⚡ 간단 평가:
- 가격: Make starts at $9/month. Flowith starts at $17.91/month. Both have a free plan.
- 다음과 같은 경우에 가장 적합합니다: Make for app-to-app business 오토메이션. Flowith for AI research and content work on a canvas.
- 주요 차이점: Make moves data between 2,000+ apps. Flowith runs AI agents inside its own workspace.
- 저희가 선택한 제품: Make for most people. It costs less and handles real 사업 workflows end to end.
Make vs Flowith both promise to automate tasks with AI.
하지만 두 제품은 같은 용도로 만들어진 것이 아닙니다.
Make connects your favorite apps and moves data between them.
Flowith gives you an AI agent and an infinite canvas for thinking work.
Picking the wrong one wastes money and weeks of setup.
개요
저희는 두 도구 모두에 대한 문서, 가격 페이지 및 사용자 리뷰를 검토했습니다.
저희 작가들은 각각의 제품을 직접 다루는 데에도 시간을 할애했습니다.
해당 내용은 아래 '우리 팀이 발견한 사항' 섹션에 나와 있습니다.
We cover key features, pricing plans, ease of use, and who each tool suits.
Want to dig deeper? Each CTA box links to our full reviews.
Make란 무엇인가요?
Make is a no code automation platform.
It was called Integromat before its rebrand.
You build workflows by linking app modules on a visual canvas.
Each workflow is called a scenario.
It lets you automate workflows across various applications.
It handles everything from simple workflows to complex automation with branches and loops.
프리랜서, 소규모 사업체, and large enterprises all use it.
Here’s a quick video walkthrough of how Make works.
🏆 Winner: Make
Connect over 2,000 apps without writing code. Build branching scenarios on a visual canvas. Start free and upgrade only when you need more.
가격 책정하기
Make uses an operations-based pricing model. Each step a scenario runs counts toward your monthly limit.
| 계획 | 가격 | 가장 적합한 대상 |
|---|---|---|
| 무료 | 월 0달러 | Learning and testing basic features |
| 핵심 | 월 9달러 | Solo users with steady workflows |
| 찬성 | 월 16달러 | 고급 기능을 필요로 하는 파워 유저 |
| 팀 | 월 29달러 | Teams sharing scenarios |
| 기업 | 맞춤 가격 책정 | Large enterprises with 보안 필요함 |
Pricing verified October 2026.
무료 체험: No separate trial. The free plan works as a permanent trial, and no card is needed.
환불 보장: No default refunds. Make reviews refund requests case by case.
📌 메모: The prices above are for annual billing. Monthly billing costs $10.59 for Core, $18.82 for Pro, and $34.12 for Teams.
⚠️ 경고: Operations add up fast. Looping over 500 rows in Google Sheets can burn 500+ operations per run. Watch your usage dashboard to avoid surprise upgrades.
Key Benefits of Make
Here’s what makes Make worth a look:
- Extensive integration capabilities: Make links over 2,000 apps. You can chain as many apps as you like in a single scenario.
- Visual workflow builder: You see every step as a bubble on a canvas. That visual approach makes data flow easy to follow.
- Advanced logic tools: Iterators, aggregators, routers, and filters come built in. You get conditional logic without writing code.
- Custom API calls: Can’t find an app? The HTTP module sends http requests to almost any service.
- Cost effective plans: Most paid plans sit between $9 and $29. That’s cheaper than many automation platforms.
- Strong community: Make has deep documentation, tutorials, and an active forum. Help is easy to find when you’re stuck.
우리 팀이 발견한 점
우리의 작가 signed up for Make and built scenarios for real content and lead tasks. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Make Pros & Cons
✅ 장점
- Connects over 2,000 apps in one platform
- Drag and drop interface shows every step visually
- Routers, filters, and error handling built in
- Paid plans start at just $9 per month
- HTTP module covers apps without a native connector
❌ 단점
- Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
- Operations count can climb quickly on loops
- No refunds by default
플로위스(Flowist)란 무엇인가요?
Flowith is an AI creation and workflow tool.
It swaps the usual chat window for an infinite canvas.
You can run many AI threads side by side on that canvas.
Its AI agent, Agent Neo, handles long multi-step jobs for you.
It also stores your notes as a searchable second brain.
Creators, researchers, and developers are its main audience.
Its whole 정점 is better productivity through AI.
This video shows the Flowith canvas in action.
