⚡ 簡単な評価:
- 価格: HitPaw starts at $22.39/month, with a $130.39 perpetual license. Topaz starts at $99/year for Gigapixel.
- 最適な用途: HitPaw suits creators who want a single click enhance. Topaz Video AI suits professionals restoring old footage.
- 主な違い： Topaz can upscale video to 8K. HitPaw caps lower but processes faster with shorter render times.
- 私たちのおすすめ： HitPaw for most users, because it bundles video and photo enhancement into one affordable app.
The pricier tool is not automatically the smarter buy.
Topaz Video AI costs more per year than HitPaw.
Yet price is the smallest gap between these two video enhancers.
They target different people with very different goals.
This HitPaw vs Topaz breakdown shows you which one fits your work.
概要
This HitPaw vs Topaz comparison covers pricing, ai models, render times, and ease of use.
私たちの 作家 spent hands-on time with HitPaw directly.
Notes on Topaz come from its documentation and published user reviews.
We also compare how each app handles old sd footage and blurry photos.
By the end, you will know which video enhancer software earns your money.
HitPawとは何ですか?
HitPaw is a desktop app that cleans up video and photos with ai.
The HitPaw Video Enhancer sharpens soft footage and lifts visual quality.
It runs offline on Windows and マック, so your files stay on your machine.
You drop in a clip, pick a model, and hit enhance.
Most people pick it because that whole process takes a single click.
Here is a closer look at how the app handles real projects.
🏆 Winner: HitPaw
One app covers video, photo, and audio work. The perpetual license costs $130.39 once. That beats paying every year.
HitPawの価格設定
HitPaw sells three licence lengths for the same software. Here is what each one costs.
| プラン | 価格 | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| 1ヶ月ライセンス | 月額22.39ドル | One-off jobs and short projects |
| 1年間ライセンス | 年間90.39ドル | Regular creators editing every week |
| 永久ライセンス | 130.39ドル（一括払い） | Anyone who hates subscriptions |
価格は2026年7月に確定しました。
無料トライアル: Yes. The free version watermarks exports and limits how much you can process.
返金保証: HitPaw offers a 30-day refund window on paid licences.
📌 注記： The perpetual license pays for itself in roughly 18 months against the yearly plan. If you enhance video more than a few times a year, buy it once.
⚠️ Pricing conflict: Some listings quote HitPaw Video Enhancer AI at $69.99, and older pages list separate tools at $19.95 and $52.99 per month. Our database records $22.39/month, $90.39/year, and $130.39 perpetual. HitPaw splits its lineup into several apps, so check which one your cart contains before paying.
Key Benefits of HitPaw
Here is what makes HitPaw worth a look:
- One-Click Workflow: Pick a model and press enhance. There are no sliders to learn first.
- SD Rescue: HitPaw lifts old sd footage to 1080p with a pleasing enhancement. It also takes 720p clips to 4K.
- Photo Side Included: HitPaw Photo Enhancer fixes blurry photos and restores old photos. It reads JPG, PNG, and WebP.
- バッチ処理: Queue a folder of images and walk away. The photo enhancer finishes each picture in seconds.
- Colour Revival: It colourises old footage, which is a job Topaz struggles with.
- Buy It Once: The $130.39 perpetual license is rare now. Most rivals moved to yearly billing only.
- Modest Hardware: It runs on ordinary laptops. You do not need a workstation graphics card.
私たちのチームが気づいたこと
Our writer installed HitPaw and ran a mix of camera clips and scanned pictures through it. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:
The clip below walks through the same steps on screen.
HitPaw Pros & Cons
✅ メリット
- Enhances video in a single click with no manual tuning
- Cheaper than Topaz, with a $130.39 perpetual license
- Faster render times than Topaz on the same hardware
- Colourises old footage that Topaz cannot handle well
- Bundles video, photo, audio, and avatar tools in one app
❌ デメリット
- Fewer ai models than Topaz for specific damage types
- No dedicated face model for recovering blurred faces
- The photo enhancer only accepts JPG, PNG, and WebP
- The free trial watermarks every export
トパーズとは何ですか？
Topaz Labs builds separate apps instead of one big suite.
Topaz Video AI handles footage, and Topaz Photo AI handles stills.
Gigapixel is the standalone upscaler for images.
Each app trains different models on different kinds of damage.
That focus is why Topaz video work is popular with restoration professionals.
The trade-off is a longer setup before you see impressive results.
Runner Up: Topaz
Built for restoration work on badly degraded video. Pick the app you need, then pay for that one alone.
