⚡ 簡単な評価:
- 価格: Clockit starts at $2.99/user/month. Time Doctor starts at $6.70.
- 最適な用途: Clockit suits attendance, shift planning, and PTO. Time Doctor suits employee monitoring and productivity tracking.
- 主な違い： Time Doctor adds screenshots, idle detection, and payroll. Clockit stays closer to basic time tracking features.
- 私たちのおすすめ： Time Doctor, rated 4.2 against Clockit’s 3.7 in our scoring.
The cheaper option here is not the obvious loser.
Clockit costs less than half of what Time Doctor charges.
But price is the smallest difference between these two.
One is an attendance and timesheet app. The other is employee monitoring software.
That gap decides which one belongs in your 仕事.
概要
This Clockit vs TimeDoctor comparison covers pricing, key features, and ease of use.
また、それぞれの時間追跡ツールがどのようなユーザーに最適なのかも詳しく解説します。
情報源としては、公開されている仕様書、ベンダーのドキュメント、G2のレビューなどが挙げられます。
弊社のライター陣も、両方のプラットフォームを実際に操作してみました。
それらのメモは、以下の「チームが気づいたこと」のセクションに記載されています。
Clockitとは何ですか?
Clockit is an employee time tracking app built around attendance.
It records clock-ins, work hours, leave requests, and shift rosters.
The platform adds biometric attendance and a realtime mobile tracker.
Managers get dynamic reports plus a lighter set of basic reports.
ほとんど 中小企業 pick it because the pricing is low.
Here is a short walkthrough of how the app behaves day to day.
クロッキット
A budget time tracker for attendance and leave. Free plan included. Good fit for small and medium businesses on tight software budgets.
Clockitの価格設定
Here is what Clockit costs in 2026. Three options, one of them free.
| プラン | 価格 | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| 無料 | $0 | Basic features for testing |
| 毎月 | 1ユーザーあたり月額2.99ドル | Small teams paying month to month |
| 毎年 | 1ユーザーあたり年間29.90ドル | Teams that commit for a full year |
価格は2026年7月に確定しました。
無料トライアル: A free plan is available, so you can test the tracking app before paying.
返金保証: Clockit does not publish a refund window. Check terms at checkout.
📌 注記： The annual plan works out to roughly $2.49 per user per month. That is the cheapest entry point of any time tracker in this comparison.
⚠️ 警告： Confirm whether your plan allows unlimited projects and unlimited users. Seat limits change what you actually pay.
Key Benefits of Clockit
Here is what makes Clockit worth a look:
- Low cost per seat: Paid access starts at $2.99 per user. That undercuts My Hours at $9/user per month and Timely at $11/user per month.
- Biometric attendance: Fingerprint check-in suits offices with a physical front desk. It cuts buddy punching.
- Realtime mobile tracker: Field staff can clock in from a phone. Managers see who is on shift right now.
- PTO and leave management: Holiday balances sit next to timesheets. You are not juggling multiple apps for one payroll run.
- Shift planning: Rosters and schedules are built in. Retail and support teams get the most value here.
- Dynamic reports: You can filter tracked データ by person, team, or date range for detailed reporting.
- 無料プラン： A no-cost plan lets you record time spent and track time spent per shift before you commit budget.
私たちのチームが気づいたこと
私たちの 作家 set up a Clockit workspace and ran a small team through a full week of shifts. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:
The clip below shows the same setup from the manager’s side of the dashboard.
Clockit Pros & Cons
✅ メリット
- Paid plans start at $2.99 per user per month
- 無料プランでは、料金を支払う前に試用できます。
- Attendance, PTO, and shift planning in one place
- Biometric check-in for on-site teams
❌ デメリット
- No screenshots or employee monitoring features
- Reporting is thinner than Time Doctor’s analytics
- Not a replacement for project management software
Time Doctorとは何ですか？
Time Doctor is employee 時間追跡ソフトウェア with monitoring built in.
The app automatically tracks work sessions in the background.
It takes random screenshots and logs keyboard and mouse activity.
Idle time detection separates real work hours from empty ones.
Managers use the tracked time data to spot productive and unproductive hours.
This overview video covers the dashboard and the desktop tracker.
🏆 Winner: Time Doctor
Automatic time tracking with screenshots, idle detection, and payroll. Built for remote teams that need proof of work hours.
