Luma vs Fliki: Easier Video Editing & Customization in 2025?

par | Nov 29, 2024

Gagnant
luma AI best section
8.0
  • AI-Powered 3D Capture
  • Neural Radiance Fields
  • Intuitive Editing Tools
  • Unreal Engine Plugin
  • Intégration transparente
  • Plan gratuit disponible
  • Le forfait payant commence à $9.99
Finaliste
fliki meilleure section
7.5
Luma vs Fliki

Creating videos used to be a big hassle. You needed fancy equipment and editing skills.

But now, Outils d'IA like Luma and Fliki make it way easier! They can whip up a video from just a little bit of text. Pretty cool, right?

But which one is better for editing those videos and making them your own? We’re exploring that today.

We’ll compare Luma Vs Fliki in terms of customization and making videos look exactly how you want them.

C'est parti !

Aperçu

We’ve spent weeks testing both Luma and Fliki to give you the best comparison.

We’ve explored their features, experimented with their customization options, and even created a few videos.

We’re sharing our findings to help you choose the right tool.

Luma AI CTA

Bring 3D to life in your videos! Luma lets you capture real-world objects. Elevate your video content & Learn more about Luma.

8sur 10

Tarifs : It has a free plan. Paid plan Starts at $9.99/month

Caractéristiques principales :

  • 3D capture
  • Vidéo IA editing
  • cinematic templates
Patch CTA

Want faster videos? Fliki AI turns text into videos with 75+ AI voices. No studios, no hassle. Explore a new world with Fliki!

7.5sur 10

Tarifs : It has a free plan. Paid plan Starts at $21/month

Caractéristiques principales :

What is Luma?

Have you ever wished you could capture something in 3D with just your phone? That’s what Luma does!

It’s an AI-powered app that turns your phone into a 3D scanner. With it, you can create amazing 3D models of objects, people, or even entire rooms.

Pretty cool, right? These models are super realistic thanks to “neural radiance fields” (NeRFs).

It uses AI to capture how light interacts with a scene, making the models look incredibly lifelike.

Découvrez également nos favoris Luma alternatives

Luma AI CTA
Devant
8.0

Unlock your video creativity with Luma! Transform ordinary objects into extraordinary 3D models & bring a new dimension to your videos. See what Luma can do for you!

Principaux avantages

  • Unique 3D capture: Transform real objects into digital 3D models.
  • Realistic AI avatars: Choose from a diverse cast of human-like avatars.
  • Intuitive video editor: Easily customize your videos with text, images, and music.
  • Sortie vidéo de haute qualité : Produce videos in up to 4K resolution.

Tarifs

Luma offers a free trial so you can test it out. Want more? Here are the paid plans:

  • Basic Free Trial: 30 Generations per month, standard priority, non-commercial use.
  • Lite ($9.99/month): 70 Generations per month, High priority, non-commercial use.
  • Standard ($29.99/month): 150 Generations per month, High priority, Remove watermark.
  • Plus ($64.99/month): 310 Generations per month, High priority, non-commercial use.
  • Pro (99.99/month): 480 Generations per month, High priority, Remove watermark.
  • Premier (499.99/month): 2430 Generations per month, High priority, Remove watermark.
luma ai pricing

Avantages

  • 3D capture is groundbreaking.
  • AI avatars look realistic.
  • Facile à apprendre et à utiliser.
  • Produces high-quality videos.
  • The free trial is very generous.

Inconvénients

  • The free trial is limited.
  • Advanced features get pricey.
  • 3D capture can be time-consuming.
  • The editing features are limited.

Qu'est-ce que Fliki ?

Want to create videos without being on camera? Fliki is your new best friend!

Il s'agit d'un Vidéo IA generation tool that turns text into spoken-word videos.

You type in your script, choose an AI voice or avatar, and boom – you have a video!

Fliki has tons of different voices and avatars to choose from. You can even clone your voice!

It’s perfect for making explainer videos, réseaux sociaux content, or presentations.

Découvrez également nos favoris Alternatives à Fliki

Patch CTA
Correctif
7.5

Explorer Vidéo IA avec Fliki ! Découvrez à quel point il est facile de créer des vidéos avec des voix réalistes dans plus de 75 langues. Fliki propose un plan gratuit généreux pour vous permettre de démarrer.

Principaux avantages

Fliki offers a range of features that make it a powerful video creation tool. Here are some of its biggest strengths:

  • Extensif voice library: Choose from over 450 voices in 75+ different languages.
  • Diverse video styles: Select from various templates and styles to match your brand or content.
  • Built-in media library: Access stock images and videos to enhance your creations.
  • Blog to video converter: Immédiatement transform your blog posts into engaging content.

