⚡ Szybki werdykt:
- Wycena: Luma paid plans start at $7.99/mo. InVideo paid plans start at $28/mo. Both have a free plan.
- Najlepiej dla: Luma for cinematic, realistic Wideo AI clips. InVideo for template-based marketing videos and social media content.
- Kluczowa różnica: Luma AI generates short clips from text and images. InVideo turns prompts into full multi-scene videos.
- Nasz wybór: Luma for most users who want realistic video generation. Its output quality is hard to match at this price.
Luma and InVideo both promise to help you create videos with AI.
But they are not the same kind of tool.
Luma AI makes short, realistic clips from a prompt or an image.
InVideo builds full marketing videos using templates and stock footage.
This Luma vs InVideo comparison shows which one fits your projects.
Przegląd
Porównanie obejmuje ceny, funkcje i łatwość użytkowania.
We also break down who each ai video generator działa najlepiej dla.
Our writers spent hands-on time with both tools.
Notatki te znajdują się poniżej w sekcjach „Co zauważył nasz zespół”.
By the end, you will know which tool to pick.
Czym jest Luma?
Luma AI is an ai video generator from Luma Labs.
It turns a text prompt or an image into a short video clip.
The platform also generates custom 3D assets on demand.
It ranks with Runway and Pika as the top ai tools for video today.
Luma is known for photorealism and a real sense of physics.
The artificial intelligence behind it reads your prompt and builds the scene.
This technology keeps improving with each model update.
Each video runs 5 seconds and can extend up to 10 seconds.
Watch the quick review below before we go deeper.
Luma
Luma AI creates cinematic, realistic clips from text and images. The Dream Machine engine handles motion and natural movement well. A free plan lets you test it first.
Cennik Luma
Here is what Luma costs in 2026. Let’s break it down.
| Plan | Cena | Najlepsze dla |
|---|---|---|
| Bezpłatny | $0 | Testing with 150 free seconds monthly |
| Lekki | 7,99 USD/miesiąc | Hobbyists and light creators |
| Plus | 23,99 USD/miesiąc | Regularni twórcy wideo |
| Nieograniczony | 75,99 USD/miesiąc | Intensywni użytkownicy i małe zespoły |
| Przedsiębiorstwo | Skontaktuj się ze sprzedażą | Large teams and custom needs |
Pricing verified June 2026.
Bezpłatny okres próbny: Yes. The free plan gives you 150 seconds of video per month with no credit card needed.
Gwarancja zwrotu pieniędzy: Refund terms follow standard subscription policy. Check before you buy.
📌 Notatka: Luma’s basic plan works out to about 20 cents for a 5-second video. That makes it cheaper than Pas startowy, which costs around $1.20 for the same length.
⚠️ Ostrzeżenie: The free plan is for non-commercial use and adds a watermark. You need a paid plan to remove it.
Główne korzyści Luma
Here is what makes Luma worth considering:
- Photorealism: Luma excels at realistic visuals and understands physics in a scene. The result looks closer to reality than most rivals.
- Dream Machine: This engine drives the video generation. It handles natural movement and motion with impressive detail.
- Text to Video and Image to Video: Type a prompt or upload an image. Luma builds a clip from either input.
- On-Demand 3D: Luma AI generates unique 3D models based on your prompts. You can adjust lighting and camera angles in 3D.
- Bezpłatny dostęp: The free version gives 150 seconds monthly. That is enough to discover what the tool can do.
- Browser Based: Luma runs in your browser. There are also apps for quick access on the go.
Co zauważył nasz zespół
Nasz pisarz signed up for Luma and spent several days creating clips. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:
Zalety i wady Luma
✅ Zalety
- Realistic visuals with a strong grasp of physics and natural movement
- Cheaper per clip than Runway for short videos
- Free plan with 150 seconds of video each month
- Generates custom 3D assets and models on demand
❌ Wady
- Clips are limited to 10 seconds, so longer projects need stitching
- Requires prompt engineering to get the best results
- Free plan is non-commercial and adds a watermark
Czym jest InVideo?
InVideo is an ai video generator built for marketing content.
You type a prompt and it turns it into a multi-scene video.
InVideo AI writes the script and generates voiceovers for you.
It ships with thousands of pre made templates to start fast.
The user friendly interface makes it easy for beginners.
