⚡ 간단 평가:
- 가격: Flowith paid plans start at $17.91/month. Gumloop’s Solo plan starts at $30.
- 다음과 같은 경우에 가장 적합합니다: Flowith for research and content work. Gumloop for workflow automation and web scraping.
- 주요 차이점: Flowith is an AI workspace with an 자발적인 agent. Gumloop is a visual workflow builder.
- 저희가 선택한 제품: Flowith for most solo creators. It costs less and its free plan includes Agent Neo.
Flowith and Gumloop both put AI agents to work for you.
하지만 두 제품은 같은 용도로 만들어진 것이 아닙니다.
Flowith is an AI workspace for research, writing, and creative projects.
Gumloop is a no code tool that helps you automate workflows across apps.
Pick the wrong one, and you pay for features you never touch.
This guide shows which one fits your goal.
개요
This Flowith vs Gumloop comparison covers pricing, features, ease of use, and support.
저희는 두 도구 모두에 대한 문서, 가격 페이지 및 사용자 리뷰를 검토했습니다.
저희 작가들은 각각의 제품을 직접 다루는 데에도 시간을 할애했습니다.
그러한 관찰 내용은 아래 '우리 팀이 발견한 사항' 섹션에 나와 있습니다.
By the end, you’ll know which tool suits your tasks.
플로위스(Flowist)란 무엇인가요?
Flowith is an AI creation and workflow management tool launched in 2025.
Its goal is more productivity with less tab-hopping.
Instead of one chat window, it gives you an infinite canvas.
You can run several AI threads side by side on that canvas.
Flowith calls this its multi thread interface.
It also includes Agent Neo, an AI agent for multi-step jobs.
The platform is built for creators, researchers, and developers with big projects.
Here’s a look at the Flowith workspace.
Watch this quick walkthrough to see it in action.
🏆 Winner: Flowith
Run research, writing, and image jobs on one canvas. Agent Neo is free on the Starter plan.
플로위스 가격
Here’s what Flowith costs in 2026. Every plan uses one shared credit pool.
| 계획 | 가격 | 가장 적합한 대상 |
|---|---|---|
| 기동기 | 월 0달러 | Trying Agent Neo and basic models |
| 찬성 | $17.91/month | 개인 창작자 및 학생 |
| 궁극적인 | $44.91/month | Heavy daily users and researchers |
| 무한 | $399.92/month | Teams running AI all day |
Pricing verified October 2026.
무료 체험: No timed trial. The Starter plan is free forever and gives 1,000 one-time credits.
환불 보장: Flowith doesn’t advertise a standard refund window. Read the terms before you upgrade.
📌 메모: Credits are unified. One pool covers 텍스트, image, and video models. Paid plans refresh monthly, and you can top up anytime.
⚠️ 경고: Unused credits expire at the end of each monthly cycle. Don’t buy a bigger plan than you’ll use.
Key Benefits of Flowith
Here’s what makes Flowith worth considering:
- Infinite canvas: Map ideas visually instead of scrolling one long chat. Big projects stay easy to follow.
- 에이전트 네오: This agent handles multi-step jobs without context limits. You set the goal, and it does the legwork.
- Oracle mode: It breaks big jobs into subtasks. Then it pulls the right tools for each one.
- Many AI models: Switch models per task without extra subscriptions. Text, image, and video all live here.
- Second brain: Flowith stores and links your notes automatically. You get a searchable knowledge base without manual tagging.
- 실시간 협업: Teammates can work on the same canvas at once. That helps shared research move faster.
우리 팀이 발견한 점
우리의 작가 signed up for Flowith and used it for research and blog post drafts. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Flowith Pros & Cons
✅ 장점
- Infinite canvas keeps complex projects visual and organized
- Agent Neo handles multi-step creative tasks on its own
- Many AI models share one unified credit pool
- Free Starter plan includes Agent Neo and the Composer
❌ 단점
- Unused monthly credits expire
- Few outside app integrations
- Some users find it expensive for scripting or 거래 작업
검룹(Gumloop)이란 무엇인가요?
Gumloop is a no code platform for AI automation.
It lets you build AI workflows with a drag and drop interface.
You connect small blocks, called nodes, on a visual canvas.
Each finished workflow handles your repetitive tasks on autopilot.
Common jobs include web scraping, data extraction, and CRM 업데이트.
It targets marketers, freelancers, and small 사업 owners without coding skills.
Here’s a look at the Gumloop builder.
