⚡ 快速结论：
- 定价： Flowith paid plans start at $17.91/month. Gumloop’s Solo plan starts at $30.
- 最适合： Flowith for research and content work. Gumloop for workflow automation and web scraping.
- 主要区别： Flowith is an AI workspace with an 自主 agent. Gumloop is a visual workflow builder.
- 我们的选择： Flowith for most solo creators. It costs less and its free plan includes Agent Neo.
Flowith and Gumloop both put AI agents to work for you.
但它们并非为同一用途而设计。
Flowith is an AI workspace for research, writing, and creative projects.
Gumloop is a no code tool that helps you automate workflows across apps.
Pick the wrong one, and you pay for features you never touch.
This guide shows which one fits your goal.
概述
This Flowith vs Gumloop comparison covers pricing, features, ease of use, and support.
我们查阅了这两款工具的文档、定价页面和用户评价。
我们的撰稿人也亲自体验了每一项功能。
这些观察结果出现在下面的“我们的团队注意到”部分中。
By the end, you’ll know which tool suits your tasks.
Flowith是什么？
Flowith is an AI creation and workflow management tool launched in 2025.
Its goal is more productivity with less tab-hopping.
Instead of one chat window, it gives you an infinite canvas.
You can run several AI threads side by side on that canvas.
Flowith calls this its multi thread interface.
It also includes Agent Neo, an AI agent for multi-step jobs.
The platform is built for creators, researchers, and developers with big projects.
Here’s a look at the Flowith workspace.
Watch this quick walkthrough to see it in action.
🏆 Winner: Flowith
Run research, writing, and image jobs on one canvas. Agent Neo is free on the Starter plan.
弗洛伊斯定价
Here’s what Flowith costs in 2026. Every plan uses one shared credit pool.
| 计划 | 价格 | 最适合 |
|---|---|---|
| 起动机 | 每月 0 美元 | Trying Agent Neo and basic models |
| 专业版 | $17.91/month | 独立创作者和学生 |
| 最终的 | $44.91/month | Heavy daily users and researchers |
| 无限 | $399.92/month | Teams running AI all day |
Pricing verified October 2026.
免费试用： No timed trial. The Starter plan is free forever and gives 1,000 one-time credits.
退款保证： Flowith doesn’t advertise a standard refund window. Read the terms before you upgrade.
📌 笔记： Credits are unified. One pool covers 文本, image, and video models. Paid plans refresh monthly, and you can top up anytime.
⚠️ 警告： Unused credits expire at the end of each monthly cycle. Don’t buy a bigger plan than you’ll use.
Key Benefits of Flowith
Here’s what makes Flowith worth considering:
- Infinite canvas: Map ideas visually instead of scrolling one long chat. Big projects stay easy to follow.
- 尼奥特工： This agent handles multi-step jobs without context limits. You set the goal, and it does the legwork.
- Oracle mode: It breaks big jobs into subtasks. Then it pulls the right tools for each one.
- Many AI models: Switch models per task without extra subscriptions. Text, image, and video all live here.
- Second brain: Flowith stores and links your notes automatically. You get a searchable knowledge base without manual tagging.
- 实时协作： Teammates can work on the same canvas at once. That helps shared research move faster.
我们的团队注意到了什么
我们的 作家 signed up for Flowith and used it for research and blog post drafts. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Flowith Pros & Cons
✅ 优点
- Infinite canvas keeps complex projects visual and organized
- Agent Neo handles multi-step creative tasks on its own
- Many AI models share one unified credit pool
- Free Starter plan includes Agent Neo and the Composer
❌缺点
- Unused monthly credits expire
- Few outside app integrations
- Some users find it expensive for scripting or 贸易 任务
Gumloop是什么？
Gumloop is a no code platform for AI automation.
It lets you build AI workflows with a drag and drop interface.
You connect small blocks, called nodes, on a visual canvas.
Each finished workflow handles your repetitive tasks on autopilot.
Common jobs include web scraping, data extraction, and 客户关系管理 更新。
It targets marketers, freelancers, and small 商业 owners without coding skills.
Here’s a look at the Gumloop builder.
This video walks through how a flow comes together.
口香糖环
Turn scraping, enrichment, and 报道 into flows that run alone. No code needed.
