Ever feel like making slides takes forever?
You need awesome presentations, but who has the time?
Imagine spending hours fiddling with layouts and 제니 vs 라이트소닉: 2025년 최고의 AI 작가 7.
It’s frustrating, right? Deadlines loom, and you’re stuck wrestling with slide design.
What if AI could do it for you? slidesAI and Tome promise to make slide creation easy.
Let’s break down Slidesai vs Tome and see which one actually delivers. We’ll look at the features, ease of use, and if they’re worth your time.
Ready to see which AI slide tool is the real deal?
概要
We dove deep into both SlidesAI and Tome, testing their features firsthand.
From generating slides from text to exploring their design capabilities, we’ve put them through real-world scenarios.
This comparison reflects our direct experience, giving you an honest look at what each tool offers.
Ready to make presentations 70% faster? Try SlidesAI. Users report significant time savings. Click to start creating SlidesAI presentations in minutes.
価格: It has a free plan. premium plan starts at $8.33/mo.
主な特徴:
- Text-to-Slide Generation
- Automatic Layout Design
- Template Variety
Transform your ideas into compelling narratives with Tome AI. Users have found that Tome AI helps to make visually stunning presentations.
価格: It has a free plan. The premium plan starts at $16/mo.
主な特徴:
- AI Image Generation
- インタラクティブコンテンツの埋め込み
- Collaborative Storytelling
What is SlidesAI?
Want slides fast? SlidesAI helps. You type in text, and it builds your presentation.
Simple, right? It’s a tool for quick slides.
No design skills are needed, and it works with Google Slides.
Also, explore our favorite SlidesAI alternatives…
スライド作成のストレスから解放されたいですか？Slides AI を試用したユーザーからは、Google スライドのプレゼンテーション作成が 70% 高速化されたという報告がありました。さあ、AI を活用した最初のスライドを作成してみましょう！
主なメリット
- Creates presentations from text in minutes.
- Offers over 10 unique AI-generated layout options.
- Saves users an average of 70% of presentation creation time.
- Allows for easy customization of styles and fonts.
価格
Here’s the breakdown:
- 基本: 12 Presentations, 2500 character input.
- Pro ($8.33/month): 120 presentations, 6000 characters input.
- プレミアム（月額16.67ドル）： プレゼンテーションは無制限、入力文字数は 6000 文字。
長所
短所
Tomeとは何ですか？
Tome is a digital story ビルダー that uses AI.
You tell it your idea, and it creates a visual story—think slides, but interactive.
It’s more than just a presentation tool.
また、私たちのお気に入りを探索してください Tomeの代替品…
主なメリット
- AI image generation: Create unique visuals 即座に.
- Interactive content: Embed live data and 3D models.
- Collaborative stories: Share and edit with your team easily.
- Fluid design: It adapts to any screen size.
価格
以下が取得内容です:
- Basic: $0 per month – Manual editing, Browse templates.
- プロ： $16 per month – Everything in basic plus AI generation & design tools.
- 企業： Contact Sales.
長所
短所
機能比較
Let’s dive into the core of these AI presentation tools.
We’ll compare key features, showing where each shines and which might better fit your needs.
1. AI Presentation Generation
SlidesAI excels at turning text into a google slide presentation in seconds.
It’s a true AI presentation maker. Tome, similar to the ガンマ app, focuses on visual storytelling with AI-generated content.
両方 AIツール help you create presentations quickly, but SlidesAI is faster for text-based slides.
2. Template and Design Options
SlidesAI offers a range of templates similar to SlidesGo, but customization is limited within the Google Workspace marketplace.
Tome provides more fluid design and adapts to screens, but it has fewer traditional templates.
3. AI Image and Media Integration
Tome’s strength lies in its AI image generation, offering unique visuals.
SlidesAI lacks this. Tome allows embedding interactive content, a feature SlidesAI doesn’t have.
4. Collaboration and Workspace
Tome’s workspace allows seamless collaboration, like real-time editing.
SlidesAI relies on Google Slides sharing, which is efficient but less integrated.
5. Integration and Compatibility
SlidesAI integrates tightly with Google Slides.
Tome works independently but offers web embedding.
SlidesAI is better for those deeply embedded in the Google workspace.
6. User Reviews and Ease of Use
User reviews show that SlidesAI is praised for its simplicity, making it easy to learn.
Tome has a steeper learning curve, but users appreciate its advanced features.
Both make creating AI presentations easier, but SlidesAI is generally considered more straightforward.
7. Text Editing and Content Refinement
SlidesAI focuses on quickly transferring your text to slides. Once there, edits are handled within Google Slides.
Tome, on the other hand, offers more in-platform text refinement and allows for more dynamic content manipulation within its interface.
This makes Tome better for those who want to fine-tune and iterate on their content directly within the presentation tool itself.
What to Look For When Choosing The Right Website Builder?
- Customization Depth: How much do you need to tweak every detail of your slides or presentations?
- Support and Tutorials: How important are accessible help and learning resources?
