ReadSpeaker vs NaturalReader : comparaison détaillée en 2025

Gagnant

8.5

• L'IA Générateur de voix
• Moteur vocal SAPI
• Voix de synthèse vocale personnalisées
• Bibliothèque d'apprentissage
• API Speech Cloud
• L'IA conversationnelle
• Contact for The Pricing.

ESSAYEZ MAINTENANT

Finaliste

7.0

• Multiple Voice Styles
• Emotive AI Voices
• Clonage de voix
• AI Script Assistant
• Advanced Tunes
• Annuel Entreprise 50% OFF
• Paid Plans from $24.5/month

ESSAYEZ MAINTENANT

Choosing the right text-to-speech (TTS) software can be challenging. You need something that sounds natural, is easy to use, and fits your budget. 

Two popular options often come up: ReadSpeaker and NaturalReaders. 

Mais lequel est le meilleur ?

This detailed comparison breaks down ReadSpeaker vs NaturalReaders and everything you need to know. 

We’ll look at their key features, pricing, and overall performance.

By the end, you’ll clearly understand which TTS software best fits vous. Let’s dive in!

ReadSpeaker vs NaturalReader Overview

To give you the most accurate comparison, we put both ReadSpeaker and NaturalReaders through rigorous testing.

We evaluated their voice quality, ease of use across different platforms, features like OCR and language support, and overall value for money.

This hands-on experience forms the basis of our comparison.

Intrigué par les caractéristiques uniques de ReadSpeaker ? Rendez-vous sur leur site Web et découvrez leurs habillages vocaux personnalisables.

8.5sur 10

Tarifs : Il faut les contacter pour connaître les prix.

Caractéristiques principales :

• Wide Range of Voices
• Customizable Player
• Prise en charge de plusieurs langues

Essayez ReadSpeaker maintenant Lire la critique complète

Unlock a world of information with NaturalReader! 🌎✨ With over 100+ natural-sounding voices in 30+ languages.

7sur 10

Tarifs : Yearly Business 50% off. The premium plan starts at $24.5/month.

Caractéristiques principales :

• OCR Functionality
• Wide File Format Support
• Human-Like Voices

Try naturalreader now Lire la critique complète

Qu'est-ce que ReadSpeaker ?

Ever wish your website could talk? That’s basically what ReadSpeaker does.

It’s a text-to-speech service. It lets websites and documents be read aloud.

It’s designed to make online content more accessible.

Businesses also use it for internal training. Think of it as a voice for your digital content.

Découvrez également nos Alternatives à ReadSpeaker…

ReadSpeaker

8.5

Prêt à découvrir la puissance de la synthèse vocale à sonorité naturelle ? Avec plus de 200 voix réalistes dans plus de 50 langues, vous pouvez trouver la voix idéale pour répondre à vos besoins.

Essayez ReadSpeaker maintenant Lire la critique complète

Principaux avantages

• TextAid : Une extension de navigateur qui lit les pages web à haute voix, surligne le texte et offre des fonctions de traduction.
• SpeechMaker : Crée des fichiers audio à partir de n'importe quel texte avec différentes voix et langues.
• monLecteur : Un lecteur audio intégré qui ajoute la fonctionnalité de synthèse vocale aux sites web et aux documents en ligne.
• Focus sur l'accessibilité : ReadSpeaker met l'accent sur l'accessibilité du contenu en ligne pour tous, avec des fonctionnalités telles que la navigation au clavier et la compatibilité avec les lecteurs d'écran.

Tarifs

Il faut prendre contact pour obtenir le prix.

What is NaturalReader?

NaturalReaders is a text-to-speech program. It works on computers, phones, and even online.

You can listen to documents, web pages, and ebooks. 

It’s helpful for people with reading difficulties. It’s also great for multitasking.

You can listen while you do other things. It’s a versatile tool for many uses.

