⚡ Szybki werdykt:
- Wycena: Kling starts at $6.99/mo. InVideo paid plans start at $28/mo, with a free plan too.
- Najlepiej dla: Kling for high fidelity cinematic shots. InVideo for finished marketing videos with voiceovers.
- Kluczowa różnica: Kling is a generative video model. InVideo is an all-in-one prompt-to-video platform.
- Nasz wybór: InVideo for most users. It turns one tekst prompt into a ready-to-publish video.
Both Kling and InVideo promise to turn an idea into a finished clip.
But they are not chasing the same job.
Kling is a generative video model built for high fidelity shots.
InVideo AI is a full platform that builds a video from one prompt.
This Kling vs InVideo guide breaks down both so you pick the right one.
Przegląd
This Kling vs InVideo comparison covers pricing, features, video quality, and ease of use.
We also break down who each video generator works best for.
Our writers reviewed documentation and pricing pages for both narzędzia AI.
They also spent hands-on time with each one.
Notatki te znajdują się poniżej w sekcjach „Co zauważył nasz zespół”.
Czym jest Kling?
Kling AI is a generative video model for wideo AI generacja.
It turns text prompts and still images into short moving clips.
The tool is built for filmmakers and advanced creators.
It is a powerful tool with advanced features like the Motion Brush for path-based animation.
They want granular control over physics and motion.
Kling can make clips up to two minutes at 1080p and 30fps.
Most users pick it for cinematic quality and realistic motion.
Watch our short walkthrough of how Kling AI generates video below.
Kling
A high fidelity generator wideo AI for cinematic shots. Great for image to video and text to video work. Built for creators who want manual control.
Cennik Kling
Here is what Kling costs in 2026. Let’s break it down.
| Plan | Cena | Najlepsze dla |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | 6,99 USD/miesiąc | Hobbyists testing ai video |
| Zawodowiec | 25,99 USD/miesiąc | Regular creators and editors |
| Premier | 64,99 USD/miesiąc | Power users and studios |
| Ultra (NOWOŚĆ) | 127,99 USD/miesiąc | Produkcja wideo o dużej objętości |
Pricing verified June 2026.
Bezpłatny okres próbny: Yes. Kling offers a free plan with daily credits. No card needed to start.
Gwarancja zwrotu pieniędzy: Refunds depend on credit usage. Check Kling’s billing terms before you pay.
📌 Notatka: Each paid plan adds more credits and faster generation. Higher tiers add more daily video generation and longer clips.
⚠️ Ostrzeżenie: Credits reset on a cycle. Heavy users on the Standard plan can run out fast. Plan your renders.
Główne korzyści Klinga
Here is what makes Kling AI worth considering:
- High Fidelity Output: Kling targets cinematic quality and realistic motion. It excels at consistent characters for high-end storytelling and ranks near tools like Google Veo for realism.
- Two Input Modes: You can choose text to video or image to video generation. This gives you more ways to start a clip.
- Pędzel ruchowy: Draw a path in the frame to set object movement. This gives you manual control over how things move.
- Dłuższe klipy: Standard clips run up to two minutes. Kling 1.5 brought noticeable video quality gains over the earlier version, and newer 2.5 and 2.6 builds extend clips to three minutes.
- Silne i szybkie przestrzeganie zaleceń: In one head-to-head test, Kling produced top video quality with the best prompt match.
- Darmowe kredyty dzienne: A free plan lets you test the model before you pay. Premium plans start low at $6.99/month.
Co zauważył nasz zespół
Nasz pisarz signed up for Kling and spent several days generating clips. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:
Zalety i wady Klinga
✅ Zalety
- High fidelity output with strong cinematic quality
- Motion Brush gives manual control over object movement
- Supports both text to video and image to video
- Free daily credits and a low $6.99 starting price
❌ Wady
- No built-in scripts, voiceovers, or stock media
- Clips need editing in another tool to become finished videos
- Credits run out fast for heavy users on lower plans
Czym jest InVideo?
InVideo AI is an all-in-one, prompt-to-video platform.
You type one prompt and it builds a full video for you.
The point is to generate videos from one line of text with no editing skills needed.
It writes a script, picks stock footage, and adds voiceovers.
Then it assembles the clip with text overlays and music.
You can also edit finished videos with simple chat commands.
It is built for marketers, YouTubers, and beginners who need finished videos fast.
Watch how InVideo AI builds a video from a single prompt below.
🏆 Winner: InVideo
An all-in-one ai video generator for marketing videos. Turns one prompt into a finished clip. Now ships with Kling, Sora 2, and VEO 3.1 inside.