トパーズの価格
Topaz charges per app rather than per suite. Buying two tools means paying twice.
| プラン | 価格 | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| ギガピクセル | 年間99ドル | Image upscaling only |
| 写真AI | 年間199ドル | Denoise, sharpen, and photo enhancement |
| ビデオAI | 年間299ドル | Footage restoration and 8K upscaling |
| Studio Bundle | 年間499ドル | Studios needing every tool |
価格は2026年7月に確定しました。
無料トライアル: Yes. Trial exports carry a watermark, and there is no free plan afterwards.
返金保証: Topaz Labs runs a 30-day refund policy on new purchases.
📌 注記： Video AI alone costs $299 a year. That is more than twice the price of the HitPaw perpetual license, which you buy once.
⚠️ 警告： Topaz Labs ended perpetual licences in September 2025. Older reviews still quote a one-time $99 or $299 purchase. Those deals are gone, and existing owners keep only the version they already bought.
Key Benefits of Topaz
Here is where Topaz pulls ahead:
- 8K Output: Topaz Video AI can upscale video to 8K. HitPaw stops well short of that ceiling.
- Specialised Models: Separate ai models target noise, compression, and motion blur. The Artemis model handles general upscaling.
- Face Recovery: A dedicated face model rebuilds facial detail on a blurred person in old footage.
- フレーム補間: It creates in-between frames for smooth slow motion from original footage.
- 微調整： Every parameter is adjustable, which matters on very old sd footage.
- Local Processing: Rendering happens on your own gpu, so nothing uploads to a server.
- API アクセス: Studios can wire Topaz into a pipeline instead of clicking through the app.
私たちのチームが気づいたこと
Note: We have not had extended hands-on time with Topaz yet. The points above come from Topaz Labs documentation and published user reviews rather than our own sessions. G2 reviews highlight the output quality and the steep hardware demands in roughly equal measure.
Topaz Pros & Cons
✅ メリット
- Better image quality than HitPaw on badly degraded clips
- Upscales footage to 8K for cinema delivery
- Dedicated face model recovers blurred faces
- Advanced frame interpolation for smooth slow motion
❌ デメリット
- No free plan, and each app is billed separately
- Needs manual parameter adjustments for the best output
- Demands stronger hardware than HitPaw
- Struggles to colourise old footage
機能比較
Ready to compare HitPaw and Topaz feature by feature?
Both HitPaw and Topaz share the same core features on paper. We walk through ten areas that decide which app suits your video content.
| 特徴 | ヒットパウ | トパーズ |
|---|---|---|
| 開始価格 | 月額22.39ドル | 年間99ドル |
| 無料プラン | ✅ | ❌ |
| 永久ライセンス | ✅ | ❌ |
| Max Video Resolution | 4K | 8K |
| Dedicated Face Model | ❌ | ✅ |
| Colourise Old Footage | ✅ | ❌ |
| フレーム補間 | ❌ | ✅ |
| Batch Photo Enhancement | ✅ | ✅ |
| オフラインで動作します | ✅ | ✅ |
| 最適な用途 | Fast everyday enhancement | Professional restoration |
1. Video Enhancement Quality
HitPaw: The HitPaw enhancer reads your clip and applies a preset chain of fixes. On old sd footage it produces a pleasing enhancement without you touching a slider. Quality lands somewhere between untouched source and a hand-graded master.
Topaz: Topaz Video AI typically achieves better image quality on the same clip. Its ai algorithms rebuild edges rather than sharpen them, which shows on very old sd footage. The catch is that you often adjust settings twice before the output looks right.
⚠️ 警告： Neither tool invents detail that was never captured. If the camera never recorded it, no ai model can bring it back honestly.
2. Upscaling and Higher Resolutions
HitPaw: HitPaw takes sd footage to 1080p and 720p clips to 4K. Upscaling works by inventing extra pixels from patterns the model learned. That is enough for social video and archive projects.
Topaz: Topaz can upscale video all the way to 8K. Its Artemis model gives satisfactory results at those higher resolutions. Interestingly, HitPaw 4K output often matches Topaz 8K output once you view both on a normal screen.
3. Denoise and Grain Removal
HitPaw: Denoise runs as part of the general model rather than a separate pass. It gives a noticeable improvement on grainy night footage. Heavy grain sometimes softens fine detail along with the noise.
Topaz: Topaz ships a general denoise model plus targeted alternatives for compression artefacts. That denoise model holds edges better at extreme noise levels. Picking the wrong one produces waxy skin, so the choice matters.
4. Face Recovery
HitPaw: There is no dedicated face model here. Faces improve as a side effect of the overall quality lift. On a distant person in a wide shot, that gap shows.
