⚡ 快速结论：
- 定价： Frase starts at $49/mo. CoWriter starts at $11.99/month.
- 最适合： Frase for 关键词研究 and content optimization. CoWriter for academic writing and drafting.
- 主要区别： Frase analyzes top ranking search results. CoWriter focuses on essays, scripts and papers.
- 我们的选择： Frase, because its research tool ties every draft to a real target keyword.
Both of these AI writing tools promise to speed up your content creation process.
Only one of them was built for search engines.
Frase is an SEO tool that studies search results before you start writing.
CoWriter is an AI writing 助手 aimed at essays, papers and scripts.
That single difference decides which one belongs in your workflow.
概述
This Frase vs Cowriter comparison covers pricing, features and how each tool fits a real seo workflow.
We reviewed documentation, pricing pages and user reviews for both platforms.
我们的撰稿人也亲自体验了每一项功能。
这些笔记出现在下面的“我们的团队注意到”部分中。
By the end you will know which 人工智能工具 matches your content creation goals.
Frase是什么？
Frase is an ai writer and research tool built for search engine optimization.
It was developed in Boston, Massachusetts, in 2017.
You give it a target keyword and Frase pulls the top 20 Google results.
From those top ranking search results it builds content briefs in minutes.
The brief lists all the keywords and essential terms your competitors share.
Frase AI also supports multilingual work in English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Dutch, Portuguese and Danish.
The whole point is to help you create seo optimized content without guessing.
Here is a walkthrough of how the platform handles a full article.
🏆 获胜者：弗雷泽
Research, write and score seo optimized content in one place. Built around real search intent data.
框架定价
Here is what Frase costs in 2026. Three tiers, no free version.
| 计划 | 价格 | 最适合 |
|---|---|---|
| 起动机 | 每月 49 美元 | Solo content writer testing the seo workflow |
| 专业的 | 每月 129 美元 | Agencies running keyword research at volume |
| 规模 | 每月 299 美元 | Large teams and heavy content production |
价格已于2026年7月核实。
免费试用： No free version and no trial. You pay before you test.
退款保证： A 5-day money-back guarantee covers your first purchase.
📌 笔记： The built-in ai writer caps AI characters per month. Unlimited access costs a $35/month add-on. The seo add on is another $35/month for advanced search engine optimization data. Google Search Console integration and WordPress publishing are included on every plan.
⚠️ Pricing conflict flagged: Our research notes list a Basic plan at $14.99/mo, a Team plan at $44.99/mo and an Enterprise tier at $114.99/mo. Our canonical data records Starter $49, Professional $129 and Scale $299. Those older figures look like retired tiers, so we use the canonical numbers everywhere in this article. Check the live pricing page before you buy.
Frase的主要优势
以下是弗雷泽值得考虑的原因：
- SERP research in one click: The research tool reads the first 20 results for your target search query. You get a content outline without opening 20 tabs.
- Topic score: A score shows how your actual content compares to competitors. It updates live as you edit.
- Question finder: Search questions tied to the same keyword to spark new angles. This is where most content ideas come from.
- Import and rework: Pull in existing content and keep the original formatting. Frase suggests fixes to your original article.
- Content gap spotting: Compare your own content against rivals to find missing subtopics. Useful for stale posts losing organic traffic.
- Search Console link-up: Google Search Console feeds real query and monthly search volume context into your briefs.
- 速度： Some users report producing content four to five times faster than before.
我们的团队注意到了什么
Our writer signed up for Frase and used it on live client briefs for several days. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:
短语的优缺点
✅ 优点
- Analyzes the first 20 SERP results to build a content brief
- Topic score shows how optimized content compares to competitors
- Google Search Console integration is included on every plan
- Costs less than MarketMuse and 冲浪者 SEO
- Responsive support team that users call helpful
❌缺点
- No free version and no trial, only a 5-day money-back guarantee
- Unlimited access to the ai writer needs a $35/month add-on
- AI generated content often reads generic and needs editing
- Some users hit interface glitches that break the flow
什么是 CoWriter？
CoWriter is an ai writing assistant built for long-form drafting.
It gives you article ideas, outlines and line-by-line suggestions.
The tool suits writers, content marketers and web publishers on tight deadlines.
Students also use it for academic essays, research papers and scripts.
Its outlines look like long-form SEO articles rather than short blurbs.
Watch how CoWriter handles a draft from a blank page.
共同编剧
Outlines, drafts and citations for academic and long-form work. Cheaper entry point than most seo content tools.