Cennik InVideo
Here is what InVideo AI costs in 2026. Let’s break it down.
| Plan | Cena | Najlepsze dla |
|---|---|---|
| Bezpłatny | $0 | Testowanie platformy |
| Plus | $28 | Twórcy solo i YouTuberzy |
| Maksym | $50 | Frequent video creation |
| Generatywny | $100 | Heavy use of premium models |
| Zespół | $899 | Agencje i duże zespoły |
Pricing verified June 2026.
Bezpłatny okres próbny: Yes. The free plan lets you create videos with limits. No card needed to start.
Gwarancja zwrotu pieniędzy: Paid plans bill monthly or yearly. You can cancel anytime from your account.
📌 Notatka: Paid plans bundle many expensive models for one fee. Most users land between $28 and $100 per month.
⚠️ Ostrzeżenie: Generation minutes are capped per plan. Premium models like Sora 2 burn through your limit faster.
Główne korzyści z InVideo
Here is what makes InVideo AI worth considering:
- One Prompt, Full Video: InVideo turns a prompt into a complete, ready-to-publish video. It writes the script and assembles the clip for you.
- No-Code Workflow: The platform needs no editing experience. Its intuitive interface and creative tools make it easy for beginners to create videos.
- Vast Stock Media: It stitches together high-quality stock footage. You get a big library for fast video creation.
- Built-In Models: Late 2025 added Kling, Sora 2, and VEO 3.1 inside the VFX House. You reach many models for one fee.
- Voiceovers and Subtitles: It adds text-to-speech voiceovers and automated subtitles. Many languages are supported for global reach.
- Edycja oparta na czacie: You edit a finished video with conversational ai commands. No timeline skills needed.
Co zauważył nasz zespół
Our writer used InVideo AI to build several marketing videos from scratch. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:
The short clip below shows that same hands-on session in action.
Zalety i wady InVideo
✅ Zalety
- Turns one prompt into a finished, ready-to-publish video
- No editing experience needed thanks to the no-code workflow
- Built-in scripts, voiceovers, stock media, and subtitles
- Bundles Kling, Sora 2, and VEO 3.1 for one monthly fee
❌ Wady
- Less granular control over physics than Kling
- Premium models burn generation minutes quickly
- Stock-based output can feel generic without manual edits
Porównanie funkcji
Ready to dig into a detailed Kling AI vs InVideo AI breakdown? We will walk through eight key features and a pricing round. Each one shows how these video generators handle the same job in different ways.
| Funkcja | Kling | W wideo |
|---|---|---|
| Cena wywoławcza | 6,99 USD/miesiąc | $28/month (free plan too) |
| Bezpłatny plan | ✅ (daily credits) | ✅ |
| Tekst na wideo | ✅ | ✅ |
| Obraz do wideo | ✅ | ❌ |
| Script + Voiceover | ❌ | ✅ |
| Biblioteka multimediów stockowych | ❌ | ✅ |
| Motion Brush / Manual Control | ✅ | ❌ |
| Built-in Models (Kling, Sora 2, VEO) | ❌ | ✅ |
| Najlepsze dla | Cinematic single clips | Finished marketing videos |
1. Generowanie tekstu na wideo
Kling: The text to video feature turns text descriptions into a single high fidelity clip. Kling reads complex prompts well and holds strong prompt adherence. In one test with identical prompts, it produced top video quality against rival platforms.
W wideo: InVideo AI takes a text prompt and builds a whole video, not just a clip. It writes a script, pulls stock footage, and adds a voiceover. This makes text to video useful for marketers who need finished content.
⚠️ Ostrzeżenie: The two tools answer the same prompt very differently. Kling gives you raw generated footage. InVideo gives you an edited video. Pick based on what you need at the end.
2. Image to Video Generation
Kling: Image to video generation is a core strength here. You upload a still image and Kling animates it with smooth motion. This is great for bringing a text to image result to life or adding movement to a photo.
W wideo: InVideo focuses on prompt-to-video, not animating a single video image. It leans on its stock library and built-in models instead. If image to video is your main goal, Kling is the stronger pick.
3. Video Editing and Assembly
Kling: Kling O1 is the generation engine, not a full editor. It outputs ai generated videos that you then refine elsewhere. You get clips, but not scripts, music, or text overlays inside the tool.
W wideo: Sztuczna inteligencja Edytor wideo handles the whole video production process in one platform. It assembles footage, adds overlays, and lets you fine tune the result with chat commands. This video editing flow saves real time.
