

⚡ Quick Verdict:
- 価格: Kling starts at $6.99/mo. InVideo paid plans start at $28/mo, with a free plan too.
- 最適な用途: Kling for high fidelity cinematic shots. InVideo for finished marketing videos with voiceovers.
- 主な違い: Kling is a generative video model. InVideo is an all-in-one prompt-to-video platform.
- Our pick: InVideo for most users. It turns one 文章 prompt into a ready-to-publish video.

Both Kling and InVideo promise to turn an idea into a finished clip.
But they are not chasing the same job.
Kling is a generative video model built for high fidelity shots.
InVideo AI is a full platform that builds a video from one prompt.
This Kling vs InVideo guide breaks down both so you pick the right one.
概要
This Kling vs InVideo comparison covers pricing, features, video quality, and ease of use.
We also break down who each video generator works best for.
Our writers reviewed documentation and pricing pages for both AIツール.
They also spent hands-on time with each one.
Those notes appear in the “What Our Team Noticed” sections below.
クリングとは何ですか?
Kling AI is a generative video model for AIビデオ 世代。
It turns text prompts and still images into short moving clips.
The tool is built for filmmakers and advanced creators.
It is a powerful tool with advanced features like the Motion Brush for path-based animation.
They want granular control over physics and motion.
Kling can make clips up to two minutes at 1080p and 30fps.
Most users pick it for cinematic quality and realistic motion.

Watch our short walkthrough of how Kling AI generates video below.

クリング
A high fidelity AIビデオジェネレーター for cinematic shots. Great for image to video and text to video work. Built for creators who want manual control.
クリングの価格
Here is what Kling costs in 2026. Let’s break it down.
| プラン | 価格 | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| 標準 | 月額6.99ドル | Hobbyists testing ai video |
| プロ | 月額25.99ドル | Regular creators and editors |
| プレミア | 月額64.99ドル | Power users and studios |
| ウルトラ(新製品) | 月額127.99ドル | 大量ビデオ制作 |
Pricing verified June 2026.

無料トライアル: Yes. Kling offers a free plan with daily credits. No card needed to start.
返金保証: Refunds depend on credit usage. Check Kling’s billing terms before you pay.
📌 注記: Each paid plan adds more credits and faster generation. Higher tiers add more daily video generation and longer clips.
⚠️ 警告: Credits reset on a cycle. Heavy users on the Standard plan can run out fast. Plan your renders.
Klingの主な利点
Here is what makes Kling AI worth considering:
- High Fidelity Output: Kling targets cinematic quality and realistic motion. It excels at consistent characters for high-end storytelling and ranks near tools like Google Veo for realism.
- Two Input Modes: You can choose text to video or image to video generation. This gives you more ways to start a clip.
- モーションブラシ: Draw a path in the frame to set object movement. This gives you manual control over how things move.
- 長めのクリップ: Standard clips run up to two minutes. Kling 1.5 brought noticeable video quality gains over the earlier version, and newer 2.5 and 2.6 builds extend clips to three minutes.
- 迅速かつ確実な遵守: In one head-to-head test, Kling produced top video quality with the best prompt match.
- 無料の毎日のクレジット: A free plan lets you test the model before you pay. Premium plans start low at $6.99/month.

What Our Team Noticed
私たちの 作家 signed up for Kling and spent several days generating clips. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:

クリングの長所と短所
✅ メリット
- High fidelity output with strong cinematic quality
- Motion Brush gives manual control over object movement
- Supports both text to video and image to video
- Free daily credits and a low $6.99 starting price
❌ デメリット
- No built-in scripts, voiceovers, or stock media
- Clips need editing in another tool to become finished videos
- Credits run out fast for heavy users on lower plans
InVideo とは何ですか?
InVideo AI is an all-in-one, prompt-to-video platform.
You type one prompt and it builds a full video for you.
The point is to generate videos from one line of text with no editing skills needed.
It writes a script, picks stock footage, and adds voiceovers.
Then it assembles the clip with text overlays and music.
You can also edit finished videos with simple chat commands.
It is built for marketers, YouTubers, and beginners who need finished videos fast.

Watch how InVideo AI builds a video from a single prompt below.