Gumloop 定价
Gumloop pricing plans run on a credit based system. Costs scale with workflow complexity.
| 计划 | 价格 | 最适合 |
|---|---|---|
| 自由的 | 自由的 | Testing simple flows |
| 独奏 | $30 | 自由职业者 以及独立营销人员 |
| 团队 | $195 | A marketing team sharing workflows |
| 企业 | 风俗 | Large firms needing dedicated infrastructure |
Pricing verified October 2026.
免费试用： No timed trial. The free plan gives 2,000 credits once you finish onboarding.
退款保证： Gumloop doesn’t list a standard refund window. Check the terms first.
📌 笔记： Gumloop offers a 20% discount code for new users. Enterprise uses custom pricing, so talk to sales.
⚠️ Price check: Some review sites list Gumloop’s paid plan starting at $97 per month. Confirm the current price at checkout.
Key Benefits of Gumloop
Here’s what makes Gumloop worth considering:
- No code building: The drag and drop builder lets you design automated processes visually. You never write code.
- Gummie 助手: Describe a task in plain words. Gummie, the Gumloop AI helper, drafts the flow and fixes errors.
- Built-in scraping: Pull web data and turn it into structured data. It also reads PDFs and documents.
- 预置模板： Ready-made “flows” help you start fast. You can tweak each one to fit your own workflow.
- App connections: It links to Google Sheets, Zendesk, and other existing tools. Data moves without copy-paste.
- 安全: Gumloop is SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR compliant. That matters when you handle customer data.
我们的团队注意到了什么
Our writer signed up for Gumloop and built a few scraping and enrichment flows. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Gumloop Pros & Cons
✅ 优点
- Drag and drop builder needs no coding skills
- Strong web scraping and document processing
- Gummie assistant drafts workflows from plain English
- SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR compliant
❌缺点
- Steep learning curve despite the no code promise
- Credit costs can be hard to predict
- No live chat, only email and community forums
功能对比
Both tools put AI models on a canvas. That’s where the overlap ends. Below, we compare 10 features side by side.
| 特征 | 弗洛伊斯 | 口香糖环 |
|---|---|---|
| 起价 | $17.91/month | $30 |
| 免费计划 | ✅ | ✅ |
| 自主人工智能代理 | ✅ | ✅ |
| Infinite Canvas Workspace | ✅ | ❌ |
| 可视化工作流构建器 | ❌ | ✅ |
| Web Scraping Nodes | ❌ | ✅ |
| Image & Video Creation | ✅ | ❌ |
| 知识库 | ✅ | ❌ |
| Chrome 扩展程序 | ❌ | ✅ |
| 最适合 | Research and content | 工作流自动化 |
1. AI Agents
弗洛伊斯： Agent Neo is Flowith’s autonomous AI agent. It plans, researches, and keeps completing steps until your goal is done. Oracle mode splits big jobs into subtasks and picks tools for each.
Gumloop： Gumloop lets you build AI agents inside your flows. They handle jobs like sentiment analysis and lead scoring. The agent follows the path you design, so you keep full control.
💡 专业提示： Flowith’s agent acts more on its own. Gumloop’s agents are more predictable. Choose based on how much freedom you want the AI to have.
2. Workspace and Ease of Use
弗洛伊斯： The intuitive canvas feels like a whiteboard for AI. Each thread becomes a node you can branch and compare. Its smart framework aims to keep you in a flow state with fewer distractions.
Gumloop： Gumloop’s UI is a visual builder. You drag nodes onto the board and link them. Users praise the user friendly interface. Still, many report an initial learning curve with complex logic.
⚠️ 警告： “No code” doesn’t mean “no effort.” Plan a few hours to learn Gumloop’s node logic. Some users also miss deeper customization for complex workflows.
3. Web Scraping and Data Extraction
弗洛伊斯： Flowith can search the web and turn findings into strategic insights. It isn’t built for scheduled scraping or bulk data processing. Treat it as a research partner, not a 刮刀.
Gumloop： This is Gumloop’s home turf. It scrapes sites and pulls fields from PDFs. Then it sends scraped data to Google Sheets or a 客户关系管理. Flows can run on a schedule to keep records up to date.
4. Content Generation
弗洛伊斯： The Flowith Composer helps you write long pieces, like a blog post or brief. You can swap models mid-draft. Every version stays on your canvas for edits.
