⚡ Nhận định nhanh:
- Chạy: Make starts at $9/month. Flowith starts at $17.91/month. Both have a free plan.
- Phù hợp nhất cho: Make for app-to-app business tự động hóa. Flowith for AI research and content work on a canvas.
- Điểm khác biệt chính: Make moves data between 2,000+ apps. Flowith runs AI agents inside its own workspace.
- Lựa chọn của chúng tôi: Make for most people. It costs less and handles real việc kinh doanh workflows end to end.
Make vs Flowith both promise to automate tasks with AI.
Loading...
Make connects your favorite apps and moves data between them.
Flowith gives you an AI agent and an infinite canvas for thinking work.
Picking the wrong one wastes money and weeks of setup.
Toàn cảnh
Chúng tôi đã xem xét tài liệu, trang giá cả và đánh giá của người dùng về cả hai công cụ.
Các cây bút của chúng tôi cũng đã dành thời gian trực tiếp tiếp xúc với từng người.
Những ghi chú đó xuất hiện trong phần "Những điều nhóm chúng tôi nhận thấy" bên dưới.
We cover key features, pricing plans, ease of use, and who each tool suits.
Want to dig deeper? Each CTA box links to our full reviews.
Make là gì?
Make is a no code automation platform.
It was called Integromat before its rebrand.
You build workflows by linking app modules on a visual canvas.
Each workflow is called a scenario.
It lets you automate workflows across various applications.
It handles everything from simple workflows to complex automation with branches and loops.
Người làm việc tự do, doanh nghiệp nhỏ, and large enterprises all use it.
Here’s a quick video walkthrough of how Make works.
🏆 Winner: Make
Connect over 2,000 apps without writing code. Build branching scenarios on a visual canvas. Start free and upgrade only when you need more.
Đưa ra giá cả
Make uses an operations-based pricing model. Each step a scenario runs counts toward your monthly limit.
| Kế hoạch | Giá | Tốt nhất cho |
|---|---|---|
| Miễn phí | 0 đô la mỗi tháng | Learning and testing basic features |
| Cốt lõi | 9 đô la mỗi tháng | Solo users with steady workflows |
| Chuyên nghiệp | 16 đô la mỗi tháng | Người dùng chuyên nghiệp cần các tính năng nâng cao |
| Đội | 29 đô la mỗi tháng | Teams sharing scenarios |
| Doanh nghiệp | Giá tùy chỉnh | Large enterprises with bảo vệ nhu cầu |
Pricing verified October 2026.
Dùng thử miễn phí: No separate trial. The free plan works as a permanent trial, and no card is needed.
Đảm bảo hoàn tiền: No default refunds. Make reviews refund requests case by case.
📌 Ghi chú: The prices above are for annual billing. Monthly billing costs $10.59 for Core, $18.82 for Pro, and $34.12 for Teams.
⚠️ Cảnh báo: Operations add up fast. Looping over 500 rows in Google Sheets can burn 500+ operations per run. Watch your usage dashboard to avoid surprise upgrades.
Key Benefits of Make
Here’s what makes Make worth a look:
- Extensive integration capabilities: Make links over 2,000 apps. You can chain as many apps as you like in a single scenario.
- Visual workflow builder: You see every step as a bubble on a canvas. That visual approach makes data flow easy to follow.
- Advanced logic tools: Iterators, aggregators, routers, and filters come built in. You get conditional logic without writing code.
- Custom API calls: Can’t find an app? The HTTP module sends http requests to almost any service.
- Cost effective plans: Most paid plans sit between $9 and $29. That’s cheaper than many automation platforms.
- Strong community: Make has deep documentation, tutorials, and an active forum. Help is easy to find when you’re stuck.
Những điều nhóm chúng tôi nhận thấy
Của chúng tôi nhà văn signed up for Make and built scenarios for real content and lead tasks. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Make Pros & Cons
✅ Ưu điểm
- Connects over 2,000 apps in one platform
- Drag and drop interface shows every step visually
- Routers, filters, and error handling built in
- Paid plans start at just $9 per month
- HTTP module covers apps without a native connector
❌ Nhược điểm
- Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
- Operations count can climb quickly on loops
- No refunds by default
Flowith là gì?
Flowith is an AI creation and workflow tool.
It swaps the usual chat window for an infinite canvas.
You can run many AI threads side by side on that canvas.
Its AI agent, Agent Neo, handles long multi-step jobs for you.
It also stores your notes as a searchable second brain.
Creators, researchers, and developers are its main audience.
Its whole sân bóng đá is better productivity through AI.
This video shows the Flowith canvas in action.