Here is a short review of the platform in action.
W wideo
InVideo turns text prompts into full videos. It pairs a massive library of stock footage with pre made templates. Great for social media and marketing.
Cennik InVideo
Here is what InVideo costs in 2026. Let’s break it down.
| Plan | Cena | Najlepsze dla |
|---|---|---|
| Bezpłatny | $0 | Trying basic features with watermarks |
| Plus | 28 USD/miesiąc | Twórcy solo i małe projekty |
| Maksym | 50 USD/miesiąc | Frequent video creators |
| Generatywny | 100 USD/miesiąc | Heavy AI generation users |
| Zespół | 899 USD/miesiąc | Larger teams needing collaboration features |
Pricing verified June 2026.
Bezpłatny okres próbny: Yes. The free plan lets you test the editor and templates before you pay.
Gwarancja zwrotu pieniędzy: InVideo follows standard subscription refund terms. Read them before buying.
📌 Notatka: The free plan and lower paid plans cap exports and add a watermark. Higher plans unlock more AI generation and the full media library.
⚠️ Ostrzeżenie: The jump from the Generative plan to the Team plan is steep. Solo creators rarely need the Team tier.
Główne korzyści z InVideo
Here is what makes InVideo worth considering:
- Ogromna biblioteka: InVideo offers a vast library of 9 million premium media assets. You get stock footage, images, and music tracks in one place.
- Pre Made Templates: Thousands of templates cover most video types. Pick one and swap in your own footage.
- Tekst na wideo: InVideo AI is designed to turn prompts into structured multi-scene videos with little effort.
- Auto Scripts and Voiceovers: The AI writes scripts and adds voiceovers. You can edit through simple text commands.
- Łatwa edycja: A timeline interface and drag-and-drop functionality keep editing simple. Beginners pick it up fast.
- Range of Features: Subtitles, language support, and AI avatars add useful additional features for marketers.
Co zauważył nasz zespół
Our writer used InVideo to build a few marketing clips. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:
Zalety i wady InVideo
✅ Zalety
- Massive library of 9 million stock footage, images, and music assets
- Thousands of pre made templates speed up creating videos
- User friendly interface that beginners learn quickly
- Auto scripts, voiceovers, and text-based editing
❌ Wady
- AI clips can look lower quality than Luma’s realistic output
- Paid plans start higher than Luma’s basic plan
- The Team plan price is a big jump for small projects
Porównanie funkcji
Ready to dive into a detailed comparison of Luma vs InVideo?
We will explore eight key features. This helps you see which platform suits your needs and which one gives the best results.
| Funkcja | Luma | W wideo |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (paid) | 7,99 USD/miesiąc | 28 USD/miesiąc |
| Bezpłatny plan | ✅ | ✅ |
| Tekst na wideo | ✅ | ✅ |
| Obraz do wideo | ✅ | ❌ |
| Pre Made Templates | ❌ | ✅ |
| Biblioteka materiałów filmowych | ❌ | ✅ (9M+) |
| 3D Asset Generation | ✅ | ❌ |
| Auto Voiceover | ❌ | ✅ |
| Najlepsze dla | Realistic AI clips | Filmy marketingowe |
1. Video Generation
Luma: Luma AI focuses on cinematic generative video clips. It builds 3D content from text prompts and produces realistic visuals. The Dream Machine engine handles motion and natural movement with care. Output runs at 1360×752 pixels.
W wideo: InVideo creates 2D video content from written scripts. It turns a prompt into a structured multi-scene video. The focus is finished marketing content rather than a single realistic scene.
⚠️ Ostrzeżenie: Luma clips top out at 10 seconds. For a long marketing video, you would stitch clips or use InVideo instead.
2. Templates and Stock Footage
Luma: Luma has no template gallery and no stock footage library. You start from a prompt or an image every time. That suits original ideas but slows down repeatable, templated work.
W wideo: InVideo ships with thousands of pre made templates. It also offers a massive library of 9 million premium assets, including stock footage, images, and music. You rarely need outside footage.
3. Realism and Visual Quality
Luma: This is where Luma pulls ahead. The AI understands physics, so objects move in a way that feels close to reality. The realistic, impressive output is the main reason people pick this tool. Many users call it the najlepszy generator wideo AI for professional quality videos. As an example, a single product clip can look studio-shot. Each video generated has the ability to mimic real camera depth.
