⚡ Veredito rápido:
- Preços: Make paid plans start at $9 per month. Replit Core starts at $20 / month.
- Ideal para: Make for no code automação between apps. Replit for writing, running, and shipping code.
- Principal diferença: Make connects tools you already use. Replit builds new software from scratch.
- Nossa escolha: Make for most negócios users. It automates daily work without any coding expertise.
Make vs Replit both promise to save you hours of work.
But they attack the problem from opposite ends.
Make lets you automate tasks across apps without writing code.
Replit gives you a full development environment right in your browser.
One is an automation tool. The other is a place to build software.
Picking the wrong one can cost you weeks.
Visão geral
Analisamos a documentação, as páginas de preços e as avaliações dos usuários para ambas as ferramentas.
Nossos redatores também passaram um tempo interagindo pessoalmente com cada um deles.
Essas observações aparecem nas seções "O que nossa equipe notou" abaixo.
We cover key features, pricing plans, ease of use, and real use cases.
O que é Make?
Make is a no-code automation platform.
It links your favorite apps so dados moves between them on its own.
You build workflows on a visual canvas with a drag and drop interface.
Make supports over 2,000 apps, from Google Sheets to Slack and Shopify.
It handles repetitive tasks across various applications, like syncing data and updating records.
Freelancers, pequenas empresas, and large enterprises all use it.
Here’s a quick look at Make in action.
🏆 Winner: Make
Build multi step workflows without touching code. Connect 2,000+ apps on one visual canvas. Start free and upgrade when you need more operations.
Defina os preços
Make uses an operations-based pricing model. Each action in a scenario counts toward your monthly limit.
| Plano | Preço | Ideal para |
|---|---|---|
| Livre | $ 0 por mês | Testing simple workflows |
| Essencial | US$ 9 por mês | Solo users with simple tasks |
| Pró | US$ 16 por mês | Power users with complex logic |
| Equipes | US$ 29 por mês | Teams sharing negócios fluxos de trabalho |
| Empresa | Preços personalizados | Grandes empresas com necessidades de segurança |
Pricing verified October 2026.
Teste grátis: No separate trial. The free plan works as a permanent trial with basic features.
Garantia de reembolso: No default refunds. Make reviews refund requests case by case.
📌 Observação: The prices above apply to annual billing. Monthly billing costs $10.59 for Core, $18.82 for Pro, and $34.12 for Teams.
⚠️ Aviso: Busy scenarios burn operations fast. Watch your usage so you don’t hit the cap mid-month.
Key Benefits of Make
Here’s what makes Make worth a look:
- Extensive integration capabilities: Make connects with over 2,000 apps. You can link as many apps as you want in one scenario.
- Visual workflow builder: You see every step as a bubble on a canvas. That makes tracing data flow easy.
- Advanced logic tools: Iterators, aggregators, routers, and filters come built in. They handle complex logic without code.
- Custom API calls: The HTTP module talks to any service with an API. You aren’t stuck if an app lacks a native connector.
- Cost effective plans: Most paid plans fall between $9 and $29. That’s low for this much control.
- Strong community: Make has large forums, templates, and tutorials. Help is easy to find when you get stuck.
O que nossa equipe observou
Nosso escritor signed up for the Make app and built real scenarios for content and lead tasks. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Make Pros & Cons
✅ Prós
- Connects over 2,000 apps in one visual canvas
- Routers, filters, and iterators handle complex workflows
- HTTP module supports custom API calls to almost any service
- Paid plans start at just $9 per month
❌ Contras
- Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
- Operations-based billing can be hard to predict
- No refunds by default
O que é Replit?
Replit is a cloud-based coding platform.
You write, run, and debug code straight from your web browser.
It supports multiple programming languages like Python, JavaScript, and Java.
Powerful features come built in, so you don’t juggle extra tools.
The Replit Agent can build an app from a plain English prompt.
You can publish projects to the cloud with a single click.
Students, solo developers, and teams all use it.
This video walks through Replit’s main tools.
Réplica
Code in any browser with zero setup. Let Replit AI write and fix code for you. Deploy production ready apps in one click.