タイムドクターの料金
Time Doctor runs three paid tiers. There is no free tier.
| プラン | 価格 | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| 基本 | $6.70 | Time tracking and basic reports |
| 標準 | $11.70 | Employee monitoring and payroll |
| プレミアム | $16.70 | Workforce analytics and advanced features |
価格は2026年7月に確定しました。
無料トライアル: A trial is offered so you can test the tracking tool before you buy.
返金保証: Refund terms are handled case by case. Read the billing page first.
📌 注記： Screenshots and distraction alerts sit above the Basic tier. Budget for Standard if employee monitoring is the reason you are buying.
⚠️ 警告： Time Doctor is still cheaper than Scoro at $22/user per month and Replicon at $40/user per month. It is not cheap next to Clockit.
Key Benefits of Time Doctor
Here is where Time Doctor earns its higher price:
- Idle time detection: The tracker flags stretches with no input. That keeps timesheets honest without manual edits.
- Random screenshots: Periodic captures show what was on screen. This is the feature buyers ask about most.
- Productivity analytics: Daily productivity analysis helps teams see where time went and adjust.
- Distraction alerts: A nudge appears when someone drifts to unrelated sites during tracking time.
- Payroll management: Approved hours flow into payroll runs. Fewer exports between other tools.
- Project budgeting: You can attach costs to work and watch project progress against a budget.
- Work-life balance metrics: Reports surface overtime patterns before burnout hits your team’s performance.
私たちのチームが気づいたこと
Our writer installed the Time Doctor desktop app and tracked a normal work week end to end. Here is what stood out:
Time Doctor Pros & Cons
✅ メリット
- Automatic time tracking runs in the background
- Idle time detection and random screenshots
- Payroll and project budgeting in one platform
- Detailed reports on employee productivity
❌ デメリット
- No free plan, unlike Clockit
- Monitoring can feel intrusive to staff
- Costs more than twice what Clockit charges
機能比較
Here is where the two products separate. We walk through ten areas, from tracking time to pricing, so you can see which platform matches your workflow.
| 特徴 | クロッキット | タイムドクター |
|---|---|---|
| 開始価格 | 1ユーザーあたり月額2.99ドル | $6.70 |
| 無料プラン | ✅ | ❌ |
| 自動時間追跡 | ✅ | ✅ |
| Random screenshots | ❌ | ✅ |
| Idle time detection | ❌ | ✅ |
| Biometric attendance | ✅ | ❌ |
| PTO and shift planning | ✅ | ❌ |
| Payroll management | ❌ | ✅ |
| Project budgeting | ❌ | ✅ |
| 最適な用途 | Attendance and rosters | 従業員の監視 |
The image below sums up where Clockit sits in this category.
1. Time Tracking and Attendance
クロキット: Attendance statistics sit at the centre of the product. Staff clock in, and the timesheet app fills itself from those entries. It tracks time by shift, by day, or by pay period.
タイムドクター： The desktop tracker starts with the task, not the door. Automatic time tracking runs in the background without interrupting workflow. Time entries attach to a task rather than a shift.
2. Employee Monitoring Features
クロキット: Monitoring here means proving presence, not watching screens. Biometric attendance confirms the person clocking in is the person on the 名簿. There are no screenshots and no activity capture.
タイムドクター： Employee monitoring can include random screenshots, and this platform takes them. It also tracks keyboard and mouse activity plus idle time. That is a bigger commitment than just time tracking.
⚠️ 警告： Tell your team before you switch on employee monitoring features. Silent screenshots damage trust faster than they boost productivity.
3. レポートと分析
クロキット: Dynamic reports let you slice tracking data by person, team, or period. You can generate detailed reports on attendance and leave. Custom reports are possible, but the depth stops at hours.
タイムドクター： Workforce analytics go past hours into behaviour. These tools can generate detailed productivity reports for analysis. All the data lands in one place, giving a complete overview of how many hours went to which apps and sites.
4. Remote Teams and Mobile Apps
クロキット: The realtime mobile tracker is aimed at field staff and site crews. A manager can see who started a shift and where. It works well for distributed hourly workers.
タイムドクター： Distributed workforce management is the core use case. Clockit offers automatic time tracking for remote teams too, but Time Doctor adds the proof layer that outsourcing agencies ask for.
5. Project Management Features
クロキット: Basic reports tie hours to work, but this is not a project management tool. There is no task board and no project templates. You will still need project management software beside it.
タイムドクター： Project management and budgeting are built in. You can efficiently manage projects against a cost ceiling and track progress as hours accumulate. Time tracking software improves project management efficiency when both live together.
💡 プロのヒント: Neither product replaces a full project management tool. Both connect to project management tools you already use, so keep task management where your team already works and manage tasks there.
