⚡ حكم سريع:
- الأسعار: Make starts at $9/month. Flowith starts at $17.91/month. Both have a free plan.
- الأفضل لـ: Make for app-to-app business الأتمتة. Flowith for AI research and content work on a canvas.
- الفرق الرئيسي: Make moves data between 2,000+ apps. Flowith runs AI agents inside its own workspace.
- اختيارنا: Make for most people. It costs less and handles real عمل workflows end to end.
Make vs Flowith both promise to automate tasks with AI.
But they are not built for the same job.
Make connects your favorite apps and moves data between them.
Flowith gives you an AI agent and an infinite canvas for thinking work.
Picking the wrong one wastes money and weeks of setup.
ملخص
لقد راجعنا الوثائق وصفحات الأسعار وتقييمات المستخدمين لكلا الأداتين.
كما أمضى كتّابنا وقتاً عملياً مع كل واحد منهم.
تظهر هذه الملاحظات في قسم "ما لاحظه فريقنا" أدناه.
We cover key features, pricing plans, ease of use, and who each tool suits.
Want to dig deeper? Each CTA box links to our full reviews.
ما هو "صنع"؟
Make is a no code automation platform.
It was called Integromat before its rebrand.
You build workflows by linking app modules on a visual canvas.
Each workflow is called a scenario.
It lets you automate workflows across various applications.
It handles everything from simple workflows to complex automation with branches and loops.
المستقلون، الشركات الصغيرة, and large enterprises all use it.
Here’s a quick video walkthrough of how Make works.
🏆 Winner: Make
Connect over 2,000 apps without writing code. Build branching scenarios on a visual canvas. Start free and upgrade only when you need more.
تحديد الأسعار
Make uses an operations-based pricing model. Each step a scenario runs counts toward your monthly limit.
| يخطط | سعر | الأفضل لـ |
|---|---|---|
| حر | 0 دولار شهرياً | Learning and testing basic features |
| جوهر | 9 دولارات شهرياً | Solo users with steady workflows |
| محترف | 16 دولارًا شهريًا | المستخدمون المتقدمون الذين يحتاجون إلى ميزات متقدمة |
| الفرق | 29 دولارًا شهريًا | Teams sharing scenarios |
| مَشرُوع | تسعير مخصص | Large enterprises with حماية الاحتياجات |
Pricing verified October 2026.
تجربة مجانية: No separate trial. The free plan works as a permanent trial, and no card is needed.
ضمان استرداد الأموال: No default refunds. Make reviews refund requests case by case.
📌 ملحوظة: The prices above are for annual billing. Monthly billing costs $10.59 for Core, $18.82 for Pro, and $34.12 for Teams.
⚠️ تحذير: Operations add up fast. Looping over 500 rows in Google Sheets can burn 500+ operations per run. Watch your usage dashboard to avoid surprise upgrades.
Key Benefits of Make
Here’s what makes Make worth a look:
- Extensive integration capabilities: Make links over 2,000 apps. You can chain as many apps as you like in a single scenario.
- Visual workflow builder: You see every step as a bubble on a canvas. That visual approach makes data flow easy to follow.
- Advanced logic tools: Iterators, aggregators, routers, and filters come built in. You get conditional logic without writing code.
- Custom API calls: Can’t find an app? The HTTP module sends http requests to almost any service.
- Cost effective plans: Most paid plans sit between $9 and $29. That’s cheaper than many automation platforms.
- Strong community: Make has deep documentation, tutorials, and an active forum. Help is easy to find when you’re stuck.
ما لاحظه فريقنا
ملكنا الكاتب signed up for Make and built scenarios for real content and lead tasks. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Make Pros & Cons
✅ المزايا
- Connects over 2,000 apps in one platform
- Drag and drop interface shows every step visually
- Routers, filters, and error handling built in
- Paid plans start at just $9 per month
- HTTP module covers apps without a native connector
❌ سلبيات
- Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
- Operations count can climb quickly on loops
- No refunds by default
ما هو Flowith؟
Flowith is an AI creation and workflow tool.
It swaps the usual chat window for an infinite canvas.
You can run many AI threads side by side on that canvas.
Its AI agent, Agent Neo, handles long multi-step jobs for you.
It also stores your notes as a searchable second brain.
Creators, researchers, and developers are its main audience.
Its whole يقذف is better productivity through AI.
This video shows the Flowith canvas in action.
Runner Up: Flowith
Research, write, and create on one infinite canvas. Agent Neo runs long tasks for you. Try it with 1,000 free credits.
