⚡ Quick Verdict:
- Preisgestaltung: Luma paid plans start at $7.99/mo. InVideo paid plans start at $28/mo. Both have a free plan.
- Ideal für: Luma for cinematic, realistic KI-Video clips. InVideo for template-based marketing videos and social media content.
- Hauptunterschied: Luma AI generates short clips from text and images. InVideo turns prompts into full multi-scene videos.
- Our pick: Luma for most users who want realistic video generation. Its output quality is hard to match at this price.
Luma and InVideo both promise to help you create videos with AI.
But they are not the same kind of tool.
Luma AI makes short, realistic clips from a prompt or an image.
InVideo builds full marketing videos using templates and stock footage.
This Luma vs InVideo comparison shows which one fits your projects.
Überblick
This comparison covers pricing, features, and ease of use.
We also break down who each ai video Generator works best for.
Our writers spent hands-on time with both tools.
Those notes appear in the “What Our Team Noticed” sections below.
By the end, you will know which tool to pick.
Was ist Luma?
Luma AI is an ai video generator from Luma Labs.
It turns a text prompt or an image into a short video clip.
The platform also generates custom 3D assets on demand.
It ranks with Runway and Pika as the top ai tools for video today.
Luma is known for photorealism and a real sense of physics.
The artificial intelligence behind it reads your prompt and builds the scene.
This technology keeps improving with each model update.
Each video runs 5 seconds and can extend up to 10 seconds.
Watch the quick review below before we go deeper.
Luma
Luma AI creates cinematic, realistic clips from text and images. The Dream Machine engine handles motion and natural movement well. A free plan lets you test it first.
Luma-Preisgestaltung
Here is what Luma costs in 2026. Let’s break it down.
| Planen | Preis | Am besten geeignet für |
|---|---|---|
| Frei | $0 | Testing with 150 free seconds monthly |
| Lite | 7,99 €/Monat | Hobbyists and light creators |
| Plus | 23,99 $/Monat | Regelmäßige Videoproduzenten |
| Unbegrenzt | 75,99 $/Monat | Vielnutzer und kleine Teams |
| Unternehmen | Kontaktieren Sie den Vertrieb. | Large teams and custom needs |
Pricing verified June 2026.
Kostenlose Testversion: Yes. The free plan gives you 150 seconds of video per month with no credit card needed.
Geld-zurück-Garantie: Refund terms follow standard subscription policy. Check before you buy.
📌 Notiz: Luma’s basic plan works out to about 20 cents for a 5-second video. That makes it cheaper than Runway, which costs around $1.20 for the same length.
⚠️ Warnung: The free plan is for non-commercial use and adds a watermark. You need a paid plan to remove it.
Wichtigste Vorteile von Luma
Here is what makes Luma worth considering:
- Photorealism: Luma excels at realistic visuals and understands physics in a scene. The result looks closer to reality than most rivals.
- Dream Machine: This engine drives the video generation. It handles natural movement and motion with impressive detail.
- Text to Video and Image to Video: Type a prompt or upload an image. Luma builds a clip from either input.
- On-Demand 3D: Luma AI generates unique 3D models based on your prompts. You can adjust lighting and camera angles in 3D.
- Kostenloser Zugang: The free version gives 150 seconds monthly. That is enough to discover what the tool can do.
- Browser Based: Luma runs in your browser. There are also apps for quick access on the go.
What Our Team Noticed
Unser Schriftsteller signed up for Luma and spent several days creating clips. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:
Luma – Vor- und Nachteile
✅ Vorteile
- Realistic visuals with a strong grasp of physics and natural movement
- Cheaper per clip than Runway for short videos
- Free plan with 150 seconds of video each month
- Generates custom 3D assets and models on demand
❌ Nachteile
- Clips are limited to 10 seconds, so longer projects need stitching
- Requires prompt engineering to get the best results
- Free plan is non-commercial and adds a watermark
Was ist InVideo?
InVideo is an ai video generator built for marketing content.
You type a prompt and it turns it into a multi-scene video.
InVideo AI writes the script and generates voiceovers for you.
It ships with thousands of pre made templates to start fast.
The user friendly interface makes it easy for beginners.
Here is a short review of the platform in action.
InVideo
InVideo turns text prompts into full videos. It pairs a massive library of stock footage with pre made templates. Great for social media and marketing.