6. Leave, PTO and Work-Life Balance
クロキット: Leave management is a headline feature, not an add-on. Holiday balances, approvals, and accruals live next to the time tracking system. HR teams at small businesses get real value here.
タイムドクター： Work-life balance metrics take a different angle. Instead of tracking leave, they flag overwork, late sessions, and weekend hours. It is a wellbeing signal rather than an HR ledger.
7. Productivity Tracking and Distractions
クロキット: The business 旅行 calendar keeps away-days out of your attendance figures. That protects the accuracy of tracked time data. But there is no measure of employee productivity inside a work session.
タイムドクター： Distraction alerts fire when attention drifts. Combined with productivity tracking, it helps identify productive and unproductive hours of employees. Daily productivity analysis helps teams spend their week better.
8. Payroll and Billable Hours
クロキット: Shift planning and scheduling feed clean hours into whatever payroll you already run. There is no built-in payroll engine. You export the numbers and process them elsewhere.
タイムドクター： Payroll management closes the loop. Approved hours convert straight into pay runs, which matters for agencies billing clients. Time tracking software helps calculate billable hours accurately when the source data is automatic.
💡 プロのヒント: Automatic time tracking minimizes errors in billable hours. If you invoice clients by the hour, that accuracy pays for the subscription on its own.
9. Integrations with Other Tools
クロキット: Integrations with other apps cover the basics that a small office needs. Time tracking apps can integrate with project management tools, and Clockit follows that pattern. Check your specific stack before signing up.
タイムドクター： The connector list is longer and leans toward task management and helpdesk platforms. If you want one record of your team’s time across multiple apps, this is the stronger side.
10. 価格設定とコスト
プランを並べて比較してみましょう。
| ティア | クロッキット | タイムドクター |
|---|---|---|
| 無料 | $0 | ❌ |
| 入場料支払い済み | Monthly: $2.99/user/month | Basic: $6.70 |
| 中級クラス | Annually: $29.90/user/year | Standard: $11.70 |
| 最高級 | ❌ | Premium: $16.70 |
クロキット: Two paid options and a free tier keep the maths simple. At $2.99 monthly, it is the cheapest way to track time across a small roster. The annual rate of $29.90 per user per year lowers it further.
タイムドクター： Three tiers, no free option, and a jump to $16.70 at the top. Against the wider market it still lands mid-range. Harvest offers a free plan and charges $12/user per month, while クイックブックス Time costs $40/month plus $10 per user.
さまざまなシナリオ
| 必要な場合は | 選ぶ | なぜ |
|---|---|---|
| 予算が限られている | クロッキット | Less than half the price |
| Screenshots and proof | タイムドクター | Built-in employee monitoring |
| Shift rosters and PTO | クロッキット | Attendance-first design |
| Billable client work | タイムドクター | Payroll and budgets included |
| 無料の出発点 | クロッキット | 無料プランあり |
| 初心者向けのセットアップ | クロッキット | Fewer settings to learn |
💰 あなたの予算
Clockit costs roughly a third of Time Doctor at entry level. For a ten-person team, that gap funds another tool entirely.
🔌 あなたの技術スタック
List your payroll, HR, and task tools first. Then confirm which tracking tool connects to all of them without a manual export.
🏢 Your Team Setup
On-site staff with fixed shifts fit Clockit’s model. Remote teams and contractors fit Time Doctor’s automatic time tracking tools better.
🎓 あなたの経験レベル
Clockit has a user friendly interface with fewer switches to configure. Time Doctor’s advanced features reward a manager willing to tune settings.
🆓 無料トライアルとデモ
Run one real project through each before deciding. Ask about offline time tracking during the trial if your crew works without steady internet.
🛟 サポートオプション
Time Doctor serves larger accounts and staffs support accordingly. Clockit leans on documentation, which suits small and medium businesses with simple questions.
切り替えガイド
Already on one of these? Here is what changes if you move.
🔄 Switching from Clockit to Time Doctor?
✅ 得られるもの：
- Random screenshots and idle time detection
- Payroll management and project budgeting
- Deeper analytics on your team’s performance
❌ 失うもの：
- 無料プラン
- Biometric attendance check-in
- PTO tracking and shift rosters
📋切り替え方法：
- Export attendance and leave records from Clockit
- Create a Time Doctor account and add your people
- Install the desktop app and set monitoring rules
🔄 Switching from Time Doctor to Clockit?
