🚀 合作咨询: fahim@fahimai.com | 深受17种语言、每月超过25万读者的信赖 🔥

🚀 合作咨询: fahim@fahimai.com

Make vs Replit in 2026: Pick the Right Tool Fast

由 | Last updated Oct 19, 2026

优胜者
制作
4.6
  • 2000 多个应用集成
  • 拖放式可视化 建造者
  • Built-in Make AI Agents
  • Filters, Routers & Iterators
  • Custom APIs via HTTP Module
  • 免费方案
  • 付费套餐,每月9美元起。
亚军
复制
4.4
  • Replit Agent Builds Full Apps
  • Real-Time Multiplayer Coding
  • One-Click Cloud Deployments
  • Built-in Security Scanner
  • 内置数据库
  • 免费入门计划
  • 付费套餐,每月 20 美元起。

⚡ 快速结论:

  • 定价: Make paid plans start at $9 per month. Replit Core starts at $20 / month.
  • 最适合: Make for no code 自动化 between apps. Replit for writing, running, and shipping code.
  • 主要区别: Make connects tools you already use. Replit builds new software from scratch.
  • 我们的选择: Make for most 商业 users. It automates daily work without any coding expertise.
make vs replit

Make vs Replit both promise to save you hours of work.

But they attack the problem from opposite ends.

Make lets you automate tasks across apps without writing code.

Replit gives you a full development environment right in your browser.

One is an automation tool. The other is a place to build software.

Picking the wrong one can cost you weeks.

概述

我们查阅了这两款工具的文档、定价页面和用户评价。

我们的撰稿人也亲自体验了每一项功能。

这些观察结果出现在下面的“我们的团队注意到”部分中。

We cover key features, pricing plans, ease of use, and real use cases.

什么是 Make?

Make is a no-code automation platform.

It links your favorite apps so 数据 moves between them on its own.

You build workflows on a visual canvas with a drag and drop interface.

Make supports over 2,000 apps, from Google Sheets to Slack and Shopify.

It handles repetitive tasks across various applications, like syncing data and updating records.

自由职业者 小型企业, and large enterprises all use it.

首页

Here’s a quick look at Make in action.

Make.com 评测:适用于任何自动化场景的最佳 AI 平台?

🏆 Winner: Make

⭐ 4.6/5 | 💰 From $9/month

Build multi step workflows without touching code. Connect 2,000+ apps on one visual canvas. Start free and upgrade when you need more operations.

制定价格

Make uses an operations-based pricing model. Each action in a scenario counts toward your monthly limit.

计划价格最适合
自由的每月 0 美元Testing simple workflows
核每月9美元Solo users with simple tasks
专业版每月16美元Power users with complex logic
团队每月 29 美元Teams sharing 商业 工作流程
企业定制定价有安全需求的大型公司

Pricing verified October 2026.

制定价格

免费试用: No separate trial. The free plan works as a permanent trial with basic features.

退款保证: No default refunds. Make reviews refund requests case by case.

📌 笔记: The prices above apply to annual billing. Monthly billing costs $10.59 for Core, $18.82 for Pro, and $34.12 for Teams.

⚠️ 警告: Busy scenarios burn operations fast. Watch your usage so you don’t hit the cap mid-month.

Key Benefits of Make

Here’s what makes Make worth a look:

  • Extensive integration capabilities: Make connects with over 2,000 apps. You can link as many apps as you want in one scenario.
  • Visual workflow builder: You see every step as a bubble on a canvas. That makes tracing data flow easy.
  • Advanced logic tools: Iterators, aggregators, routers, and filters come built in. They handle complex logic without code.
  • Custom API calls: The HTTP module talks to any service with an API. You aren’t stuck if an app lacks a native connector.
  • Cost effective plans: Most paid plans fall between $9 and $29. That’s low for this much control.
  • Strong community: Make has large forums, templates, and tutorials. Help is easy to find when you get stuck.
获得最高收益

我们的团队注意到了什么

我们的 作家 signed up for the Make app and built real scenarios for content and lead tasks. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:

创造个人体验

Make Pros & Cons

✅ 优点
  • Connects over 2,000 apps in one visual canvas
  • Routers, filters, and iterators handle complex workflows
  • HTTP module supports custom API calls to almost any service
  • Paid plans start at just $9 per month
❌缺点
  • Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
  • Operations-based billing can be hard to predict
  • No refunds by default

Replit是什么?

Replit is a cloud-based coding platform.

You write, run, and debug code straight from your web browser.

