⚡ 簡単な評価:
- 価格: Make starts at $9 per month. Lutra starts at $23/month, billed annually.
- 最適な用途: Make for multi step workflows across many apps. Lutra for data enrichment and web research.
- 主な違い： Make uses a visual builder. Lutra takes requests in plain English.
- 私たちのおすすめ： Make for most people. It costs less and handles far more workflow types.
Make and Lutra both promise to automate tasks you hate doing by hand.
But they come at the problem from opposite ends.
Make gives you a canvas and lets you draw your workflow.
Lutra lets you type what you want and builds the steps for you.
One rewards patience. The other rewards clear instructions.
概要
This Make vs Lutra comparison covers pricing, key features, ease of use, and 安全.
私たちは両方のドキュメント、価格ページ、ユーザーレビューを確認しました オートメーション プラットフォーム。
私たちのライター陣は、それぞれの動物と実際に触れ合う時間も設けました。
それらのメモは、以下の「チームが気づいたこと」のセクションに記載されています。
Want to dig deeper? Each tool has a full review linked below.
Makeとは何ですか？
Make is a no code オートメーション プラットフォーム。
It connects your favorite apps so data moves between them on its own.
You build each workflow on a visual canvas, without writing code.
It links actions across various applications, more than 2,000 in all.
フリーランサー, small businesses, and large enterprises all use it.
Here’s a quick look at how the Make app works.
作る
Build complex automation on a visual canvas. Route data with filters, routers, and conditional logic. Start free and upgrade when you outgrow it.
価格設定
Make’s pricing model is based on operations. Each step a workflow runs counts toward your monthly limit.
| プラン | 価格 | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| 無料 | 月額0ドル | Simple workflows and learning the builder |
| コア | 月額9ドル | Solo users running steady automations |
| プロ | 月額16ドル | 高度な機能を必要とするパワーユーザー |
| チーム | 月額29ドル | Teams sharing scenarios and roles |
| 企業 | カスタム価格設定 | セキュリティ対策が必要な大企業 |
Pricing verified October 2026.
無料トライアル: There is no separate trial. The free plan works as a permanent trial, with no credit card needed.
返金保証: Make doesn’t offer refunds by default. It reviews requests case by case.
📌 注記： Prices above reflect annual billing. Paying monthly costs $10.59 for Core, $18.82 for Pro, and $34.12 for Teams.
⚠️ 警告： There are no hidden fees, but operations add up fast. Creating automations is free, yet each run of a ten-step scenario uses ten operations.
Key Benefits of Make
Here’s what makes Make worth considering:
- ビジュアルワークフロービルダー: You drag modules onto a canvas and link them. You see every path your data takes.
- Extensive Integration Capabilities: Make works with thousands of apps. You can add as many apps as you need to one workflow.
- Complex Logic Without Code: Iterators, aggregators, routers, and filters come built in. No coding expertise is required.
- Custom API Calls: Can’t find an app? The HTTP module sends HTTP requests to almost any third party services.
- エラー処理: You decide what happens when a step fails. Clear error messages show where things broke.
- 大規模なコミュニティ: Make has deep documentation, tutorials, and an active forum. Help is easy to find as you build workflows.
私たちのチームが気づいたこと
Our writer used Make to move form leads into Google Sheets and a CRM実際に体験してみて特に印象に残った点は以下のとおりです。
Make Pros & Cons
✅ メリット
- Paid plans start at just $9 per month
- Visual canvas shows every branch and filter
- Handles branching, loops, and error routes
- HTTP module connects apps without native support
❌ デメリット
- Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
- Operation counts can be hard to predict
- Refunds are only handled case by case
ルトラとは何ですか？
Lutra AI is an intelligent アシスタント for work across multiple applications.
You describe a job in natural language, and it carries it out.
It specializes in data enrichment, research, and メール管理.
Jiquan Ngiam and Bo Zhi See created it to cut app-switching.
The company calls it the first productivity agent for your whole workspace.
Watch Lutra handle a real request in this walkthrough.
ルトラ
Type a task and let the AI agent do the clicking. It can fill spreadsheets, enrich leads, and draft emails for you.