🏆 Winner: InVideo
An all-in-one ai video generator for marketing videos. Turns one prompt into a finished clip. Now ships with Kling, Sora 2, and VEO 3.1 inside.
動画内価格設定
Here is what InVideo AI costs in 2026. Let’s break it down.
| プラン | 価格 | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| 無料 | $0 | プラットフォームのテスト |
| プラス | $28 | ソロクリエイターとYouTuber |
| マックス | $50 | Frequent video creation |
| 生成的 | $100 | Heavy use of premium models |
| チーム | $899 | 代理店や大規模なチーム |
Pricing verified June 2026.

無料トライアル: Yes. The free plan lets you create videos with limits. No card needed to start.
返金保証: Paid plans bill monthly or yearly. You can cancel anytime from your account.
📌 注記: Paid plans bundle many expensive models for one fee. Most users land between $28 and $100 per month.
⚠️ 警告: Generation minutes are capped per plan. Premium models like Sora 2 burn through your limit faster.
InVideoの主なメリット
Here is what makes InVideo AI worth considering:
- One Prompt, Full Video: InVideo turns a prompt into a complete, ready-to-publish video. It writes the script and assembles the clip for you.
- No-Code Workflow: The platform needs no editing experience. Its intuitive interface and creative tools make it easy for beginners to create videos.
- Vast Stock Media: It stitches together high-quality stock footage. You get a big library for fast video creation.
- Built-In Models: Late 2025 added Kling, Sora 2, and VEO 3.1 inside the VFX House. You reach many models for one fee.
- Voiceovers and Subtitles: It adds text-to-speech voiceovers and automated subtitles. Many languages are supported for global reach.
- チャットベースの編集: You edit a finished video with conversational ai commands. No timeline skills needed.

What Our Team Noticed
Our writer used InVideo AI to build several marketing videos from scratch. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:

The short clip below shows that same hands-on session in action.
InVideoの長所と短所
✅ メリット
- Turns one prompt into a finished, ready-to-publish video
- No editing experience needed thanks to the no-code workflow
- Built-in scripts, voiceovers, stock media, and subtitles
- Bundles Kling, Sora 2, and VEO 3.1 for one monthly fee
❌ デメリット
- Less granular control over physics than Kling
- Premium models burn generation minutes quickly
- Stock-based output can feel generic without manual edits
機能比較
Ready to dig into a detailed Kling AI vs InVideo AI breakdown? We will walk through eight key features and a pricing round. Each one shows how these video generators handle the same job in different ways.
| 特徴 | クリング | ビデオ内 |
|---|---|---|
| 開始価格 | 月額6.99ドル | $28/month (free plan too) |
| 無料プラン | ✅ (daily credits) | ✅ |
| テキストからビデオへ | ✅ | ✅ |
| 画像からビデオへ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Script + Voiceover | ❌ | ✅ |
| ストックメディアライブラリ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Motion Brush / Manual Control | ✅ | ❌ |
| Built-in Models (Kling, Sora 2, VEO) | ❌ | ✅ |
| 最適な用途 | Cinematic single clips | Finished marketing videos |
1. テキストからビデオへの変換
クリング: The text to video feature turns text descriptions into a single high fidelity clip. Kling reads complex prompts well and holds strong prompt adherence. In one test with identical prompts, it produced top video quality against rival platforms.

ビデオ内: InVideo AI takes a text prompt and builds a whole video, not just a clip. It writes a script, pulls stock footage, and adds a voiceover. This makes text to video useful for marketers who need finished content.

⚠️ 警告: The two tools answer the same prompt very differently. Kling gives you raw generated footage. InVideo gives you an edited video. Pick based on what you need at the end.
2. Image to Video Generation
クリング: Image to video generation is a core strength here. You upload a still image and Kling animates it with smooth motion. This is great for bringing a text to image result to life or adding movement to a photo.

ビデオ内: InVideo focuses on prompt-to-video, not animating a single video image. It leans on its stock library and built-in models instead. If image to video is your main goal, Kling is the stronger pick.
3. Video Editing and Assembly
クリング: Kling O1 is the generation engine, not a full editor. It outputs ai generated videos that you then refine elsewhere. You get clips, but not scripts, music, or text overlays inside the tool.

ビデオ内: AI ビデオエディター handles the whole video production process in one platform. It assembles footage, adds overlays, and lets you fine tune the result with chat commands. This video editing flow saves real time.