4. Motion and Cinematic Control
Kling: Advanced Motion Transfer plus the Motion Brush give you manual control over movement. You draw paths to steer certain elements in the frame. It can render a shallow depth of field for a filmic look, which is built for filmmakers who want fine control over physics and motion in complex scenes.
W wideo: InVideo does not offer motion brush style controls. It trades that granular control for speed and finished output. For cinematic quality with manual tuning, Kling wins this round.
5. Voiceovers, Sound and Audio
Kling: The AI Sound Effects Generator adds audio to your clips. It is handy for matching sound to motion. But Kling has no built-in voiceover, so narration must come from another tool.
W wideo: AI Voiceover gives you text-to-speech narration in one click. It pairs with the script and footage to produce videos that sound polished. This is a clear edge for marketing videos and educational content.
6. Scripts and Templates
W wideo: The AI Script Generator writes a full script from your idea. This is one of the additional features that helps beginners start fast. It is a real time-saver under tight deadlines.
InVideo also ships a large template library to speed up video creation.
Kling: Kling has no script writer or template library. It is a focused video generator, not a content suite. You bring your own text prompts and plan.
7. Specialty Generators
Kling: The AI Virtual Try-On Generator is a niche but useful tool. It places clothing on a model image for product shots. This shows how Kling pushes ai technology beyond plain clips.
W wideo: Sztuczna inteligencja Awatara Generator creates a talking presenter for your video. It fits explainer and training clips. Both tools add advanced customization options, just for different goals.
8. Languages and Subtitles
W wideo: All Language Support lets you make videos in many languages. This helps creators reach a global audience. It is a strong fit for teams shipping content worldwide.
Automated subtitles then add napisy without manual typing.
Kling: Kling has no subtitle or multi-language layer. It focuses on the visual side of ai video. You add captions later in your editor.
9. Ceny i koszty
Porównajmy plany cenowe obok siebie.
| Plan | Kling | W wideo |
|---|---|---|
| Bezpłatny | Darmowe kredyty dziennie | $0 |
| Wstęp opłacony | 6,99 USD/miesiąc (standard) | 28 dolarów (plus) |
| Poziom średni | 25,99 USD/miesiąc (wersja Pro) | 50 USD (maks.) |
| Wysoki poziom | 64,99 USD/miesiąc (Premier) | 100 dolarów (generatywne) |
| Najwyższy poziom | 127,99 USD/miesiąc (Ultra) | 899 dolarów (zespół) |
Kling: Kling is cheaper at the entry point. The Standard plan costs $6.99/month. If you only need raw video generation, the low starting price is hard to beat.
W wideo: InVideo costs more, but you get a full set of tools for the fee. One paid plan bundles scripts, voiceovers, stock media, and several premium models. For finished marketing videos, the value adds up.
Różne scenariusze
| Jeśli potrzebujesz… | Wybierać | Dlaczego |
|---|---|---|
| Najniższa cena wejścia | Kling | Ceny zaczynają się od 6,99 USD/miesiąc |
| Finished marketing videos | W wideo | Script, voiceover, footage in one |
| Cinematic single clips | Kling | High fidelity, manual control |
| 10–20 videos per day | W wideo | Fast prompt-to-video workflow |
| Image to video | Kling | Animates a still image |
| Przyjazne dla początkujących | W wideo | No-code, no editing needed |
💰 Twój budżet
Kling wins on raw price with a $6.99 start. InVideo costs more but bundles many tools, so the value depends on what you ship.
🔌 Twój zestaw technologii
Kling fits if you already own an editor. InVideo replaces several tools at once with its all-in-one platform.
📝 Twój typ treści
For ads, social, or educational content, InVideo is faster. For art-driven clips, Kling delivers cinematic quality.
🎓 Twój poziom doświadczenia
Beginners do best with InVideo’s user friendly interface. Kling rewards users who like manual control and tuning.
🆓 Bezpłatne wersje próbne i dema
Both offer free plans. Test Kling’s daily credits and InVideo’s free tier before you pick a paid plan.
🛟 Support and Teams
Small teams that need shared output lean toward InVideo. Solo creators chasing high fidelity shots lean toward Kling.
Przewodnik po przełączaniu
Korzystasz już z jednego z tych narzędzi? Oto, czego możesz się spodziewać po zmianie.
🔄 Switching from Kling to InVideo?