Runner Up: Flowith
Research, write, and create on one infinite canvas. Agent Neo runs long tasks for you. Try it with 1,000 free credits.
플로위스 가격
Flowith charges in unified credits. One credit pool covers 텍스트, image, and video models.
| 계획 | 가격 | 가장 적합한 대상 |
|---|---|---|
| 기동기 | 월 0달러 | Trying basic models and Agent Neo |
| 찬성 | $17.91/month | Individual creators and students |
| 궁극적인 | $44.91/month | Heavy daily research and content generation |
| 무한 | $399.92/month | Studios and teams with huge credit needs |
Pricing verified October 2026.
무료 체험: The forever-free Starter plan gives 1,000 one-time credits. It includes basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo.
환불 보장: We couldn’t confirm a standard refund window. Check the billing terms before you upgrade.
📌 메모: Paid plans refresh credits every month. You can top up anytime if you run short.
⚠️ 경고: Unused credits expire at the end of each monthly cycle. They don’t roll over, so size your plan carefully.
Key Benefits of Flowith
Here’s where Flowith earns its place:
- Intuitive canvas: Ideas branch out visually instead of scrolling away. Big projects stay easy to navigate.
- 에이전트 네오: This AI agent runs multi-step creative tasks. Flowith says it works without context limits.
- Oracle mode: It breaks a big job into subtasks. Then it pulls the right tools for each part.
- Many models, one place: You pick different AI models for different content tasks. No tab-switching between apps.
- 지식의 정원: Flowith stores and links your info automatically. You skip manual tagging and still find things later.
- Live collaboration: Team members can work on the same canvas at the same time.
우리 팀이 발견한 점
Our writer signed up for Flowith and used it for research and draft outlines. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Flowith Pros & Cons
✅ 장점
- Infinite canvas keeps research threads organized
- Agent Neo handles long, multi-step jobs
- One credit pool for text, image, and video
- Real-time collaboration on shared canvases
❌ 단점
- Some reviewers call it pricey for what it does
- Weak for scripting or 거래 작업
- Unused credits expire each month
- Few direct app integrations
기능 비교
Make is an automation tool. Flowith is an AI workspace. Below, we compare ten areas so you can see where each one fits.
| 특징 | 만들다 | 플로위스 |
|---|---|---|
| 시작 가격 | 월 9달러 | $17.91/month |
| 무료 플랜 | ✅ | ✅ (1,000 one-time credits) |
| AI 에이전트 | ✅ | ✅ Agent Neo |
| Visual Builder / Canvas | ✅ Scenario canvas | ✅ Infinite canvas |
| 2,000개 이상의 앱 연동 | ✅ | ❌ |
| Custom API Calls (HTTP) | ✅ | ❌ |
| Image & Video Creation | ❌ (via third party services) | ✅ |
| 지식 기반 | ❌ | ✅ 지식의 정원 |
| 실시간 협업 | Teams plan | ✅ |
| 가장 적합한 대상 | Business workflows | AI research and content |
1. AI Agents
만들다: Make AI Agents sit inside your scenarios. They decide which step to run next based on goals you set. Because they live in a workflow, they can act on real apps and data.
플로위스: Agent Neo is the star here. It’s built for limitless creative and research jobs that run across many steps. You give it a goal, and it keeps completing steps without hitting context limits.
2. Visual Builder and Interface
만들다: The workflow builder is a drag-and-drop canvas of connected modules. You can watch data move through each bubble as a scenario runs. It’s clear, but it takes time to learn.
플로위스: Flowith calls its layout a smart framework for deep work. Each idea becomes a node you can branch from. The goal is fewer distractions and more time in a flow state.
3. Integrations and API Access
만들다: This is Make’s home turf. It supports over 2,000 apps, from Google Sheets to CRMs and e-commerce stores. The HTTP module handles API integrations for any tool that offers one.
플로위스: Flowith connects AI models, not business apps. You won’t find triggers for Slack, Gmail, or Shopify here. Its strength stays inside its own canvas.
⚠️ 경고: If you need syncing data between apps in real time, Flowith can’t do that job. Make can.
4. Complex Logic and Error Handling
만들다: Routers split paths. Filters stop bad data. Iterators and aggregators handle lists. Error handlers catch failures and show clear error messages. One broken step doesn’t kill the whole run.
플로위스: Oracle mode handles complexity in a different way. It splits a big request into subtasks and picks tools for each. You steer with prompts, not with if-then rules.
