres próbny: The forever-free Starter plan gives 1,000 one-time credits. It includes basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo.
Gwarancja zwrotu pieniędzy: We couldn’t confirm a standard refund window. Check the billing terms before you upgrade.
📌 Notatka: Paid plans refresh credits every month. You can top up anytime if you run short.
⚠️ Ostrzeżenie: Unused credits expire at the end of each monthly cycle. They don’t roll over, so size your plan carefully.
Key Benefits of Flowith
Here’s where Flowith earns its place:
- Intuitive canvas: Ideas branch out visually instead of scrolling away. Big projects stay easy to navigate.
- Agent Neo: This AI agent runs multi-step creative tasks. Flowith says it works without context limits.
- Oracle mode: It breaks a big job into subtasks. Then it pulls the right tools for each part.
- Many models, one place: You pick different AI models for different content tasks. No tab-switching between apps.
- Ogród wiedzy: Flowith stores and links your info automatically. You skip manual tagging and still find things later.
- Live collaboration: Team members can work on the same canvas at the same time.
Co zauważył nasz zespół
Our writer signed up for Flowith and used it for research and draft outlines. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Flowith Pros & Cons
✅ Zalety
- Infinite canvas keeps research threads organized
- Agent Neo handles long, multi-step jobs
- One credit pool for text, image, and video
- Real-time collaboration on shared canvases
❌ Wady
- Some reviewers call it pricey for what it does
- Weak for scripting or handlowy zadania
- Unused credits expire each month
- Few direct app integrations
Porównanie funkcji
Make is an automation tool. Flowith is an AI workspace. Below, we compare ten areas so you can see where each one fits.
| Funkcja | Robić | Flowith |
|---|---|---|
| Cena wywoławcza | 9 dolarów miesięcznie | $17.91/month |
| Bezpłatny plan | ✅ | ✅ (1,000 one-time credits) |
| Agenci AI | ✅ | ✅ Agent Neo |
| Visual Builder / Canvas | ✅ Scenario canvas | ✅ Infinite canvas |
| Ponad 2000 integracji aplikacji | ✅ | ❌ |
| Custom API Calls (HTTP) | ✅ | ❌ |
| Image & Video Creation | ❌ (via third party services) | ✅ |
| Baza wiedzy | ❌ | ✅ Ogród Wiedzy |
| Współpraca w czasie rzeczywistym | Teams plan | ✅ |
| Najlepsze dla | Business workflows | AI research and content |
1. AI Agents
Robić: Make AI Agents sit inside your scenarios. They decide which step to run next based on goals you set. Because they live in a workflow, they can act on real apps and data.
Flowith: Agent Neo is the star here. It’s built for limitless creative and research jobs that run across many steps. You give it a goal, and it keeps completing steps without hitting context limits.
2. Visual Builder and Interface
Robić: The workflow builder is a drag-and-drop canvas of connected modules. You can watch data move through each bubble as a scenario runs. It’s clear, but it takes time to learn.
Flowith: Flowith calls its layout a smart framework for deep work. Each idea becomes a node you can branch from. The goal is fewer distractions and more time in a flow state.
3. Integrations and API Access
Robić: This is Make’s home turf. It supports over 2,000 apps, from Google Sheets to CRMs and e-commerce stores. The HTTP module handles API integrations for any tool that offers one.
Flowith: Flowith connects AI models, not business apps. You won’t find triggers for Slack, Gmail, or Shopify here. Its strength stays inside its own canvas.
⚠️ Ostrzeżenie: If you need syncing data between apps in real time, Flowith can’t do that job. Make can.
4. Complex Logic and Error Handling
Robić: Routers split paths. Filters stop bad data. Iterators and aggregators handle lists. Error handlers catch failures and show clear error messages. One broken step doesn’t kill the whole run.
Flowith: Oracle mode handles complexity in a different way. It splits a big request into subtasks and picks tools for each. You steer with prompts, not with if-then rules.
5. Generowanie treści
Robić: Make doesn’t write content itself. It calls Aplikacje AI like OpenAI and then posts the output. Media społecznościowe automation is a common use, such as drafting and scheduling posts.
Flowith: The Flowith Composer is built for writing. You can draft long pieces with several models in one view.
It also has an AI-powered photo editor for quick visuals.
https://fahimai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ai-powered-photo-editor-980×532.pngv
Video generation runs on the same credit pool.