Topaz: Face Recovery uses a specialised face model trained only on faces. It rebuilds eyes and mouths that the original footage barely recorded. This is the clearest technology gap between the two apps.
5. Photo Enhancement
HitPaw: HitPaw Photo Enhancer runs three ai models for different jobs. It fixes blurry photos, restores old photos, and upscales images 4x without input scale tweaks. Each picture finishes in a few seconds, and batches run unattended.
Topaz: Topaz Photo AI delivers sharper output on high-resolution stills. It does not colourise old pictures, so black-and-white scans stay grey. HitPaw wins on breadth here while Topaz photo output wins on peak sharpness.
6. Object Removal and Image Cleanup
HitPaw: The object remover paints out distractions and fills the gap with additional データ drawn from surrounding pixels. It handles signs, wires, and stray people in an image well. Large removals still leave smudges.
Topaz: Photo AI added a remove module alongside dust and scratch repair for old photos. It targets restoration rather than creative editing. For heavy retouching, most people still open フォトショップ afterwards.
7. AI Models and Model Choice
HitPaw: You get a short menu of models with plain names like general and animation. Fewer choices means fewer wrong turns for beginners. The developer updates them, though release notes stay thin.
Topaz: Topaz exposes many different models, each tuned to one kind of degradation. Running two models in sequence produces solid results that a single pass misses. That flexibility is also why the learning curve is steeper.
💡 プロのヒント: Export a ten second sample with two models before committing a full timeline. It takes minutes and saves hours.
8. Speed, Render Times, and Hardware
HitPaw: HitPaw generally processes videos faster than Topaz on identical hardware. It runs happily on a mid-range Windows laptop. Shorter render times matter when you enhance clips every week.
Topaz: Topaz demands higher hardware requirements and rewards a strong gpu. Long jobs can run overnight, which is normal for restoration work. Crash recovery resumes an interrupted render instead of starting over.
9. Extra Tools Beyond Enhancement
HitPaw: The same purchase includes an ai music ジェネレータ, voice cloning, and the Edimakor video editor. Few video enhancers throw in creative tools like these. It is a cool bonus if you make content solo.
Topaz: Topaz stays narrow on purpose and ships no editor, no audio tools, and no titles. You still need separate video 編集者 for the actual cut. What you get instead is an API for studio pipelines.
10. 価格設定とコスト
プランを並べて比較してみましょう。
| プランの種類 | ヒットパウ | トパーズ |
|---|---|---|
| 無料プラン | Watermarked trial | ❌ なし |
| 毎月 | 月額22.39ドル | ❌ 提供されていません |
| 年間 | 年間90.39ドル | $99–$299/year per app |
| バンドル | Included in one licence | $499/year Studio |
| One-time | $130.39 perpetual | ❌ Ended Sept 2025 |
HitPaw: One licence covers video and photo work together. The $130.39 perpetual option removes renewals entirely. For hobbyists, that maths is hard to argue with.
Topaz: Wanting both video and photo enhancement pushes you toward the $499 bundle. That is roughly four HitPaw perpetual licences per year. The premium buys quality, not quantity.
さまざまなシナリオ
| 必要な場合は | 選ぶ | なぜ |
|---|---|---|
| 予算が限られている | ヒットパウ | Perpetual licence, no renewals |
| 8K delivery | トパーズ | Only one that reaches 8K |
| Faces in old footage | トパーズ | Dedicated face model |
| Colourising archive film | ヒットパウ | Topaz cannot colourise |
| Fast weekly turnaround | ヒットパウ | Shorter render times |
| Photo and video in one app | ヒットパウ | Single licence covers both |
💰 あなたの予算
HitPaw asks $130.39 once and never again. Topaz asks $299 every year for Video AI alone.
🖥️ Your Hardware
Topaz expects a capable gpu and punishes weak machines with long waits. HitPaw runs fine on an ordinary Windows laptop.
🎞️ Your Source Material
Badly damaged archive reels favour Topaz and its specialised models. Ordinary camera clips reach good enough quality in HitPaw much sooner.
🎓 あなたの経験レベル
Beginners get a usable result from HitPaw on the first try. Topaz rewards people who enjoy learning what each parameter does.
🆓 無料トライアルとデモ
Both trials watermark exports, which is enough to demonstrate the difference on your own files. Run the same clip through each before you decide.
🛟 サポートオプション
Topaz runs an active community forum where staff answer model questions. HitPaw leans on email support and written guides instead.
切り替えガイド
Already own one of these tools? Here is what changes if you move.
🔄 Switching from HitPaw to Topaz?