Preços de Réplica
Replit offers four plans. Its pricing model mixes free access with paid tiers and optional add-ons.
| Plano | Preço | Ideal para |
|---|---|---|
| Iniciante | $0 por mês | Learning and small public apps |
| Núcleo de Replicação | US$ 20 por mês | Individual developers using the Agent |
| Equipes | US$ 35 por mês | Groups needing private deployments |
| Empresa | Personalizado | Companies with strict security needs |
Pricing verified October 2026.
Teste grátis: The Starter plan is free forever. It allows 10 development apps with public access only.
Garantia de reembolso: Replit doesn’t advertise a standard refund window. Check terms before you upgrade.
📌 Observação: Replit Core includes full Replit Agent access, unlimited apps, and $25 in monthly credits. The Teams price is per user. Enterprise adds all the features of Teams plus extra security.
⚠️ Aviso: Heavy Agent use and extra compute add-ons can push costs past the base price. Track your credits.
Key Benefits of Replit
Here’s why developers pick Replit:
- Zero setup: The Agent configures your environment and installs libraries for you. You start coding in minutes.
- Assistência por IA: Replit AI autocompletes code snippets and helps fix bugs. You can even chat with your codebase.
- Colaboração em tempo real: Multiplayer mode lets other users edit the same project live. You see each change the moment it happens.
- Built-in debugging tools: The debugger finds errors fast. It also shows how your program behaves step by step.
- Safe secrets: Secrets management stores API keys and environment variables securely.
- Classroom tools: Professores get Google Classroom sync, assignments, and automated grading.
O que nossa equipe observou
Our writer signed up for Replit and used the Agent to build and deploy small web apps. Here’s what stood out:
Replit Pros & Cons
✅ Prós
- Browser-based IDE with no installs needed
- Replit Agent builds apps from natural language prompts
- Live multiplayer editing for team projects
- One-click hosting and GitHub sync
❌ Contras
- Free plan limits you to public apps
- Agent credits can run out on large builds
- Product Hunt rating sits lower at 3.8/5
Comparação de recursos
Make and Replit share a few traits. Both run in the browser, both have a free plan, and both lean on AI. But the jobs they do are very different. Here are 10 areas where they split.
| Recurso | Fazer | Réplica |
|---|---|---|
| Preço inicial pago | US$ 9 por mês | US$ 20 por mês |
| Plano Gratuito | ✅ | ✅ |
| No-Code Visual Builder | ✅ | ✅ (Visual Editor) |
| Agentes de IA | ✅ | ✅ |
| 2,000+ App Connectors | ✅ | ❌ |
| Full Code Editor | ❌ | ✅ |
| App Hosting & Deployment | ❌ | ✅ |
| Real-Time Co-Editing | ❌ | ✅ |
| Role Based Access Control | ✅ (Teams+) | ✅ (Teams+) |
| Ideal para | Business workflows | Software development |
1. AI Agents
Fazer: Make AI Agents sit inside your scenarios. They read incoming data, decide the next step, and act across your apps. You set goals and guardrails instead of every single rule.
Resposta: The Replit Agent is a coding partner. You describe an app in natural language. It writes the code, installs dependencies, and sets up the project. It’s great for quick MVPs and testing ideas.
2. Visual Builder
Fazer: The whole product is a visual builder. You drag modules onto a canvas and draw lines between them. This visual approach shows exactly where data goes, which helps when you debug.
Resposta: Replit’s visual editor lets you tweak an app’s look by clicking on it. Under the hood, it still edits real code. You also get a file explorer and a full code editor for more control.
3. Complex Workflows & Logic
Fazer: This is where Make shines. Routers split one flow into branches. Filters and conditional logic decide which path data takes. Iterators and aggregators loop through lists, so one scenario can process hundreds of rows. Complex automation stays readable on the canvas.
Lead capture is a common example of more complex workflows.
Invoice handling works the same way, with no manual copy-paste.
Resposta: Replit has no workflow canvas. Any logic lives in code you or the Agent writes. That gives unlimited flexibility, but you need some technical know how to maintain it.
4. Integrations & API Connections
Fazer: Make offers ready connectors for over 2,000 apps. When one is missing, the HTTP module sends http requests to any API. That covers almost any third party services you rely on, and API integrations need no code.
Resposta: Replit connects to outside APIs through code written in various programming languages. It stores keys safely and syncs with GitHub for version control. A built-in database also saves you from setting up a separate backend.