✅ 得られるもの：
- A much lower bill per seat
- Leave, holiday, and shift scheduling
- Less friction with staff who dislike monitoring
❌ 失うもの：
- Screenshots and activity capture
- Payroll runs inside the platform
- Distraction alerts and productivity scoring
📋切り替え方法：
- Download your reports and time entries from Time Doctor
- Open a Clockit workspace and import your roster
- Set shift patterns and leave policies before go-live
私たちのレビューで取り上げられなかったこと
This comparison focused on small teams and agencies. We did not test enterprise SSO, custom API work, or bulk licensing. Legal rules around employee monitoring vary by country, and we are not the people to advise on that. If you manage hundreds of seats, your priorities will differ from what we covered here.
最終評決
| カテゴリ | 勝者 |
|---|---|
| 💰価格 | クロッキット |
| ⏱️ Time tracking depth | タイムドクター |
| 👁️ Employee monitoring | タイムドクター |
| 📊 Detailed reporting | タイムドクター |
| 🗓️ Attendance and PTO | クロッキット |
| 💵 Payroll and billing | タイムドクター |
| 👶 Ease of use | クロッキット |
| 🏆総合優勝 | タイムドクター |
🏆 WINNER: TIME DOCTOR
Time Doctor wins 4 out of 7 categories and scores 4.2 against 3.7.
最適な用途: Remote teams, agencies billing clients, and managers who need proof of work hours
These are two different products wearing the same label. Clockit is an attendance system with a clock. Time Doctor is a productivity platform that happens to count minutes.
Clockit is the better buy if your problem is rosters, leave, and a cheap way to record time spent. It ranks among the best time tracking apps at that price, and the free plan makes trying it painless.
Time Doctor takes the overall win because it answers a harder 質問, which is why we rate it the best time tracking software of the two. It shows how many hours turned into output, not just attendance. Automatic time tracking can improve overall team productivity, and time tracking tools can save companies up to $50,000 annually when billing leaks get closed.
More of Clockit Compared
Here is how Clockit measures up against other time tracking tools:
Clockit vs クロックファイ
Clockit wins on: Biometric attendance, PTO and leave approvals, shift rosters for hourly staff
Clockifyが優れている点： A more generous free tier, wider integration catalogue, stronger project-level timesheets
Clockit vs トグル
Clockit wins on: Attendance-first design, cheaper paid seats, built-in scheduling for shift work
Togglが勝利した点： One-click timers for フリーランサー, cleaner reporting exports, better fit for agency task management
Clockit vs 収穫
Clockit wins on: Lower seat price, leave management, on-site check-in hardware support
ハーベストが勝利した理由： Ability to create invoices from tracked hours, expense capture, mature client billing at $12/user per month
More of Time Doctor Compared
Monitoring rivals overlap heavily. Hubstaff tracks visited URLs and used apps. TimeCamp detects idle time and tracks used apps. DeskTime categorizes apps as productive or unproductive. Here is how the closest three stack up:
タイムドクターの勝利条件： Screenshots and activity capture, distraction alerts, payroll runs inside the platform
Clockifyが優れている点： Free access for unlimited users, simpler onboarding, lower total cost for large headcounts
タイムドクター vs タイムラー
タイムドクターの勝利条件： Team-wide oversight, budget tracking per project, reporting built for managers not individuals
Timeularが勝利した点： Physical tracking dice, privacy-respecting design, faster manual logging for solo consultants
Time Doctor vs メムタイム
タイムドクターの勝利条件： Cloud dashboards for managers, payroll integration, screenshot evidence for client disputes
Memtimeが優れている点： Fully offline capture on the local machine, no surveillance of staff, automatic timeline reconstruction
よくある質問
What is the #1 employee time tracking tool for daily office use?
For daily office use, Clockit fits best. Biometric check-in, rosters, and leave approvals cover what an office actually needs, and paid seats start at $2.99.
What is the best app to keep track of work hours?
It depends on your team. Choose Clockit for shift-based staff and a free plan. Choose Time Doctor for remote workers who need automatic tracking and proof.
タイムドクターは何のために使われるのですか？
It is used to measure work sessions, monitor activity, and report on productivity. Agencies and outsourcing firms rely on it for accurate billing and client evidence.
What is the best free time tracker with screenshots?
Neither tool here offers that combination. Clockit’s free plan has no screenshots, and Time Doctor has no free tier. Clockify’s free plan is the usual starting point.
Can Time Doctor detect mouse jigglers?
It logs keyboard and mouse activity, so repetitive movement with no typing looks suspicious in reports. Detection is not guaranteed, but idle patterns often expose it.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 