Gumloop： Gumloop treats content generation as one step in a pipeline. Scrape a topic, summarize it, then draft a post. It shines when you need the same output again and again.
5. 知识管理
弗洛伊斯： Knowledge Garden turns Flowith into a second brain. It stores your notes and links related ideas, so you find things fast. Flowith cites user reports of 40% faster task completion and 78% faster retrieval.
Gumloop： Gumloop has no note storage or knowledge base. It moves and enriches data between apps instead. Enrichment adds details to leads and personalizes 外联.
6. Templates and Community
弗洛伊斯： The Agent Community lets you open agents other people built. The Knowledge Market goes further. Creators share and sell curated knowledge bases there.
Here’s how the Knowledge Market looks inside the app.
Gumloop： Gumloop’s template library is one of its great resources. Each flow is a pre built starting point for sales, marketing, or ops work.
The pre built templates gallery groups flows by use case.
7. Image and Video Creation
弗洛伊斯： Flowith includes an AI powered photo editor. It can also produce professional-quality videos from prompts. Both pull from the same credit pool as text.
https://fahimai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ai-powered-photo-editor-980×532.pngv
Video projects sit on the same canvas as your writing.
Gumloop： Gumloop has no native photo or 视频编辑器. It’s a workflow tool, not a creative studio.
⚠️ 警告： Image and video jobs burn Flowith credits faster than text. Watch your balance.
8. 搜索引擎优化和营销
弗洛伊斯： Flowith can help with 关键词研究 and outlines through chat. But it has no marketing data connectors. You copy results out by hand.
Gumloop： Gumloop has ready flows for SEO efforts, like competitor audits and content briefs. Marketers often pair them with Google Analytics exports. It suits 小型企业 that can’t hire an analyst.
社交媒体 listening adds brand tracking on top.
9. 集成和扩展
弗洛伊斯： Flowith focuses on its own workspace. It connects many AI models but few outside apps. Linking it to your CRM takes a workaround.
Gumloop： Does Gumloop integrate with popular tools? Yes. It works with Google Sheets, Slack, Zendesk, and CRMs. The Chrome extension triggers flows from any page, and custom nodes reach internal tools.
10. 定价与成本
让我们来并排比较一下这些定价方案。
| 层级 | 弗洛伊斯 | 口香糖环 |
|---|---|---|
| 自由的 | Starter: $0/month | 免费：免费 |
| 入口 | Pro: $17.91/month | Solo: $30 |
| 中 | Ultimate: $44.91/month | Team: $195 |
| 顶部 | Infinite: $399.92/month | 企业：定制 |
弗洛伊斯： Flowith is cheaper at the entry and mid tiers. One credit pool covers every model. The catch is monthly credit expiry.
Gumloop： Gumloop costs more, and complex flows eat credits fast. Is Gumloop worth it? Yes, if one flow replaces hours of manual work each week.
不同场景
| 如果您需要…… | 选择 | 为什么 |
|---|---|---|
| 预算紧张 | 弗洛伊斯 | 较低的入门价格 |
| Research and writing | 弗洛伊斯 | Agent Neo plus Composer |
| 网络爬虫 | 口香糖环 | Dedicated scraping nodes |
| Image and video work | 弗洛伊斯 | Built-in editors |
| 应用间自动化 | 口香糖环 | 广泛整合 |
| Compliance needs | 口香糖环 | SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR |
💰 您的预算
Flowith is the cheaper start for solo users. If you only need basic scraping, Thunderbit is a lighter, cheaper option than Gumloop.
🔌 您的技术栈
Gumloop fits teams that live in Sheets, Slack, and a CRM. Flowith suits people who work mostly inside one AI workspace.
📝你的工作风格
Deep thinkers who branch ideas will love Flowith. If you want to automate tasks that repeat daily, pick Gumloop.
🎓您的经验水平
Flowith feels familiar if you’ve used ChatGPT. Gumloop needs more setup time before complex tasks run smoothly.
🆓 免费套餐
Both offer a free plan with starter credits. Run one real project in each before paying.
🛟 支持选项
Gumloop’s customer support runs through email and forums, with no live chat. Both tools lean on self-serve help docs.
切换指南
已经在使用这些工具之一了吗？如果您切换到其他工具，以下是您可能遇到的情况。
🔄 Switching from Flowith to Gumloop?