InVideo-Preisgestaltung
Here is what InVideo costs in 2026. Let’s break it down.
| Planen | Preis | Am besten geeignet für |
|---|---|---|
| Frei | $0 | Trying basic features with watermarks |
| Plus | 28 $/Monat | Einzelkünstler und kleine Projekte |
| Max | 50 $/Monat | Frequent video creators |
| Generativ | 100 US-Dollar/Monat | Heavy AI generation users |
| Team | 899 $/Monat | Larger teams needing collaboration features |
Pricing verified June 2026.
Kostenlose Testversion: Yes. The free plan lets you test the editor and templates before you pay.
Geld-zurück-Garantie: InVideo follows standard subscription refund terms. Read them before buying.
📌 Notiz: The free plan and lower paid plans cap exports and add a watermark. Higher plans unlock more AI generation and the full media library.
⚠️ Warnung: The jump from the Generative plan to the Team plan is steep. Solo creators rarely need the Team tier.
Wichtigste Vorteile von InVideo
Here is what makes InVideo worth considering:
- Riesige Bibliothek: InVideo offers a vast library of 9 million premium media assets. You get stock footage, images, and music tracks in one place.
- Pre Made Templates: Thousands of templates cover most video types. Pick one and swap in your own footage.
- Text zu Video: InVideo AI is designed to turn prompts into structured multi-scene videos with little effort.
- Auto Scripts and Voiceovers: The AI writes scripts and adds voiceovers. You can edit through simple text commands.
- Einfache Bearbeitung: A timeline interface and drag-and-drop functionality keep editing simple. Beginners pick it up fast.
- Range of Features: Subtitles, language support, and AI avatars add useful additional features for marketers.
What Our Team Noticed
Our writer used InVideo to build a few marketing clips. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:
InVideo Vor- und Nachteile
✅ Vorteile
- Massive library of 9 million stock footage, images, and music assets
- Thousands of pre made templates speed up creating videos
- User friendly interface that beginners learn quickly
- Auto scripts, voiceovers, and text-based editing
❌ Nachteile
- AI clips can look lower quality than Luma’s realistic output
- Paid plans start higher than Luma’s basic plan
- The Team plan price is a big jump for small projects
Funktionsvergleich
Ready to dive into a detailed comparison of Luma vs InVideo?
We will explore eight key features. This helps you see which platform suits your needs and which one gives the best results.
| Besonderheit | Luma | InVideo |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (paid) | 7,99 €/Monat | 28 $/Monat |
| Kostenloser Plan | ✅ | ✅ |
| Text zu Video | ✅ | ✅ |
| Bild zu Video | ✅ | ❌ |
| Pre Made Templates | ❌ | ✅ |
| Stock Footage Bibliothek | ❌ | ✅ (9M+) |
| 3D Asset Generation | ✅ | ❌ |
| Auto Voiceover | ❌ | ✅ |
| Am besten geeignet für | Realistic AI clips | Marketingvideos |
1. Video Generation
Luma: Luma AI focuses on cinematic generative video clips. It builds 3D content from text prompts and produces realistic visuals. The Dream Machine engine handles motion and natural movement with care. Output runs at 1360×752 pixels.
Im Video: InVideo creates 2D video content from written scripts. It turns a prompt into a structured multi-scene video. The focus is finished marketing content rather than a single realistic scene.
⚠️ Warnung: Luma clips top out at 10 seconds. For a long marketing video, you would stitch clips or use InVideo instead.
2. Templates and Stock Footage
Luma: Luma has no template gallery and no stock footage library. You start from a prompt or an image every time. That suits original ideas but slows down repeatable, templated work.
Im Video: InVideo ships with thousands of pre made templates. It also offers a massive library of 9 million premium assets, including stock footage, images, and music. You rarely need outside footage.
3. Realism and Visual Quality
Luma: This is where Luma pulls ahead. The AI understands physics, so objects move in a way that feels close to reality. The realistic, impressive output is the main reason people pick this tool. Many users call it the bester KI-Videogenerator for professional quality videos. As an example, a single product clip can look studio-shot. Each video generated has the ability to mimic real camera depth.