Runner Up: Flowith
Research, write, and create on one infinite canvas. Agent Neo runs long tasks for you. Try it with 1,000 free credits.
Bảng giá Flowith
Flowith charges in unified credits. One credit pool covers chữ, image, and video models.
| Kế hoạch | Giá | Tốt nhất cho |
|---|---|---|
| Người mới bắt đầu | 0 đô la/tháng | Trying basic models and Agent Neo |
| Chuyên nghiệp | $17.91/month | Individual creators and students |
| Tối thượng | $44.91/month | Heavy daily research and content generation |
| Vô cực | $399.92/month | Studios and teams with huge credit needs |
Pricing verified October 2026.
Dùng thử miễn phí: The forever-free Starter plan gives 1,000 one-time credits. It includes basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo.
Đảm bảo hoàn tiền: We couldn’t confirm a standard refund window. Check the billing terms before you upgrade.
📌 Ghi chú: Paid plans refresh credits every month. You can top up anytime if you run short.
⚠️ Cảnh báo: Unused credits expire at the end of each monthly cycle. They don’t roll over, so size your plan carefully.
Key Benefits of Flowith
Here’s where Flowith earns its place:
- Intuitive canvas: Ideas branch out visually instead of scrolling away. Big projects stay easy to navigate.
- Đặc vụ Neo: This AI agent runs multi-step creative tasks. Flowith says it works without context limits.
- Oracle mode: It breaks a big job into subtasks. Then it pulls the right tools for each part.
- Many models, one place: You pick different AI models for different content tasks. No tab-switching between apps.
- Vườn Tri thức: Flowith stores and links your info automatically. You skip manual tagging and still find things later.
- Live collaboration: Team members can work on the same canvas at the same time.
Những điều nhóm chúng tôi nhận thấy
Our writer signed up for Flowith and used it for research and draft outlines. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Flowith Pros & Cons
✅ Ưu điểm
- Infinite canvas keeps research threads organized
- Agent Neo handles long, multi-step jobs
- One credit pool for text, image, and video
- Real-time collaboration on shared canvases
❌ Nhược điểm
- Some reviewers call it pricey for what it does
- Weak for scripting or giao dịch nhiệm vụ
- Unused credits expire each month
- Few direct app integrations
So sánh tính năng
Make is an automation tool. Flowith is an AI workspace. Below, we compare ten areas so you can see where each one fits.
| Tính năng | Làm | Flowith |
|---|---|---|
| Giá khởi điểm | 9 đô la mỗi tháng | $17.91/month |
| Gói miễn phí | ✅ | ✅ (1,000 one-time credits) |
| Các tác nhân AI | ✅ | ✅ Agent Neo |
| Visual Builder / Canvas | ✅ Scenario canvas | ✅ Infinite canvas |
| Hơn 2.000 ứng dụng tích hợp | ✅ | ❌ |
| Custom API Calls (HTTP) | ✅ | ❌ |
| Image & Video Creation | ❌ (via third party services) | ✅ |
| Cơ sở kiến thức | ❌ | ✅ Vườn Tri thức |
| Cộng tác thời gian thực | Teams plan | ✅ |
| Tốt nhất cho | Business workflows | AI research and content |
1. AI Agents
Làm: Make AI Agents sit inside your scenarios. They decide which step to run next based on goals you set. Because they live in a workflow, they can act on real apps and data.
Flowith: Agent Neo is the star here. It’s built for limitless creative and research jobs that run across many steps. You give it a goal, and it keeps completing steps without hitting context limits.
2. Visual Builder and Interface
Làm: The workflow builder is a drag-and-drop canvas of connected modules. You can watch data move through each bubble as a scenario runs. It’s clear, but it takes time to learn.
Flowith: Flowith calls its layout a smart framework for deep work. Each idea becomes a node you can branch from. The goal is fewer distractions and more time in a flow state.
3. Integrations and API Access
Làm: This is Make’s home turf. It supports over 2,000 apps, from Google Sheets to CRMs and e-commerce stores. The HTTP module handles API integrations for any tool that offers one.
Flowith: Flowith connects AI models, not business apps. You won’t find triggers for Slack, Gmail, or Shopify here. Its strength stays inside its own canvas.
⚠️ Cảnh báo: If you need syncing data between apps in real time, Flowith can’t do that job. Make can.
4. Complex Logic and Error Handling
Làm: Routers split paths. Filters stop bad data. Iterators and aggregators handle lists. Error handlers catch failures and show clear error messages. One broken step doesn’t kill the whole run.
Flowith: Oracle mode handles complexity in a different way. It splits a big request into subtasks and picks tools for each. You steer with prompts, not with if-then rules.