合作撰稿人定价
CoWriter keeps things simple. Two paid tiers, both under $25.
| 计划 | 价格 | 最适合 |
|---|---|---|
| 专业版 | 每月 11.99 美元 | Basic editing plus 50 completion suggestions per day |
| 优质的 | 每月 23.99 美元 | All Pro features, VIP treatment and 早期的 获取新功能 |
价格已于2026年7月核实。
免费试用： Yes. A limited free tier lets you test the editor before paying.
退款保证： Not published. Cancel from your account settings instead.
📌 笔记： The Pro plan caps you at 50 completion suggestions per day. Heavy drafters hit that ceiling fast, which is the main reason to move up to Premium.
⚠️ Pricing conflict flagged: Older records list Premium at $385 and Pro at $20.00, and a third source quotes paid plans starting at $19 per month. Our verified 2026 rates are Pro $11.99/month and Premium $23.99/month, and those are the figures used throughout this article. Confirm on the CoWriter site before checkout.
Key Benefits of CoWriter
Here is where CoWriter earns its place:
- Idea generation: Prompts help unstick ideas when you stare at a blank document. Good for anyone who struggles to start writing.
- Outline builder: Structures a long piece before you write a single word. The shape holds up for 2,000-word drafts.
- IEEE citation generator: Formats references for technical and academic work. Saves manual reference chasing.
- Custom styles and tones: Match a brand 嗓音 or a course rubric. Style corrections leave room for self expression.
- AI detection awareness: The undetectable 论文写手 tries to soften obvious AI generated patterns. Human review still matters.
- 入门价格低： At $11.99/month it undercuts almost every content tool in this category.
我们的团队注意到了什么
Our writer signed up for CoWriter and pushed a few long drafts through it. Here is what stood out:
CoWriter Pros & Cons
✅ 优点
- Entry price of $11.99/month beats most rivals
- Built-in IEEE citation generator for academic drafts
- Outline builder aimed squarely at long-form pieces
- Custom writing styles and tones for different audiences
❌缺点
- No keyword research or SERP data at all
- Output is still detectable as AI generated content
- Pro plan limits you to 50 completion suggestions per day
- Name clashes with Co:Writer Universal, which confuses buyers
功能对比
Ready for a closer look at Frase vs CoWriter? We compare ten areas that decide which platform earns a spot in your content creation process.
| 特征 | 短语 | 共同编剧 |
|---|---|---|
| 起价 | 每月 49 美元 | 每月 11.99 美元 |
| 免费版 | ❌ | ✅ |
| 关键词研究 | ✅ | ❌ |
| 搜索引擎结果分析器 | ✅ | ❌ |
| 主题得分 | ✅ | ❌ |
| 大纲生成器 | ✅ | ✅ |
| 引用生成器 | ❌ | ✅ |
| AI Detection Handling | ❌ | ✅ |
| Google 搜索控制台 | ✅ | ❌ |
| 最适合 | SEO内容团队 | Academic and long-form writers |
1. Research and Search Intent
短语： The SERP analyzer reads the first 20 results for your target search query. It reports word count, headings and shared subtopics, so search intent stops being guesswork. That research layer is the reason people pick Frase over generic AI writing tools.
共同编剧： The AI research paper generator pulls source material for academic topics instead of ranking data. It never touches search results or monthly search volume. For a thesis chapter that is fine, for a blog post it leaves you blind.
2. AI Writing and Drafting
短语： The AI article wizard walks you from a target keyword to a finished draft. Reviewers agree the ai content generation quality trails dedicated writers like 碧玉 AI. Treat the draft as raw clay, not finished copy.
共同编剧： Drafting is the whole point here, and the 无法检测 essay writer produces longer, steadier prose. Its ai generation still needs a human pass for facts and voice. Nobody should publish either tool’s first output untouched.
⚠️ 警告： Both tools produce ai generated content that reads generic without editing. Budget time for a rewrite pass on every draft.
3. Content Optimization and Scoring
短语： A topic score grades your draft against the pages already ranking. Import existing content, keep the original formatting, and watch the number climb as you edit. This is the closest thing here to real content optimization tools.
共同编剧： Scoring here targets ai detection, not rankings. The AI detection proof mode reworks phrasing that classifiers usually flag. Useful for coursework, useless for seo optimization.
4. Outline Building
短语： Its outline builder mirrors the heading structure of competitors ranking for the same keyword. You can accept the AI version or drag your own headings around. Starting a new document with that skeleton saves an hour of planning.
共同编剧： Its outline builder shapes long-form pieces without looking at rivals. The result reads like a well-organised essay plan. Strong structure, zero competitive signal.