It supports multiple programming languages like Python, JavaScript, and Java.

Powerful features come built in, so you don’t juggle extra tools.

The Replit Agent can build an app from a plain English prompt.

You can publish projects to the cloud with a single click.

Students, solo developers, and teams all use it.

复制首页

This video walks through Replit’s main tools.

Replit AI 评测 (2025) - 你需要知道的一切!

复制

⭐ 4.4/5 | 💰 From $20/month

Code in any browser with zero setup. Let Replit AI write and fix code for you. Deploy production ready apps in one click.

复式定价

Replit offers four plans. Its pricing model mixes free access with paid tiers and optional add-ons.

计划价格最适合
起动机每月 0 美元Learning and small public apps
复制核心每月 20 美元Individual developers using the Agent
团队每月 35 美元Groups needing private deployments
企业风俗Companies with strict security needs

Pricing verified October 2026.

复式定价

免费试用: The Starter plan is free forever. It allows 10 development apps with public access only.

退款保证: Replit doesn’t advertise a standard refund window. Check terms before you upgrade.

📌 笔记: Replit Core includes full Replit Agent access, unlimited apps, and $25 in monthly credits. The Teams price is per user. Enterprise adds all the features of Teams plus extra security.

⚠️ 警告: Heavy Agent use and extra compute add-ons can push costs past the base price. Track your credits.

Key Benefits of Replit

Here’s why developers pick Replit:

  • Zero setup: The Agent configures your environment and installs libraries for you. You start coding in minutes.
  • 人工智能辅助: Replit AI autocompletes code snippets and helps fix bugs. You can even chat with your codebase.
  • 实时协作: Multiplayer mode lets other users edit the same project live. You see each change the moment it happens.
  • Built-in debugging tools: The debugger finds errors fast. It also shows how your program behaves step by step.
  • Safe secrets: Secrets management stores API keys and environment variables securely.
  • Classroom tools: 教师 get Google Classroom sync, assignments, and automated grading.
拆分顶级福利

我们的团队注意到了什么

Our writer signed up for Replit and used the Agent to build and deploy small web apps. Here’s what stood out:

重复个人经历

Replit Pros & Cons

✅ 优点
  • Browser-based IDE with no installs needed
  • Replit Agent builds apps from natural language prompts
  • Live multiplayer editing for team projects
  • One-click hosting and GitHub sync
❌缺点
  • Free plan limits you to public apps
  • Agent credits can run out on large builds
  • Product Hunt rating sits lower at 3.8/5

功能对比

Make and Replit share a few traits. Both run in the browser, both have a free plan, and both lean on AI. But the jobs they do are very different. Here are 10 areas where they split.

特征制作复制
起始支付价格每月9美元每月 20 美元
免费计划✅✅
No-Code Visual Builder✅✅ (Visual Editor)
人工智能代理✅✅
2,000+ App Connectors✅❌
Full Code Editor❌✅
App Hosting & Deployment❌✅
Real-Time Co-Editing❌✅
Role Based Access Control✅ (Teams+)✅ (Teams+)
最适合Business workflowsSoftware development

1. AI Agents

制作: Make AI Agents sit inside your scenarios. They read incoming data, decide the next step, and act across your apps. You set goals and guardrails instead of every single rule.

制造人工智能代理

复制: The Replit Agent is a coding partner. You describe an app in natural language. It writes the code, installs dependencies, and sets up the project. It’s great for quick MVPs and testing ideas.

复制代理

2. Visual Builder

制作: The whole product is a visual builder. You drag modules onto a canvas and draw lines between them. This visual approach shows exactly where data goes, which helps when you debug.

以可视化方式编排自动化

复制: Replit’s visual editor lets you tweak an app’s look by clicking on it. Under the hood, it still edits real code. You also get a file explorer and a full code editor for more control.

Replit 可视化编辑器

3. Complex Workflows & Logic

制作: This is where Make shines. Routers split one flow into branches. Filters and conditional logic decide which path data takes. Iterators and aggregators loop through lists, so one scenario can process hundreds of rows. Complex automation stays readable on the canvas.

实现代理自动化

Lead capture is a common example of more complex workflows.

实现潜在客户开发自动化

Invoice handling works the same way, with no manual copy-paste.

实现发票自动化

复制: Replit has no workflow canvas. Any logic lives in code you or the Agent writes. That gives unlimited flexibility, but you need some technical know how to maintain it.

4. Integrations & API Connections

制作: Make offers ready connectors for over 2,000 apps. When one is missing, the HTTP module sends http requests to any API. That covers almost any third party services you rely on, and API integrations need no code.

