⚡ Verdict rapide :
- Tarification : Make starts at $9 per month. Lutra starts at $23/month, billed annually.
- Idéal pour : Make for multi step workflows across many apps. Lutra for data enrichment and web research.
- Différence principale : Make uses a visual builder. Lutra takes requests in plain English.
- Notre choix : Make for most people. It costs less and handles far more workflow types.
Make and Lutra both promise to automate tasks you hate doing by hand.
But they come at the problem from opposite ends.
Make gives you a canvas and lets you draw your workflow.
Lutra lets you type what you want and builds the steps for you.
One rewards patience. The other rewards clear instructions.
Aperçu
This Make vs Lutra comparison covers pricing, key features, ease of use, and sécurité.
Nous avons examiné la documentation, les pages de tarification et les avis des utilisateurs pour les deux. automation plateformes.
Nos rédacteurs ont également passé du temps à manipuler chaque plante.
Ces observations figurent dans les sections « Ce que notre équipe a remarqué » ci-dessous.
Want to dig deeper? Each tool has a full review linked below.
Qu'est-ce que Make ?
Make is a no code automation plate-forme.
It connects your favorite apps so data moves between them on its own.
You build each workflow on a visual canvas, without writing code.
It links actions across various applications, more than 2,000 in all.
travailleurs indépendants, small businesses, and large enterprises all use it.
Here’s a quick look at how the Make app works.
Faire
Build complex automation on a visual canvas. Route data with filters, routers, and conditional logic. Start free and upgrade when you outgrow it.
Établir les prix
Make’s pricing model is based on operations. Each step a workflow runs counts toward your monthly limit.
| Plan | Prix | Idéal pour |
|---|---|---|
| Gratuit | 0 $ par mois | Simple workflows and learning the builder |
| Cœur | 9 $ par mois | Solo users running steady automations |
| Pro | 16 $ par mois | Utilisateurs experts ayant besoin de fonctionnalités avancées |
| Équipes | 29 $ par mois | Teams sharing scenarios and roles |
| Entreprise | Tarification personnalisée | Grandes entreprises ayant des besoins en matière de sécurité |
Pricing verified October 2026.
Essai gratuit : There is no separate trial. The free plan works as a permanent trial, with no credit card needed.
Garantie de remboursement : Make doesn’t offer refunds by default. It reviews requests case by case.
📌 Note: Prices above reflect annual billing. Paying monthly costs $10.59 for Core, $18.82 for Pro, and $34.12 for Teams.
⚠️ Avertissement: There are no hidden fees, but operations add up fast. Creating automations is free, yet each run of a ten-step scenario uses ten operations.
Key Benefits of Make
Here’s what makes Make worth considering:
- Générateur de flux de travail visuel : You drag modules onto a canvas and link them. You see every path your data takes.
- Extensive Integration Capabilities: Make works with thousands of apps. You can add as many apps as you need to one workflow.
- Complex Logic Without Code: Iterators, aggregators, routers, and filters come built in. No coding expertise is required.
- Custom API Calls: Can’t find an app? The HTTP module sends HTTP requests to almost any third party services.
- Gestion des erreurs : You decide what happens when a step fails. Clear error messages show where things broke.
- Grande communauté : Make has deep documentation, tutorials, and an active forum. Help is easy to find as you build workflows.
Ce que notre équipe a remarqué
Our writer used Make to move form leads into Google Sheets and a CRMVoici ce qui a retenu l'attention lors de cette expérience pratique :
Make Pros & Cons
✅ Avantages
- Paid plans start at just $9 per month
- Visual canvas shows every branch and filter
- Handles branching, loops, and error routes
- HTTP module connects apps without native support
❌ Inconvénients
- Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
- Operation counts can be hard to predict
- Refunds are only handled case by case
Qu'est-ce que Lutra ?
Lutra AI is an intelligent assistant for work across multiple applications.
You describe a job in natural language, and it carries it out.
It specializes in data enrichment, research, and gestion des e-mails.
Jiquan Ngiam and Bo Zhi See created it to cut app-switching.
The company calls it the first productivity agent for your whole workspace.
Watch Lutra handle a real request in this walkthrough.
