

⚡ 간단 평가:
- 가격: Make starts at $9 per month. Lutra starts at $23/month, billed annually.
- 다음과 같은 경우에 가장 적합합니다: Make for multi step workflows across many apps. Lutra for data enrichment and web research.
- 주요 차이점: Make uses a visual builder. Lutra takes requests in plain English.
- 저희가 선택한 제품: Make for most people. It costs less and handles far more workflow types.

Make and Lutra both promise to automate tasks you hate doing by hand.
But they come at the problem from opposite ends.
Make gives you a canvas and lets you draw your workflow.
Lutra lets you type what you want and builds the steps for you.
One rewards patience. The other rewards clear instructions.
개요
This Make vs Lutra comparison covers pricing, key features, ease of use, and 보안.
저희는 두 제품 모두의 문서, 가격표, 사용자 리뷰를 검토했습니다. 오토메이션 플랫폼.
저희 작가들은 각각의 제품을 직접 다루는 데에도 시간을 할애했습니다.
해당 내용은 아래 '우리 팀이 발견한 사항' 섹션에 나와 있습니다.
Want to dig deeper? Each tool has a full review linked below.
Make란 무엇인가요?
Make is a no code 오토메이션 플랫폼.
It connects your favorite apps so data moves between them on its own.
You build each workflow on a visual canvas, without writing code.

It links actions across various applications, more than 2,000 in all.
프리랜서, small businesses, and large enterprises all use it.
Here’s a quick look at how the Make app works.

만들다
Build complex automation on a visual canvas. Route data with filters, routers, and conditional logic. Start free and upgrade when you outgrow it.
가격 책정하기
Make’s pricing model is based on operations. Each step a workflow runs counts toward your monthly limit.
| 계획 | 가격 | 가장 적합한 대상 |
|---|---|---|
| 무료 | 월 0달러 | Simple workflows and learning the builder |
| 핵심 | 월 9달러 | Solo users running steady automations |
| 찬성 | 월 16달러 | 고급 기능을 필요로 하는 파워 유저 |
| 팀 | 월 29달러 | Teams sharing scenarios and roles |
| 기업 | 맞춤 가격 책정 | 보안이 필요한 대기업 |
Pricing verified October 2026.

무료 체험: There is no separate trial. The free plan works as a permanent trial, with no credit card needed.
환불 보장: Make doesn’t offer refunds by default. It reviews requests case by case.
📌 메모: Prices above reflect annual billing. Paying monthly costs $10.59 for Core, $18.82 for Pro, and $34.12 for Teams.
⚠️ 경고: There are no hidden fees, but operations add up fast. Creating automations is free, yet each run of a ten-step scenario uses ten operations.
Key Benefits of Make
Here’s what makes Make worth considering:
- 시각적 워크플로 빌더: You drag modules onto a canvas and link them. You see every path your data takes.
- Extensive Integration Capabilities: Make works with thousands of apps. You can add as many apps as you need to one workflow.
- Complex Logic Without Code: Iterators, aggregators, routers, and filters come built in. No coding expertise is required.
- Custom API Calls: Can’t find an app? The HTTP module sends HTTP requests to almost any third party services.
- 오류 처리: You decide what happens when a step fails. Clear error messages show where things broke.
- 대규모 커뮤니티: Make has deep documentation, tutorials, and an active forum. Help is easy to find as you build workflows.

우리 팀이 발견한 점
Our writer used Make to move form leads into Google Sheets and a CRM직접 체험하면서 가장 눈에 띄었던 점은 다음과 같습니다.

Make Pros & Cons
✅ 장점
- Paid plans start at just $9 per month
- Visual canvas shows every branch and filter
- Handles branching, loops, and error routes
- HTTP module connects apps without native support
❌ 단점
- Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
- Operation counts can be hard to predict
- Refunds are only handled case by case
루트라란 무엇인가요?
Lutra AI is an intelligent 어시스턴트 for work across multiple applications.
You describe a job in natural language, and it carries it out.
It specializes in data enrichment, research, and 이메일 관리.

Jiquan Ngiam and Bo Zhi See created it to cut app-switching.
The company calls it the first productivity agent for your whole workspace.
Watch Lutra handle a real request in this walkthrough.