- Mobile Compatibility: How crucial is it that your presentations look good and function well on mobile デバイス?
- Data Privacy and Security: What are the platforms’ policies regarding your presentation data?
- スケーラビリティ: If you anticipate your presentation needs growing, how well can each platform scale with you?
- Presentation Style: Do you need traditional, information-heavy slides or interactive, visually driven presentations?
- AI Reliance: How much do you want AI to handle the design versus having granular control?
- Offline Access: Is offline access a necessity, or is a cloud-based solution sufficient?
- Future Updates: Research each platform’s roadmap and how frequently they update their features.
最終評決
So, which one wins? It depends on you. SlidesAI is great if you need fast, simple slides.
It works right with Google Slides. You’ll save time.
But, if you want amazing visuals and interactive stories, Tome is better.
It’s more creative. It pushes the boundaries of presentations. We tested both.
We spent hours using them. We know what works. We know what’s easy.
We think Tome is more exciting. It’s the future of presentations.
It lets you tell stories in new ways. If you want to impress, pick Tome.
It’s worth the extra effort.
More of SlidesAI
- SlidesAI vs Slidesgo: SlidesAI is an AI-powered tool that generates slides from text within Google Slides, offering speed in creation. Slidesgo provides a vast library of pre-designed, customizable templates that require manual content input. SlidesAI focuses on rapid generation, while Slidesgo offers design variety.
- SlidesAI vs Beautiful AI: SlidesAI, a Google Slides add-on, emphasizes AI-driven text-to-slide conversion and customization within the familiar Google environment. Beautiful.ai is a standalone platform using AI-powered smart templates for automated design and brand consistency, potentially offering less direct integration with existing workflows.
- SlidesAI vs Canva: SlidesAI is an AI tool focused on quickly creating presentation slides from text. カンバ is a comprehensive design platform with numerous presentation templates and design elements, offering more creative control but requiring more manual design work compared to SlidesAI’s automated approach.
- SlidesAI vs Gamma: SlidesAI quickly generates slides from text within Google Slides. Gamma is an AI-first platform for creating presentations (and websites/docs) with a focus on interactive and visually engaging content. It offers more in-platform editing but requires learning a new interface.
- SlidesAI vs Prezi: SlidesAI creates traditional, linear slides from text within Google Slides. プレジ uses a dynamic, non-linear zooming interface for engaging presentations, offering a different delivery style compared to SlidesAI’s conventional slide format.
- SlidesAI vs Pitch: SlidesAI is an AI-powered Google Slides add-on for quick slide generation. ピッチ is a collaborative presentation platform designed for teams, emphasizing streamlined workflows and brand consistency with its own set of templates and features, unlike SlidesAI’s integration with Google Slides.
More of Tome
- Tome vs Slidesgo: Tomeは、スライドを超えた物語をAIで作成します。Slidesgoは、PowerPointとGoogleスライド用の静的テンプレートを提供しています。
- トメ vs 美しいAI: TomeはAIを活用してビジュアルナラティブを構築します。Beautiful.aiは、ブランディングのためのAI駆動型スマートテンプレートを提供します。
- Tome vs Canva: Tomeは、コンテンツとレイアウトにAIを活用したビジュアルナラティブに重点を置いています。Canvaは、プレゼンテーションテンプレートを備えた多用途のデザインプラットフォームです。
- トーム対ガンマ: Tomeは、魅力的なビジュアルナラティブを作成するためにAIを活用しています。Gammaは、迅速なコンテンツ生成のためのAIファーストのプラットフォームです。
- Tome vs Prezi: Tomeは、従来のスライドとは異なり、視覚的なストーリーテリングを重視しています。Preziは、ダイナミックで非線形のズームインターフェースを備えています。
- トメ ピッチ対: Tome uses AI to create engaging visual narratives. Pitch is a collaborative platform designed for team presentations.
よくある質問
Is SlidesAI or Tome better for creating a Google Slides presentation?
SlidesAI is generally better for quickly creating a Google Slides presentation. It integrates directly with Google Slides and focuses on text-to-slide conversion. Tome is better for highly visual, interactive presentations but doesn’t integrate with Google Slides.
Which AI presentation maker has the better free plan?
Tome offers a free plan, but it’s limited in AI credits. SlidesAI doesn’t have a free plan. So, if you need an AI presentation maker with a free option, Tome is your choice, but with restrictions.
Can Tome or SlidesAI help me create presentations quickly?
Yes, both AI tools are designed to help you create presentations quickly. SlidesAI excels at rapid text-to-slide generation, while Tome focuses on faster visual creation and layout.
Does SlidesAI or Tome offer better value for money?
Value for money depends on your needs. SlidesAI is cost-effective for simple, text-based presentations. Tome offers advanced visual and interactive features, justifying its price for those needing dynamic presentations.
Which AI tool is easier to use for beginners?
SlidesAI is generally considered easier for beginners. Its simple interface and direct Google Slides integration make it straightforward. Tome’s more advanced features might require a steeper learning curve.
English 
Chinese 
French 
German 
Japanese 
Korean 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Spanish