Im Video: InVideo’s AI scenes can look lower quality next to Luma. The platform leans on stock footage to fill the gap and still ships professional looking videos. For a polished human presenter, its AI avatars help but still feel less lifelike.
4. Scripts and Voiceovers
Luma: Luma does not write scripts or add voiceovers. It generates the visuals only. You bring audio and narration from another tool if your project needs them.
Im Video: InVideo AI automatically writes scripts and generates voiceovers. This saves time when you need a full video fast. It is a clear win for marketing and social media content.
5. Editing Tools
Luma: Luma offers advanced 3D editing tools. You can adjust lighting and camera angles in 3D. These customization options are powerful but have a steeper learning curve for beginners.
Im Video: InVideo uses a timeline interface for clip timing and drag-and-drop functionality. You can also edit through text commands. It is the easier tool for first-time video editing.
6. Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Luma: Luma requires prompt engineering to produce the desired effect. New users may feel afraid of the blank prompt box at first. Once you learn the rhythm, the speed of creating clips improves.
Im Video: InVideo offers a user friendly interface for beginners creating videos. Templates and text commands lower the barrier. Most people log in and ship a first video the same day.
7. Anwendungsfälle
Luma: Luma fits creative and cinematic projects. Think concept art, product shots, and short visual ideas where realism matters most. It is the best tool when you want one striking scene.
Im Video: InVideo is suitable for marketing and social media content creation. If you publish to a crowd on a schedule, its templates and stock footage keep the videos created flowing.
8. Collaboration and Access
Luma: Luma is browser based with companion apps. It is built more for solo creators than teams. There are fewer built-in collaboration features compared to InVideo.
Im Video: InVideo adds collaboration features on its higher plans. A small team can share projects and assets in one workspace. That makes it a stronger fit for agencies.
9. Preisgestaltung und Kosten
Lasst uns die Preispläne nebeneinander vergleichen.
| Planen | Luma | InVideo |
|---|---|---|
| Frei | $0 (150 sec/mo) | $0 |
| Eintritt bezahlt | 7,99 €/Monat | 28 $/Monat |
| Mittleres Niveau | 23,99 $/Monat | 50 $/Monat |
| Hohe Stufe | 75,99 $/Monat | 100 US-Dollar/Monat |
| Vollständiges Finanzmanagement | Kontaktieren Sie den Vertrieb. | 899 $/Monat |
Luma: Luma is the cheaper way in. Both tools use different pricing models based on usage. Luma’s basic plan costs about 20 cents for a 5-second video. For reference, Runway charges around $1.20 for the same clip, so Luma saves real money on volume.
Im Video: InVideo costs more per month at entry, but you get the templates, stock footage, and auto voiceovers in one place. The free and basic plans come with limited features and a watermark. For a marketing team, the higher bundle can be worth the higher paid plans.
Verschiedene Szenarien
| Falls Sie Folgendes benötigen: | Wählen | Warum |
|---|---|---|
| Günstigster Einstiegspreis | Luma | Paid plans from $7.99 |
| Realistic AI clips | Luma | Best photorealism and physics |
| Pre made templates | InVideo | Thousands ready to use |
| Stock footage | InVideo | 9M+ asset library |
| Beginner friendly start | InVideo | Easier interface |
💰 Ihr Budget
Luma is cheaper to start and cheaper per clip. If money is tight, the basic plan is the safer first step.
🔌 Dein Tech-Stack
Both run in a browser, so setup is simple. InVideo’s templates and stock footage reduce the need for extra apps.
📝 Ihr Content-Stil
Pick Luma for original, cinematic scenes. Pick InVideo for repeatable marketing videos built from templates.
🎓 Dein Erfahrungslevel
InVideo is friendlier for beginners. Luma rewards users who learn prompt engineering and want more control.
🆓 Kostenlose Testversionen und Demos
Both offer a free version. Test Luma’s 150 free seconds and InVideo’s free plan before you commit.
🛟 Supportoptionen
InVideo’s larger plans add team support and collaboration features. Solo creators on either tool rely mostly on docs and community help.
Umstellungsleitfaden
Nutzen Sie bereits eines dieser Tools? Hier erfahren Sie, was Sie beim Wechsel erwartet.
🔄 Switching from Luma to InVideo?
