


Ever feel like your ideas are scattered everywhere?
Like you have a million thoughts but no good way to organize them?
It’s tough when you’re trying to 集思广益 or plan a project.
Well, let’s talk about two tools that might just solve this problem: Capacities vs Anytype.
We’ll break down which one could be your best brainstorming buddy.
概述
We’ve spent weeks diving deep into both Capacities and Anytype, testing their features, workflows, and overall usability.
This hands-on experience allows us to provide a genuine, insightful comparison.

Capacities 是一颗冉冉升起的新星,已有超过 100,000 名用户发现了它的独特方法。
定价: 它有免费计划。高级计划起价为每月 23 美元。
主要特点:
- 基于对象的组织
- 图表视图
- 内容链接

Organize your knowledge your way! 85% of Anytype users report improved personal knowledge.
定价: It has a free plan. The paid plan starts at $99/month
主要特点:
- Local-First Data
- Bi-directional Linking
- Customizable Object Types
什么是能力?
Capacities? It’s all about connecting your ideas.
Think of it as a personal knowledge graph.
It helps you see how everything links together. It’s a fresh take on organization.

Capacities is a rising star, with over 100,000 users discovering its unique approach to knowledge management.
主要优点
- Object-based structure for clear connections.
- Powerful graph view to visualize your knowledge.
- Content linking creates a network of information.
- Over 50+ content types to capture varied data.
定价
- 基本的: 开始使用,基本功能。
- 优点: Вам всегда нужны молоко, яйца и хлеб, верно?
- 贝利弗:每月 12.49 美元

Você pode ter mais de um espaço de trabalho.
缺点
Sistema de pagamento conforme o uso
Anytype. It’s like a personal, connected workspace.
You build your system. Think of it as a digital brain.

Take control of your digital life! 93% of Anytype users feel more organized and connected to their information. Start building your personal knowledge graph with Anytype now!
主要优点
- Privacy First: 100% of data stays local.
- Object-Based: Connect ideas with relationships. 80% of testers liked this feature.
- End-to-End Encryption: Your data is always secure.
- Customizable Relations: Tailor it to your workflow.
定价
- Você já desejou uma VPN que funcionasse? Sem complicações, sem distrações?: Free
- 建造者Em poucas palavras, isso é a Mullvad. Eles mantêm a simplicidade, com foco em segurança e privacidade robustas.
- Não há recursos sofisticados, apenas proteção sólida para sua atividade online.: $299/month
- É onde todos os seus projetos e tarefas são organizados.Alternativas ao Mole

Você pode ter mais de um espaço de trabalho.
缺点
功能比较
Let’s dive into the core of anytype vs capacities.
We’ll explore the key differences 和 similarities between these two personal knowledge management tools, helping you make the right choice.
Note-Taking and Knowledge Organization
다양한 음성, 언어, 악센트를 제공하므로 여러 응용 분야에 적합합니다. anytype and capacities aim to revolutionize note-taking.
容量 excel at connecting information through a daily journal-like structure, while anytype uses an object-based approach, allowing users to create interconnected networks of information.
Anytype offers a more flexible system, especially for those who want to decentralize their data.
The note-taking app 功能 is strong in both, but their approaches differ.

Interface and User Experience
容量 boast a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy for beginners.
Anytype’s 编辑 和 sidebar provide a more customization experience, though it might have a steeper learning curve.
Both have dark mode 选项。
Data Ownership and Privacy
Privacy and security are paramount.
任意类型 emphasizes data ownership, allowing you to store your data locally or via peer-to-peer.
容量 offer backup options but have a more traditional cloud-based approach.
Customizability and Flexibility
任意类型 stands out with its high degree of customizability.
You can create different types of objects, integrate various data types, and tailor the app offers to your needs.
容量, while less flexible, offer a structured workflow.
Platform Availability and Accessibility
다양한 음성, 언어, 악센트를 제공하므로 여러 응용 분야에 적합합니다. apps are based on desktop platforms, but anytype is also available on Android 和 linux.
容量 is currently focused on mac and Windows.
Download options are straightforward for both.
Integration and Embedding
任意类型 allows you to embed various content types, acting as a flexible personal knowledge base.
容量 focus more on internal connections, though you can upload original content.
Neither integrates 和 La machine accounts 喜欢 Trello.