5. 콘텐츠 생성
만들다: Make doesn’t write content itself. It calls AI 앱 like OpenAI and then posts the output. 소셜 미디어 automation is a common use, such as drafting and scheduling posts.
플로위스: The Flowith Composer is built for writing. You can draft long pieces with several models in one view.
It also has an AI-powered photo editor for quick visuals.
https://fahimai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ai-powered-photo-editor-980×532.pngv
Video generation runs on the same credit pool.
6. Business Process Automation
만들다: Make shines at repetitive tasks across departments. Lead capture, contract routing, and invoice processing are all common scenarios. Marketing, inventory, and customer support teams use it too.
Contract workflows can send, sign, and file documents without manual steps.
Invoice scenarios pull numbers from emails and push them into 회계 도구.
플로위스: Flowith isn’t built for back-office work. It can plan a process or write a report about it. But it won’t move a record from one system to another.
7. Knowledge and Research
만들다: Make has no built-in note system. You can pipe research into 개념 or a database. But the storage and search happen in another tool.
플로위스: The Knowledge Garden turns your files into a searchable base. It links ideas without manual tagging. Some reports claim up to 40% faster task completion and 78% faster retrieval. Treat those numbers as claims, not guarantees.
8. Templates and Community
만들다: The Templates Gallery gives you ready-made scenarios to copy. A large forum and tutorial library back it up. That makes creating automations easier 일찍 in your automation journey.
플로위스: Flowith has an Agent Community where people share agents. Its Knowledge Market lets creators trade knowledge bases.
Here’s a look at the Knowledge Market.
9. 사용 편의성
만들다: Simple tasks take minutes. But more complex workflows bring a steep learning curve around APIs and data mapping. Expect some trial and error before you build workflows with confidence.
플로위스: If you can type a prompt, you can 플로위스를 사용하세요. Reviewers praise how its interface supports deep work. The canvas does take a short adjustment if you’re used to chat apps.
💡 꿀팁: New to Make? Copy a template first. Editing a working scenario teaches faster than starting from a blank canvas.
10. 가격 및 비용
| 층 | 만들다 | 플로위스 |
|---|---|---|
| 무료 | Free: $0 per month | Starter: $0/month |
| 기입 | Core: $9 per month | Pro: $17.91/month |
| 중간 | Pro: $16 per month | Ultimate: $44.91/month |
| Team / Top | Teams: $29 per month | Infinite: $399.92/month |
| 기업 | 맞춤 가격 책정 | ❌ |
만들다: Make is the cheaper paid plan at every step. Its operations-based pricing has no hidden fees, but heavy loops raise your bill. It’s priced below 자피어 for similar volume.
플로위스: Credits work across every model, which keeps things simple. The catch is expiry. Credits you don’t spend vanish at the end of each cycle.
다양한 시나리오
| 필요하시면 | 선택하다 | 왜 |
|---|---|---|
| 빠듯한 예산 | 만들다 | Paid plans start at $9 |
| Connect business apps | 만들다 | 2,000+ integrations |
| AI research and writing | 플로위스 | Canvas plus Composer |
| Long 자발적인 AI jobs | 플로위스 | Agent Neo |
| Custom API calls | 만들다 | HTTP module |
| Fast start for beginners | 플로위스 | Prompt-driven, no mapping |
💰 예산
Make’s paid plan costs about half of Flowith’s entry plan. If money is tight, Make gives more for less.
🔌 사용 중인 기술 스택
Already run on Google Sheets, a CRM, and email? Make ties them together, while Flowith stays a separate workspace.
📝 당신의 업무 스타일
Writers and researchers who think visually will feel at home in Flowith. Ops people who think in steps will prefer Make.
🎓 귀하의 경험 수준
Flowith needs no coding expertise or setup. Make needs some patience, but you never have to touch code.
🆓 무료 체험 및 데모
Both have a free plan, so test with a real task. Make’s free tier never ends, while Flowith’s credits are one-time.
🛟 지원 옵션
Make has a big forum, docs, and video guides. Flowith’s community is smaller and newer, so answers can take longer.
전환 가이드
이미 이러한 도구 중 하나를 사용하고 계신가요? 전환 시 예상되는 사항은 다음과 같습니다.
🔄 Switching from Make to Flowith?