✅ Co zyskasz:
- Built-in scripts, voiceovers, and stock media
- A no-code workflow that needs no editing skills
- Access to Kling, Sora 2, and VEO 3.1 in one place
❌ Co stracisz:
- Motion Brush and granular physics control
- Direct image to video generation
- The $6.99 entry price
📋 Jak przełączyć:
- Export your finished Kling clips
- Utwórz bezpłatne konto InVideo
- Drop your prompt in and let InVideo assemble the video
🔄 Switching from InVideo to Kling?
✅ Co zyskasz:
- Higher fidelity, more cinematic generated videos
- Motion Brush for manual control over movement
- A lower starting price at $6.99/month
❌ Co stracisz:
- Auto scripts, voiceovers, and the stock library
- Chat-based editing of finished videos
- Multi-language support and automated subtitles
📋 Jak przełączyć:
- Save your InVideo scripts and assets
- Sign up for a free Kling account
- Feed prompts or images in and refine clips with Motion Brush
Czego nie objęła nasza recenzja
This comparison focused on individual creators and small teams. We did not test heavy agency workflows or the $899 Team plan in depth. Our notes reflect the June 2026 versions, and both tools update often, so future updates may shift the results. If you push very long renders or complex scenes daily, your experience may differ from what we describe here.
Ostateczny werdykt
| Kategoria | Zwycięzca |
|---|---|
| 💰 Pricing (entry) | Kling |
| 🚀 Finished Videos | W wideo |
| ⚡ Speed to Publish | W wideo |
| 🎯 Cinematic Quality | Kling |
| 👶 Łatwość użytkowania | W wideo |
| 🔌 Built-in Models | W wideo |
| 🏆 Zwycięzca klasyfikacji generalnej | W wideo |
🏆 WINNER: INVIDEO
InVideo wins 4 out of 6 categories.
Najlepiej dla: Marketing videos, social content, educational content, and fast video creation.
Kling and InVideo are two very different ai tools. They both make video, but they finish in different places.
Kling is a specialized video generator for high fidelity, cinematic clips. It is the better pick for image to video work and manual control.
InVideo AI is an all-in-one platform that turns one prompt into a finished video. It writes scripts, adds voiceovers, and now bundles Kling, Sora 2, and VEO 3.1 inside.
Kling is excellent for creators who want raw, cinematic footage to refine. But if you need finished marketing videos fast, InVideo is the better choice for most users.
Więcej o Klingu w porównaniu
Here is how Kling stacks up against other video generators:
Kling kontra pas startowy Gen 3
Kling wygrywa w: longer clip length, lower entry price, image to video quality
Runway Gen 3 wins on: the fastest generation times, mature Motion Brush, polished camera controls
Kling kontra Luma Maszyna snów
Kling wygrywa w: clip length up to three minutes, prompt adherence, manual control tools
Luma Dream Machine wins on: quick free renders, simple start, smooth camera moves
Kling wygrywa w: a free plan to start, lower paid pricing, Virtual Try-On extras
Sora wygrywa w: brand recognition, broad scene variety, strong physics in complex prompts
Więcej informacji o InVideo w porównaniu
Here is how InVideo stacks up against other tools:
InVideo wygrywa w kategoriach: true prompt-to-video, built-in premium models, broader template library
Obraz wygrywa na: turning long blog posts into clips, simple repurposing, quick summaries
InVideo kontra Canva
InVideo wygrywa w kategoriach: automatic script and voiceover, full video from one prompt, AI editing by chat
Canva wygrywa w kategoriach: design templates, brand kits, all-purpose graphics beyond video
InVideo kontra Fliki
InVideo wygrywa w kategoriach: larger stock media library, more editing depth, multiple built-in models
Fliki wygrywa w: jak żywy głos cloning, faster faceless videos, simpler text-to-speech focus
Często zadawane pytania
Czy istnieje darmowa wersja InVideo AI?
Yes. InVideo has a free plan that lets you create videos with limits on minutes and exports. No credit card is needed to start.
Jak długie są filmy Kling AI?
Standard clips run up to two minutes at 1080p and 30fps. The newer 2.5 and 2.6 builds extend clips to three minutes through video extensions.
Czy Kling jest lepszy od Lumy?
Kling often leads on prompt adherence, clip length, and manual control. Luma Dream Machine is quick and easy for fast, simple renders.
Co jest lepsze, Pictory czy InVideo?
InVideo suits true prompt-to-video and marketing content with voiceovers. Pictory is better for turning blog posts into short clips quickly.
Which AI video generator should I pick?
Pick InVideo for finished videos from one prompt. Pick Kling for cinematic, high fidelity clips you plan to refine in your own editor.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 