W wideo: InVideo’s AI scenes can look lower quality next to Luma. The platform leans on stock footage to fill the gap and still ships professional looking videos. For a polished human presenter, its AI avatars help but still feel less lifelike.
4. Scripts and Voiceovers
Luma: Luma does not write scripts or add voiceovers. It generates the visuals only. You bring audio and narration from another tool if your project needs them.
W wideo: InVideo AI automatically writes scripts and generates voiceovers. This saves time when you need a full video fast. It is a clear win for marketing and social media content.
5. Editing Tools
Luma: Luma offers advanced 3D editing tools. You can adjust lighting and camera angles in 3D. These customization options are powerful but have a steeper learning curve for beginners.
W wideo: InVideo uses a timeline interface for clip timing and drag-and-drop functionality. You can also edit through text commands. It is the easier tool for first-time video editing.
6. Łatwość użytkowania
Luma: Luma requires prompt engineering to produce the desired effect. New users may feel afraid of the blank prompt box at first. Once you learn the rhythm, the speed of creating clips improves.
W wideo: InVideo offers a user friendly interface for beginners creating videos. Templates and text commands lower the barrier. Most people log in and ship a first video the same day.
7. Przypadki użycia
Luma: Luma fits creative and cinematic projects. Think concept art, product shots, and short visual ideas where realism matters most. It is the best tool when you want one striking scene.
W wideo: InVideo is suitable for marketing and social media content creation. If you publish to a crowd on a schedule, its templates and stock footage keep the videos created flowing.
8. Collaboration and Access
Luma: Luma is browser based with companion apps. It is built more for solo creators than teams. There are fewer built-in collaboration features compared to InVideo.
W wideo: InVideo adds collaboration features on its higher plans. A small team can share projects and assets in one workspace. That makes it a stronger fit for agencies.
9. Ceny i koszty
Porównajmy plany cenowe obok siebie.
| Plan | Luma | W wideo |
|---|---|---|
| Bezpłatny | $0 (150 sec/mo) | $0 |
| Wstęp opłacony | 7,99 USD/miesiąc | 28 USD/miesiąc |
| Poziom średni | 23,99 USD/miesiąc | 50 USD/miesiąc |
| Wysoki poziom | 75,99 USD/miesiąc | 100 USD/miesiąc |
| Najwyższy poziom | Skontaktuj się ze sprzedażą | 899 USD/miesiąc |
Luma: Luma is the cheaper way in. Both tools use different pricing models based on usage. Luma’s basic plan costs about 20 cents for a 5-second video. For reference, Runway charges around $1.20 for the same clip, so Luma saves real money on volume.
W wideo: InVideo costs more per month at entry, but you get the templates, stock footage, and auto voiceovers in one place. The free and basic plans come with limited features and a watermark. For a marketing team, the higher bundle can be worth the higher paid plans.
Różne scenariusze
| Jeśli potrzebujesz… | Wybierać | Dlaczego |
|---|---|---|
| Najniższa cena wejścia | Luma | Paid plans from $7.99 |
| Realistic AI clips | Luma | Best photorealism and physics |
| Pre made templates | W wideo | Thousands ready to use |
| Stock footage | W wideo | 9M+ asset library |
| Beginner friendly start | W wideo | Easier interface |
💰 Twój budżet
Luma is cheaper to start and cheaper per clip. If money is tight, the basic plan is the safer first step.
🔌 Twój zestaw technologii
Both run in a browser, so setup is simple. InVideo’s templates and stock footage reduce the need for extra apps.
📝 Twój styl treści
Pick Luma for original, cinematic scenes. Pick InVideo for repeatable marketing videos built from templates.
🎓 Twój poziom doświadczenia
InVideo is friendlier for beginners. Luma rewards users who learn prompt engineering and want more control.
🆓 Bezpłatne wersje próbne i dema
Both offer a free version. Test Luma’s 150 free seconds and InVideo’s free plan before you commit.
🛟 Opcje wsparcia
InVideo’s larger plans add team support and collaboration features. Solo creators on either tool rely mostly on docs and community help.
Przewodnik po przełączaniu
Korzystasz już z jednego z tych narzędzi? Oto, czego możesz się spodziewać po zmianie.
🔄 Switching from Luma to InVideo?