This video walks through how a flow comes together.
검룹
Turn scraping, enrichment, and 보고 into flows that run alone. No code needed.
검룹 가격
Gumloop pricing plans run on a credit based system. Costs scale with workflow complexity.
| 계획 | 가격 | 가장 적합한 대상 |
|---|---|---|
| 무료 | 무료 | Testing simple flows |
| 독주 | $30 | 프리랜서 그리고 솔로 마케터들 |
| 팀 | $195 | A marketing team sharing workflows |
| 기업 | 관습 | Large firms needing dedicated infrastructure |
Pricing verified October 2026.
무료 체험: No timed trial. The free plan gives 2,000 credits once you finish onboarding.
환불 보장: Gumloop doesn’t list a standard refund window. Check the terms first.
📌 메모: Gumloop offers a 20% discount code for new users. Enterprise uses custom pricing, so talk to sales.
⚠️ Price check: Some review sites list Gumloop’s paid plan starting at $97 per month. Confirm the current price at checkout.
Key Benefits of Gumloop
Here’s what makes Gumloop worth considering:
- No code building: The drag and drop builder lets you design automated processes visually. You never write code.
- Gummie 어시스턴트: Describe a task in plain words. Gummie, the Gumloop AI helper, drafts the flow and fixes errors.
- Built-in scraping: Pull web data and turn it into structured data. It also reads PDFs and documents.
- 미리 만들어진 템플릿: Ready-made “flows” help you start fast. You can tweak each one to fit your own workflow.
- App connections: It links to Google Sheets, 젠데스크, and other existing tools. Data moves without copy-paste.
- 보안: Gumloop is SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR compliant. That matters when you handle customer data.
우리 팀이 발견한 점
Our writer signed up for Gumloop and built a few scraping and enrichment flows. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Gumloop Pros & Cons
✅ 장점
- Drag and drop builder needs no coding skills
- Strong web scraping and document processing
- Gummie assistant drafts workflows from plain English
- SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR compliant
❌ 단점
- Steep learning curve despite the no code promise
- Credit costs can be hard to predict
- No live chat, only email and community forums
기능 비교
Both tools put AI models on a canvas. That’s where the overlap ends. Below, we compare 10 features side by side.
| 특징 | 플로위스 | 검룹 |
|---|---|---|
| 시작 가격 | $17.91/month | $30 |
| 무료 플랜 | ✅ | ✅ |
| 자율 AI 에이전트 | ✅ | ✅ |
| Infinite Canvas Workspace | ✅ | ❌ |
| 시각적 워크플로 빌더 | ❌ | ✅ |
| Web Scraping Nodes | ❌ | ✅ |
| Image & Video Creation | ✅ | ❌ |
| 지식 기반 | ✅ | ❌ |
| 크롬 확장 프로그램 | ❌ | ✅ |
| 가장 적합한 대상 | Research and content | 워크플로 자동화 |
1. AI Agents
플로위스: Agent Neo is Flowith’s autonomous AI agent. It plans, researches, and keeps completing steps until your goal is done. Oracle mode splits big jobs into subtasks and picks tools for each.
검루프: Gumloop lets you build AI agents inside your flows. They handle jobs like sentiment analysis and lead scoring. The agent follows the path you design, so you keep full control.
💡 꿀팁: Flowith’s agent acts more on its own. Gumloop’s agents are more predictable. Choose based on how much freedom you want the AI to have.
2. Workspace and Ease of Use
플로위스: The intuitive canvas feels like a whiteboard for AI. Each thread becomes a node you can branch and compare. Its smart framework aims to keep you in a flow state with fewer distractions.
검루프: Gumloop’s UI is a visual builder. You drag nodes onto the board and link them. Users praise the user friendly interface. Still, many report an initial learning curve with complex logic.
⚠️ 경고: “No code” doesn’t mean “no effort.” Plan a few hours to learn Gumloop’s node logic. Some users also miss deeper customization for complex workflows.
3. Web Scraping and Data Extraction
플로위스: Flowith can search the web and turn findings into strategic insights. It isn’t built for scheduled scraping or bulk data processing. Treat it as a research partner, not a 스크레이퍼.
검루프: This is Gumloop’s home turf. It scrapes sites and pulls fields from PDFs. Then it sends scraped data to Google Sheets or a CRM. Flows can run on a schedule to keep records up to date.