ルトラの価格設定
Lutra uses a credit system. Every account gets monthly credits that refresh on their own.
| プラン | 価格 | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| 無料 | $0 | Trying a few simple tasks |
| 不可欠 | 月額23ドル（年間請求） | Solo users with regular research jobs |
| プロ | 月額63ドル（年間請求） | Heavy enrichment and outreach work |
| 企業 | カスタム価格設定 | Companies needing SSO and 監査 トレイル |
Pricing verified October 2026.
無料トライアル: The free plan lets you test Lutra with a small credit allowance.
返金保証: Lutra doesn’t advertise a set refund window. Ask support before you commit to annual billing.
📌 注記： Not all tasks cost the same. Web searches and data enrichment burn more credits than simple actions.
⚠️ 警告： Paid plan prices are for annual billing. Check your credit use on the free plan first.
Key Benefits of Lutra
Here’s what makes Lutra worth considering:
- Natural Language Automation: You type what you need. Lutra builds and runs the steps.
- Runs Actual Code: Lutra executes real code behind each task. That helps ensure consistent outcomes every run.
- 緊密な統合: It plugs into Google Workspace, Microsoft, Slack, HubSpot, and many other apps.
- データセキュリティ: Lutra is SOC 2 Type II certified with end-to-end encryption. It doesn’t store data long-term unless you ask.
- プレイブック： Save a task, then share it with your team. This helps standardize processes across a company.
- 運行スケジュール： Workflows can run on a schedule, even when you’re offline.
私たちのチームが気づいたこと
私たちの 作家 signed up for Lutra and asked it to pull and enrich lead lists. Here’s what stood out:
Lutra Pros & Cons
✅ メリット
- Plain-English requests replace manual setup
- Strong at research, scraping, and enrichment
- SOC 2 Type II certified security
- Playbooks make good tasks repeatable
❌ デメリット
- Paid plans cost more than Make’s
- Credit burn is uneven across task types
- Smaller app list than dedicated automation tools
機能比較
Make is a workflow builder. Lutra is an AI agent that does work for you. Here’s how they compare across ten areas.
| 特徴 | 作る | ルトラ |
|---|---|---|
| 開始価格 | 月額9ドル | $23/month (annual) |
| 無料プラン | ✅ | ✅ |
| Visual Drag and Drop Builder | ✅ | ❌ |
| AIエージェント | ✅ | ✅ |
| Built-in Web Research | ❌ | ✅ |
| カスタムAPI | ✅ HTTP module | ✅ via MCP |
| Iterators & Error Handling | ✅ | ❌ |
| Shareable Templates | ✅ テンプレート | ✅ Playbooks |
| 最適な用途 | Complex automation | Research and data tasks |
1. AI Agents
作る： Make AI Agents sit inside your scenarios. You give an agent a goal and the tools it may use. It then decides which step to take next.
ルトラ: The whole product is the agent. You chat with it like other AIアシスタント, but it acts across your work apps. It can research ユーチューブ videos and summarize them on request.
2. Reliability and Consistent Outcomes
作る： Agentic automation mixes AI decisions with fixed steps. You keep strict rules where they matter. AI only handles the fuzzy parts.
ルトラ: Lutra AI ensures repeatable results by writing and running actual code. That beats a chatbot guessing each time. Its PubMed RSS report shows how scheduled tasks can automate reports.
3. Workflow Building and Ease of Use
作る： The drag and drop interface lets you see each module, route, and filter. Simple workflows take minutes. More complex workflows take practice, so expect a steep learning curve.
ルトラ: There’s no canvas to learn. You type, and conversational AI handles the setup. It can also build visualizations, like a cross-platform app analysis dashboard.
💡 プロのヒント: Lutra feels more beginner friendly on day one. Some reviewers still mention a learning curve in finding everything it can do.
4. Data Extraction and Enrichment
作る： Make can process data from invoices, forms, and files. Parsing tools reshape it before it lands in Google Sheets.
ルトラ: This is Lutra’s home turf. It finds structured data on web pages, PDFs, and docs, then enriches each row. It can turn Google Drive PDFs into tidy Sheets.