✅ Co zyskasz:
- Thousands of pre made templates
- A massive library of stock footage and music
- Auto scripts and voiceovers for full videos
❌ Co stracisz:
- Photorealistic, physics-aware clips
- Image to video generation
- On-demand 3D asset creation
📋 Jak przełączyć:
- Download your finished Luma clips
- Create an InVideo account and pick a template
- Drop your clips into the timeline and add a script
🔄 Switching from InVideo to Luma?
✅ Co zyskasz:
- Realistic, cinematic video generation
- Image to video and 3D asset tools
- A lower entry price per clip
❌ Co stracisz:
- Pre made templates and the stock footage library
- Auto scripts and voiceovers
- The easy, beginner-first interface
📋 Jak przełączyć:
- Export your InVideo project assets
- Create a Luma account and open Dream Machine
- Write prompts or upload an image to generate clips
Czego nie objęła nasza recenzja
This comparison focused on individual creators and small teams. We did not test large enterprise rollouts or InVideo’s $899 Team plan in depth. Our notes are based on the June 2026 versions, and features may change. If you generate hundreds of videos a month, your priorities may differ from what we covered here.
Ostateczny werdykt
| Kategoria | Zwycięzca |
|---|---|
| 💰 Cennik | Luma |
| 🎬 Realism & Quality | Luma |
| 🧩 Templates & Library | W wideo |
| 🎙️ Scripts & Voiceovers | W wideo |
| 👶 Łatwość użytkowania | W wideo |
| 🧊 3D & Image to Video | Luma |
| 🏆 Zwycięzca klasyfikacji generalnej | Luma |
🏆 WINNER: LUMA
Luma wins 4 out of 6 categories.
Najlepiej dla: realistic AI clips, image to video, cinematic ideas, budget creators
Luma and InVideo are two different kinds of generatory wideo AI.
Luma is built for realistic, cinematic clips from prompts and images.
InVideo is built for template-driven marketing videos at scale.
InVideo is an excellent choice for social media teams who need templates and stock footage.
But if you want the most realistic video generation for the money, Luma is the better pick for most users.
Więcej Luma w porównaniu
Here is how Luma stacks up against other competitors:
Luma wygrywa w: lower cost per clip (20 cents vs $1.20), photorealism, image to video
Zwycięstwa na pasie startowym: longer editing toolkit, mature feature set, more credits on its base plan
Luma wygrywa w: realism, physics handling, 3D asset generation
Pika wygrywa w: playful effects, fast iterations, beginner-friendly prompts
Luma kontra Sora
Luma wygrywa w: open access, cheaper entry, image to video flexibility
Sora wygrywa w: longer clip lengths, scene consistency, broad creative range
Więcej informacji o InVideo w porównaniu
Here is how InVideo stacks up against other competitors:
InVideo wygrywa w kategoriach: bigger template gallery, 9M asset library, lower entry price
Synteza wygrywa na: lifelike AI avatars, training video focus, polished spokesperson clips
InVideo kontra Veed
InVideo wygrywa w kategoriach: prompt to multi-scene generation, auto voiceovers, template volume
Veed wygrywa w: sharper subtitle tools, cleaner podcast editing, simple screen recording
InVideo kontra Fliki
InVideo wygrywa w kategoriach: richer template library, drag-and-drop editing, broader media assets
Fliki wygrywa w: faster text to speech, more głos options, quick faceless video output
Często zadawane pytania
Co robi Luma AI?
Luma AI generates short, realistic video clips from a text prompt or an image. It also creates custom 3D assets on demand and handles motion with natural movement.
Czy korzystanie z Luma AI jest darmowe?
Yes, there is a free plan. It gives 150 seconds of video per month for non-commercial use and adds a watermark. Paid plans start at $7.99.
Czy istnieje darmowa wersja InVideo AI?
Yes. The free plan lets you test the editor, templates, and stock footage. Exports are limited and include a watermark until you upgrade to a paid plan.
Kim są konkurenci Luma Labs?
The main rivals are Runway, Pika, Sora, and Kling. Each is an ai video generator, but Luma stands out for realistic visuals and a lower cost per clip.
Jest Canva or InVideo better?
Canva is better for quick graphics and simple edits. InVideo is the stronger tool for prompt-based video generation with templates and stock footage.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 