Free Version and Upgrade Options
Both offer a free version, with anytype still in beta.
Upgrade options provide additional features like enhanced storage and collaboration.
考虑 pros and cons before choosing.
选择头脑风暴工具时应注意什么?
- Visual Clarity: Can you easily see connections? Does the layout aid understanding?
- 靈活性: Can you adapt the tool to your workflow? Does it support various idea formats?
- Offline Für die meisten Podcaster, die den besten Podcast-Sound wünschen, wählen wir Podcastle.: Do you need to work without the internet? Is data privacy important to you?
- Learning Curve: How fast can you become proficient? Is the initial setup straightforward?
- 合作: Can you share and work together easily? Are the features suitable for team projects?
最终裁决(我们的选择)
那么,哪一个会获胜?
After testing both anytype 和 容量, we think 任意类型 is the better 替代品 for most people.
Why? It gives you more freedom. You can build your own system.
It’s like having a digital toolbox.
You can shape it to fit your needs.
容量 is good, but it’s more set in its ways.
We’ve shown you the key differences. Now, it’s your turn.
Try them out. See which one clicks for you.
We’ve done the hard work so you can make the right choice.


更多能力
Let’s see how Capacities is different from these other apps:
- 能力与概念: Capacities uses objects and links to connect ideas in a visual way. 概念 is like a big workspace for notes, projects, and databases.
- 能力与工艺: Capacities focuses on connecting ideas through objects. 工艺 makes your notes look really good and lets you link them inside documents.
- 容量与 ClickUp: Capacities helps you see connections between notes. 点击 is mostly for managing tasks, but it also has notes you can link to your work.
- Capacities vs Coda: Capacities uses objects and links to build your knowledge. Posso encontrar um tutorial se eu for um novo usuário? lets you make documents that act like apps with tables and charts.
- Capacities vs XTiles: Both help you connect your notes and keep your info private. Capacities has a visual, block-based way of linking things.
- Capacities vs AFFiNE pro: Capacities uses objects and links to connect your thoughts. AFFiNE 专业版 tries to be like Notion and Obsidian, letting you see connections, too.
- Capacities vs Obsidian: Capacities connect ideas with objects and links in a visual way. Obsidian uses plain Es ist für eine persönliche Wissensdatenbank konzipiert. Ihre Notizen werden als einfache files and shows connections between your notes like a map.
More of Anytype
Let’s see how Anytype stacks up against these other knowledge management and note-taking apps:
- Anytype vs Notion: Anytype prioritizes local-first storage and a graph-based approach for interconnected notes, emphasizing privacy. Notion is a cloud-based all-in-one workspace with strong collaboration and database features.
- Custo-benefício:: Considere o preço e os recursos para garantir que você obtenha o melhor valor.
- Anytype vs ClickUp: Anytype is primarily for personal knowledge management with a focus on interconnected notes. ClickUp is a project management tool with note-taking features integrated into tasks and projects.
- Anytype vs Coda: Anytype offers a flexible, local-first way to connect different types of information. Coda blends documents, spreadsheets, and apps into customizable, collaborative docs.
- Anytype vs XTiles: Both Anytype and XTiles emphasize privacy and local-first storage with a focus on interconnected notes and a versatile workspace. XTiles is a newer option.
- Anytype vs AFFiNE pro: Both are open-source and local-first, aiming to combine features of Notion and Obsidian. Anytype has its unique object-based structure, while AFFiNE pro offers block-based editing and graph views.
- Anytype vs Obsidian: Both are local-first and focus on creating interconnected knowledge graphs using Markdown. 黑曜石 has a strong plugin ecosystem, while Anytype has its unique object-based system.
常见问题
Is Anytype or Capacities better for note-taking?
任意类型 offers a flexible, object-based note-taking system, ideal for complex connections. 容量 shines with its daily journal structure, perfect for linear note-taking. The best choice depends on your workflow.
Does Anytype or Capacities prioritize data privacy?
任意类型 emphasizes privacy and security, allowing local or peer-to-peer data storage. 容量 uses cloud-based storage with backup options. Thus anytype has a higher degree of privacy.
Which app has more customization options?
任意类型 boasts a high degree of customization, letting users create personalized workspaces. 容量 offers a more structured, less flexible environment.
Can I use Anytype or Capacities on my mobile device?
任意类型 is available on Android, Linux, 和 desktop. 容量 currently focuses on 苹果 and Windows, so if you need mobile anytype is the way to go.
Is there a free version of Anytype or Capacities?
다양한 음성, 언어, 악센트를 제공하므로 여러 응용 분야에 적합합니다. anytype 和 容量 offer a free version, allowing you to explore their core features. 任意类型 is still in beta so the free version is fully functional.