Lutra
Type a task and let the AI agent do the clicking. It can fill spreadsheets, enrich leads, and draft emails for you.
Tarification de Lutra
Lutra uses a credit system. Every account gets monthly credits that refresh on their own.
| Plan | Prix | Idéal pour |
|---|---|---|
| Gratuit | $0 | Trying a few simple tasks |
| Essentiel | 23 $/mois (facturé annuellement) | Solo users with regular research jobs |
| Professionnel | 63 $/mois (facturé annuellement) | Heavy enrichment and outreach work |
| Entreprise | Tarification personnalisée | Companies needing SSO and audit sentiers |
Pricing verified October 2026.
Essai gratuit : The free plan lets you test Lutra with a small credit allowance.
Garantie de remboursement : Lutra doesn’t advertise a set refund window. Ask support before you commit to annual billing.
📌 Note: Not all tasks cost the same. Web searches and data enrichment burn more credits than simple actions.
⚠️ Avertissement: Paid plan prices are for annual billing. Check your credit use on the free plan first.
Key Benefits of Lutra
Here’s what makes Lutra worth considering:
- Natural Language Automation: You type what you need. Lutra builds and runs the steps.
- Runs Actual Code: Lutra executes real code behind each task. That helps ensure consistent outcomes every run.
- Intégrations profondes : It plugs into Google Workspace, Microsoft, Slack, HubSpot, and many other apps.
- Sécurité des données : Lutra is SOC 2 Type II certified with end-to-end encryption. It doesn’t store data long-term unless you ask.
- Manuels de jeu : Save a task, then share it with your team. This helps standardize processes across a company.
- Exécutions programmées : Workflows can run on a schedule, even when you’re offline.
Ce que notre équipe a remarqué
Notre écrivain signed up for Lutra and asked it to pull and enrich lead lists. Here’s what stood out:
Lutra Pros & Cons
✅ Avantages
- Plain-English requests replace manual setup
- Strong at research, scraping, and enrichment
- SOC 2 Type II certified security
- Playbooks make good tasks repeatable
❌ Inconvénients
- Paid plans cost more than Make’s
- Credit burn is uneven across task types
- Smaller app list than dedicated automation tools
Comparaison des fonctionnalités
Make is a workflow builder. Lutra is an AI agent that does work for you. Here’s how they compare across ten areas.
| Fonctionnalité | Faire | Lutra |
|---|---|---|
| Prix initial | 9 $ par mois | $23/month (annual) |
| Plan gratuit | ✅ | ✅ |
| Visual Drag and Drop Builder | ✅ | ❌ |
| Agents IA | ✅ | ✅ |
| Built-in Web Research | ❌ | ✅ |
| API personnalisées | ✅ HTTP module | ✅ via MCP |
| Iterators & Error Handling | ✅ | ❌ |
| Shareable Templates | ✅ Modèles | ✅ Playbooks |
| Idéal pour | Complex automation | Research and data tasks |
1. AI Agents
Faire: Make AI Agents sit inside your scenarios. You give an agent a goal and the tools it may use. It then decides which step to take next.
Lutra : The whole product is the agent. You chat with it like other assistants IA, but it acts across your work apps. It can research YouTube videos and summarize them on request.
2. Reliability and Consistent Outcomes
Faire: Agentic automation mixes AI decisions with fixed steps. You keep strict rules where they matter. AI only handles the fuzzy parts.
Lutra : Lutra AI ensures repeatable results by writing and running actual code. That beats a chatbot guessing each time. Its PubMed RSS report shows how scheduled tasks can automate reports.
3. Workflow Building and Ease of Use
Faire: The drag and drop interface lets you see each module, route, and filter. Simple workflows take minutes. More complex workflows take practice, so expect a steep learning curve.
Lutra : There’s no canvas to learn. You type, and conversational AI handles the setup. It can also build visualizations, like a cross-platform app analysis dashboard.
💡 Conseil de pro : Lutra feels more beginner friendly on day one. Some reviewers still mention a learning curve in finding everything it can do.
4. Data Extraction and Enrichment
Faire: Make can process data from invoices, forms, and files. Parsing tools reshape it before it lands in Google Sheets.
Lutra : This is Lutra’s home turf. It finds structured data on web pages, PDFs, and docs, then enriches each row. It can turn Google Drive PDFs into tidy Sheets.