5. Tạo nội dung
Làm: Make doesn’t write content itself. It calls Ứng dụng AI like OpenAI and then posts the output. Mạng xã hội automation is a common use, such as drafting and scheduling posts.
Flowith: The Flowith Composer is built for writing. You can draft long pieces with several models in one view.
It also has an AI-powered photo editor for quick visuals.
https://fahimai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ai-powered-photo-editor-980×532.pngv
Video generation runs on the same credit pool.
6. Business Process Automation
Làm: Make shines at repetitive tasks across departments. Lead capture, contract routing, and invoice processing are all common scenarios. Marketing, inventory, and customer support teams use it too.
Contract workflows can send, sign, and file documents without manual steps.
Invoice scenarios pull numbers from emails and push them into kế toán công cụ.
Flowith: Flowith isn’t built for back-office work. It can plan a process or write a report about it. But it won’t move a record from one system to another.
7. Knowledge and Research
Làm: Make has no built-in note system. You can pipe research into Khái niệm or a database. But the storage and search happen in another tool.
Flowith: The Knowledge Garden turns your files into a searchable base. It links ideas without manual tagging. Some reports claim up to 40% faster task completion and 78% faster retrieval. Treat those numbers as claims, not guarantees.
8. Templates and Community
Làm: The Templates Gallery gives you ready-made scenarios to copy. A large forum and tutorial library back it up. That makes creating automations easier sớm in your automation journey.
Flowith: Flowith has an Agent Community where people share agents. Its Knowledge Market lets creators trade knowledge bases.
Here’s a look at the Knowledge Market.
9. Dễ sử dụng
Làm: Simple tasks take minutes. But more complex workflows bring a steep learning curve around APIs and data mapping. Expect some trial and error before you build workflows with confidence.
Flowith: If you can type a prompt, you can sử dụng Flowith. Reviewers praise how its interface supports deep work. The canvas does take a short adjustment if you’re used to chat apps.
💡 Mẹo hay: New to Make? Copy a template first. Editing a working scenario teaches faster than starting from a blank canvas.
10. Định giá & Chi phí
| Cấp độ | Làm | Flowith |
|---|---|---|
| Miễn phí | Free: $0 per month | Starter: $0/month |
| Lối vào | Core: $9 per month | Pro: $17.91/month |
| Giữa | Pro: $16 per month | Ultimate: $44.91/month |
| Team / Top | Teams: $29 per month | Infinite: $399.92/month |
| Doanh nghiệp | Giá tùy chỉnh | ❌ |
Làm: Make is the cheaper paid plan at every step. Its operations-based pricing has no hidden fees, but heavy loops raise your bill. It’s priced below Zapier for similar volume.
Flowith: Credits work across every model, which keeps things simple. The catch is expiry. Credits you don’t spend vanish at the end of each cycle.
Các kịch bản khác nhau
| Nếu bạn cần… | Chọn | Tại sao |
|---|---|---|
| Ngân sách eo hẹp | Làm | Paid plans start at $9 |
| Connect business apps | Làm | 2,000+ integrations |
| AI research and writing | Flowith | Canvas plus Composer |
| Long tự động AI jobs | Flowith | Agent Neo |
| Custom API calls | Làm | HTTP module |
| Fast start for beginners | Flowith | Prompt-driven, no mapping |
💰 Ngân sách của bạn
Make’s paid plan costs about half of Flowith’s entry plan. If money is tight, Make gives more for less.
🔌 Bộ công nghệ của bạn
Already run on Google Sheets, a CRM, and email? Make ties them together, while Flowith stays a separate workspace.
📝 Phong cách làm việc của bạn
Writers and researchers who think visually will feel at home in Flowith. Ops people who think in steps will prefer Make.
🎓 Trình độ kinh nghiệm của bạn
Flowith needs no coding expertise or setup. Make needs some patience, but you never have to touch code.
🆓 Dùng thử và bản demo miễn phí
Both have a free plan, so test with a real task. Make’s free tier never ends, while Flowith’s credits are one-time.
🛟 Các tùy chọn hỗ trợ
Make has a big forum, docs, and video guides. Flowith’s community is smaller and newer, so answers can take longer.
Hướng dẫn chuyển đổi
Bạn đã sử dụng một trong những công cụ này rồi? Dưới đây là những điều bạn cần biết nếu chuyển sang sử dụng công cụ khác.
🔄 Switching from Make to Flowith?