أسعار فلويث
Flowith charges in unified credits. One credit pool covers نص, image, and video models.
| يخطط | سعر | الأفضل لـ |
|---|---|---|
| بداية | 0 دولار شهرياً | Trying basic models and Agent Neo |
| محترف | $17.91/month | Individual creators and students |
| ذروة | $44.91/month | Heavy daily research and content generation |
| لا نهائي | $399.92/month | Studios and teams with huge credit needs |
Pricing verified October 2026.
تجربة مجانية: The forever-free Starter plan gives 1,000 one-time credits. It includes basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo.
ضمان استرداد الأموال: We couldn’t confirm a standard refund window. Check the billing terms before you upgrade.
📌 ملحوظة: Paid plans refresh credits every month. You can top up anytime if you run short.
⚠️ تحذير: Unused credits expire at the end of each monthly cycle. They don’t roll over, so size your plan carefully.
Key Benefits of Flowith
Here’s where Flowith earns its place:
- Intuitive canvas: Ideas branch out visually instead of scrolling away. Big projects stay easy to navigate.
- العميل نيو: This AI agent runs multi-step creative tasks. Flowith says it works without context limits.
- Oracle mode: It breaks a big job into subtasks. Then it pulls the right tools for each part.
- Many models, one place: You pick different AI models for different content tasks. No tab-switching between apps.
- حديقة المعرفة: Flowith stores and links your info automatically. You skip manual tagging and still find things later.
- Live collaboration: Team members can work on the same canvas at the same time.
ما لاحظه فريقنا
Our writer signed up for Flowith and used it for research and draft outlines. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Flowith Pros & Cons
✅ المزايا
- Infinite canvas keeps research threads organized
- Agent Neo handles long, multi-step jobs
- One credit pool for text, image, and video
- Real-time collaboration on shared canvases
❌ سلبيات
- Some reviewers call it pricey for what it does
- Weak for scripting or تجارة المهام
- Unused credits expire each month
- Few direct app integrations
مقارنة الميزات
Make is an automation tool. Flowith is an AI workspace. Below, we compare ten areas so you can see where each one fits.
| ميزة | يصنع | فلويث |
|---|---|---|
| السعر المبدئي | 9 دولارات شهرياً | $17.91/month |
| خطة مجانية | ✅ | ✅ (1,000 one-time credits) |
| وكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي | ✅ | ✅ Agent Neo |
| Visual Builder / Canvas | ✅ Scenario canvas | ✅ Infinite canvas |
| أكثر من 2000 عملية تكامل مع التطبيقات | ✅ | ❌ |
| Custom API Calls (HTTP) | ✅ | ❌ |
| Image & Video Creation | ❌ (via third party services) | ✅ |
| قاعدة المعرفة | ❌ | ✅ حديقة المعرفة |
| التعاون في الوقت الفعلي | Teams plan | ✅ |
| الأفضل لـ | Business workflows | AI research and content |
1. AI Agents
يصنع: Make AI Agents sit inside your scenarios. They decide which step to run next based on goals you set. Because they live in a workflow, they can act on real apps and data.
فلويث: Agent Neo is the star here. It’s built for limitless creative and research jobs that run across many steps. You give it a goal, and it keeps completing steps without hitting context limits.
2. Visual Builder and Interface
يصنع: The workflow builder is a drag-and-drop canvas of connected modules. You can watch data move through each bubble as a scenario runs. It’s clear, but it takes time to learn.
فلويث: Flowith calls its layout a smart framework for deep work. Each idea becomes a node you can branch from. The goal is fewer distractions and more time in a flow state.
3. Integrations and API Access
يصنع: This is Make’s home turf. It supports over 2,000 apps, from Google Sheets to CRMs and e-commerce stores. The HTTP module handles API integrations for any tool that offers one.
فلويث: Flowith connects AI models, not business apps. You won’t find triggers for Slack, Gmail, or Shopify here. Its strength stays inside its own canvas.
⚠️ تحذير: If you need syncing data between apps in real time, Flowith can’t do that job. Make can.
4. Complex Logic and Error Handling
يصنع: Routers split paths. Filters stop bad data. Iterators and aggregators handle lists. Error handlers catch failures and show clear error messages. One broken step doesn’t kill the whole run.
فلويث: Oracle mode handles complexity in a different way. It splits a big request into subtasks and picks tools for each. You steer with prompts, not with if-then rules.