Tarifs

Fliki has a free plan with limited features. Their paid plans start at just $21 per month. Here’s the breakdown:

  • Gratuit: $0/mois - 300 voix, Générer des images AI.
  • Standard: $21/mois - 1000+ voix, Générer des clips vidéo AI, Pas de filigrane.
  • Prime: $66/month – 2000+ voices, Voice cloning, Avatar IA, Soutien prioritaire.
Fliki AI

Avantages

  • Interface extrêmement conviviale.
  • Vaste choix de voix.
  • Prise en charge d'un grand nombre de langues.
  • Sortie audio de haute qualité.
  • Des voix d'IA réalistes.

Inconvénients

  • Limited video customization.
  • Fewer video templates than Long.
  • S'appuie largement sur des images d'archives.
  • Les vidéos peuvent sembler robotiques.

Comparaison des fonctionnalités

Now, let’s get down to entreprise! We’ll compare Luma and Fliki head-to-head across critical features to see which AI video générateur is on top.

1. Video Generation Capabilities

Luma and Fliki are powerful générateurs vidéo, but they go about it differently.

Luma focuses on creating high-quality videos from 3D models, while Fliki specializes in generating visually appealing videos from text using AI voices.

  • Luma: Excels at producing realistic 3D environments that can be animated and transformed into videos. It’s ideal for showcasing products, creating virtual tours, or generating unique visual content.
  • Fliki : Quickly generates videos from scripts or blog posts using a vast library of AI voices and avatars. It’s perfect for explainer videos, social media content, and presentations.
Front IA

2. Video Quality

When it comes to video quality, both tools offer high-quality video output but with different strengths.

  • Luma: Produces incredibly realistic and detailed videos thanks to its use of neural radiance fields. The level of detail and realism in Luma’s videos is unmatched.
  • Fliki : Generates videos with good visual quality, but the focus is more on the audio and the overall message conveyed by the AI voices and avatars.
Front IA

3. Video Editing

Luma and Fliki bffer video editing capabilities, but their approaches differ significantly.

Luma functions as an AI video editor for 3D environments, while Fliki provides essential editing tools for video clips generated from text.

  • Luma: Allows you to manipulate 3D models, adjust lighting, add effects, and fine-tune your videos within its intuitive interface.
  • Fliki : Offers essential editing tools like trimming, adding music, and adjusting the timing of visuals. However, its editing features are less extensive than those of Luma.

4. AI Model

Luma and Fliki leverage advanced AI models to power their video generation capabilities.

  • Luma: Utilizes cutting-edge NeRF technology to create realistic 3D models and environments. This allows for highly detailed and immersive videos.
  • Fliki : Employs AI models for text-to-speech and avatar generation, resulting in natural-sounding voices and expressive characters.

5. Facilité d'utilisation

Both AI générateurs vidéo are designed with user-friendliness in mind, making them accessible to beginners and experienced creators alike.

  • Luma: Features an intuitive interface that makes capturing and editing 3D models a breeze.
  • Fliki : Offers a straightforward process for generating videos from text. Input your script, choose your voice and avatar, and let Fliki do the work.

6. Customization Options

Both video tools provide options for customizing your video content, but the extent of customization varies.

  • Luma: Offers extensive customization options within its 3D environment. You can manipulate objects, adjust lighting, apply effects, and fine-tune various aspects of your video.
  • Fliki : This app provides some customization options, such as choosing different voices, avatars, and background music. However, its customization features are not as comprehensive as Luma’s.
Fliki AI

7. Use Cases

Luma and Fliki cater to different needs and use cases.

  • Luma: Ideal for creating product demos, virtual tours, architectural visualizations, and other content that benefits from realistic 3D environments.
  • Fliki is perfect for generating explainer videos, educational content, social media posts, marketing materials, and any video that relies on narration and visuals.
Fliki AI

This comparison highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each video editor across various features.

By understanding these differences, you can choose the best AI video générateur for your specific needs and create compelling AI-generated videos.

Que faut-il rechercher lors du choix d'un générateur de vidéos d'IA ?

  • Vos besoins spécifiques : Consider what types of videos you want to create. Do you need realistic 3D models, or are you focused on text-based videos with AI voices?
  • Facilité d'utilisation : Choose a tool that matches your technical skills and comfort level.
  • Options de personnalisation : How important is it to have fine-grained control over your videos?
  • Tarifs : Evaluate the pricing plans and ensure they align with your budget and usage requirements.
  • Qualité de la production : Pay attention to the resolution and overall quality of the generated videos.
  • Caractéristiques: Look for features that are important to you, such as voice cloning, AI avatars, or 3D capture.
  • Soutien: Check if the platform offers good customer support if you need assistance.

Verdict final

So, which AI video generator comes out on top? For us, it’s Luma!

We were blown away by the realistic 3D videos it creates. It’s perfect for making eye-catching content that really stands out.

Plus, it’s super easy to use, even for beginners.