4. Content Generation
플로위스: The Flowith Composer helps you write long pieces, like a blog post or brief. You can swap models mid-draft. Every version stays on your canvas for edits.
검루프: Gumloop treats content generation as one step in a pipeline. Scrape a topic, summarize it, then draft a post. It shines when you need the same output again and again.
5. 지식 관리
플로위스: Knowledge Garden turns Flowith into a second brain. It stores your notes and links related ideas, so you find things fast. Flowith cites user reports of 40% faster task completion and 78% faster retrieval.
검루프: Gumloop has no note storage or knowledge base. It moves and enriches data between apps instead. Enrichment adds details to leads and personalizes 쭉 내밀다.
6. Templates and Community
플로위스: The Agent Community lets you open agents other people built. The Knowledge Market goes further. Creators share and sell curated knowledge bases there.
Here’s how the Knowledge Market looks inside the app.
검루프: Gumloop’s template library is one of its great resources. Each flow is a pre built starting point for sales, marketing, or ops work.
The pre built templates gallery groups flows by use case.
7. Image and Video Creation
플로위스: Flowith includes an AI powered photo editor. It can also produce professional-quality videos from prompts. Both pull from the same credit pool as text.
https://fahimai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ai-powered-photo-editor-980×532.pngv
Video projects sit on the same canvas as your writing.
검루프: Gumloop has no native photo or 동영상 편집기. It’s a workflow tool, not a creative studio.
⚠️ 경고: Image and video jobs burn Flowith credits faster than text. Watch your balance.
8. SEO 및 마케팅
플로위스: Flowith can help with 키워드 조사 and outlines through chat. But it has no marketing data connectors. You copy results out by hand.
검루프: Gumloop has ready flows for SEO efforts, like competitor audits and content briefs. Marketers often pair them with Google Analytics exports. It suits 소규모 사업체 that can’t hire an analyst.
소셜 미디어 listening adds brand tracking on top.
9. 통합 및 확장
플로위스: Flowith focuses on its own workspace. It connects many AI models but few outside apps. Linking it to your CRM takes a workaround.
검루프: Does Gumloop integrate with popular tools? Yes. It works with Google Sheets, Slack, Zendesk, and CRMs. The Chrome extension triggers flows from any page, and custom nodes reach internal tools.
10. 가격 및 비용
요금제를 나란히 비교해 보겠습니다.
| 층 | 플로위스 | 검룹 |
|---|---|---|
| 무료 | Starter: $0/month | 무료: 무료 |
| 기입 | Pro: $17.91/month | Solo: $30 |
| 중간 | Ultimate: $44.91/month | Team: $195 |
| 맨 위 | Infinite: $399.92/month | 기업: 맞춤형 |
플로위스: Flowith is cheaper at the entry and mid tiers. One credit pool covers every model. The catch is monthly credit expiry.
검루프: Gumloop costs more, and complex flows eat credits fast. Is Gumloop worth it? Yes, if one flow replaces hours of manual work each week.
다양한 시나리오
| 필요하시면 | 선택하다 | 왜 |
|---|---|---|
| 빠듯한 예산 | 플로위스 | 진입 가격 낮추기 |
| Research and writing | 플로위스 | Agent Neo plus Composer |
| Loading... | 검룹 | Dedicated scraping nodes |
| Image and video work | 플로위스 | Built-in editors |
| 앱 간 자동화 | 검룹 | 광범위한 통합 |
| Compliance needs | 검룹 | SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR |
💰 예산
Flowith is the cheaper start for solo users. If you only need basic scraping, Thunderbit is a lighter, cheaper option than Gumloop.
🔌 사용 중인 기술 스택
Gumloop fits teams that live in Sheets, Slack, and a CRM. Flowith suits people who work mostly inside one AI workspace.
📝 당신의 업무 스타일
Deep thinkers who branch ideas will love Flowith. If you want to automate tasks that repeat daily, pick Gumloop.
🎓 귀하의 경험 수준
Flowith feels familiar if you’ve used 챗GPT. Gumloop needs more setup time before complex tasks run smoothly.
🆓 무료 플랜
Both offer a free plan with starter credits. Run one real project in each before paying.
🛟 지원 옵션
Gumloop’s customer support runs through email and forums, with no live chat. Both tools lean on self-serve help docs.
전환 가이드
이미 이러한 도구 중 하나를 사용하고 계신가요? 전환 시 예상되는 사항은 다음과 같습니다.
🔄 Switching from Flowith to Gumloop?