5. Modelos
Fazer: The template gallery holds ready scenarios for marketing, sales, and e-commerce. Pick one, connect your accounts, and you’re live. It’s the fastest way to start your automation journey.
Resposta: Replit templates give you starter projects with default settings and pre-installed packages. They help beginners skip the boring setup and jump into coding.
6. Security & Error Handling
Fazer: Make gives you error handling routes inside each scenario. You can retry, skip, or alert someone when a step fails. Clear error messages show which module broke and why.
Resposta: Replit’s security scanner checks your code for weak spots. Secrets stay hidden from other users. Educators also get secure spaces that protect estudante trabalhar.
7. Deployment & Hosting
Fazer: Make doesn’t host apps. Your scenarios run on Make’s servers, triggered by schedules, webhooks, or real time data events. There’s nothing to deploy.
Resposta: Replit lets you build, test, and deploy from one tab. Options include autoscale deployments that grow with traffic. Teams plans add private deployments for internal tools.
Replit also scans for issues right before an app goes live.
8. Colaboração
Fazer: The Teams plan lets several people share and manage scenarios. Roles control who can edit what. Collaboration is about sharing finished workflows, not editing live together.
Resposta: Multiplayer mode is Replit’s star collaboration feature. Multiple users code in the same file and see changes imediatamente. It’s ideal for pair programming, workshops, and collaborative coding in class. A built-in chat keeps this collaborative environment organized.
9. Ease of Use & Support
Fazer: Simple workflows take minutes to build. Advanced features take longer to learn, and that steep learning curve is the top complaint. Creating automations gets easier with strong docs, tutorials, and a big community.
Resposta: Replit offers a user friendly environment with an intuitive interface. A file explorer keeps your project files tidy. G2 reviews give it 4.4/5, while Capterra and Software Advice show 4.6/5. Its docs cover every tool in detail.
⚠️ Aviso: “Easy” means different things here. Make is easy if you can’t code. Replit is easy if you want to code.
10. Preços e Custos
| Nível do plano | Fazer | Réplica |
|---|---|---|
| Livre | Free: $0 per month | Starter: $0 / month |
| Entrada | Core: $9 per month | Replit Core: $20 / month |
| Meio | Pro: $16 per month | — |
| Equipe | Teams: $29 per month | Teams: $35 / month |
| Empresa | Preços personalizados | Personalizado |
Fazer: Five plans give you room to grow slowly. You pay for operations, not seats, so a solo user stays cheap. Make has no hidden fees, but heavy usage pushes you up a tier.
Resposta: Replit Core costs more but includes the Agent and $25 in credits. That’s fair value if you build apps often. Teams pricing is per user, so costs rise with headcount.
Diferentes cenários
| Se você precisar | Escolher | Por que |
|---|---|---|
| Orçamento apertado | Fazer | Os planos pagos começam com preços mais baixos. |
| Automate workflows between apps | Fazer | 2,000+ ready connectors |
| Build a custom web app | Réplica | Full IDE plus hosting |
| Zero coding skills | Fazer | Pure drag-and-drop canvas |
| Teach a coding class | Réplica | Google Classroom and auto-grading |
| Live team coding | Réplica | Multiplayer editing |
💰 Seu orçamento
Make’s entry plan costs less than half of Replit Core. If you only need simple tasks automated, Make is the cheaper start.
🔌 Seu conjunto de tecnologias
Running on Google Sheets, a CRM, and an email tool? Make ties them together in one platform.
📝 Seu estilo de trabalho
Prefer clicking and connecting? Pick Make. Prefer writing code or prompting an AI to write it? Pick Replit.
🎓 Seu nível de experiência
Both tools serve all skill levels. Non technical users get going faster with Make, while coders unlock Replit’s full potential.
🆓 Testes e demonstrações grátis
Both offer a free plan with no time limit. Build one real project on each before you move to a paid plan.
🛟 Opções de suporte
Make’s customer support is backed by a huge forum and template library. Replit’s community shares projects, tips, and even paid Bounties for coding help.
Guia de Troca
Most people don’t fully switch. They use both. Still, here’s what changes if you move.
🔄 Switching from Make to Replit?
✅ O que você vai ganhar:
- Freedom to build any custom app or tool
- One-click hosting for your projects
- Live co-editing with teammates
❌ O que você perderá:
- 2,000+ ready app connectors
- The no-code scenario canvas
- Built-in routers, filters, and retries
📋 Como mudar:
- List each Make scenario and the apps it touches.