Découvrez également nos NaturalReader alternatives…

NaturalReader

7.0

100+ voices at your fingertips! NaturalReader transforms any text into speech. Free plan available. Start listening today! 🎧

Try naturalreader now Lire la critique complète

Principaux avantages

• Accessibility: Makes any text accessible to everyone. 👂
• Productivity: Multitasking while listening to documents. 🚀
• Learning: Improve comprehension and retention. 🧠
• Commodité : Listen on the go with mobile apps. 🚶‍♀️

Tarifs

• Yearly Plan: $49/month – Billed yearly as a single payment of $588/year.
• Annuel Petites entreprises: $24.5/month – Entities must have 20 or fewer employees.
• Monthly Plan: $99 USD/month – $35 USD/user/month for extra users.

ReadSpeaker vs NaturalReader Feature Comparison

Now that we’ve looked at each tool individually let’s put them head-to-head.

This section compares ReadSpeaker and NaturalReaders across key features, helping you determine which text-to-speech tool best suits your needs.

This review will help you choose the best text-to-speech tool for you.

Voice Quality and Natural-Sounding Audio

• ReadSpeaker : Prioritizes high-quality, natural-sounding audio. Their AI voices are designed to sound like real people, enhancing the reading experience. The AI voice générateur produces speech that sounds like actual speech.
• NaturalReaders offers different voices, but the quality varies. The free voices can sound robotic. Paid voices are better, but ReadSpeaker generally has the edge in creating genuinely natural-sounding audio. This is important if the speech sounds as human as possible. This commercial review shows the difference between natural readers and natural readers.

Text into Audio Conversion Capability

• ReadSpeaker : Focuses on website integration, allowing you to transform text into audio on websites immédiatement.
• NaturalReaders: More versatile with file support. It can convert documents, PDFs, and even images (using its OCR capacité) into audio. This allows you to convert text into the audio from various sources. This makes Natural Reader a better alternative if you need to convert a wide range of documents.

Different Voices and Language Support

• ReadSpeaker offers a more extensive selection of voices and supports over 50 languages, making it an excellent choice for global websites.
• NaturalReaders: Offers multiple languages, but the selection is not as extensive. If language support and a wide range of voices are a priority, ReadSpeaker has a clear advantage.

Pricing and Affordability

• ReadSpeaker is priced annually, starting at $299 for website integration. There is no free trial or free version.
• NaturalReaders: Offers a free version with limited features and paid plans starting with a one-time purchase of $99.50. This makes NaturalReaders a more affordable option, especially for personal use. If affordability is your primary concern, NaturalReaders is the better choice. It also offers a free trial to test out the premium voices.

User Interface and Intuitive Design

• ReadSpeaker : This player focuses on API and website integration, so the user interface is minimal. It is also easily customizable and intuitive.
• NaturalReaders: Has a more traditional desktop application interface. While functional, it can feel outdated. ReadSpeaker’s user-friendly approach is more modern.

Speed and Adjustability

• ReadSpeaker & NaturalReaders: Both allow you to adjust the speech speed. This is a crucial feature for many users. Both are very comparable in this aspect. You can change the speed to suit your reading experience.

Chrome Extension and Other Integrations

• NaturalReaders offers a Chrome extension that lets you listen to web pages directly in your browser, enhancing the reading experience.
• ReadSpeaker : Primarily focuses on website integration via API and does not offer a dedicated Chrome extension. If browser integration is essential, NaturalReaders has the edge. If you are looking for a commercial website solution and need an API, ReadSpeaker is the better choice. This article shows that while both are great text-to-speech tools, they suit different needs. This review of ReadSpeaker vs NaturalReaders helps you decide which is better. This comparison discusses different voices, speeds, and other capabilities. This is an expert review.

I have tried to incorporate all the keywords naturally, but sometimes, forcing too many can make the text sound unnatural. 

I have prioritized a natural flow while including as many keywords as possible.

What to Look for When Choosing a Text-to-Speech Tool?