루트라
Type a task and let the AI agent do the clicking. It can fill spreadsheets, enrich leads, and draft emails for you.
Loading...
Lutra uses a credit system. Every account gets monthly credits that refresh on their own.
| 계획 | 가격 | 가장 적합한 대상 |
|---|---|---|
| 무료 | $0 | Trying a few simple tasks |
| 필수적인 | Loading... | Solo users with regular research jobs |
| 전문적인 | Loading... | Heavy enrichment and outreach work |
| 기업 | 맞춤 가격 책정 | Companies needing SSO and 심사 트레일 |
Pricing verified October 2026.

무료 체험: The free plan lets you test Lutra with a small credit allowance.
환불 보장: Lutra doesn’t advertise a set refund window. Ask support before you commit to annual billing.
📌 메모: Not all tasks cost the same. Web searches and data enrichment burn more credits than simple actions.
⚠️ 경고: Paid plan prices are for annual billing. Check your credit use on the free plan first.
Key Benefits of Lutra
Here’s what makes Lutra worth considering:
- Natural Language Automation: You type what you need. Lutra builds and runs the steps.
- Runs Actual Code: Lutra executes real code behind each task. That helps ensure consistent outcomes every run.
- 심층 통합: It plugs into Google Workspace, Microsoft, Slack, HubSpot, and many other apps.
- 데이터 보안: Lutra is SOC 2 Type II certified with end-to-end encryption. It doesn’t store data long-term unless you ask.
- 플레이북: Save a task, then share it with your team. This helps standardize processes across a company.
- 예정된 실행: Workflows can run on a schedule, even when you’re offline.

우리 팀이 발견한 점
우리의 작가 signed up for Lutra and asked it to pull and enrich lead lists. Here’s what stood out:

Lutra Pros & Cons
✅ 장점
- Plain-English requests replace manual setup
- Strong at research, scraping, and enrichment
- SOC 2 Type II certified security
- Playbooks make good tasks repeatable
❌ 단점
- Paid plans cost more than Make’s
- Credit burn is uneven across task types
- Smaller app list than dedicated automation tools
기능 비교
Make is a workflow builder. Lutra is an AI agent that does work for you. Here’s how they compare across ten areas.
| 특징 | 만들다 | 루트라 |
|---|---|---|
| 시작 가격 | 월 9달러 | $23/month (annual) |
| 무료 플랜 | ✅ | ✅ |
| Visual Drag and Drop Builder | ✅ | ❌ |
| AI 에이전트 | ✅ | ✅ |
| Built-in Web Research | ❌ | ✅ |
| 사용자 지정 API | ✅ HTTP module | ✅ via MCP |
| Iterators & Error Handling | ✅ | ❌ |
| Shareable Templates | ✅ 템플릿 | ✅ Playbooks |
| 가장 적합한 대상 | Complex automation | Research and data tasks |
1. AI Agents
만들다: Make AI Agents sit inside your scenarios. You give an agent a goal and the tools it may use. It then decides which step to take next.

루트라: The whole product is the agent. You chat with it like other AI 비서, but it acts across your work apps. It can research 유튜브 videos and summarize them on request.

2. Reliability and Consistent Outcomes
만들다: Agentic automation mixes AI decisions with fixed steps. You keep strict rules where they matter. AI only handles the fuzzy parts.

루트라: Lutra AI ensures repeatable results by writing and running actual code. That beats a chatbot guessing each time. Its PubMed RSS report shows how scheduled tasks can automate reports.

3. Workflow Building and Ease of Use
만들다: The drag and drop interface lets you see each module, route, and filter. Simple workflows take minutes. More complex workflows take practice, so expect a steep learning curve.

루트라: There’s no canvas to learn. You type, and conversational AI handles the setup. It can also build visualizations, like a cross-platform app analysis dashboard.

💡 꿀팁: Lutra feels more beginner friendly on day one. Some reviewers still mention a learning curve in finding everything it can do.
4. Data Extraction and Enrichment
만들다: Make can process data from invoices, forms, and files. Parsing tools reshape it before it lands in Google Sheets.

루트라: This is Lutra’s home turf. It finds structured data on web pages, PDFs, and docs, then enriches each row. It can turn Google Drive PDFs into tidy Sheets.