6. Business Process Automation
Robić: Make shines at repetitive tasks across departments. Lead capture, contract routing, and invoice processing are all common scenarios. Marketing, inventory, and customer support teams use it too.
Contract workflows can send, sign, and file documents without manual steps.
Invoice scenarios pull numbers from emails and push them into księgowość narzędzia.
Flowith: Flowith isn’t built for back-office work. It can plan a process or write a report about it. But it won’t move a record from one system to another.
7. Knowledge and Research
Robić: Make has no built-in note system. You can pipe research into Pojęcie or a database. But the storage and search happen in another tool.
Flowith: The Knowledge Garden turns your files into a searchable base. It links ideas without manual tagging. Some reports claim up to 40% faster task completion and 78% faster retrieval. Treat those numbers as claims, not guarantees.
8. Templates and Community
Robić: The Templates Gallery gives you ready-made scenarios to copy. A large forum and tutorial library back it up. That makes creating automations easier wczesny in your automation journey.
Flowith: Flowith has an Agent Community where people share agents. Its Knowledge Market lets creators trade knowledge bases.
Here’s a look at the Knowledge Market.
9. Łatwość użytkowania
Robić: Simple tasks take minutes. But more complex workflows bring a steep learning curve around APIs and data mapping. Expect some trial and error before you build workflows with confidence.
Flowith: If you can type a prompt, you can użyj Flowith. Reviewers praise how its interface supports deep work. The canvas does take a short adjustment if you’re used to chat apps.
💡 Wskazówka: New to Make? Copy a template first. Editing a working scenario teaches faster than starting from a blank canvas.
10. Ceny i koszty
| Szczebel | Robić | Flowith |
|---|---|---|
| Bezpłatny | Free: $0 per month | Starter: $0/month |
| Wejście | Core: $9 per month | Pro: $17.91/month |
| Średni | Pro: $16 per month | Ultimate: $44.91/month |
| Team / Top | Teams: $29 per month | Infinite: $399.92/month |
| Przedsiębiorstwo | Niestandardowe ceny | ❌ |
Robić: Make is the cheaper paid plan at every step. Its operations-based pricing has no hidden fees, but heavy loops raise your bill. It’s priced below Zapier for similar volume.
Flowith: Credits work across every model, which keeps things simple. The catch is expiry. Credits you don’t spend vanish at the end of each cycle.
Różne scenariusze
| Jeśli potrzebujesz… | Wybierać | Dlaczego |
|---|---|---|
| Ograniczony budżet | Robić | Paid plans start at $9 |
| Connect business apps | Robić | 2,000+ integrations |
| AI research and writing | Flowith | Canvas plus Composer |
| Long autonomiczny AI jobs | Flowith | Agent Neo |
| Custom API calls | Robić | HTTP module |
| Fast start for beginners | Flowith | Prompt-driven, no mapping |
💰 Twój budżet
Make’s paid plan costs about half of Flowith’s entry plan. If money is tight, Make gives more for less.
🔌 Twój zestaw technologii
Already run on Google Sheets, a CRM, and email? Make ties them together, while Flowith stays a separate workspace.
📝 Twój styl pracy
Writers and researchers who think visually will feel at home in Flowith. Ops people who think in steps will prefer Make.
🎓 Twój poziom doświadczenia
Flowith needs no coding expertise or setup. Make needs some patience, but you never have to touch code.
🆓 Bezpłatne wersje próbne i dema
Both have a free plan, so test with a real task. Make’s free tier never ends, while Flowith’s credits are one-time.
🛟 Opcje wsparcia
Make has a big forum, docs, and video guides. Flowith’s community is smaller and newer, so answers can take longer.
Przewodnik po przełączaniu
Korzystasz już z jednego z tych narzędzi? Oto, czego możesz się spodziewać po zmianie.
🔄 Switching from Make to Flowith?
✅ Co zyskasz:
- An infinite canvas for research and burza mózgów
- Built-in image and video creation
- A searchable knowledge base for your notes
❌ Co stracisz:
- Triggers and actions across 2,000+ apps
- Routers, filters, and scheduled scenarios
- Custom HTTP and API connections
📋 Jak przełączyć:
- List which Make scenarios are content or research jobs
- Create a free Flowith account and test those jobs
- Keep Make running for anything that moves app data
🔄 Switching from Flowith to Make?