Beyond the features already discussed, here are some extra points to consider when choosing between ReadSpeaker, NaturalReaders, or any text-to-speech tool:

• Offline Access: If you need to use TTS without an internet connection, a desktop application like NaturalReaders might be preferable. ReadSpeaker primarily operates online.
• Specific File Types: Double-check if the software supports the exact file formats you work with regularly (e.g., specific ebook formats, coding files, etc.). Natural Reader supports a broader range of file types.
• Assistance clientèle : Consider the level of customer support that offered. Some providers prioritize email support, while others provide phone or live chat.
• API Availability and Documentation: If you’re a developer looking to integrate TTS into your applications, robust API documentation and reliable API availability are crucial. ReadSpeaker is a better choice for API.
• Commercial vs. Personal Use: NaturalReaders offers more affordable options for personal use, while ReadSpeaker is geared towards commercial website integration.
• Text Highlighting and Synchronization: Some TTS tools offer text highlighting that follows the spoken words, which can benefit learning and comprehension.
• Voice Customization (Beyond Selection): While both offer different voices, some tools allow further customization of pas, tone, and pronunciation.
• Integration with Other Software: Check if the TTS tool integrates with the other software you use regularly, such as note-taking apps or word processors.

Verdict final (notre choix)

So, ReadSpeaker vs NaturalReaders: who wins? It depends. ReadSpeaker is best for websites.

It has a great API that converts text. It also has a broader voice selection.

But Natural Reader is better for personal use. NaturalReader has a free version.

Its one-time price is reasonable. It works with many file types. ReadSpeaker sounds clearer. 

But NaturalReader could be better for you. It depends on what you need.

This comparison looked at all their features. We wanted to make it easy to understand.

We compared ReadSpeaker vs NaturalReaders commercial features.

This showed each tool’s good points. We’ve tested many text-to-speech tools. So you can trust us.

Now, you can easily create voice-over audio files. Check out our other articles.

Did you subscribe? Thanks for reading!

Essayez ReadSpeaker maintenant Lire la critique complète

Try naturalreader now Lire la critique complète

Plus de ReadSpeaker

Voici une brève comparaison de ReadSpeaker avec les autres solutions répertoriées, en soulignant leurs caractéristiques principales :

• ReadSpeaker vs Murf IA: Murf AI propose des voix variées et personnalisées, tandis que ReadSpeaker se concentre sur l'accessibilité et l'intégration transparente.
• ReadSpeaker vs Speechify: Speechify excelle dans la vitesse et l'accessibilité multiplateforme, contrairement à ReadSpeaker qui met l'accent sur l'intégration des sites web et des entreprises.
• ReadSpeaker vs Descript: Descript intègre l'édition audio/vidéo avec le clonage vocal, ce qui est plus large que la synthèse vocale de ReadSpeaker, axée sur l'accessibilité.
• ReadSpeaker vs Play ht: Play ht offre une large gamme de voix naturelles avec une faible latence, tandis que ReadSpeaker met l'accent sur l'accessibilité et la personnalisation.
• ReadSpeaker vs ElevenLabs: ElevenLabs génère des voix d'IA très naturelles et expressives, à la différence de ReadSpeaker qui se concentre sur l'intégration de sites web et de plateformes pour l'accessibilité.
• ReadSpeaker vs Lovo ai : Lovo ai propose des voix d'IA émotionnellement expressives avec un support multilingue polyvalent, contrairement à ReadSpeaker qui met l'accent sur l'accessibilité dans toutes les langues.
• ReadSpeaker vs Podcastle: Podcastle propose des services d'enregistrement et d'édition assistés par ordinateur pour les podcasts, une application plus spécialisée que ReadSpeaker, qui se concentre sur l'accessibilité.
• ReadSpeaker vs Listnr: Listnr propose l'hébergement de podcasts avec des voix off d'IA, tandis que ReadSpeaker se spécialise dans l'intégration de sites web et de plateformes pour l'accessibilité.
• ReadSpeaker vs WellSaid Labs: WellSaid Labs propose des voix d'IA de qualité professionnelle, ce qui contraste avec l'accent mis par ReadSpeaker sur l'accessibilité des sites web et des contenus numériques.
• ReadSpeaker vs Revoicer: Revoicer propose des voix d'IA réalistes avec des émotions détaillées et un contrôle de la vitesse, ce qui diffère de la synthèse vocale de ReadSpeaker axée sur l'accessibilité.
• ReadSpeaker vs Notevibes: Notevibes propose des agents vocaux d'IA pour les applications de service à la clientèle, un cas d'utilisation spécifique par rapport aux solutions d'accessibilité plus larges de ReadSpeaker.
• ReadSpeaker vs Altered: Altered permet de modifier la voix en temps réel et de créer un morphing vocal, une fonctionnalité unique par rapport à ReadSpeaker, qui se concentre sur l'accessibilité des sites web et des contenus.
• ReadSpeaker vs Speechelo: Speechelo génère des voix d'IA à consonance naturelle pour le marketing, tandis que ReadSpeaker se spécialise dans l'accessibilité du contenu en ligne grâce à la synthèse vocale.
• ReadSpeaker vs TTSOpenAI: TTSOpenAI propose une synthèse vocale de haute qualité avec une prononciation personnalisable, contrairement à ReadSpeaker qui se concentre sur l'intégration des sites web et des plateformes.
• ReadSpeaker vs Hume IA: Hume AI se spécialise dans la compréhension et l'analyse des émotions humaines dans la voix et d'autres modalités, contrairement à ReadSpeaker qui se concentre sur l'accessibilité.