实现社交媒体自动化

复制: Replit connects to outside APIs through code written in various programming languages. It stores keys safely and syncs with GitHub for version control. A built-in database also saves you from setting up a separate backend.

复制内置数据库

5. 模板

制作: The template gallery holds ready scenarios for marketing, sales, and e-commerce. Pick one, connect your accounts, and you’re live. It’s the fastest way to start your automation journey.

制作模板库

复制: Replit templates give you starter projects with default settings and pre-installed packages. They help beginners skip the boring setup and jump into coding.

项目复制模板

6. Security & Error Handling

制作: Make gives you error handling routes inside each scenario. You can retry, skip, or alert someone when a step fails. Clear error messages show which module broke and why.

实现 IT 工作流程自动化

复制: Replit’s security scanner checks your code for weak spots. Secrets stay hidden from other users. Educators also get secure spaces that protect 学生 工作。

Replit 安全扫描器

7. Deployment & Hosting

制作: Make doesn’t host apps. Your scenarios run on Make’s servers, triggered by schedules, webhooks, or real time data events. There’s nothing to deploy.

复制: Replit lets you build, test, and deploy from one tab. Options include autoscale deployments that grow with traffic. Teams plans add private deployments for internal tools.

复制部署

Replit also scans for issues right before an app goes live.

Replit 部署前安全扫描

8. 协作

制作: The Teams plan lets several people share and manage scenarios. Roles control who can edit what. Collaboration is about sharing finished workflows, not editing live together.

联系自动化

复制: Multiplayer mode is Replit’s star collaboration feature. Multiple users code in the same file and see changes 即刻. It’s ideal for pair programming, workshops, and collaborative coding in class. A built-in chat keeps this collaborative environment organized.

Replit 同步协作

9. Ease of Use & Support

制作: Simple workflows take minutes to build. Advanced features take longer to learn, and that steep learning curve is the top complaint. Creating automations gets easier with strong docs, tutorials, and a big community.

复制: Replit offers a user friendly environment with an intuitive interface. A file explorer keeps your project files tidy. G2 reviews give it 4.4/5, while Capterra and Software Advice show 4.6/5. Its docs cover every tool in detail.

复制文档

⚠️ 警告: “Easy” means different things here. Make is easy if you can’t code. Replit is easy if you want to code.

10. 定价与成本

计划层级制作复制
自由的Free: $0 per monthStarter: $0 / month
入口Core: $9 per monthReplit Core: $20 / month
中Pro: $16 per month—
团队Teams: $29 per monthTeams: $35 / month
企业定制定价风俗

制作: Five plans give you room to grow slowly. You pay for operations, not seats, so a solo user stays cheap. Make has no hidden fees, but heavy usage pushes you up a tier.

复制: Replit Core costs more but includes the Agent and $25 in credits. That’s fair value if you build apps often. Teams pricing is per user, so costs rise with headcount.

不同场景

如果您需要……选择为什么
预算紧张制作付费计划起价较低
Automate workflows between apps制作2,000+ ready connectors
Build a custom web app复制Full IDE plus hosting
Zero coding skills制作Pure drag-and-drop canvas
Teach a coding class复制Google Classroom and auto-grading
Live team coding复制Multiplayer editing

💰 您的预算

Make’s entry plan costs less than half of Replit Core. If you only need simple tasks automated, Make is the cheaper start.

🔌 您的技术栈

Running on Google Sheets, a 客户关系管理, and an email tool? Make ties them together in one platform.

📝你的工作风格

Prefer clicking and connecting? Pick Make. Prefer writing code or prompting an AI to write it? Pick Replit.

🎓您的经验水平

Both tools serve all skill levels. Non technical users get going faster with Make, while coders unlock Replit’s full potential.

🆓 免费试用和演示

Both offer a free plan with no time limit. Build one real project on each before you move to a paid plan.

🛟 支持选项

Make’s customer support is backed by a huge forum and template library. Replit’s community shares projects, tips, and even paid Bounties for coding help.

切换指南

Most people don’t fully switch. They use both. Still, here’s what changes if you move.

🔄 Switching from Make to Replit?

✅ 你将获得:

  • Freedom to build any custom app or tool
  • One-click hosting for your projects
  • Live co-editing with teammates

❌ 你会失去什么:

  • 2,000+ ready app connectors
  • The no-code scenario canvas
  • Built-in routers, filters, and retries

📋 如何切换:

  1. List each Make scenario and the apps it touches.
  2. Create a Replit account and start with the free Starter plan.
  3. Ask the Replit Agent to rebuild each flow as a small script.
🔄 Switching from Replit to Make?