- Create a Replit account and start with the free Starter plan.
- Ask the Replit Agent to rebuild each flow as a small script.
🔄 Switching from Replit to Make?
✅ O que você vai ganhar:
- Automations without writing or maintaining code
- Native connectors for most SaaS tools
- Preço inicial mais baixo
❌ O que você perderá:
- App hosting and deployments
- A full IDE with debugging
- Multiplayer coding sessions
📋 Como mudar:
- Push your Replit code to GitHub as a backup.
- Sign up for Make’s free plan.
- Rebuild glue scripts as scenarios using templates.
O que nossa avaliação não abordou
This comparison focused on solo users and small teams. We didn’t evaluate Enterprise plans, SSO, or custom contracts for either tool. We didn’t stress-test Make at huge operation volumes. We also skipped Replit apps under heavy traffic. Each tool has limitations we didn’t fully map. Features reflect the October 2026 versions and may change.
Veredicto final
| Categoria | Ganhador |
|---|---|
| 💰 Preços | Fazer |
| 🔌 Integrações | Fazer |
| 🧠 Workflow Logic | Fazer |
| 👶 Ease of Use (No Code) | Fazer |
| 🤖 Agentes de IA | Réplica |
| 🚀 Deployment | Réplica |
| 🤝 Colaboração | Réplica |
| 🏆 Vencedor Geral | Fazer |
🏆 WINNER: MAKE
Make wins 4 out of 7 categories.
Ideal para: Small businesses, marketers, and ops teams automating daily work
Make and Replit aren’t true rivals. Make is a powerful automation platform for moving data between apps. Replit is a versatile platform for writing and shipping code.
Replit is an excellent tool for developers, students, and anyone building complex projects. Its Agent and live collaboration features are hard to beat.
But most readers want to automate busywork, not build software. For that, Make costs less and asks for zero code. That’s why it takes our top spot.
Want to dig deeper? Our full reviews give a clear understanding of each tool’s ability and setup.
More of Make Compared
Here’s how Make stacks up against both Zapier and two other automation platforms:
Obtenha vitórias em: branching paths and loops (unlike Zapier’s linear steps), operation-based billing that suits many small steps, and a lower entry price.
Zapier vence em: a simpler linear trigger-action setup, a bigger app library, and a faster start for absolute beginners.
Make vs n8n
Obtenha vitórias em: a friendlier canvas, more native connectors, and no server to manage.
n8n vence em: a self-hosting option, open source code, and custom code nodes for developers.
Make vs Pabblely Conectar
Obtenha vitórias em: deeper data tools, stronger error handling, and a wider set of apps.
Pabbly Connect wins on: one-time payment deals, free internal steps, and simpler flat pricing.
More of Replit Compared
Here’s how Replit compares with other build and automation tools:
Replit vs Zapier
Replit wins on: building full apps, hosting what you build, and total control through code.
Zapier vence em: no coding at all, ready app connections, and quicker setup for basic features.
Replit wins on: a real IDE, AI that writes whole apps, and live multiplayer editing.
n8n vence em: visual workflow nodes, self-hosting, and many native integrations.
Replit vs MindStudio
Replit wins on: support for many languages, one-click deployments, and classroom tools.
MindStudio wins on: no-code AI agent design, easy model switching, and faster agent launches for non-coders.
Perguntas frequentes
Para que serve o Make.com?
It connects apps and runs workflows automatically. Common uses include lead capture, invoices, social posts, and inventory updates. It also syncs data between tools like Google Sheets and a CRM.
Para que serve o Replit?
It’s a browser-based place to write, run, and deploy code. People use it to learn programming and prototype apps with AI. Teachers run classes on it too.
O site Make.com é difícil de usar?
Basic scenarios are easy to build. Advanced logic with iterators and routers takes practice. Start with templates and you’ll learn the canvas quickly.
Replit é uma boa opção para iniciantes?
Yes. There’s nothing to install, and the Agent sets up projects for you. Built-in AI explains errors, which makes learning faster than in a local editor.
O Make é melhor que o Zapier?
For complex logic and lower cost, yes. Zapier is simpler and has more apps. Pick Make if you want branching and loops, Zapier if you want speed.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 