⚡ 快速结论：
- 定价： Make has a free plan and paid plans from $9/month. n8n Cloud starts at $20/month.
- 最适合： Make suits non technical users and 小型企业. n8n suits developers and technical teams.
- 主要区别： n8n lets you self host and write code. Make keeps everything visual in the cloud.
- 我们的选择： Make for most people. It is cheaper to start and easier to learn.
n8n and Make both promise to automate tasks you hate doing by hand.
They look alike at first glance.
Both use a visual canvas where you link apps together.
但它们是为截然不同的人群设计的。
Make is a no code automation tool for everyday 商业 用户。
n8n is a workflow automation platform for people who get their hands dirty with code.
概述
This n8n vs Make comparison covers pricing, key features, ease of use, and data control.
We reviewed documentation, pricing pages, and G2 reviews for both tools.
我们的撰稿人也亲自体验了每一项功能。
这些笔记出现在下面的“我们的团队注意到”部分中。
Want to dig deeper? Each section below covers one area.
By the end, you will know which tool fits your automation journey.
n8n是什么？
n8n is an open, node-based workflow automation tool.
Each node in an n8n workflow does one job, like sending an email.
You chain nodes together to connect apps and move data between different platforms.
It works as a no code builder, but you can drop in custom code anytime.
That mix makes it popular with developers and technical teams.
这里有一个平台快速演示视频。
n8n
Build automations with code when you need it. Self-host to keep your own data private.
n8n 定价
Here is what n8n Cloud costs in 2026.
| 计划 | 价格 | 最适合 |
|---|---|---|
| 起动机 | 每月20美元 | Solo builders testing cloud workflows |
| 专业版 | 每月 50 美元 | Teams running more complex projects |
| 企业 | 定制定价 | Large enterprises needing SSO and air gapped deployments |
Pricing verified October 2026.
免费试用： n8n Cloud offers a free trial on the starter plan. The Community Edition is free if you self host.
退款保证： n8n does not advertise a set refund window. Check terms before you upgrade.
📌 笔记： n8n charges per workflow run, not per step. A 3-node workflow and a 30-node workflow cost the same. Cloud plans never charge for workflow complexity.
⚠️ 警告： Self-hosting is free, but servers are not. Your real cost depends on your hosting and the time spent maintaining your instance.
Key Benefits of n8n
Here is what makes n8n worth a look:
- Full Control of Data: Self-host with Docker or Kubernetes. Sensitive data stays behind your own firewall.
- 合规准备就绪： Self-hosting helps with GDPR, HIPAA, and SOC 2 rules. You decide where data lives.
- Real Code When Needed: Write JavaScript or Python code inside any workflow. Self-hosted setups can even add npm packages.
- AI Agent Nodes: Built-in nodes for LangChain, vector databases, and OpenAI. You can build context-aware agent workflows.
- 公平定价模式： You pay for successful executions, not individual steps. Big workflows stay cheap.
- Source Code You Can See: The fair code license keeps the source visible. You can inspect and modify it.
我们的团队注意到了什么
我们的 作家 signed up for n8n Cloud and built a few automations for content research. Here is what stood out:
n8n Pros & Cons
✅ 优点
- Self-host for free with the Community Edition
- Run JavaScript and Python inside workflows
- Pricing per execution, not per step
- Strong AI agent and LangChain nodes
❌缺点
- No free cloud plan
- Fewer native integrations than Make
- Needs technical know how for advanced setups
什么是 Make？
Make is a powerful automation platform that runs in the cloud.
You build “scenarios” by dragging app modules onto a canvas.
It connects over 2,000 apps without writing code.
Filters, routers, and conditional logic let scenarios branch and loop.
自由职业者, small businesses, and large enterprises all use it.
This short video shows the Make app in action.
制作
Build visual automations without code. Start free and scale as you grow.