5. Génération de prospects
Faire: Make moves leads from ads, forms, and landing pages into your CRM. It scores, tags, and routes them by rules you set.
Lutra : Lutra builds the lead list itself. It scrapes contact details from sites like LinkedIn and enriches each profile. A sales team gets ready-to-use records.
6. Marketing and Email Automation
Faire: Make can post to social channels on a schedule. It also syncs customer interactions across tools, which helps e commerce stores keep inventory updated.
Lutra : Lutra can automate emails with CRM data. It drafts personalized campaigns and Gmail replies, then sends follow-ups and tracks the results.
7. Integrations and Custom APIs
Faire: With 2,000+ apps, Make covers most tools you already use. The HTTP module handles custom API calls for everything else. That makes it great for syncing data across IT systems.
Lutra : Lutra connects to existing apps like Outlook, Stripe, and HubSpot. It supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) for custom integrations, with SSO, RBAC, and audit trails.
⚠️ Avertissement: Lutra’s app list is shorter. Check your must-have tools before you pay for a plan.
8. Templates and Playbooks
Faire: The templates gallery gives you ready-made scenarios. Pick one, connect your accounts, and tweak the steps.
Lutra : Playbooks are saved tasks you can share across your company. A profile finder playbook, for example, runs the same way for everyone.
9. Business Workflows by Team
Faire: Make is highly versatile. It runs contract approvals for legal, invoices for finance, and tickets for IT.
Lutra : Lutra serves sales, recruiting, finance, and immobilier. It finds phone numbers, sources candidates, reconciles expenses, and scrapes Zillow listings.
10. Tarification et coût
Here are both pricing plans side by side.
| Plan | Faire | Lutra |
|---|---|---|
| Gratuit | 0 $ par mois | $0 |
| Entrée | Core: $9 per month | Essential: $23/month (billed annually) |
| Milieu | Pro: $16 per month | Professional: $63/month (billed annually) |
| Équipe | Teams: $29 per month | — |
| Entreprise | Tarification personnalisée | Tarification personnalisée |
Faire: Make is the cost effective pick. Most paid plans fall between $9 and $29. Reviewers often say it beats Zapier and Pipedream on price.
Lutra : Lutra costs more, but each credit does heavier work. One task can replace hours of manual research.
Différents scénarios
| Si vous avez besoin | Choisir | Pourquoi |
|---|---|---|
| budget serré | Faire | Paid plans start at $9 |
| Advanced workflows with branching | Faire | Routers, iterators, error routes |
| Lead research and enrichment | Lutra | Scrapes and enriches on request |
| Connecting niche apps | Faire | 2,000+ apps plus HTTP |
| Zero setup for non technical users | Lutra | Type tasks in plain English |
| Strict data security | Lutra | SOC 2 Type II, MCP guardrails |
💰 Votre budget
Make wins on raw cost. Lutra makes sense when one task saves hours of research.
🔌 Votre pile technologique
Many tools, or niche ones? Pick Make. Mostly Google Workspace and Microsoft? Lutra covers you.
⚙️ Your Workflow Style
Make suits always-on pipelines that run thousands of times. Lutra suits jobs where an AI must read, search, and decide.
🎓 Votre niveau d'expérience
New to automation? Lutra needs little technical know how. Make takes longer to learn but gives more control.
🆓 Essais et démos gratuits
Both offer a free plan. Run one real task in each before you pay.
🛟 Options d'assistance
Make’s customer support is backed by a huge community and tutorials. Lutra’s resources are smaller but growing.
🔒 Confidentialité et sécurité des données
Lutra uses secure authentication on every connection. It also limits risky mixes of private data, external systems, and untrusted content.
Guide de changement
Vous utilisez déjà l'un de ces outils ? Voici à quoi vous attendre si vous en changez.
🔄 Switching from Make to Lutra?
✅ Ce que vous y gagnerez :
- Tasks set up by typing, not building
- Built-in web searches and lead enrichment
- SOC 2 Type II security with MCP controls
❌ Ce que vous perdrez :
- The visual canvas and fine control
- A much larger app library
- Des coûts mensuels réduits
📋 Comment changer :
- List your Make scenarios and what each one does.