5. 잠재고객 발굴
만들다: Make moves leads from ads, forms, and landing pages into your CRM. It scores, tags, and routes them by rules you set.

루트라: Lutra builds the lead list itself. It scrapes contact details from sites like LinkedIn and enriches each profile. A sales team gets ready-to-use records.

6. Marketing and Email Automation
만들다: Make can post to social channels on a schedule. It also syncs customer interactions across tools, which helps e commerce stores keep inventory updated.

루트라: Lutra can automate emails with CRM data. It drafts personalized campaigns and Gmail replies, then sends follow-ups and tracks the results.

7. Integrations and Custom APIs
만들다: With 2,000+ apps, Make covers most tools you already use. The HTTP module handles custom API calls for everything else. That makes it great for syncing data across IT systems.

루트라: Lutra connects to existing apps like Outlook, Stripe, and HubSpot. It supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) for custom integrations, with SSO, RBAC, and audit trails.

⚠️ 경고: Lutra’s app list is shorter. Check your must-have tools before you pay for a plan.
8. Templates and Playbooks
만들다: The templates gallery gives you ready-made scenarios. Pick one, connect your accounts, and tweak the steps.

루트라: Playbooks are saved tasks you can share across your company. A profile finder playbook, for example, runs the same way for everyone.

9. Business Workflows by Team
만들다: Make is highly versatile. It runs contract approvals for legal, invoices for finance, and tickets for IT.

루트라: Lutra serves sales, recruiting, finance, and 부동산. It finds phone numbers, sources candidates, reconciles expenses, and scrapes Zillow listings.