制定价格
Make has five pricing plans, including a forever-free tier.
| 计划 | 价格 | 最适合 |
|---|---|---|
| 自由的 | 每月 0 美元 | Learning and simple workflows |
| 核 | 每月9美元 | Freelancers with steady automations |
| 专业版 | 每月16美元 | Power users needing advanced features |
| 团队 | 每月 29 美元 | Teams sharing scenarios |
| 企业 | 定制定价 | 大型组织 |
Pricing verified October 2026.
免费试用： There is no separate trial. The free plan works as a permanent trial.
退款保证： Make has no default refund policy. It reviews refunds case by case.
📌 笔记： Paid prices above are billed annually. Monthly billing costs $10.59 for Core, $18.82 for Pro, and $34.12 for Teams.
⚠️ 警告： Make’s pricing model counts every operation. Each module step uses one, so heavy scenarios hit your monthly limit fast.
Key Benefits of Make
Here is why Make wins over so many beginners:
- Visual Approach: A clean drag and drop interface shows exactly how data flows. You can see every path at a glance.
- Extensive Integration Capabilities: More than 2,000 apps connect out of the box. The HTTP module covers the rest.
- Advanced Logic Without Code: Iterators, aggregators, filters, and error handling come built in. You build complex logic visually.
- 经济实惠： Most paid plans run $9 to $29. G2 reviews often call it cost effective next to Zapier.
- Huge Learning Library: Docs, tutorials, and an active community help when you get stuck.
- Unlimited Apps Per Scenario: One scenario can link as many apps as you need.
我们的团队注意到了什么
Our writer used Make to automate social posts and lead capture for a client site. Here is what stood out:
Make Pros & Cons
✅ 优点
- 免费方案永久有效
- Over 2,000 app integrations
- Clear visual workflow builder
- Paid plans start at $9 per month
❌缺点
- Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
- Operations-based billing can add up
- No self-hosting option
功能对比
Both tools help you automate workflows across various applications. The real gap shows up in how much control you want. Here are ten areas where they differ.
| 特征 | n8n | 制作 |
|---|---|---|
| 起价 | 每月20美元 | 0 美元（免费方案） |
| 免费计划 | ❌ (free self-host) | ✅ |
| 自托管 | ✅ | ❌ |
| Custom Code (JS/Python) | ✅ | ❌ (HTTP and built-in functions only) |
| 原生集成 | 400+ | 2,000+ |
| 人工智能代理 | ✅ | ✅ |
| Error Handling | ✅ | ✅ |
| 模板 | ✅ | ✅ |
| 最适合 | Developers and technical teams | Non-technical users and small teams |
1. 可视化工作流构建器
n8n： n8n uses a node-based canvas. Every workflow starts with a trigger node, then flows through action nodes. It supports loops and branching paths, though the interface feels more technical.
制作： Make’s visual builder is the cleaner of the two. Modules sit in circles, and routers split data into multi step workflows. Beginners find it easier to follow at a glance. Most people build workflows here within minutes.
2. AI Agents and Agentic Workflows
n8n： In 2026, n8n links with LLMs to build agents that reason, summarize, and act across systems. Dedicated nodes cover LangChain, vector stores, and OpenAI. It is a strong pick for building agentic systems with memory.
制作： Make AI Agents let you add AI capabilities inside a normal scenario. You describe a goal, and the agent picks which tools to run. It is simpler to set up but offers less low-level control.
Make also supports agentic automation across your existing scenarios.
3. Integrations and API Access
n8n： n8n offers over 400 integrations, including Notion, LinkedIn, and Google Sheets. You must set up credentials for each service. For anything missing, the HTTP Request node handles http requests to any API.
制作： Make connects more than 2,000 apps, so your favorite apps are likely already there. Its HTTP app supports custom API calls for third party services without a native module. Syncing data between tools takes a few clicks.
4. Custom Code and Developer Control
n8n： This is where n8n pulls ahead. You can write JavaScript or Python code in a Code node. Self-hosted users can add npm packages for extra functionality. It even works for SaaS backend prototyping.
制作： Make avoids writing code by design. You get built-in functions for 文本, dates, and math. That is enough for most business workflows, but developers may feel boxed in.