5. リードジェネレーション
作る： Make moves leads from ads, forms, and landing pages into your CRM. It scores, tags, and routes them by rules you set.
ルトラ: Lutra builds the lead list itself. It scrapes contact details from sites like LinkedIn and enriches each profile. A sales team gets ready-to-use records.
6. Marketing and Email Automation
作る： Make can post to social channels on a schedule. It also syncs customer interactions across tools, which helps e commerce stores keep inventory updated.
ルトラ: Lutra can automate emails with CRM data. It drafts personalized campaigns and Gmail replies, then sends follow-ups and tracks the results.
7. Integrations and Custom APIs
作る： With 2,000+ apps, Make covers most tools you already use. The HTTP module handles custom API calls for everything else. That makes it great for syncing data across IT systems.
ルトラ: Lutra connects to existing apps like Outlook, Stripe, and HubSpot. It supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) for custom integrations, with SSO, RBAC, and audit trails.
⚠️ 警告： Lutra’s app list is shorter. Check your must-have tools before you pay for a plan.
8. Templates and Playbooks
作る： The templates gallery gives you ready-made scenarios. Pick one, connect your accounts, and tweak the steps.
ルトラ: Playbooks are saved tasks you can share across your company. A profile finder playbook, for example, runs the same way for everyone.
9. Business Workflows by Team
作る： Make is highly versatile. It runs contract approvals for legal, invoices for finance, and tickets for IT.
ルトラ: Lutra serves sales, recruiting, finance, and 不動産. It finds phone numbers, sources candidates, reconciles expenses, and scrapes Zillow listings.
10. 価格設定とコスト
Here are both pricing plans side by side.
| プラン | 作る | ルトラ |
|---|---|---|
| 無料 | 月額0ドル | $0 |
| エントリ | Core: $9 per month | Essential: $23/month (billed annually) |
| 中 | Pro: $16 per month | Professional: $63/month (billed annually) |
| チーム | Teams: $29 per month | — |
| 企業 | カスタム価格設定 | カスタム価格設定 |
作る： Make is the cost effective pick. Most paid plans fall between $9 and $29. Reviewers often say it beats ザピエール and Pipedream on price.
ルトラ: Lutra costs more, but each credit does heavier work. One task can replace hours of manual research.
さまざまなシナリオ
| 必要な場合は | 選ぶ | なぜ |
|---|---|---|
| 予算が限られている | 作る | Paid plans start at $9 |
| Advanced workflows with branching | 作る | Routers, iterators, error routes |
| Lead research and enrichment | ルトラ | Scrapes and enriches on request |
| Connecting niche apps | 作る | 2,000+ apps plus HTTP |
| Zero setup for non technical users | ルトラ | Type tasks in plain English |
| Strict data security | ルトラ | SOC 2 Type II, MCP guardrails |
💰 あなたの予算
Make wins on raw cost. Lutra makes sense when one task saves hours of research.
🔌 あなたの技術スタック
Many tools, or niche ones? Pick Make. Mostly Google Workspace and Microsoft? Lutra covers you.
⚙️ Your Workflow Style
Make suits always-on pipelines that run thousands of times. Lutra suits jobs where an AI must read, search, and decide.
🎓 あなたの経験レベル
New to automation? Lutra needs little technical know how. Make takes longer to learn but gives more control.
🆓 無料トライアルとデモ
Both offer a free plan. Run one real task in each before you pay.
🛟 サポートオプション
Make’s customer support is backed by a huge community and tutorials. Lutra’s resources are smaller but growing.
🔒 データプライバシーとセキュリティ
Lutra uses secure authentication on every connection. It also limits risky mixes of private data, external systems, and untrusted content.
切り替えガイド
既にこれらのツールのいずれかをご利用ですか？切り替える場合、どのような変更が予想されますか？
🔄 Switching from Make to Lutra?
✅ 得られるもの：
- Tasks set up by typing, not building
- Built-in web searches and lead enrichment
- SOC 2 Type II security with MCP controls
❌ 失うもの：
- The visual canvas and fine control
- A much larger app library
- 月々の費用が削減される
📋切り替え方法：
- List your Make scenarios and what each one does.