✅ 얻게 될 이점:
- An infinite canvas for research and 브레인스토밍
- Built-in image and video creation
- A searchable knowledge base for your notes
❌ 잃게 될 것:
- Triggers and actions across 2,000+ apps
- Routers, filters, and scheduled scenarios
- Custom HTTP and API connections
📋 전환 방법:
- List which Make scenarios are content or research jobs
- Create a free Flowith account and test those jobs
- Keep Make running for anything that moves app data
🔄 Switching from Flowith to Make?
✅ 얻게 될 이점:
- Real automation between your business apps
- 더 저렴한 유료 플랜
- Detailed error handling and run history
❌ 잃게 될 것:
- The visual research canvas
- Agent Neo’s long-running AI tasks
- Built-in image and video tools
📋 전환 방법:
- Export your Flowith notes and outputs
- Sign up for Make’s free plan
- Rebuild repeat jobs from a template and connect your apps
저희 리뷰에서 다루지 않은 내용
This comparison focused on solo users and small teams. We didn’t test Make’s Enterprise plan or Flowith’s $399.92 Infinite tier. We also didn’t build a mobile app with either tool. Searched “make app” hoping to build one? Try AI or no-code app 건축업자 instead. They suit beginners and fast prototypes.
최종 판결
| 범주 | 우승자 |
|---|---|
| 💰 가격 | 만들다 |
| 🔌 통합 | 만들다 |
| 🧠 Complex Logic | 만들다 |
| 🤖 AI 에이전트 | 플로위스 |
| ✍️ 콘텐츠 생성 | 플로위스 |
| 📚 템플릿 및 커뮤니티 | 만들다 |
| 👶 사용 편의성 | 플로위스 |
| 🏆 종합 우승 | 만들다 |
🏆 WINNER: MAKE
Make wins 4 out of 7 categories.
다음과 같은 경우에 가장 적합합니다: Business automation, app syncing, budget-conscious teams
Make is a powerful automation platform for moving work between apps. It costs less and gives you tight control over every step.
Flowith is a strong pick for research, writing, and AI-heavy creative work. Its canvas and Agent Neo do things Make simply wasn’t built for.
For most readers, the job is cutting manual work across tools. That’s why Make takes the win. Many people will happily use both.
More of Make Compared
Weighing both Zapier and Make? Start with the first card below.
Loading... Lower prices for similar volume, branching routers, and finer control over data parsing.
Loading... A larger app library, a simpler linear setup, and a faster start for beginners.
Make vs n8n
Loading... Fully hosted setup, friendlier for non-coders, and more ready-made app modules.
Loading... Self-hosting, custom code nodes, and source-available licensing.
Make vs Pabbly 연결하다
Loading... Deeper logic tools, a bigger app catalog, and built-in AI agents.
파블리 Connect wins on: Lifetime-deal pricing, free internal steps, and lower long-term cost.
Make vs 검룹
Loading... Wider app support, mature error handling, and cheaper entry plans.
Loading... AI-first nodes, built-in web scraping, and LLM steps without your own API key.
More of Flowith Compared
Here’s how Flowith compares with other AI workspaces:
Flowith vs Notion
Flowith wins on: Multi-model AI on a canvas, 자발적인 agent tasks, and auto-linked knowledge.
Notion이 다음 항목에서 승리했습니다: Docs and databases, mature team wikis, and wider app connections.
플로위스 vs 마인드스튜디오
Flowith wins on: Free-form research canvas, image and video creation, and a personal knowledge base.
MindStudio wins on: Building custom AI apps, sharing agents with clients, and structured agent workflows.
Flowith wins on: Visual thinking space, long-running Agent Neo jobs, and built-in note storage.
Loading... App integrations, scheduled automations, and web scraping nodes.
자주 묻는 질문
Make.com은 무엇에 사용되나요?
It connects apps and automates workflows without code. Common uses include lead capture, invoices, and social posts. It also syncs records between Google Sheets and a CRM.
Make가 Zapier보다 나은가요?
For complex logic and lower cost, yes. Zapier is simpler and has more apps. Unlike Zapier’s linear steps, Make supports branching paths and loops.
flowith.io는 무료인가요?
Yes, partly. The Starter plan is free forever with 1,000 one-time credits. It includes basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo. Paid plans start at $17.91/month.
Flowith는 다른 앱과 연동할 수 있나요?
Only in a limited way. It connects many AI models inside one interface. For moving data between business apps, a tool like Make is the better fit.
자동화에 가장 적합한 AI는 무엇일까요?
For app-to-app automation, Make offers the best value here. For research and content tasks run by an AI agent, Flowith is the stronger choice.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 