4. Motion and Cinematic Control
クリング: Advanced Motion Transfer plus the Motion Brush give you manual control over movement. You draw paths to steer certain elements in the frame. It can render a shallow depth of field for a filmic look, which is built for filmmakers who want fine control over physics and motion in complex scenes.

ビデオ内: InVideo does not offer motion brush style controls. It trades that granular control for speed and finished output. For cinematic quality with manual tuning, Kling wins this round.
5. Voiceovers, Sound and Audio
クリング: The AI Sound Effects Generator adds audio to your clips. It is handy for matching sound to motion. But Kling has no built-in voiceover, so narration must come from another tool.

ビデオ内: AI Voiceover gives you text-to-speech narration in one click. It pairs with the script and footage to produce videos that sound polished. This is a clear edge for marketing videos and educational content.

6. Scripts and Templates
ビデオ内: The AI Script Generator writes a full script from your idea. This is one of the additional features that helps beginners start fast. It is a real time-saver under tight deadlines.

InVideo also ships a large template library to speed up video creation.

クリング: Kling has no script writer or template library. It is a focused video generator, not a content suite. You bring your own text prompts and plan.
7. Specialty Generators
クリング: The AI Virtual Try-On Generator is a niche but useful tool. It places clothing on a model image for product shots. This shows how Kling pushes ai technology beyond plain clips.

ビデオ内: AI アバター Generator creates a talking presenter for your video. It fits explainer and training clips. Both tools add advanced customization options, just for different goals.

8. Languages and Subtitles
ビデオ内: All Language Support lets you make videos in many languages. This helps creators reach a global audience. It is a strong fit for teams shipping content worldwide.

Automated subtitles then add キャプション without manual typing.