10. 가격 및 비용
Here are both pricing plans side by side.
| 계획 | 만들다 | 루트라 |
|---|---|---|
| 무료 | 월 0달러 | $0 |
| 기입 | Core: $9 per month | Essential: $23/month (billed annually) |
| 중간 | Pro: $16 per month | Professional: $63/month (billed annually) |
| 팀 | Teams: $29 per month | — |
| 기업 | 맞춤 가격 책정 | 맞춤 가격 책정 |
만들다: Make is the cost effective pick. Most paid plans fall between $9 and $29. Reviewers often say it beats 자피어 and Pipedream on price.
루트라: Lutra costs more, but each credit does heavier work. One task can replace hours of manual research.
다양한 시나리오
| 필요하시면 | 선택하다 | 왜 |
|---|---|---|
| 빠듯한 예산 | 만들다 | Paid plans start at $9 |
| Advanced workflows with branching | 만들다 | Routers, iterators, error routes |
| Lead research and enrichment | 루트라 | Scrapes and enriches on request |
| Connecting niche apps | 만들다 | 2,000+ apps plus HTTP |
| Zero setup for non technical users | 루트라 | Type tasks in plain English |
| Strict data security | 루트라 | SOC 2 Type II, MCP guardrails |
💰 예산
Make wins on raw cost. Lutra makes sense when one task saves hours of research.
🔌 사용 중인 기술 스택
Many tools, or niche ones? Pick Make. Mostly Google Workspace and Microsoft? Lutra covers you.
⚙️ Your Workflow Style
Make suits always-on pipelines that run thousands of times. Lutra suits jobs where an AI must read, search, and decide.
🎓 귀하의 경험 수준
New to automation? Lutra needs little technical know how. Make takes longer to learn but gives more control.
🆓 무료 체험 및 데모
Both offer a free plan. Run one real task in each before you pay.
🛟 지원 옵션
Make’s customer support is backed by a huge community and tutorials. Lutra’s resources are smaller but growing.
🔒 데이터 개인정보 보호 및 보안
Lutra uses secure authentication on every connection. It also limits risky mixes of private data, external systems, and untrusted content.
전환 가이드
이미 이러한 도구 중 하나를 사용하고 계신가요? 전환 시 예상되는 사항은 다음과 같습니다.
🔄 Switching from Make to Lutra?
✅ 얻게 될 이점:
- Tasks set up by typing, not building
- Built-in web searches and lead enrichment
- SOC 2 Type II security with MCP controls
❌ 잃게 될 것:
- The visual canvas and fine control
- A much larger app library
- 월 비용 절감
📋 전환 방법:
- List your Make scenarios and what each one does.
- Create a free Lutra account and connect your apps.
- Describe each task in plain English and save it as a Playbook.
🔄 Switching from Lutra to Make?
✅ 얻게 될 이점:
- Cheaper plans for high-volume runs
- Iterators, routers, and error handling
- 2,000+ apps and HTTP module access
❌ 잃게 될 것:
- Plain-English task creation
- Native research and scraping
- Shareable Playbooks
📋 전환 방법:
- Write down the steps each Lutra Playbook performs.
- Sign up for Make’s free plan and connect your apps.
- Rebuild each task from a template or a blank scenario.
저희 리뷰에서 다루지 않은 내용
This comparison focused on solo users and small teams. We didn’t evaluate Enterprise plans, custom pricing, or high-volume runs with millions of operations. We also didn’t measure real time data speed or long-term credit costs at scale. Features reflect October 2026 versions and may change.
최종 판결
| 범주 | 우승자 |
|---|---|
| 💰 가격 | 만들다 |
| 🧩 Workflow Builder | 만들다 |
| 🧠 Complex Logic & Error Handling | 만들다 |
| 🔌 통합 | 만들다 |
| 📚 템플릿 및 커뮤니티 | 만들다 |
| 🔍 Data Enrichment & Research | 루트라 |
| 🤖 AI 에이전트 | 루트라 |
| 👶 사용 편의성 | 루트라 |
| 🏆 종합 우승 | 만들다 |
🏆 WINNER: MAKE
Make wins 5 out of 8 categories.
다음과 같은 경우에 가장 적합합니다: Multi-app automation, budget-minded teams, complex workflows
Make is a powerful automation platform for people who want control. It costs less and connects more apps. Its visual approach turns messy 사업 workflows into clear diagrams.
Lutra is the better fit for research-heavy work. If your days involve web searches, lead lists, and messy spreadsheets, Lutra saves real time. It lets you skip the builder and just ask.
Still, most readers want one tool that runs reliably in the background. For that, Make is the stronger choice. Start on the free plan and grow from there.
More of Make Compared
Here’s how Make stacks up against other automation tools:
Loading... branching paths, lower entry price, and deeper data parsing. Unlike Zapier, it bills per operation.
Loading... a simpler linear setup, a larger app library, and faster onboarding.
Make vs n8n
Loading... zero hosting work, a friendlier canvas, and a bigger template gallery.
Loading... open-source code, self-hosting, and code nodes for developers.
Make vs 파블리 연결하다
Loading... more native apps, stronger error handling, and built-in AI agents.
Pabbly Connect wins on: lifetime deals, free internal steps, and simpler billing.
More of Lutra Compared
Here’s how Lutra stacks up against other AI workflows tools:
Lutra wins on: chat-based setup, native web research, and lead enrichment.
Loading... thousands more apps, lower starting cost, and mature trigger-action automation.
Loading... 검룹
Lutra wins on: no node building, SOC 2 Type II security, and shareable Playbooks.
Loading... a visual AI pipeline builder, scraping nodes, and step-level control.
Loading... 마인드스튜디오
Lutra wins on: ready-to-use task agent, CRM-driven email, and Google Drive extraction.
MindStudio wins on: building custom AI 앱, model choice, and branded agent interfaces.
자주 묻는 질문
Make가 Zapier보다 나은가요?
For complex logic and lower cost, yes. Zapier is simpler and has more apps. Make gives you branching, iterators, and better control over how data is processed.
Make.com은 사용하기 어렵나요?
Basic tasks are easy to set up. Advanced workflows take practice, especially with API integrations. Templates and tutorials shorten your automation journey.
Make.com 이용료는 얼마인가요?
There’s a free plan. Paid plans are Core at $9, Pro at $16, and Teams at $29 per month. Enterprise uses custom pricing.
Lutra AI는 안전한가요?
Yes. It is SOC 2 Type II certified and uses end-to-end encryption. It doesn’t keep your data long-term unless you ask it to.
Lutra AI는 무엇에 사용되나요?
It handles data extraction, lead enrichment, web research, and email follow-ups. You describe the job, and the agent works to complete tasks across your connected apps.