✅ Was Sie davon haben:
- Thousands of pre made templates
- A massive library of stock footage and music
- Auto scripts and voiceovers for full videos
❌ Was Sie verlieren werden:
- Photorealistic, physics-aware clips
- Image to video generation
- On-demand 3D asset creation
📋 So wechseln Sie:
- Download your finished Luma clips
- Create an InVideo account and pick a template
- Drop your clips into the timeline and add a script
🔄 Switching from InVideo to Luma?
✅ Was Sie davon haben:
- Realistic, cinematic video generation
- Image to video and 3D asset tools
- A lower entry price per clip
❌ Was Sie verlieren werden:
- Pre made templates and the stock footage library
- Auto scripts and voiceovers
- The easy, beginner-first interface
📋 So wechseln Sie:
- Export your InVideo project assets
- Create a Luma account and open Dream Machine
- Write prompts or upload an image to generate clips
What Our Review Didn’t Cover
This comparison focused on individual creators and small teams. We did not test large enterprise rollouts or InVideo’s $899 Team plan in depth. Our notes are based on the June 2026 versions, and features may change. If you generate hundreds of videos a month, your priorities may differ from what we covered here.
Endgültiges Urteil
| Kategorie | Gewinner |
|---|---|
| 💰 Preisgestaltung | Luma |
| 🎬 Realism & Quality | Luma |
| 🧩 Templates & Library | InVideo |
| 🎙️ Scripts & Voiceovers | InVideo |
| 👶 Benutzerfreundlichkeit | InVideo |
| 🧊 3D & Image to Video | Luma |
| 🏆 Gesamtsieger | Luma |
🏆 WINNER: LUMA
Luma wins 4 out of 6 categories.
Ideal für: realistic AI clips, image to video, cinematic ideas, budget creators
Luma and InVideo are two different kinds of KI-Videogeneratoren.
Luma is built for realistic, cinematic clips from prompts and images.
InVideo is built for template-driven marketing videos at scale.
InVideo is an excellent choice for social media teams who need templates and stock footage.
But if you want the most realistic video generation for the money, Luma is the better pick for most users.
Mehr von Luma im Vergleich
Here is how Luma stacks up against other competitors:
Luma gewinnt in folgender Kategorie: lower cost per clip (20 cents vs $1.20), photorealism, image to video
Runway gewinnt in: longer editing toolkit, mature feature set, more credits on its base plan
Luma gewinnt in folgender Kategorie: realism, physics handling, 3D asset generation
Pika gewinnt bei: playful effects, fast iterations, beginner-friendly prompts
Luma vs Sora
Luma gewinnt in folgender Kategorie: open access, cheaper entry, image to video flexibility
Sora gewinnt durch: longer clip lengths, scene consistency, broad creative range
Mehr von InVideo im Vergleich
Here is how InVideo stacks up against other competitors:
InVideo gewinnt in folgenden Kategorien: bigger template gallery, 9M asset library, lower entry price
Synthesia Siege bei: lifelike AI avatars, training video focus, polished spokesperson clips
InVideo vs Veed
InVideo gewinnt in folgenden Kategorien: prompt to multi-scene generation, auto voiceovers, template volume
Veed gewinnt bei: sharper subtitle tools, cleaner Podcast editing, simple screen recording
InVideo vs Fliki
InVideo gewinnt in folgenden Kategorien: richer template library, drag-and-drop editing, broader media assets
Fliki gewinnt durch: faster text to speech, more Stimme options, quick faceless video output
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Was macht Luma AI?
Luma AI generates short, realistic video clips from a text prompt or an image. It also creates custom 3D assets on demand and handles motion with natural movement.
Ist Luma AI kostenlos nutzbar?
Yes, there is a free plan. It gives 150 seconds of video per month for non-commercial use and adds a watermark. Paid plans start at $7.99.
Gibt es eine kostenlose Version von InVideo AI?
Yes. The free plan lets you test the editor, templates, and stock footage. Exports are limited and include a watermark until you upgrade to a paid plan.
Wer sind die Konkurrenten von Luma Labs?
The main rivals are Runway, Pika, Sora, and Kling. Each is an ai video generator, but Luma stands out for realistic visuals and a lower cost per clip.
Ist Canva or InVideo better?
Canva is better for quick graphics and simple edits. InVideo is the stronger tool for prompt-based video generation with templates and stock footage.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 