5. Content Generation
يصنع: Make doesn’t write content itself. It calls تطبيقات الذكاء الاصطناعي like OpenAI and then posts the output. وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي automation is a common use, such as drafting and scheduling posts.
فلويث: The Flowith Composer is built for writing. You can draft long pieces with several models in one view.
It also has an AI-powered photo editor for quick visuals.
https://fahimai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ai-powered-photo-editor-980×532.pngv
Video generation runs on the same credit pool.
6. Business Process Automation
يصنع: Make shines at repetitive tasks across departments. Lead capture, contract routing, and invoice processing are all common scenarios. Marketing, inventory, and customer support teams use it too.
Contract workflows can send, sign, and file documents without manual steps.
Invoice scenarios pull numbers from emails and push them into محاسبة أدوات.
فلويث: Flowith isn’t built for back-office work. It can plan a process or write a report about it. But it won’t move a record from one system to another.
7. Knowledge and Research
يصنع: Make has no built-in note system. You can pipe research into فكرة or a database. But the storage and search happen in another tool.
فلويث: The Knowledge Garden turns your files into a searchable base. It links ideas without manual tagging. Some reports claim up to 40% faster task completion and 78% faster retrieval. Treat those numbers as claims, not guarantees.
8. Templates and Community
يصنع: The Templates Gallery gives you ready-made scenarios to copy. A large forum and tutorial library back it up. That makes creating automations easier مبكر in your automation journey.
فلويث: Flowith has an Agent Community where people share agents. Its Knowledge Market lets creators trade knowledge bases.
Here’s a look at the Knowledge Market.
9. سهولة الاستخدام
يصنع: Simple tasks take minutes. But more complex workflows bring a steep learning curve around APIs and data mapping. Expect some trial and error before you build workflows with confidence.
فلويث: If you can type a prompt, you can استخدم Flowith. Reviewers praise how its interface supports deep work. The canvas does take a short adjustment if you’re used to chat apps.
💡 نصيحة احترافية: New to Make? Copy a template first. Editing a working scenario teaches faster than starting from a blank canvas.
10. التسعير والتكلفة
| المستوى | يصنع | فلويث |
|---|---|---|
| حر | Free: $0 per month | Starter: $0/month |
| دخول | Core: $9 per month | Pro: $17.91/month |
| منتصف | Pro: $16 per month | Ultimate: $44.91/month |
| Team / Top | Teams: $29 per month | Infinite: $399.92/month |
| مَشرُوع | تسعير مخصص | ❌ |
يصنع: Make is the cheaper paid plan at every step. Its operations-based pricing has no hidden fees, but heavy loops raise your bill. It’s priced below زابير for similar volume.
فلويث: Credits work across every model, which keeps things simple. The catch is expiry. Credits you don’t spend vanish at the end of each cycle.
سيناريوهات مختلفة
| إذا كنت بحاجة إلى | يختار | لماذا |
|---|---|---|
| ميزانية محدودة | يصنع | Paid plans start at $9 |
| Connect business apps | يصنع | 2,000+ integrations |
| AI research and writing | فلويث | Canvas plus Composer |
| Long ذاتي القيادة AI jobs | فلويث | Agent Neo |
| Custom API calls | يصنع | HTTP module |
| Fast start for beginners | فلويث | Prompt-driven, no mapping |
💰 ميزانيتك
Make’s paid plan costs about half of Flowith’s entry plan. If money is tight, Make gives more for less.
🔌 مجموعة أدواتك التقنية
Already run on Google Sheets, a إدارة علاقات العملاء, and email? Make ties them together, while Flowith stays a separate workspace.
📝 أسلوب عملك
Writers and researchers who think visually will feel at home in Flowith. Ops people who think in steps will prefer Make.
🎓 مستوى خبرتك
Flowith needs no coding expertise or setup. Make needs some patience, but you never have to touch code.
🆓 تجارب وعروض توضيحية مجانية
Both have a free plan, so test with a real task. Make’s free tier never ends, while Flowith’s credits are one-time.
🛟 خيارات الدعم
Make has a big forum, docs, and video guides. Flowith’s community is smaller and newer, so answers can take longer.
دليل التبديل
هل تستخدم إحدى هذه الأدوات بالفعل؟ إليك ما يمكن توقعه إذا قمت بالتبديل.
🔄 Switching from Make to Flowith?