✅ Những lợi ích bạn sẽ nhận được:
- An infinite canvas for research and động não
- Built-in image and video creation
- A searchable knowledge base for your notes
❌ Những gì bạn sẽ mất:
- Triggers and actions across 2,000+ apps
- Routers, filters, and scheduled scenarios
- Custom HTTP and API connections
📋 Cách chuyển đổi:
- List which Make scenarios are content or research jobs
- Create a free Flowith account and test those jobs
- Keep Make running for anything that moves app data
🔄 Switching from Flowith to Make?
✅ Những lợi ích bạn sẽ nhận được:
- Real automation between your business apps
- Các gói trả phí rẻ hơn
- Detailed error handling and run history
❌ Những gì bạn sẽ mất:
- The visual research canvas
- Agent Neo’s long-running AI tasks
- Built-in image and video tools
📋 Cách chuyển đổi:
- Export your Flowith notes and outputs
- Sign up for Make’s free plan
- Rebuild repeat jobs from a template and connect your apps
Những điều mà bài đánh giá của chúng tôi chưa đề cập
This comparison focused on solo users and small teams. We didn’t test Make’s Enterprise plan or Flowith’s $399.92 Infinite tier. We also didn’t build a mobile app with either tool. Searched “make app” hoping to build one? Try AI or no-code app thợ xây instead. They suit beginners and fast prototypes.
Phán quyết cuối cùng
| Loại | Người thắng |
|---|---|
| 💰 Giá cả | Làm |
| 🔌 Tích hợp | Làm |
| 🧠 Complex Logic | Làm |
| 🤖 Các tác nhân AI | Flowith |
| ✍️ Tạo nội dung | Flowith |
| 📚 Mẫu & Cộng đồng | Làm |
| 👶 Dễ sử dụng | Flowith |
| 🏆 Người chiến thắng chung cuộc | Làm |
🏆 WINNER: MAKE
Make wins 4 out of 7 categories.
Phù hợp nhất cho: Business automation, app syncing, budget-conscious teams
Make is a powerful automation platform for moving work between apps. It costs less and gives you tight control over every step.
Flowith is a strong pick for research, writing, and AI-heavy creative work. Its canvas and Agent Neo do things Make simply wasn’t built for.
For most readers, the job is cutting manual work across tools. That’s why Make takes the win. Many people will happily use both.
More of Make Compared
Weighing both Zapier and Make? Start with the first card below.
Giành chiến thắng trong: Lower prices for similar volume, branching routers, and finer control over data parsing.
Zapier thắng thế nhờ: A larger app library, a simpler linear setup, and a faster start for beginners.
Make vs n8n
Giành chiến thắng trong: Fully hosted setup, friendlier for non-coders, and more ready-made app modules.
n8n thắng nhờ: Self-hosting, custom code nodes, and source-available licensing.
Make vs Pabbly Kết nối
Giành chiến thắng trong: Deeper logic tools, a bigger app catalog, and built-in AI agents.
Pabbly Connect wins on: Lifetime-deal pricing, free internal steps, and lower long-term cost.
Make vs Gumloop
Giành chiến thắng trong: Wider app support, mature error handling, and cheaper entry plans.
Gumloop thắng nhờ: AI-first nodes, built-in web scraping, and LLM steps without your own API key.
More of Flowith Compared
Here’s how Flowith compares with other AI workspaces:
Flowith vs Notion
Flowith wins on: Multi-model AI on a canvas, tự động agent tasks, and auto-linked knowledge.
Notion thắng ở các điểm sau: Docs and databases, mature team wikis, and wider app connections.
Flowith so với MindStudio
Flowith wins on: Free-form research canvas, image and video creation, and a personal knowledge base.
MindStudio wins on: Building custom AI apps, sharing agents with clients, and structured agent workflows.
Flowith wins on: Visual thinking space, long-running Agent Neo jobs, and built-in note storage.
Gumloop thắng nhờ: App integrations, scheduled automations, and web scraping nodes.
Câu hỏi thường gặp
Make.com được dùng để làm gì?
It connects apps and automates workflows without code. Common uses include lead capture, invoices, and social posts. It also syncs records between Google Sheets and a CRM.
Liệu Make có tốt hơn Zapier không?
For complex logic and lower cost, yes. Zapier is simpler and has more apps. Unlike Zapier’s linear steps, Make supports branching paths and loops.
Flowith.io có miễn phí không?
Yes, partly. The Starter plan is free forever with 1,000 one-time credits. It includes basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo. Paid plans start at $17.91/month.
Flowith có thể tích hợp với các ứng dụng khác không?
Only in a limited way. It connects many AI models inside one interface. For moving data between business apps, a tool like Make is the better fit.
Loại trí tuệ nhân tạo nào tốt nhất cho tự động hóa?
For app-to-app automation, Make offers the best value here. For research and content tasks run by an AI agent, Flowith is the stronger choice.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 