✅ Co zyskasz:
- Real automation between your business apps
- Tańsze plany płatne
- Detailed error handling and run history
❌ Co stracisz:
- The visual research canvas
- Agent Neo’s long-running AI tasks
- Built-in image and video tools
📋 Jak przełączyć:
- Export your Flowith notes and outputs
- Sign up for Make’s free plan
- Rebuild repeat jobs from a template and connect your apps
Czego nie objęła nasza recenzja
This comparison focused on solo users and small teams. We didn’t test Make’s Enterprise plan or Flowith’s $399.92 Infinite tier. We also didn’t build a mobile app with either tool. Searched “make app” hoping to build one? Try AI or no-code app budowniczych instead. They suit beginners and fast prototypes.
Ostateczny werdykt
| Kategoria | Zwycięzca |
|---|---|
| 💰 Cennik | Robić |
| 🔌 Integracje | Robić |
| 🧠 Complex Logic | Robić |
| 🤖 Agenci AI | Flowith |
| ✍️ Generowanie treści | Flowith |
| 📚 Szablony i społeczność | Robić |
| 👶 Łatwość użytkowania | Flowith |
| 🏆 Zwycięzca klasyfikacji generalnej | Robić |
🏆 WINNER: MAKE
Make wins 4 out of 7 categories.
Najlepiej dla: Business automation, app syncing, budget-conscious teams
Make is a powerful automation platform for moving work between apps. It costs less and gives you tight control over every step.
Flowith is a strong pick for research, writing, and AI-heavy creative work. Its canvas and Agent Neo do things Make simply wasn’t built for.
For most readers, the job is cutting manual work across tools. That’s why Make takes the win. Many people will happily use both.
More of Make Compared
Weighing both Zapier and Make? Start with the first card below.
Wygrywaj na: Lower prices for similar volume, branching routers, and finer control over data parsing.
Zapier wygrywa w: A larger app library, a simpler linear setup, and a faster start for beginners.
Make vs n8n
Wygrywaj na: Fully hosted setup, friendlier for non-coders, and more ready-made app modules.
n8n wygrywa w: Self-hosting, custom code nodes, and source-available licensing.
Make vs Pabbly Łączyć
Wygrywaj na: Deeper logic tools, a bigger app catalog, and built-in AI agents.
Pabbly Connect wins on: Lifetime-deal pricing, free internal steps, and lower long-term cost.
Make vs Gumloop
Wygrywaj na: Wider app support, mature error handling, and cheaper entry plans.
Gumloop wygrywa w: AI-first nodes, built-in web scraping, and LLM steps without your own API key.
More of Flowith Compared
Here’s how Flowith compares with other AI workspaces:
Flowith vs Notion
Flowith wins on: Multi-model AI on a canvas, autonomiczny agent tasks, and auto-linked knowledge.
Notion wygrywa w: Docs and databases, mature team wikis, and wider app connections.
Flowith kontra MindStudio
Flowith wins on: Free-form research canvas, image and video creation, and a personal knowledge base.
MindStudio wins on: Building custom AI apps, sharing agents with clients, and structured agent workflows.
Flowith wins on: Visual thinking space, long-running Agent Neo jobs, and built-in note storage.
Gumloop wygrywa w: App integrations, scheduled automations, and web scraping nodes.
Często zadawane pytania
Do czego służy Make.com?
It connects apps and automates workflows without code. Common uses include lead capture, invoices, and social posts. It also syncs records between Google Sheets and a CRM.
Czy Make jest lepszy niż Zapier?
For complex logic and lower cost, yes. Zapier is simpler and has more apps. Unlike Zapier’s linear steps, Make supports branching paths and loops.
Czy flowith.io jest darmowe?
Yes, partly. The Starter plan is free forever with 1,000 one-time credits. It includes basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo. Paid plans start at $17.91/month.
Czy Flowith można zintegrować z innymi aplikacjami?
Only in a limited way. It connects many AI models inside one interface. For moving data between business apps, a tool like Make is the better fit.
Która sztuczna inteligencja najlepiej nadaje się do automatyzacji?
For app-to-app automation, Make offers the best value here. For research and content tasks run by an AI agent, Flowith is the stronger choice.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 