✅ 얻게 될 이점:
- Scheduled scraping and data extraction
- Direct links to Sheets, Slack, and CRMs
- SOC 2 Type 2 및 GDPR 준수
❌ 잃게 될 것:
- The infinite canvas and multi-thread chats
- Knowledge Garden as your second brain
- Built-in image and video tools
📋 전환 방법:
- Export key notes and drafts from Flowith
- Create a free Gumloop account and finish onboarding
- Rebuild your top task with a template
🔄 Switching from Gumloop to Flowith?
✅ 얻게 될 이점:
- Agent Neo for open-ended creative work
- A searchable knowledge base
- A lower entry price
❌ 잃게 될 것:
- Scheduled flows that deploy automations for you
- Dedicated scraping nodes
- The Chrome extension
📋 전환 방법:
- Export flow outputs from Gumloop to Sheets
- Sign up for the free Flowith Starter plan
- Upload your files to Knowledge Garden
저희 리뷰에서 다루지 않은 내용
This comparison focused on solo creators, freelancers, and small teams. We didn’t test Gumloop’s Enterprise plan or Flowith’s Infinite tier. API limits and HIPAA needs weren’t part of this review. Both tools change fast, so features may differ after October 2026.
최종 판결
| 범주 | 우승자 |
|---|---|
| 💰 가격 | 플로위스 |
| 🤖 AI 에이전트 | 플로위스 |
| ✍️ 콘텐츠 제작 | 플로위스 |
| 🧠 Knowledge Management | 플로위스 |
| 👶 사용 편의성 | 플로위스 |
| 🕸️ Web Scraping | 검룹 |
| 🔌 통합 | 검룹 |
| 🔒 보안 | 검룹 |
| 🏆 종합 우승 | 플로위스 |
🏆 WINNER: FLOWITH
Flowith wins 5 out of 8 categories.
다음과 같은 경우에 가장 적합합니다: Research, long-form writing, visual 브레인스토밍
Flowith and Gumloop solve different problems. Flowith is a thinking space with AI 도구 built in. Gumloop is a factory for AI driven automation.
Gumloop is the better pick for scraping, data jobs, and app-to-app workflow automation. Its security and integrations are stronger.
But most beginners want help thinking, writing, and creating. Flowith does that for less money, with a gentler start.
More of Flowith Compared
Here’s how Flowith stacks up against other tools:
플로위스 vs 개념
Flowith wins on: autonomous agent work, multi-model access, and image creation.
Notion이 다음 항목에서 승리했습니다: structured databases, team wikis, and a huge template gallery.
Flowith wins on: visual canvas thinking, a built-in knowledge base, and video output.
마인드스튜디오 승리 항목: publishing custom AI apps, embedding them, and fine model settings.
플로위스 vs 자피어
Flowith wins on: creative output, research depth, and an agent that plans on its own.
Loading... thousands of app connectors, simple triggers, and reliable background runs.
More of Gumloop Compared
Here’s how Gumloop stacks up against other automation tools:
Loading... AI-first nodes, built-in scraping, and PDF parsing.
Loading... a bigger app library, easier triggers, and live chat on higher plans.
Loading... zero setup, a gentler builder, and the Gummie assistant.
n8n 승리 항목: self-hosting, deep code steps, and lower costs at high volume.
Gumloop vs Lindy
Loading... visual flow mapping, scraping depth, and template variety.
Lindy wins on: smarter AI decisions, email and calendar agents, and less wiring.
For more detail, read our full Gumloop review.
자주 묻는 질문
플로위스는 무슨 일을 하나요?
It’s an AI workspace on an infinite canvas. You run several chats at once across many AI models. Agent Neo handles multi-step research, writing, and image tasks.
flowith.io는 무료인가요?
Yes. The Starter plan is free forever. It gives 1,000 one-time credits plus basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo. Paid plans start at $17.91/month.
검룹 가격은 얼마인가요?
There’s a free plan. Solo costs $30, Team costs $195, and Enterprise is custom. Credits drive the bill, so heavy flows cost more.
Zapier와 Gumloop의 차이점은 무엇인가요?
Zapier connects thousands of apps with simple triggers. Gumloop is AI-first, with scraping, PDF parsing, and AI nodes built in. Pick Gumloop for heavy data work.
자동화에 가장 적합한 AI는 무엇일까요?
For app-to-app automation, Gumloop or Zapier work best. For research and content tasks run by an agent, Flowith is the stronger fit.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 