✅ ما ستجنيه:
- An infinite canvas for research and العصف الذهني
- Built-in image and video creation
- A searchable knowledge base for your notes
❌ ما ستخسره:
- Triggers and actions across 2,000+ apps
- Routers, filters, and scheduled scenarios
- Custom HTTP and API connections
📋 كيفية التبديل:
- List which Make scenarios are content or research jobs
- Create a free Flowith account and test those jobs
- Keep Make running for anything that moves app data
🔄 Switching from Flowith to Make?
✅ ما ستجنيه:
- Real automation between your business apps
- خطط مدفوعة أرخص
- Detailed error handling and run history
❌ ما ستخسره:
- The visual research canvas
- Agent Neo’s long-running AI tasks
- Built-in image and video tools
📋 كيفية التبديل:
- Export your Flowith notes and outputs
- Sign up for Make’s free plan
- Rebuild repeat jobs from a template and connect your apps
ما لم تتناوله مراجعتنا
This comparison focused on solo users and small teams. We didn’t test Make’s Enterprise plan or Flowith’s $399.92 Infinite tier. We also didn’t build a mobile app with either tool. Searched “make app” hoping to build one? Try AI or no-code app بناؤون instead. They suit beginners and fast prototypes.
الحكم النهائي
| فئة | الفائز |
|---|---|
| 💰 الأسعار | يصنع |
| 🔌 عمليات التكامل | يصنع |
| 🧠 Complex Logic | يصنع |
| 🤖 وكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي | فلويث |
| ✍️ إنشاء المحتوى | فلويث |
| 📚 القوالب والمجتمع | يصنع |
| 👶 سهولة الاستخدام | فلويث |
| 🏆 الفائز الإجمالي | يصنع |
🏆 WINNER: MAKE
Make wins 4 out of 7 categories.
الأفضل لـ: Business automation, app syncing, budget-conscious teams
Make is a powerful automation platform for moving work between apps. It costs less and gives you tight control over every step.
Flowith is a strong pick for research, writing, and AI-heavy creative work. Its canvas and Agent Neo do things Make simply wasn’t built for.
For most readers, the job is cutting manual work across tools. That’s why Make takes the win. Many people will happily use both.
More of Make Compared
Weighing both Zapier and Make? Start with the first card below.
Make wins on: Lower prices for similar volume, branching routers, and finer control over data parsing.
Zapier wins on: A larger app library, a simpler linear setup, and a faster start for beginners.
Make vs n8n
Make wins on: Fully hosted setup, friendlier for non-coders, and more ready-made app modules.
n8n wins on: Self-hosting, custom code nodes, and source-available licensing.
Make vs Pabbly يتصل
Make wins on: Deeper logic tools, a bigger app catalog, and built-in AI agents.
حصوي Connect wins on: Lifetime-deal pricing, free internal steps, and lower long-term cost.
Make vs غاملوب
Make wins on: Wider app support, mature error handling, and cheaper entry plans.
Gumloop wins on: AI-first nodes, built-in web scraping, and LLM steps without your own API key.
More of Flowith Compared
Here’s how Flowith compares with other AI workspaces:
Flowith vs Notion
Flowith wins on: Multi-model AI on a canvas, ذاتي القيادة agent tasks, and auto-linked knowledge.
تتفوق Notion في: Docs and databases, mature team wikis, and wider app connections.
فلويث مقابل مايند ستوديو
Flowith wins on: Free-form research canvas, image and video creation, and a personal knowledge base.
MindStudio wins on: Building custom AI apps, sharing agents with clients, and structured agent workflows.
Flowith wins on: Visual thinking space, long-running Agent Neo jobs, and built-in note storage.
Gumloop wins on: App integrations, scheduled automations, and web scraping nodes.
الأسئلة الشائعة
ما هو استخدام موقع Make.com؟
It connects apps and automates workflows without code. Common uses include lead capture, invoices, and social posts. It also syncs records between Google Sheets and a CRM.
هل برنامج Make أفضل من برنامج Zapier؟
For complex logic and lower cost, yes. Zapier is simpler and has more apps. Unlike Zapier’s linear steps, Make supports branching paths and loops.
هل موقع flowith.io مجاني؟
Yes, partly. The Starter plan is free forever with 1,000 one-time credits. It includes basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo. Paid plans start at $17.91/month.
هل يمكن دمج Flowith مع تطبيقات أخرى؟
Only in a limited way. It connects many AI models inside one interface. For moving data between business apps, a tool like Make is the better fit.
أي نوع من الذكاء الاصطناعي هو الأفضل للأتمتة؟
For app-to-app automation, Make offers the best value here. For research and content tasks run by an AI agent, Flowith is the stronger choice.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 