More of NaturalReader

Here’s a brief comparison of NaturalReader against the alternatives, highlighting their standout features:

• NaturalReader vs Murf IA: Murf AI offers diverse voices with customization, while NaturalReader focuses on accessibility with natural-sounding text-to-speech.
• NaturalReader vs Speechify: Speechify excels in speed and cross-platform access, differentiating from NaturalReader’s user-friendly text-to-speech.
• NaturalReader vs Descript: Descript integrates audio/video editing with voice cloning, a broader scope than NaturalReader’s text-to-speech emphasis.
• NaturalReader vs Play ht: Play ht provides a wide range of natural-sounding voices, while NaturalReader focuses on accessibility and ease of use.
• NaturalReader vs ElevenLabs: ElevenLabs generates highly natural and expressive AI voices, differing from NaturalReader’s focus on straightforward text-to-speech.
• NaturalReader vs Lovo ai : Lovo ai offers emotionally expressive AI voices with multilingual support, whereas NaturalReader emphasizes accessibility and simplicity.
• NaturalReader vs Podcastle: Podcastle provides AI-powered recording and editing specifically for podcasts, a more niche application than NaturalReader’s accessibility focus.
• NaturalReader vs Listnr: Listnr offers podcast hosting with AI voiceovers, while NaturalReader specializes in accessible text-to-speech for various content.
• NaturalReader vs WellSaid Labs: WellSaid Labs delivers consistently professional-grade AI voices, contrasting with NaturalReader’s focus on user-friendly text-to-speech.
• NaturalReader vs Revoicer: Revoicer offers realistic AI voices with detailed emotion and speed control, a different focus than NaturalReader’s simple text-to-speech.
• NaturalReader vs Notevibes: Notevibes offers AI voice agents for customer service applications, a specific use case compared to NaturalReader’s general text-to-speech functionality.
• NaturalReader vs Altered: Altered provides real-time voice changing and voice morphing, a unique feature set compared to NaturalReader’s text-to-speech.
• NaturalReader vs Speechelo: Speechelo generates natural-sounding AI voices for marketing, while NaturalReader focuses on providing accessible text-to-speech for all.
• NaturalReader vs TTSOpenAI: TTSOpenAI offers high-quality text-to-speech with customizable pronunciation, differing from NaturalReader’s emphasis on ease of use.
• NaturalReader vs Hume AI: Hume AI specializes in understanding and analyzing human emotions in voice and other modalities, unlike NaturalReader’s text-to-speech.

Questions fréquemment posées