✅ 得られるもの：
- 8K output and better results on badly damaged reels
- A face model that rebuilds blurred faces
- Frame interpolation for smooth slow motion
❌ 失うもの：
- Colourisation of black-and-white footage
- The bundled editor, music, and 声 ツール
- Your perpetual licence and the faster render times
📋切り替え方法：
- Export your finished masters from HitPaw before the licence lapses
- Start the Topaz trial and pick the single app you actually need
- Re-run one old project to learn which models suit your footage
🔄 Switching from Topaz to HitPaw?
✅ 得られるもの：
- A one-time payment instead of a yearly bill
- Colourisation and a much simpler process
- Photo, audio, and editing tools in the same app
❌ 失うもの：
- 8K upscaling and peak visual quality
- Dedicated face recovery and frame interpolation
- API access and fine parameter control
📋切り替え方法：
- Finish any renders in progress, since presets do not transfer
- Install HitPaw and test the free version on one clip
- Buy the perpetual licence once the output meets your bar
私たちのレビューで取り上げられなかったこと
This comparison focused on solo creators and small studios enhancing their own files. We did not benchmark the Topaz API inside a render farm, and we did not test either app on Apple silicon against a Windows workstation. Colour-managed HDR delivery sits outside what we looked at. If you restore film for broadcast, your priorities will differ from ours.
最終評決
| カテゴリ | 勝者 |
|---|---|
| 💰価格 | ヒットパウ |
| 🎯 Peak Image Quality | トパーズ |
| ⚡ Speed and Render Times | ヒットパウ |
| 🔍 Upscaling Ceiling | トパーズ |
| 👶 使いやすさ | ヒットパウ |
| 🖼️ Photo Enhancement Breadth | ヒットパウ |
| 🧰 Extra Tools | ヒットパウ |
| 🏆総合優勝 | ヒットパウ |
🏆 WINNER: HITPAW
HitPaw wins 5 out of 7 categories.
最適な用途: Everyday creators, archive colourisation, photo and video work in one licence
HitPaw and Topaz are not really chasing the same buyer. HitPaw is a lightweight consumer app that gets you 90% of the way for a fraction of the cost.
Topaz is a restoration instrument aimed at people paid to rescue footage. Its cinematic output is the reason studios keep renewing.
If you need 8K masters or need to bring a blurred face back to life, pay the Topaz premium. Everyone else gets more from HitPaw for less money.
More of HitPaw Compared
HitPaw also competes outside enhancing video quality, because its avatar and voice tools overlap with generation platforms:
HitPaw vs ヘイジェン
HitPaw wins on: One-time pricing, offline rendering, and repair work that HeyGen does not attempt
HeyGenが勝利した点： Photoreal avatars, 175+ language dubbing, and browser-based team collaboration
HitPaw vs シンセシア
HitPaw wins on: Cost for solo creators, local file privacy, and upscaling existing footage
Synthesiaが優れている点： Corporate training templates, brand kits, and SOC 2 compliance for enterprise buyers
HitPaw vs ヴィード
HitPaw wins on: Desktop processing speed, no upload limits, and stronger restoration models
VEEDが勝利した点： Auto subtitles, a timeline editor in the browser, and instant sharing links
More of Topaz Compared
Here is how Topaz measures up against other upscaling tools:
Topaz vs Magnific AI
Topaz wins on: Faithful detail, video support, and local rendering with no per-image credits
Magnific wins on: Creative reimagining, browser access on any machine, and prompt-guided upscales
Topaz vs レミニ
Topaz wins on: Print-grade output, batch control, and no cloud upload of private pictures
レミニが勝利した点： Mobile convenience, a free tier, and one-tap portrait restoration
Topaz vs Adobe Lightroom
Topaz wins on: Upscaling ceiling, model variety, and rescuing files Lightroom gives up on
Lightroom wins on: Cataloguing, colour grading, and a cheaper photography plan overall
よくある質問
Is Topaz better than HitPaw?
For peak quality on damaged footage, yes. Topaz reaches 8K and recovers faces. HitPaw wins on price, speed, and simplicity for everyday jobs.
What is better than Topaz Video AI?
Nothing beats it outright on restoration quality. HitPaw is better on cost and render speed. Magnific suits creative upscales rather than faithful repair.
Is HitPaw Photo AI good?
Yes, it is strong value. Three models cover sharpening, restoration, and 4x upscaling, and it finishes each photo in seconds. Format support is limited though.
Is HitPaw Video Enhancer worth it?
If you hope to avoid subscriptions, yes. The $130.39 perpetual licence costs less than half a year of Topaz Video AI and covers photos too.
Can both tools upscale video to 8K?
Only Topaz reaches 8K. HitPaw Video Enhancer AI tops out at 4K, which most screens cannot display anyway. Check your delivery spec first.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 