✅ 你将获得:

  • Automations without writing or maintaining code
  • Native connectors for most SaaS tools
  • 更低的起价

❌ 你会失去什么:

  • App hosting and deployments
  • A full IDE with debugging
  • Multiplayer coding sessions

📋 如何切换:

  1. Push your Replit code to GitHub as a backup.
  2. Sign up for Make’s free plan.
  3. Rebuild glue scripts as scenarios using templates.

我们的评测没有涵盖的内容

This comparison focused on solo users and small teams. We didn’t evaluate Enterprise plans, SSO, or custom contracts for either tool. We didn’t stress-test Make at huge operation volumes. We also skipped Replit apps under heavy traffic. Each tool has limitations we didn’t fully map. Features reflect the October 2026 versions and may change.

最终判决

类别优胜者
💰 定价制作
🔌 集成制作
🧠 Workflow Logic制作
👶 Ease of Use (No Code)制作
🤖人工智能代理复制
🚀 Deployment复制
🤝 合作复制
🏆 总冠军制作

🏆 WINNER: MAKE

Make wins 4 out of 7 categories.

最适合: Small businesses, marketers, and ops teams automating daily work

Make and Replit aren’t true rivals. Make is a powerful automation platform for moving data between apps. Replit is a versatile platform for writing and shipping code.

Replit is an excellent tool for developers, students, and anyone building complex projects. Its Agent and live collaboration features are hard to beat.

But most readers want to automate busywork, not build software. For that, Make costs less and asks for zero code. That’s why it takes our top spot.

Want to dig deeper? Our full reviews give a clear understanding of each tool’s ability and setup.

More of Make Compared

Here’s how Make stacks up against both Zapier and two other automation platforms:

Make vs Zapier

赢得比赛: branching paths and loops (unlike Zapier’s linear steps), operation-based billing that suits many small steps, and a lower entry price.

Zapier 在以下方面胜出: a simpler linear trigger-action setup, a bigger app library, and a faster start for absolute beginners.

Make vs n8n

赢得比赛: a friendlier canvas, more native connectors, and no server to manage.

n8n 获胜: a self-hosting option, open source code, and custom code nodes for developers.

Make vs 帕布利 连接

赢得比赛: deeper data tools, stronger error handling, and a wider set of apps.

Pabbly Connect wins on: one-time payment deals, free internal steps, and simpler flat pricing.

More of Replit Compared

Here’s how Replit compares with other build and automation tools:

Replit vs Zapier

Replit wins on: building full apps, hosting what you build, and total control through code.

Zapier 在以下方面胜出: no coding at all, ready app connections, and quicker setup for basic features.

Replit vs n8n

Replit wins on: a real IDE, AI that writes whole apps, and live multiplayer editing.

n8n 获胜: visual workflow nodes, self-hosting, and many native integrations.

Replit vs MindStudio

Replit wins on: support for many languages, one-click deployments, and classroom tools.

MindStudio wins on: no-code AI agent design, easy model switching, and faster agent launches for non-coders.

常见问题解答

Make.com 是用来做什么的?

It connects apps and runs workflows automatically. Common uses include lead capture, invoices, social posts, and inventory updates. It also syncs data between tools like Google Sheets and a 客户关系管理.

Replit 是用来做什么的?

It’s a browser-based place to write, run, and deploy code. People use it to learn programming and prototype apps with AI. Teachers run classes on it too.

Make.com 难用吗?

Basic scenarios are easy to build. Advanced logic with iterators and routers takes practice. Start with templates and you’ll learn the canvas quickly.

Replit适合新手吗?

Yes. There’s nothing to install, and the Agent sets up projects for you. Built-in AI explains errors, which makes learning faster than in a local editor.

Make 比 Zapier 更好吗?

For complex logic and lower cost, yes. Zapier is simpler and has more apps. Pick Make if you want branching and loops, Zapier if you want speed.

Fahim Joharder,创始人

Fahim Joharder,创始人

测试过 900 多款人工智能工具。月活跃读者超过 25 万。

🤝 寻求合作:

📩 fahim@fahimai.com 或者 预约通话

关联方披露:

我们依靠读者支持。当您通过我们网站上的链接购买商品时,我们可能会获得佣金。

我们的评论均由专家撰写,并基于实际经验。请查看我们的评论。 编辑指南 和 隐私政策

相关文章