- Create a free Lutra account and connect your apps.
- Describe each task in plain English and save it as a Playbook.
🔄 Switching from Lutra to Make?
✅ 得られるもの：
- Cheaper plans for high-volume runs
- Iterators, routers, and error handling
- 2,000+ apps and HTTP module access
❌ 失うもの：
- Plain-English task creation
- Native research and scraping
- Shareable Playbooks
📋切り替え方法：
- Write down the steps each Lutra Playbook performs.
- Sign up for Make’s free plan and connect your apps.
- Rebuild each task from a template or a blank scenario.
私たちのレビューで取り上げられなかったこと
This comparison focused on solo users and small teams. We didn’t evaluate Enterprise plans, custom pricing, or high-volume runs with millions of operations. We also didn’t measure real time data speed or long-term credit costs at scale. Features reflect October 2026 versions and may change.
最終評決
| カテゴリ | 勝者 |
|---|---|
| 💰価格 | 作る |
| 🧩 Workflow Builder | 作る |
| 🧠 Complex Logic & Error Handling | 作る |
| 🔌 連携機能 | 作る |
| 📚 テンプレートとコミュニティ | 作る |
| 🔍 Data Enrichment & Research | ルトラ |
| 🤖 AIエージェント | ルトラ |
| 👶 使いやすさ | ルトラ |
| 🏆総合優勝 | 作る |
🏆 WINNER: MAKE
Make wins 5 out of 8 categories.
最適な用途: Multi-app automation, budget-minded teams, complex workflows
Make is a powerful automation platform for people who want control. It costs less and connects more apps. Its visual approach turns messy 仕事 workflows into clear diagrams.
Lutra is the better fit for research-heavy work. If your days involve web searches, lead lists, and messy spreadsheets, Lutra saves real time. It lets you skip the builder and just ask.
Still, most readers want one tool that runs reliably in the background. For that, Make is the stronger choice. Start on the free plan and grow from there.
More of Make Compared
Here’s how Make stacks up against other automation tools:
勝利を掴もう： branching paths, lower entry price, and deeper data parsing. Unlike Zapier, it bills per operation.
Zapierが優れている点： a simpler linear setup, a larger app library, and faster onboarding.
Make vs n8n
勝利を掴もう： zero hosting work, a friendlier canvas, and a bigger template gallery.
n8nが勝利： open-source code, self-hosting, and code nodes for developers.
Make vs パブリー 接続する
勝利を掴もう： more native apps, stronger error handling, and built-in AI agents.
Pabbly Connect wins on: lifetime deals, free internal steps, and simpler billing.
More of Lutra Compared
Here’s how Lutra stacks up against other AI workflows tools:
Lutra wins on: chat-based setup, native web research, and lead enrichment.
Zapierが優れている点： thousands more apps, lower starting cost, and mature trigger-action automation.
ルトラ対 ガムループ
Lutra wins on: no node building, SOC 2 Type II security, and shareable Playbooks.
Gumloopが勝つ理由： a visual AI pipeline builder, scraping nodes, and step-level control.
ルトラ対 マインドスタジオ
Lutra wins on: ready-to-use task agent, CRM-driven email, and Google Drive extraction.
MindStudio wins on: building custom AIアプリ, model choice, and branded agent interfaces.
よくある質問
MakeはZapierより優れているのか？
For complex logic and lower cost, yes. Zapier is simpler and has more apps. Make gives you branching, iterators, and better control over how data is processed.
Make.comは使いにくいですか？
Basic tasks are easy to set up. Advanced workflows take practice, especially with API integrations. Templates and tutorials shorten your automation journey.
Make.comの料金はいくらですか？
There’s a free plan. Paid plans are Core at $9, Pro at $16, and Teams at $29 per month. Enterprise uses custom pricing.
Lutra AIは安全ですか？
Yes. It is SOC 2 Type II certified and uses end-to-end encryption. It doesn’t keep your data long-term unless you ask it to.
Lutra AIは何に使われていますか？
It handles data extraction, lead enrichment, web research, and email follow-ups. You describe the job, and the agent works to complete tasks across your connected apps.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 