But hold on! Fliki is still a great choice if you need to make videos quickly from text. It’s awesome for things like explainer videos or social media posts.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on what toi need.

We’ve given you all the info, so you can make the right decision.

Trust us, we’ve spent a lot of time testing these tools! Now go out there and create some awesome videos!

More of Luma

  • Luma vs Runway: Luma excels at AI image-to-video and text-to-video, while Runway offers a broader generative AI suite for diverse video creation.
  • Luma vs Pika: Luma specializes in animating images to video alongside text prompts, whereas Pika emphasizes rapid, high-quality video generation with creative control.
  • Luma contre Sora: Luma turns images and text into dynamic videos; Sora is OpenAI’s advanced model, generating highly realistic and imaginative scenes from text.
  • Luma vs Kling: Luma focuses on image and text-to-video animation, while Kling provides an AI studio for both video and image generation, including editing.
  • Luma vs Assistive: Luma transforms static visuals or text into videos; Assistive creates videos from text input or by animating uploaded photos.
  • Devant vs BasedLabs: Luma emphasizes AI-driven image and text-to-video creation, while BasedLabs offers an AI studio for creating diverse video content from text and images.
  • Luma vs Pixverse: Luma focuses on AI-powered image-to-video and text-to-video; Pixverse is an AI suite for converting photos, text, and videos into engaging content.
  • Luma vs InVideo: Luma generates videos from images and text with AI; InVideo is a versatile online editor with AI features for converting scripts/articles into videos.
  • Luma vs Veed: Luma primarily uses AI for image/text-to-video animation; Veed is a comprehensive AI production studio with text-to-video, avatars, and extensive editing tools.
  • Luma vs Canva: Luma concentrates on creating AI videos from images/text; Canva is a broader graphic design platform with integrated video editing and AI features.
  • Luma vs Vizard: Luma creates videos from images/text using AI; Vizard specializes in using AI to extract and optimize short, engaging clips from longer videos.

Plus de Fliki

  • Fliki vs Runway: Fliki excelle dans la création de vidéos en synthèse vocale ; Runway offre des capacités vidéo d'IA générative plus étendues.
  • Fliki vs Pika: Fliki privilégie les vidéos narrées à partir de textes ; Pika se concentre sur les vidéos génératives rapides et de haute qualité.
  • Fliki vs Sora: Fliki se spécialise dans le script-vidéo avec voix ; Sora vise à générer des scènes très réalistes.
  • Fliki vs Kling: Fliki converts text to voiced videos, while Kling provides a comprehensive AI video and image studio.
  • Fliki vs Assistive: Fliki delivers AI-voiced text-to-video, while Assistive transforms ideas/photos into video and offers more advanced editing.
  • Fliki vs BasedLabs: Fliki excelle dans les vidéos narrées à partir de textes ; BasedLabs génère des vidéos professionnelles à partir d'invites, avec des avatars d'IA forts.
  • Fliki vs Pixverse: Fliki crée des vidéos vocales à partir de textes ; Pixverse crée un contenu vidéo diversifié à partir d'entrées variées, avec davantage d'options de personnalisation.
  • Fliki vs InVideo: Fliki donne la priorité à la génération de vidéos par synthèse vocale ; InVideo propose un éditeur complet avec des fonctions avancées de conversion de scripts en vidéo par l'IA.
  • Fliki vs Veed: Fliki emphasizes text-to-video with AI voices, while Veed provides a wider AI production studio, including avatars and editing.
  • Fliki vs Canva: Fliki convertit le texte en vidéos vocales ; Canva est un outil de conception plus large avec un montage vidéo de base.
  • Fliki vs Vizard: Fliki génère de nouvelles vidéos à partir de textes, tandis que Vizard réutilise principalement des contenus vidéo de longue durée pour en faire des clips attrayants.

Questions fréquemment posées

Can I use Luma and Fliki to create commercial videos?

Yes, both Luma and Fliki allow you to create videos for commercial use, depending on your subscription plan. Be sure to check the specific terms and conditions for each platform.

Is Luma’s “Dream Machine” difficult to use?

Not at all! Luma’s Dream Machine app is designed to be user-friendly, even for beginners. The interface is intuitive, and the capture process is straightforward.

What kind of videos can I create with Fliki?

Fliki is versatile and can be used to create various types of videos, including explainer videos, educational content, social media posts, marketing materials, and presentations.

Do I need any video editing experience to use these tools?

Nope! Both Luma and Fliki are designed to be accessible to users with no prior video editing experience. They offer intuitive interfaces and simplifié flux de travail.

Which tool is better for creating videos with a human presenter?

While both tools can incorporate human presenters, Fliki might be a better choice for this purpose. It offers a wider range of AI avatars that can deliver your script in a natural and engaging way. You can also clone your own voice for a truly personalized touch.