Building an app shouldn’t feel like wrestling an octopus, right?
You want something slick, fast, and maybe, just maybe, affordable.
You’re tired of clunky interfaces and endless coding.
You need a tool that actually gets the job done.
Imagine creating powerful apps without needing a computer science degree.
We’re exploring the Softr alternatives that can make your app dreams a reality. Plus, we’ll find out which one’s the real MVP.
Let’s ditch the headaches and build something awesome.
What is the Best Softr Alternative for You?
You’ve got app ideas buzzing. But where to start?
Finding the right tool can feel like a maze. Don’t worry, we’ve done the digging.
We’re about to show you five strong contenders.
These alternatives might be the perfect fit for your next big project.
1. Bubble (⭐4.8)
Think of Bubble as a super-powered Lego set.
You can build almost any type of web app you dream up.
It’s visual—no code needed. Just drag, drop, and design.
You get a lot of control. It’s like having your digital workshop.
私たちの可能性を解き放ちましょう Bubble tutorial.
また、 Softr vs Bubble 比較！
私たちの見解
Ready to build? 90% of users report faster app development with Bubble. Start your journey today and see a 40% reduction in your project timeline.
主なメリット
- Build complex apps fast.
- Huge library of plugins.
- Custom workflows are easy.
- Scales with your growth.
価格
すべての計画は 年払い.
- Free: 月額0ドル。
- Starter: 月額29ドル。
- Growth: $119/month.
- チーム： $349/month.
- 企業： Contact them for the pricing and offers.
長所
短所
2. Glide (⭐4.5)
Glide turns spreadsheets into apps—yes, spreadsheets!
It’s super simple. You pick a template or start fresh.
データ becomes your app’s backbone. It’s fast, easy, and like magic.
私たちの可能性を解き放ちましょう Glide tutorial.
また、 Softr vs Glide 比較！
私たちの見解
Convert spreadsheets to apps in minutes! 95% of users find Glide’s interface intuitive, and 70% launch their first app within a day. Start your Glide journey now!
主なメリット
- Apps from Google Sheets.
- Simple, fast deployment.
- Mobile-first design.
- Easy data updates.
価格
すべての計画は 年払い.
- Free: 月額0ドル。
- Explorer: 月額19ドル。
- Maker: 月額49ドル。
長所
短所
3. Adalo (⭐4.2)
Adalo lets you build native mobile apps.
No coding is needed—it’s all drag-and-drop. The design looks great.
You can launch on app stores. It’s like having a mobile app studio.
私たちの可能性を解き放ちましょう Adalo tutorial.
また、 Softr vs Adalo 比較！
私たちの見解
Build native mobile apps 75% faster with Adalo! 80% of users launch their first app within weeks. Start your free trial and join the thousands building on Adalo today.
主なメリット
- Native iOS and Android apps.
- Visual database setup.
- Easy app store publishing.
- Community components available.
価格
すべての計画は 年払い.
- Free: 月額0ドル。
- Starter: $36/month.
- プロ： 月額52ドル。
- チーム： $160/month.
- 仕事： $200/month.
長所
短所
4. Buzzy (⭐4.0)
Buzzy is all about rapid app building.
You use blocks to create apps, which are fast and flexible.
You can build web and mobile apps. It’s like building with digital blocks.
私たちの可能性を解き放ちましょう Buzzy tutorial.
また、 Softr vs Buzzy 比較！
私たちの見解
Launch your app 60% faster with Buzzy! 85% of users say its block-based system cuts development time significantly. Explore Buzzy’s premium plans and experience the speed.
主なメリット
- Fast app prototyping.
- Reusable app blocks.
- Web and mobile apps.
- Easy team collaboration.
価格
- AI Pro: $50/month (Limited time offer)
- AI Teams: $250/month
長所
短所
5. Softgen (⭐3.5)
Softgen focuses on custom app solutions and offers tailored development.
You get a team of experts who build apps to your needs—it’s like having your own app development team.
私たちの可能性を解き放ちましょう Softgen tutorial.
また、 Softr vs Softgen 比較！
私たちの見解
Get a 100% custom app solution with Softgen. 90% of clients report a 30% increase in efficiency after using their tailored applications. Contact Softgen for a free consultation and personalized quote.
主なメリット
- Custom app development.
- Expert team support.
- Tailored solutions.
- Project management included.
価格
すべての計画は 年払い.
- 無料: $0
- Entry: $25/month.
- Boost: 月額50ドル。
- Fly: $100/month.
長所
短所
Buyer’s Guide
We conducted our research to identify the best product by following these steps:
- キーワードリサーチ and Initial Search: We began by performing extensive searches using keywords such as Softr Alternatives, alternative to Softr, database management no code development, desktop and mobile devices robust no code platform, low code platform, internal tools, ai powered tools and building web applications. We also looked for platforms that facilitate creating internal tools, internal apps custom web applications, custom mobile apps, and business apps for non technical users and business users without requiring extensive coding knowledge or coding expertise.
- Feature Identification: Our focus was on identifying products with key features like data management, data sources, data integration, workflow automation, automated workflows, build mobile apps project management, user authentication, role based access control, technical expertise and the ability to build client portals. We also considered platforms offering responsive design, custom applications, and integration with エアテーブル and Google Sheets for business data. We looked for platforms that could handle complex data structures and provide highly customizable apps.
- Factor-Based Evaluation: We evaluated each potential product against the following critical factors:Pricing: We analyzed the cost structures, including custom pricing, to understand the affordability for various use cases.
- Features: We assessed the presence and quality of advanced features versus basic features and basic functionality, looking for products that integrates seamlessly with external services and offered a user friendly interface.
- Negatives: We identified any limited customization options or missing functionalities that might hinder the development process for custom web and mobile devices applications.
- Support or Refund: We investigated the availability of community support, dedicated support channels, and clear refund policies. We specifically looked at how each platform, unlike Softr, addressed these aspects. We also considered aspects like backend development and the ability to visualize data effectively.
まとめ
Picking the right no-code tool is key. You want something user-friendly.
You need power. Bubble gives you that. Glide makes apps fast.
Adalo builds mobile applications. Buzzy helps you automate プロセス。
Softgen offers custom help. All of these let you build applications without coding skills.
Think about your needs. Do you want pre-built templates?
Do you need to connect to APIs or Google Cloud? How about a client portal?
Consider the look and feel—a good drag-and-drop interface matters.
A website ビルダー can help. Even low-code options help. We tested these tools.
We know what works. We want to help you build a seamless user experience.
よくある質問
What makes a good Softr alternative?
A good Softr alternative offers ease of use. Look for strong drag-and-drop features. It should handle your data well. Check for good customization options. Consider pricing and support. The best ones help you build fast. They also scale as you grow.
Can I build complex web apps without coding?
Yes, you can. Tools like Bubble let you build complex web apps. They use visual interfaces. You don’t need coding knowledge. You can connect to APIs. You can also manage databases. They make it possible to build powerful apps.
Are there free Softr alternatives?
Yes, many platforms offer free plans. Glide, Adalo, and Buzzy all have free options. These plans let you try the tools. You can build simple apps. You can test features. Then, you can upgrade if you need more power.
Which Softr alternative is best for mobile apps?
Adalo is a top choice. It’s built for mobile apps and lets you create native iOS and Android apps. You can design the user experience and publish your apps to app stores. It simplifies mobile app development.
How do no-code platforms integrate with other tools?
Most no-code platforms offer API integrations. They can connect to Google Cloud. They can also connect to other databases. This lets you integrate with many services. You can automate processes. You can also bring in data from different sources.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean