⚡ 간단 평가:
- 가격: Luma paid plans start at $7.99/mo. InVideo paid plans start at $28/mo. Both have a free plan.
- 다음과 같은 경우에 가장 적합합니다: Luma for cinematic, realistic AI 비디오 clips. InVideo for template-based marketing videos and social media content.
- 주요 차이점: Luma AI generates short clips from text and images. InVideo turns prompts into full multi-scene videos.
- 저희가 선택한 제품: Luma for most users who want realistic video generation. Its output quality is hard to match at this price.
Luma and InVideo both promise to help you create videos with AI.
But they are not the same kind of tool.
Luma AI makes short, realistic clips from a prompt or an image.
InVideo builds full marketing videos using templates and stock footage.
This Luma vs InVideo comparison shows which one fits your projects.
개요
이 비교에서는 가격, 기능 및 사용 편의성을 다룹니다.
We also break down who each ai video 발전기 ~에 가장 적합합니다.
Our writers spent hands-on time with both tools.
해당 내용은 아래 '우리 팀이 발견한 사항' 섹션에 나와 있습니다.
By the end, you will know which tool to pick.
루마란 무엇인가요?
Luma AI is an ai video generator from Luma Labs.
It turns a text prompt or an image into a short video clip.
The platform also generates custom 3D assets on demand.
It ranks with Runway and 피카 as the top ai tools for video today.
Luma is known for photorealism and a real sense of physics.
The artificial intelligence behind it reads your prompt and builds the scene.
This technology keeps improving with each model update.
Each video runs 5 seconds and can extend up to 10 seconds.
Watch the quick review below before we go deeper.
루마
Luma AI creates cinematic, realistic clips from text and images. The Dream Machine engine handles motion and natural movement well. A free plan lets you test it first.
루마 가격
Here is what Luma costs in 2026. Let’s break it down.
| 계획 | 가격 | 가장 적합한 대상 |
|---|---|---|
| 무료 | $0 | Testing with 150 free seconds monthly |
| 라이트 | 월 7.99달러 | Hobbyists and light creators |
| 을 더한 | 월 23.99달러 | 일반 동영상 제작자 |
| 제한 없는 | 월 75.99달러 | 헤비 유저 및 소규모 팀 |
| 기업 | 영업 담당자에게 문의하세요. | Large teams and custom needs |
Pricing verified June 2026.
무료 체험: Yes. The free plan gives you 150 seconds of video per month with no credit card needed.
환불 보장: Refund terms follow standard subscription policy. Check before you buy.
📌 메모: Luma’s basic plan works out to about 20 cents for a 5-second video. That makes it cheaper than 통로, which costs around $1.20 for the same length.
⚠️ 경고: The free plan is for non-commercial use and adds a watermark. You need a paid plan to remove it.
Luma의 주요 이점
Here is what makes Luma worth considering:
- Photorealism: Luma excels at realistic visuals and understands physics in a scene. The result looks closer to reality than most rivals.
- Dream Machine: This engine drives the video generation. It handles natural movement and motion with impressive detail.
- Text to Video and Image to Video: Type a prompt or upload an image. Luma builds a clip from either input.
- On-Demand 3D: Luma AI generates unique 3D models based on your prompts. You can adjust lighting and camera angles in 3D.
- 무료 이용 가능: The free version gives 150 seconds monthly. That is enough to discover what the tool can do.
- Browser Based: Luma runs in your browser. There are also apps for quick access on the go.
우리 팀이 발견한 점
우리의 작가 signed up for Luma and spent several days creating clips. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:
루마의 장점과 단점
✅ 장점
- Realistic visuals with a strong grasp of physics and natural movement
- Cheaper per clip than Runway for short videos
- Free plan with 150 seconds of video each month
- Generates custom 3D assets and models on demand
❌ 단점
- Clips are limited to 10 seconds, so longer projects need stitching
- Requires prompt engineering to get the best results
- Free plan is non-commercial and adds a watermark
InVideo란 무엇인가요?
InVideo is an ai video generator built for marketing content.
You type a prompt and it turns it into a multi-scene video.
InVideo AI writes the script and generates voiceovers for you.
It ships with thousands of pre made templates to start fast.
The user friendly interface makes it easy for beginners.
Here is a short review of the platform in action.
인비디오
InVideo turns text prompts into full videos. It pairs a massive library of stock footage with pre made templates. Great for social media and marketing.
InVideo 가격 책정
Here is what InVideo costs in 2026. Let’s break it down.
| 계획 | 가격 | 가장 적합한 대상 |
|---|---|---|
| 무료 | $0 | Trying basic features with watermarks |
| 을 더한 | 월 28달러 | 개인 창작자 및 소규모 프로젝트 |
| 맥스 | 월 50달러 | Frequent video creators |
| 생성적 | 월 100달러 | Heavy AI generation users |
| 팀 | 월 899달러 | Larger teams needing collaboration features |
Pricing verified June 2026.
무료 체험: Yes. The free plan lets you test the editor and templates before you pay.
환불 보장: InVideo follows standard subscription refund terms. Read them before buying.
📌 메모: The free plan and lower paid plans cap exports and add a watermark. Higher plans unlock more AI generation and the full media library.
⚠️ 경고: The jump from the Generative plan to the Team plan is steep. Solo creators rarely need the Team tier.
InVideo의 주요 이점
Here is what makes InVideo worth considering:
- 방대한 라이브러리: InVideo offers a vast library of 9 million premium media assets. You get stock footage, images, and music tracks in one place.
- Pre Made Templates: Thousands of templates cover most video types. Pick one and swap in your own footage.
- 텍스트를 영상으로 변환: InVideo AI is designed to turn prompts into structured multi-scene videos with little effort.
- Auto Scripts and Voiceovers: The AI writes scripts and adds voiceovers. You can edit through simple text commands.
- 간편한 편집: A timeline interface and drag-and-drop functionality keep editing simple. Beginners pick it up fast.
- Range of Features: Subtitles, language support, and AI avatars add useful additional features for marketers.
우리 팀이 발견한 점
Our writer used InVideo to build a few marketing clips. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:
InVideo의 장점과 단점
✅ 장점
- Massive library of 9 million stock footage, images, and music assets
- Thousands of pre made templates speed up creating videos
- User friendly interface that beginners learn quickly
- Auto scripts, voiceovers, and text-based editing
❌ 단점
- AI clips can look lower quality than Luma’s realistic output
- Paid plans start higher than Luma’s basic plan
- The Team plan price is a big jump for small projects
기능 비교
Ready to dive into a detailed comparison of Luma vs InVideo?
We will explore eight key features. This helps you see which platform suits your needs and which one gives the best results.
| 특징 | 루마 | 인비디오 |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (paid) | 월 7.99달러 | 월 28달러 |
| 무료 플랜 | ✅ | ✅ |
| 텍스트를 영상으로 변환 | ✅ | ✅ |
| 이미지를 동영상으로 변환 | ✅ | ❌ |
| Pre Made Templates | ❌ | ✅ |
| 스톡 영상 라이브러리 | ❌ | ✅ (9M+) |
| 3D Asset Generation | ✅ | ❌ |
| Auto Voiceover | ❌ | ✅ |
| 가장 적합한 대상 | Realistic AI clips | 마케팅 영상 |
1. Video Generation
루마: Luma AI focuses on cinematic generative video clips. It builds 3D content from text prompts and produces realistic visuals. The Dream Machine engine handles motion and natural movement with care. Output runs at 1360×752 pixels.
인비디오: InVideo creates 2D video content from written scripts. It turns a prompt into a structured multi-scene video. The focus is finished marketing content rather than a single realistic scene.
⚠️ 경고: Luma clips top out at 10 seconds. For a long marketing video, you would stitch clips or use InVideo instead.
2. Templates and Stock Footage
루마: Luma has no template gallery and no stock footage library. You start from a prompt or an image every time. That suits original ideas but slows down repeatable, templated work.
인비디오: InVideo ships with thousands of pre made templates. It also offers a massive library of 9 million premium assets, including stock footage, images, and music. You rarely need outside footage.
3. Realism and Visual Quality
루마: This is where Luma pulls ahead. The AI understands physics, so objects move in a way that feels close to reality. The realistic, impressive output is the main reason people pick this tool. Many users call it the 최고의 AI 비디오 생성기 for professional quality videos. As an example, a single product clip can look studio-shot. Each video generated has the ability to mimic real camera depth.
인비디오: InVideo’s AI scenes can look lower quality next to Luma. The platform leans on stock footage to fill the gap and still ships professional looking videos. For a polished human presenter, its AI avatars help but still feel less lifelike.
4. Scripts and Voiceovers
루마: Luma does not write scripts or add voiceovers. It generates the visuals only. You bring audio and narration from another tool if your project needs them.
인비디오: InVideo AI automatically writes scripts and generates voiceovers. This saves time when you need a full video fast. It is a clear win for marketing and social media content.
5. Editing Tools
루마: Luma offers advanced 3D editing tools. You can adjust lighting and camera angles in 3D. These customization options are powerful but have a steeper learning curve for beginners.
인비디오: InVideo uses a timeline interface for clip timing and drag-and-drop functionality. You can also edit through text commands. It is the easier tool for first-time video editing.
6. 사용 편의성
루마: Luma requires prompt engineering to produce the desired effect. New users may feel afraid of the blank prompt box at first. Once you learn the rhythm, the speed of creating clips improves.
인비디오: InVideo offers a user friendly interface for beginners creating videos. Templates and text commands lower the barrier. Most people log in and ship a first video the same day.
7. 사용 사례
루마: Luma fits creative and cinematic projects. Think concept art, product shots, and short visual ideas where realism matters most. It is the best tool when you want one striking scene.
인비디오: InVideo is suitable for marketing and social media content creation. If you publish to a crowd on a schedule, its templates and stock footage keep the videos created flowing.
8. Collaboration and Access
루마: Luma is browser based with companion apps. It is built more for solo creators than teams. There are fewer built-in collaboration features compared to InVideo.
인비디오: InVideo adds collaboration features on its higher plans. A small team can share projects and assets in one workspace. That makes it a stronger fit for agencies.
9. 가격 및 비용
요금제를 나란히 비교해 보겠습니다.
| 계획 | 루마 | 인비디오 |
|---|---|---|
| 무료 | $0 (150 sec/mo) | $0 |
| 입장료 지불됨 | 월 7.99달러 | 월 28달러 |
| 중급 | 월 23.99달러 | 월 50달러 |
| 상위 등급 | 월 75.99달러 | 월 100달러 |
| 최상위 | 영업 담당자에게 문의하세요. | 월 899달러 |
루마: Luma is the cheaper way in. Both tools use different pricing models based on usage. Luma’s basic plan costs about 20 cents for a 5-second video. For reference, Runway charges around $1.20 for the same clip, so Luma saves real money on volume.
인비디오: InVideo costs more per month at entry, but you get the templates, stock footage, and auto voiceovers in one place. The free and basic plans come with limited features and a watermark. For a marketing team, the higher bundle can be worth the higher paid plans.
다양한 시나리오
| 필요하시면 | 선택하다 | 왜 |
|---|---|---|
| 가장 저렴한 진입 가격 | 루마 | Paid plans from $7.99 |
| Realistic AI clips | 루마 | Best photorealism and physics |
| Pre made templates | 인비디오 | Thousands ready to use |
| Stock footage | 인비디오 | 9M+ asset library |
| Beginner friendly start | 인비디오 | Easier interface |
💰 예산
Luma is cheaper to start and cheaper per clip. If money is tight, the basic plan is the safer first step.
🔌 사용 중인 기술 스택
Both run in a browser, so setup is simple. InVideo’s templates and stock footage reduce the need for extra apps.
📝 콘텐츠 스타일
Pick Luma for original, cinematic scenes. Pick InVideo for repeatable marketing videos built from templates.
🎓 귀하의 경험 수준
InVideo is friendlier for beginners. Luma rewards users who learn prompt engineering and want more control.
🆓 무료 체험 및 데모
Both offer a free version. Test Luma’s 150 free seconds and InVideo’s free plan before you commit.
🛟 지원 옵션
InVideo’s larger plans add team support and collaboration features. Solo creators on either tool rely mostly on docs and community help.
전환 가이드
이미 이러한 도구 중 하나를 사용하고 계신가요? 전환 시 기대할 수 있는 사항은 다음과 같습니다.
🔄 Switching from Luma to InVideo?
✅ 얻게 될 이점:
- Thousands of pre made templates
- A massive library of stock footage and music
- Auto scripts and voiceovers for full videos
❌ 잃게 될 것:
- Photorealistic, physics-aware clips
- Image to video generation
- On-demand 3D asset creation
📋 전환 방법:
- Download your finished Luma clips
- Create an InVideo account and pick a template
- Drop your clips into the timeline and add a script
🔄 Switching from InVideo to Luma?
✅ 얻게 될 이점:
- Realistic, cinematic video generation
- Image to video and 3D asset tools
- A lower entry price per clip
❌ 잃게 될 것:
- Pre made templates and the stock footage library
- Auto scripts and voiceovers
- The easy, beginner-first interface
📋 전환 방법:
- Export your InVideo project assets
- Create a Luma account and open Dream Machine
- Write prompts or upload an image to generate clips
저희 리뷰에서 다루지 않은 내용
This comparison focused on individual creators and small teams. We did not test large enterprise rollouts or InVideo’s $899 Team plan in depth. Our notes are based on the June 2026 versions, and features may change. If you generate hundreds of videos a month, your priorities may differ from what we covered here.
최종 판결
| 범주 | 우승자 |
|---|---|
| 💰 가격 | 루마 |
| 🎬 Realism & Quality | 루마 |
| 🧩 Templates & Library | 인비디오 |
| 🎙️ Scripts & Voiceovers | 인비디오 |
| 👶 사용 편의성 | 인비디오 |
| 🧊 3D & Image to Video | 루마 |
| 🏆 종합 우승 | 루마 |
🏆 WINNER: LUMA
Luma wins 4 out of 6 categories.
다음과 같은 경우에 가장 적합합니다: realistic AI clips, image to video, cinematic ideas, budget creators
Luma and InVideo are two different kinds of AI 비디오 생성기.
Luma is built for realistic, cinematic clips from prompts and images.
InVideo is built for template-driven marketing videos at scale.
InVideo is an excellent choice for social media teams who need templates and stock footage.
But if you want the most realistic video generation for the money, Luma is the better pick for most users.
루마 비교
Here is how Luma stacks up against other competitors:
루마는 다음에서 승리합니다: lower cost per clip (20 cents vs $1.20), photorealism, image to video
런웨이 우승: longer editing toolkit, mature feature set, more credits on its base plan
루마는 다음에서 승리합니다: realism, physics handling, 3D asset generation
피카가 승리한 항목: playful effects, fast iterations, beginner-friendly prompts
루마 vs 소라
루마는 다음에서 승리합니다: open access, cheaper entry, image to video flexibility
소라가 승리한 경기: longer clip lengths, scene consistency, broad creative range
InVideo와 비교했을 때 더 많은 내용이 있습니다.
Here is how InVideo stacks up against other competitors:
InVideo가 다음 부문에서 승리했습니다: bigger template gallery, 9M asset library, lower entry price
신세시아 승리 항목: lifelike AI avatars, training video focus, polished spokesperson clips
인비디오 vs 비드
InVideo가 다음 부문에서 승리했습니다: prompt to multi-scene generation, auto voiceovers, template volume
Veed는 다음에서 승리합니다: sharper subtitle tools, cleaner 팟캐스트 editing, simple screen recording
인비디오 vs 플리키
InVideo가 다음 부문에서 승리했습니다: richer template library, drag-and-drop editing, broader media assets
Fliki가 승리한 경기: faster text to speech, more 목소리 options, quick faceless video output
자주 묻는 질문
Luma AI는 무엇을 하는 회사인가요?
Luma AI generates short, realistic video clips from a text prompt or an image. It also creates custom 3D assets on demand and handles motion with natural movement.
Luma AI는 무료로 사용할 수 있나요?
Yes, there is a free plan. It gives 150 seconds of video per month for non-commercial use and adds a watermark. Paid plans start at $7.99.
InVideo AI의 무료 버전이 있나요?
Yes. The free plan lets you test the editor, templates, and stock footage. Exports are limited and include a watermark until you upgrade to a paid plan.
루마랩스의 경쟁사는 누구인가요?
The main rivals are Runway, Pika, Sora, and 클링. Each is an ai video generator, but Luma stands out for realistic visuals and a lower cost per clip.
~이다 캔버스 or InVideo better?
Canva is better for quick graphics and simple edits. InVideo is the stronger tool for prompt-based video generation with templates and stock footage.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 