- Create a free Lutra account and connect your apps.
- Describe each task in plain English and save it as a Playbook.
🔄 Switching from Lutra to Make?
✅ Ce que vous y gagnerez :
- Cheaper plans for high-volume runs
- Iterators, routers, and error handling
- 2,000+ apps and HTTP module access
❌ Ce que vous perdrez :
- Plain-English task creation
- Native research and scraping
- Shareable Playbooks
📋 Comment changer :
- Write down the steps each Lutra Playbook performs.
- Sign up for Make’s free plan and connect your apps.
- Rebuild each task from a template or a blank scenario.
Ce que notre analyse n'a pas couvert
This comparison focused on solo users and small teams. We didn’t evaluate Enterprise plans, custom pricing, or high-volume runs with millions of operations. We also didn’t measure real time data speed or long-term credit costs at scale. Features reflect October 2026 versions and may change.
Verdict final
| Catégorie | Gagnant |
|---|---|
| 💰 Tarification | Faire |
| 🧩 Workflow Builder | Faire |
| 🧠 Complex Logic & Error Handling | Faire |
| 🔌 Intégrations | Faire |
| 📚 Modèles et communauté | Faire |
| 🔍 Data Enrichment & Research | Lutra |
| 🤖 Agents IA | Lutra |
| 👶 Facilité d'utilisation | Lutra |
| 🏆 Vainqueur toutes catégories | Faire |
🏆 WINNER: MAKE
Make wins 5 out of 8 categories.
Idéal pour : Multi-app automation, budget-minded teams, complex workflows
Make is a powerful automation platform for people who want control. It costs less and connects more apps. Its visual approach turns messy entreprise workflows into clear diagrams.
Lutra is the better fit for research-heavy work. If your days involve web searches, lead lists, and messy spreadsheets, Lutra saves real time. It lets you skip the builder and just ask.
Still, most readers want one tool that runs reliably in the background. For that, Make is the stronger choice. Start on the free plan and grow from there.
More of Make Compared
Here’s how Make stacks up against other automation tools:
Gagnez des victoires sur : branching paths, lower entry price, and deeper data parsing. Unlike Zapier, it bills per operation.
Zapier l'emporte sur : a simpler linear setup, a larger app library, and faster onboarding.
Make vs n8n
Gagnez des victoires sur : zero hosting work, a friendlier canvas, and a bigger template gallery.
n8n gagne sur : open-source code, self-hosting, and code nodes for developers.
Make vs Pabblely Connecter
Gagnez des victoires sur : more native apps, stronger error handling, and built-in AI agents.
Pabbly Connect wins on: lifetime deals, free internal steps, and simpler billing.
More of Lutra Compared
Here’s how Lutra stacks up against other AI workflows tools:
Lutra wins on: chat-based setup, native web research, and lead enrichment.
Zapier l'emporte sur : thousands more apps, lower starting cost, and mature trigger-action automation.
Lutra vs Gumloop
Lutra wins on: no node building, SOC 2 Type II security, and shareable Playbooks.
Gumloop gagne sur : a visual AI pipeline builder, scraping nodes, and step-level control.
Lutra vs MindStudio
Lutra wins on: ready-to-use task agent, CRM-driven email, and Google Drive extraction.
MindStudio wins on: building custom Applications d'IA, model choice, and branded agent interfaces.
Foire aux questions
Make est-il meilleur que Zapier ?
For complex logic and lower cost, yes. Zapier is simpler and has more apps. Make gives you branching, iterators, and better control over how data is processed.
Make.com est-il difficile à utiliser ?
Basic tasks are easy to set up. Advanced workflows take practice, especially with API integrations. Templates and tutorials shorten your automation journey.
Combien coûte Make.com ?
There’s a free plan. Paid plans are Core at $9, Pro at $16, and Teams at $29 per month. Enterprise uses custom pricing.
Lutra AI est-il sûr ?
Yes. It is SOC 2 Type II certified and uses end-to-end encryption. It doesn’t keep your data long-term unless you ask it to.
À quoi sert Lutra AI ?
It handles data extraction, lead enrichment, web research, and email follow-ups. You describe the job, and the agent works to complete tasks across your connected apps.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 