✅ 你将获得：
- Scheduled scraping and data extraction
- Direct links to Sheets, Slack, and CRMs
- SOC 2 Type 2 和 GDPR 合规性
❌ 你会失去什么：
- The infinite canvas and multi-thread chats
- Knowledge Garden as your second brain
- Built-in image and video tools
📋 如何切换：
- Export key notes and drafts from Flowith
- Create a free Gumloop account and finish onboarding
- Rebuild your top task with a template
🔄 Switching from Gumloop to Flowith?
✅ 你将获得：
- Agent Neo for open-ended creative work
- A searchable knowledge base
- A lower entry price
❌ 你会失去什么：
- Scheduled flows that deploy automations for you
- Dedicated scraping nodes
- The Chrome extension
📋 如何切换：
- Export flow outputs from Gumloop to Sheets
- Sign up for the free Flowith Starter plan
- Upload your files to Knowledge Garden
我们的评测没有涵盖的内容
This comparison focused on solo creators, freelancers, and small teams. We didn’t test Gumloop’s Enterprise plan or Flowith’s Infinite tier. API limits and HIPAA needs weren’t part of this review. Both tools change fast, so features may differ after October 2026.
最终判决
| 类别 | 优胜者 |
|---|---|
| 💰 定价 | 弗洛伊斯 |
| 🤖人工智能代理 | 弗洛伊斯 |
| ✍️ 内容创作 | 弗洛伊斯 |
| 🧠 Knowledge Management | 弗洛伊斯 |
| 👶 易用性 | 弗洛伊斯 |
| 🕸️ Web Scraping | 口香糖环 |
| 🔌 集成 | 口香糖环 |
| 🔒 安全 | 口香糖环 |
| 🏆 总冠军 | 弗洛伊斯 |
Flowith and Gumloop solve different problems. Flowith is a thinking space with 人工智能工具 built in. Gumloop is a factory for AI driven automation.
Gumloop is the better pick for scraping, data jobs, and app-to-app workflow automation. Its security and integrations are stronger.
But most beginners want help thinking, writing, and creating. Flowith does that for less money, with a gentler start.
More of Flowith Compared
Here’s how Flowith stacks up against other tools:
Flowith vs 概念
Flowith wins on: autonomous agent work, multi-model access, and image creation.
Notion 在以下方面胜出： structured databases, team wikis, and a huge template gallery.
Flowith wins on: visual canvas thinking, a built-in knowledge base, and video output.
MindStudio 获胜方式： publishing custom AI apps, embedding them, and fine model settings.
Flowith vs Zapier
Flowith wins on: creative output, research depth, and an agent that plans on its own.
Zapier 在以下方面胜出： thousands of app connectors, simple triggers, and reliable background runs.
More of Gumloop Compared
Here’s how Gumloop stacks up against other automation tools:
Gumloop 赢得： AI-first nodes, built-in scraping, and PDF parsing.
Zapier 在以下方面胜出： a bigger app library, easier triggers, and live chat on higher plans.
Gumloop 赢得： zero setup, a gentler builder, and the Gummie assistant.
n8n 获胜方式： self-hosting, deep code steps, and lower costs at high volume.
Gumloop vs Lindy
Gumloop 赢得： visual flow mapping, scraping depth, and template variety.
Lindy wins on: smarter AI decisions, email and calendar agents, and less wiring.
For more detail, read our full Gumloop review.
常见问题解答
Flowith是做什么的？
It’s an AI workspace on an infinite canvas. You run several chats at once across many AI models. Agent Neo handles multi-step research, writing, and image tasks.
flowith.io 是免费的吗？
Yes. The Starter plan is free forever. It gives 1,000 one-time credits plus basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo. Paid plans start at $17.91/month.
Gumloop 的价格是多少？
There’s a free plan. Solo costs $30, Team costs $195, and Enterprise is custom. Credits drive the bill, so heavy flows cost more.
Zapier 和 Gumloop 有什么区别？
Zapier connects thousands of apps with simple triggers. Gumloop is AI-first, with scraping, PDF parsing, and AI nodes built in. Pick Gumloop for heavy data work.
哪种人工智能最适合自动化？
For app-to-app automation, Gumloop or Zapier work best. For research and content tasks run by an agent, Flowith is the stronger fit.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 