5. Error Handling and Debugging
n8n： n8n lets you build full error-handling subflows. You can replay a failed execution with the same data. Clear error messages show which node broke and why. That matters for complex automation running on real time data.
制作： Make has built-in error handlers like 恢复, Ignore, and Rollback. You attach them to any module. It is powerful, but setting it up takes some practice.
⚠️ 警告： Neither tool fixes bad logic for you. Test each automation workflow with sample data before it touches live customers.
6. Business Use Cases
n8n： Here are a few examples of what n8n handles well: web scraping, automated reports, and data syncs. It can also send notifications when a trigger fires. Workflows run manually or on a schedule.
制作： Make shines at marketing, sales, and finance tasks. Think social posting, inventory updates, and e commerce order flows. It also handles customer interactions and invoices.
Finance teams can push invoices through approval without manual entry.
7. 模板
n8n： n8n’s library lists 5103 automation templates. Many come from its active community, so quality varies. They are great for learning how nodes fit together.
制作： Make’s Templates Gallery is polished and easy to 浏览. You pick a template, connect accounts, and go. It is a fast way to start creating automations.
8. Self-Hosting and Data Control
n8n： You can self host n8n on your own servers with Docker Compose or Kubernetes. Setup can take under a minute with Docker. The n8n AI Starter Kit also runs as a Docker container. You also gain the ability to tune server speed yourself.
制作： Make is cloud-only. You cannot run it on your own hardware. That is fine for most small teams, but strict industries may need more.
9. 安全与合规
n8n： Self-hosting keeps data inside your firewall, which helps with GDPR, HIPAA, and SOC 2. Enterprise adds SSO and advanced permissions, enabling tighter access rules. You get full control over every deployment.
制作： Make handles security on its own cloud. Enterprise plans add stronger admin controls for large teams. It also automates sensitive document flows like contracts.
10. 定价与成本
| 计划 | n8n | 制作 |
|---|---|---|
| 自由的 | ❌ (Community Edition self-host) | Free: $0 per month |
| 入口 | Starter: $20 per month | Core: $9 per month |
| 中 | Pro: $50 per month | Pro: $16 per month |
| 团队 | — | Teams: $29 per month |
| 企业 | 定制定价 | 定制定价 |
n8n： n8n bills per execution, so complex workflows cost the same as simple tasks. That makes it cost effective at scale. The Pro plan suits growing teams, and self-hosting is free apart from server costs.
制作： Make is cheaper to start and has a real free plan. But every operation counts, so busy scenarios can push you to a higher paid plan. There are no hidden fees beyond that.
不同场景
| 如果您需要…… | 选择 | 为什么 |
|---|---|---|
| 预算紧张 | 制作 | Free plan, paid from $9/month |
| 自托管 | n8n | Run it on your own servers |
| Custom code | n8n | JavaScript and Python nodes |
| 大多数集成 | 制作 | 2,000+ apps |
| Strict compliance | n8n | Data stays in your firewall |
| 适合初学者的设置 | 制作 | Cleaner visual builder |
💰 您的预算
Make costs less to start and offers a free plan. n8n gets cheaper for heavy, multi-node workflows.
🔌 您的技术栈
Make covers more apps natively. n8n fills gaps with code and API integrations.
⚙️ Your Workflow Style
Pick Make for simple workflows built visually. Pick n8n for more complex workflows with real code.
🎓您的经验水平
Make needs no coding expertise for basic features. n8n rewards people who are comfortable with code.
🆓 免费试用和演示
Make’s free plan lets you test real scenarios. With n8n, try the cloud trial or self-host the free edition.
🛟 支持选项
Make offers documentation, tutorials, and customer support by plan. n8n leans on its community forum and paid enterprise support.
切换指南
已经在使用这些工具了吗？如果您切换到其他工具，可能会遇到以下情况。
🔄 Switching from n8n to Make?