5. Templates and Idea Generation
短语： Templates cover product copy, a meta description, intros and summaries. Every one of them stays tied to the brief, so creating content in bulk keeps a consistent angle. Handy when a content creator juggles ten posts at once.
共同编剧： Idea generation leans on prompts that spark angles rather than fixed templates. It helps creativity when you are stuck on a blank document. Less structured, more open-ended.
6. Titles and Headlines
短语： The blog title generator spins title ideas that already include your keyword. Each suggestion is checked against what currently earns clicks. Small feature, real effect on organic traffic.
共同编剧： The AI script generator writes hooks for video and 播客 intros instead of blog headlines. It reaches beyond articles into scripts, a cover letter or a newsletter. Different job, different output.
7. Paragraphs and Citations
短语： The paragraph generator fills gaps inside a section you have already outlined. It stays on brief, which matters when you are chasing high ranking content. There is no citation tool, so sourcing stays manual.
共同编剧： The IEEE citation generator formats references while you draft. That saves academic writers a genuine chore and lowers accidental plagiarism risk. Frase has nothing close to it.
8. Question Research and Tone Control
短语： The question finder surfaces real questions people ask around a topic. Answering them is the fastest route to seo friendly articles and featured snippets. It is also how many teams create high ranking content from scratch.
共同编剧： Custom writing styles and tones let you set formality, length and register. A 学生 and a marketer get very different output from the same prompt. Tone control here beats anything in Frase.
9. Analytics and Integrations
短语： SEO analytics connect to Search Console on every plan, and WordPress publishing ships with all tiers too. You can push a finished draft straight to your site or copy it into Google Docs. That closes the loop from research to published page.
共同编剧： Integrations are thin. You copy 文本 out and paste it wherever it needs to go. For a solo writer that is fine, for a publishing team it adds friction.
💡 专业提示： If your team already lives in Search Console, Frase’s data link removes a manual export step from your weekly 报道.
10. 定价与成本
Let’s put the plans side by side.
| 层级 | 短语 | 共同编剧 |
|---|---|---|
| 自由的 | ❌ 无免费版本 | ✅ 免费档位有限 |
| 入口 | 入门级每月 49 美元 | Pro $11.99/month |
| 中 | 专业版，每月 129 美元 | Premium $23.99/month |
| 顶部 | 规模：每月 299 美元 | — |
| 附加组件 | $35/month AI, $35/month SEO | None published |
短语： Starter at $49/mo buys the research engine, not just an 人工智能助手. Both add-ons can push a real bill to $119/month, so budget for them. Even then it sits below MarketMuse and near Surfer SEO.
共同编剧： At $11.99/month it is the cheapest way to get a drafting partner. You get no ranking data for that money, which makes sense given its academic focus. Premium at $23.99/month is still less than half of Frase’s entry tier.
不同场景
| 如果您需要…… | 选择 | 为什么 |
|---|---|---|
| 预算紧张 | 共同编剧 | Starts at $11.99/month |
| 关键词研究 | 短语 | Only tool with SERP data |
| Academic citations | 共同编剧 | IEEE citation generator built in |
| Ranking blog posts | 短语 | Topic score guides every edit |
| Essay drafting | 共同编剧 | Long-form outlines and tone control |
| Search Console data | 短语 | 所有套餐均包含 |
💰 您的预算
Frase asks $49/mo before add-ons, which is a real commitment for a 自由职业者. CoWriter opens at $11.99/month and still gives you a drafting partner.
🔌 您的技术栈
Frase plugs into Search Console and WordPress on every tier. CoWriter expects you to copy text into whatever editor you already use.
📝 你的写作风格
A content writer chasing rankings needs the brief-first approach Frase enforces. An essayist or scriptwriter will prefer CoWriter’s tone controls.
🎓您的经验水平
Beginners often find Frase’s scoring screens busier than NeuronWriter’s. CoWriter is simpler, so people new to AI drafting learn faster with it.
🆓 免费试用和演示
CoWriter lets you test a limited tier before paying anything. Frase gives you a 5-day money-back guarantee instead, so try it on a live brief immediately.
🛟 支持选项
Frase’s support team gets praise in reviews for quick, useful replies. CoWriter’s Premium tier promises VIP treatment, though response times are not published.
切换指南
Already paying for one of them? Here is what changes if you move.
🔄 Switching from Frase to CoWriter?