クリング: Kling has no subtitle or multi-language layer. It focuses on the visual side of ai video. You add captions later in your editor.
9. 価格設定とコスト
料金プランを並べて比較してみましょう。
| プラン | クリング | ビデオ内 |
|---|---|---|
| 無料 | 無料の毎日のクレジット | $0 |
| 入場料支払い済み | 月額6.99ドル(スタンダードプラン) | 28ドル(プラス) |
| 中級クラス | 月額25.99ドル(プロプラン) | 50ドル(上限) |
| ハイティア | 月額64.99ドル(プレミアプラン) | 100ドル(生成型) |
| トップティア | 月額127.99ドル(ウルトラプラン) | 899ドル(チーム) |
クリング: Kling is cheaper at the entry point. The Standard plan costs $6.99/month. If you only need raw video generation, the low starting price is hard to beat.
ビデオ内: InVideo costs more, but you get a full set of tools for the fee. One paid plan bundles scripts, voiceovers, stock media, and several premium models. For finished marketing videos, the value adds up.
さまざまなシナリオ
| 必要な場合は | 選ぶ | なぜ |
|---|---|---|
| 最低価格 | クリング | 月額6.99ドルから |
| Finished marketing videos | ビデオ内 | Script, voiceover, footage in one |
| Cinematic single clips | クリング | High fidelity, manual control |
| 10–20 videos per day | ビデオ内 | Fast prompt-to-video workflow |
| Image to video | クリング | Animates a still image |
| 初心者向け | ビデオ内 | No-code, no editing needed |
💰 あなたの予算
Kling wins on raw price with a $6.99 start. InVideo costs more but bundles many tools, so the value depends on what you ship.
🔌 あなたの技術スタック
Kling fits if you already own an editor. InVideo replaces several tools at once with its all-in-one platform.
📝 コンテンツの種類
For ads, social, or educational content, InVideo is faster. For art-driven clips, Kling delivers cinematic quality.
🎓 あなたの経験レベル
Beginners do best with InVideo’s user friendly interface. Kling rewards users who like manual control and tuning.
🆓 無料トライアルとデモ
Both offer free plans. Test Kling’s daily credits and InVideo’s free tier before you pick a paid plan.
🛟 Support and Teams
Small teams that need shared output lean toward InVideo. Solo creators chasing high fidelity shots lean toward Kling.
切り替えガイド
既にこれらのツールのいずれかをご利用ですか?切り替える場合、どのような変更が想定されますか?
🔄 Switching from Kling to InVideo?
✅ 得られるもの:
- Built-in scripts, voiceovers, and stock media
- A no-code workflow that needs no editing skills
- Access to Kling, Sora 2, and VEO 3.1 in one place
❌ 失うもの:
- Motion Brush and granular physics control
- Direct image to video generation
- The $6.99 entry price
📋切り替え方法:
- Export your finished Kling clips
- 無料のInVideoアカウントを作成する
- Drop your prompt in and let InVideo assemble the video
🔄 Switching from InVideo to Kling?
✅ 得られるもの:
- Higher fidelity, more cinematic generated videos
- Motion Brush for manual control over movement
- A lower starting price at $6.99/month
❌ 失うもの:
- Auto scripts, voiceovers, and the stock library
- Chat-based editing of finished videos
- Multi-language support and automated subtitles
📋切り替え方法:
- Save your InVideo scripts and assets
- Sign up for a free Kling account
- Feed prompts or images in and refine clips with Motion Brush
What Our Review Didn’t Cover
This comparison focused on individual creators and small teams. We did not test heavy agency workflows or the $899 Team plan in depth. Our notes reflect the June 2026 versions, and both tools update often, so future updates may shift the results. If you push very long renders or complex scenes daily, your experience may differ from what we describe here.
最終評決
| カテゴリ | 勝者 |
|---|---|
| 💰 Pricing (entry) | クリング |
| 🚀 Finished Videos | ビデオ内 |
| ⚡ Speed to Publish | ビデオ内 |
| 🎯 Cinematic Quality | クリング |
| 👶 使いやすさ | ビデオ内 |
| 🔌 Built-in Models | ビデオ内 |
| 🏆総合優勝 | ビデオ内 |
🏆 WINNER: INVIDEO
InVideo wins 4 out of 6 categories.
最適な用途: Marketing videos, social content, educational content, and fast video creation.
Kling and InVideo are two very different ai tools. They both make video, but they finish in different places.
Kling is a specialized video generator for high fidelity, cinematic clips. It is the better pick for image to video work and manual control.
InVideo AI is an all-in-one platform that turns one prompt into a finished video. It writes scripts, adds voiceovers, and now bundles Kling, Sora 2, and VEO 3.1 inside.
Kling is excellent for creators who want raw, cinematic footage to refine. But if you need finished marketing videos fast, InVideo is the better choice for most users.
クリングの比較をもっと見る
Here is how Kling stacks up against other video generators:
クリング対ランウェイ Gen 3
クリングが勝利した点: longer clip length, lower entry price, image to video quality
Runway Gen 3 wins on: the fastest generation times, mature Motion Brush, polished camera controls
クリング対ルマ ドリームマシン
クリングが勝利した点: clip length up to three minutes, prompt adherence, manual control tools
Luma Dream Machine wins on: quick free renders, simple start, smooth camera moves
クリングが勝利した点: a free plan to start, lower paid pricing, Virtual Try-On extras
ソラが勝つのは: brand recognition, broad scene variety, strong physics in complex prompts
InVideoの比較をもっと見る
Here is how InVideo stacks up against other tools:
InVideoが勝利した点: true prompt-to-video, built-in premium models, broader template library
ピクトリー 勝利したタイトル: turning long blog posts into clips, simple repurposing, quick summaries
InVideo vs カンバ
InVideoが勝利した点: automatic script and voiceover, full video from one prompt, AI editing by chat
Canvaが優れている点: design templates, brand kits, all-purpose graphics beyond video
InVideo vs フリキ
InVideoが勝利した点: larger stock media library, more editing depth, multiple built-in models
フリキが勝利: リアルな 声 cloning, faster faceless videos, simpler text-to-speech focus
よくある質問
InVideo AIの無料版はありますか?
Yes. InVideo has a free plan that lets you create videos with limits on minutes and exports. No credit card is needed to start.
Kling AIの動画の長さはどれくらいですか?
Standard clips run up to two minutes at 1080p and 30fps. The newer 2.5 and 2.6 builds extend clips to three minutes through video extensions.
クリングはルマより優れているのか?
Kling often leads on prompt adherence, clip length, and manual control. Luma Dream Machine is quick and easy for fast, simple renders.
PictoryとInVideo、どちらが良いですか?
InVideo suits true prompt-to-video and marketing content with voiceovers. Pictory is better for turning blog posts into short clips quickly.
Which AI video generator should I pick?
Pick InVideo for finished videos from one prompt. Pick Kling for cinematic, high fidelity clips you plan to refine in your own editor.