✅ 你将获得：
- A free cloud plan with no servers to manage
- Over 2,000 native integrations
- An easier builder for non-coders on your team
❌ 你会失去什么：
- Self-hosting and full data control
- JavaScript and Python Code nodes
- Flat pricing per execution
📋 如何切换：
- Export and document your n8n workflows
- Create a free Make account
- Rebuild each workflow as a Make scenario
🔄 Switching from Make to n8n?
✅ 你将获得：
- Freedom to self host and keep data private
- Custom code inside any workflow
- No charge for workflow complexity
❌ 你会失去什么：
- The forever-free cloud plan
- Some native app modules
- Make’s simpler visual builder
📋 如何切换：
- List your Make scenarios and connected apps
- Start an n8n Cloud trial or install with Docker
- Recreate each scenario using nodes
我们的评测没有涵盖的内容
This comparison focused on solo users and small teams. We did not test Enterprise SSO, air-gapped installs, or high-volume load. Features reflect October 2026 versions and may change. If you manage hundreds of workflows, your needs may differ.
最终判决
| 类别 | 优胜者 |
|---|---|
| 💰 定价 | 制作 |
| 👶 易用性 | 制作 |
| 🔌 集成 | 制作 |
| 🎨 Visual Builder | 制作 |
| 🛟 Support & Learning | 制作 |
| 🤖人工智能代理 | n8n |
| 💻 自定义代码 | n8n |
| 🔒 Self-Hosting & Data Control | n8n |
| 🏆 总冠军 | 制作 |
🏆 WINNER: MAKE
Make wins 5 out of 8 categories.
最适合： Small businesses, marketers, and non-coders
Make is the better pick for most people. It is cheaper to start, covers more apps, and keeps everything visual. You can run real automations on the free plan.
n8n is the stronger tool for developers. Want to self host, write code, or build AI agents? It gives you more power. Its per-execution pricing also helps at scale.
Either tool can make life easier by cutting manual work. Start with Make if you are new. If you are interested in self-hosting later, move to n8n.
More of n8n Compared
Here is how n8n stacks up against other automation platforms:
n8n 与 Zapier
n8n 获胜： self-hosting, code nodes, and flat per-execution pricing.
Zapier 在以下方面胜出： a simpler linear setup, a bigger app library, and quicker onboarding.
n8n 对比 帕布利
n8n 获胜： branching logic, AI agent nodes, and open source code.
Pabbly Connect wins on: lifetime-deal pricing, no server upkeep, and an easier start.
n8n 对比 口香糖环
n8n 获胜： data ownership, deeper integrations, and code freedom.
Gumloop 赢得： AI-first templates, a friendlier canvas, and less setup.
More of Make Compared
Here is how Make stacks up against other automation platforms:
Make vs Zapier
赢得比赛： branching routers, operations-based pricing, and finer data control.
Zapier 在以下方面胜出： an intuitive UI, a larger app list, and quick task setups.
Make vs Pabbly Connect
赢得比赛： more native apps, stronger error handling, and a richer template gallery.
Pabbly Connect wins on: one-time pricing options, simpler menus, and predictable bills.
Make vs MindStudio
赢得比赛： general app automation, wider integrations, and a mature builder.
MindStudio wins on: AI agent design, prompt tooling, and AI-only use cases.
常见问题解答
n8n 是做什么用的？
n8n connects apps and automates tasks like data syncs, reports, notifications, and web scraping. Developers also use it to build AI agents with custom JavaScript or Python.
n8n 完全免费吗？
The self-hosted Community Edition is free, but you pay for servers. n8n Cloud starts at $20 per month, with Pro at $50 per month.
Make.com 的费用是多少？
Make has a free plan. Paid plans cost $9 (Core), $16 (Pro), and $29 (Teams) per month billed annually. Enterprise uses custom pricing.
Make.com 难用吗？
Simple scenarios are easy to build. Advanced routers, iterators, and error handlers take practice. Expect a learning curve as workflows grow.
Which one is better, Make or n8n?
Make is better for beginners and small budgets. n8n is better for developers who want self-hosting, custom code, and deeper AI agent control.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 