✅ 你将获得：
- A monthly bill roughly a quarter the size
- An IEEE citation generator for academic work
- AI detection handling on generated drafts
❌ 你会失去什么：
- SERP analysis and every keyword research feature
- The topic score that guides your edits
- Search Console and WordPress connections
📋 如何切换：
- Export your Frase briefs and drafts as documents
- Open a CoWriter account on the free tier
- Rebuild your house style using custom tones
🔄 Switching from CoWriter to Frase?
✅ 你将获得：
- SERP analysis across the top 20 results
- A topic score for measurable content production quality
- Search Console data feeding your briefs
❌ 你会失去什么：
- The built-in citation formatting
- AI detection proof rewriting
- A free tier and a much smaller bill
📋 如何切换：
- Copy your CoWriter drafts into plain documents
- Start a Frase Starter plan and link Search Console
- Import each draft and rework it against the topic score
我们的评测没有涵盖的内容
This comparison focused on solo writers and small content teams. We did not test enterprise contracts, API access or bulk seat licensing on either platform. Our notes reflect the July 2026 versions, and both companies ship changes often. If you write in a language outside Frase’s eight supported options, your results will differ from ours.
最终判决
| 类别 | 优胜者 |
|---|---|
| 💰 定价 | 共同编剧 |
| 🔍 Research and Search Intent | 短语 |
| ✍️ AI写作质量 | 共同编剧 |
| 📈 Content Optimization | 短语 |
| 🧱 Outline Building | 短语 |
| 🎓 Academic Support | 共同编剧 |
| 🔌 集成 | 短语 |
| 📊 分析 | 短语 |
| 🏆 总冠军 | 短语 |
🏆 获奖者：FRASE
Frase 在 8 个类别中赢得了 5 个。
最适合： keyword research, content briefs, reworking existing posts, agency content production
These two products are not really chasing the same buyer. Frase is a search-first platform that happens to include an ai writer. CoWriter is a drafting companion that happens to produce long articles.
CoWriter is the better pick for essays, papers and anything needing citations. It is also four times cheaper, which matters on a student budget.
If your work is judged by rankings, Frase is the safer investment. Our full Frase review covers the editor in more depth if you want the granular view.
比弗雷斯更多
Here is how Frase measures up against other seo content tools:
弗雷斯 vs 冲浪者 SEO
弗雷泽获胜的理由是： faster brief generation, question research depth, lower entry price
Surfer SEO 胜出的原因： tighter on-page scoring, cleaner editor, broader integration list
弗雷泽获胜的理由是： far lower cost, quicker onboarding, more accessible for solo writers
MarketMuse 胜出的原因： site-wide topic modelling, deeper competitive inventories, enterprise reporting
弗雷泽获胜的理由是： Search Console linkage, richer question data, stronger brief templates
神经元写入器 获胜方式： friendlier scoring screen, cheaper monthly tiers, gentler learning curve
弗雷泽获胜的理由是： SERP research accuracy, brief customisation, import of existing posts
无鳞坚果 获胜方式： bundled writing credits, cruise-mode drafting, all-in-one pricing
More of CoWriter Compared
Here is how CoWriter stacks up against other drafting tools:
共同作者 vs 珍妮
CoWriter wins on: lower entry price, script generation, custom tone presets
珍妮获胜的条件是： in-line citation search, larger paper database, smoother autocomplete
共同作者 vs Paperpal
CoWriter wins on: outline building, idea prompts, cheaper monthly plan
Paperpal 赢得： language editing accuracy, journal submission checks, Word add-in polish
共同作者 vs QuillBot
CoWriter wins on: full-draft generation, structured outlines, IEEE formatting
QuillBot 胜出： paraphrasing control, summariser quality, generous free tier
CoWriter wins on: generating drafts from nothing, citation output, topic ideation
Grammarly 在以下方面胜出： everyday correction accuracy, browser coverage, team style guides
常见问题解答
我可以免费使用 Frase 吗？
No. There is no free version and no trial. You pay upfront, and a 5-day money-back guarantee covers you if the platform disappoints.
Frase是如何运作的？
You enter a target keyword. The platform reads the top 20 Google results, builds a brief with essential terms, then scores your draft against those pages.
共同编剧是做什么的？
It generates article ideas, outlines and long-form drafts. Extras include an IEEE citation generator, custom tones and an AI detection proof mode for academic work.
共同写作人工智能是免费的吗？
A limited free tier exists. Paid plans run $11.99/month for Pro and $23.99/month for Premium, which adds VIP support and early access to new features.
Frase是正规的吗？
Yes. It launched in Boston in 2017 and reviewers call it reliable and safe. Support earns consistent praise, though the interface occasionally glitches.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 