⚡ 簡単な評価:
- 価格: Scite costs $20 monthly, or $12/month on the yearly plan. Paperguide starts at $0 with a free plan, then $12/month billed annually.
- 最適な用途: Scite suits researchers who need evidence behind citations. Paperguide suits students writing papers who also want a reference manager.
- 主な違い： Scite labels each citing paper as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning. Paperguide handles the writing process instead.
- 私たちのおすすめ： Scite, because no other tool here checks whether the literature agrees with a claim.
PhD students compare Scite and Paperguide for one reason.
They are drowning in research papers and running out of hours.
Both tools promise to save so much time during a literature review.
But they attack the problem from opposite ends.
Scite checks the evidence behind citations in scientific literature.
Paperguide writes, cites, and stores your academic papers in one place.
概要
This Scite vs Paperguide comparison covers pricing, features, and how each research process actually runs.
私たちの 作家 spent time inside Scite directly.
Notes on Paperguide come from its documentation, pricing page, and G2 reviews.
Our affiliate links keep this site running, but they never change the verdict.
By the end you will know which tool fits your research needs.
Sciteとは何ですか?
Scite is a citation analysis tool built for scientific literature.
It helps researchers discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations.
A Smart Citation shows the context of the citation from the citing paper.
It adds a classification describing whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence.
A deep learning model reads full-text articles to sort those citation statements.
Scite has analyzed and indexed over 1 billion citation statements to date.
The short video below walks through how Scite works in a real search.
🏆 Winner: Scite
See who supports a claim and who disputes it. Smart Citations turn raw citation counts into real evidence.
Sciteの価格
Scite keeps its pricing simple. There are two published options.
| プラン | 価格 | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| 月額プラン | $20 | Short projects and one-off reference checks |
| 年間プラン | 月額12ドル | Students and academics working all year |
価格は2026年7月に確定しました。
無料トライアル: Scite lists no free plan in the two options above. Check the signup page for any trial offer running at the time you join.
返金保証: No refund window appears in the published plans. Read the checkout terms before you pay.
📌 注記： The yearly plan costs $144 a year. Paying month to month costs $240. That gap is $96 saved for the same access.
⚠️ 警告： Several G2 users report problems with billing and subscription renewals. Cancel through your account page and keep the email receipt.
Key Benefits of Scite
Here is what makes Scite worth a look:
- スマート引用: Each citing paper is tagged as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning. You see the thought process behind the citation, not just a number.
- Retraction flags: Scite marks publications that have been retracted or corrected. That one signal protects the quality of your reference list.
- 照会確認： Upload a manuscript and Scite verifies whether your cited sources were retracted, disputed, or hit with editorial notices.
- カスタムダッシュボード： Track a field over time, spot the experts, and follow related work as new citations land.
- Structured insights: Scite can pull PICO terms or named biomarkers into tables you shape yourself.
- Badges everywhere: Scite badges appear on Google Scholar and PubMed, so smart citation counts show up while you search.
- API アクセス: Teams can pipe Scite データ into their own systems and tools.
This clip breaks down the top benefits in under two minutes.
私たちのチームが気づいたこと
Our writer signed up for Scite and ran a reference check on a draft manuscript. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:
Scite Pros & Cons
✅ メリット
- Over 1 billion citation statements indexed with context
- Flags retracted and corrected publications before you cite them
- Reference Check verifies a full manuscript in one upload
- Browser extension shows smart citations while you read online
- Email alerts track new evidence on your own publication
❌ デメリット
- No free plan, so casual users pay from day one
- Some users report accuracy gaps in the search engine
- Reviewers have hit fabricated quotes and nonexistent sources in the assistant
- Billing and renewal complaints show up in G2 reviews
Paperguide とは何ですか?
Paperguide is an AI research assistant for the whole research process.
It launched in 2023 and was previously ChatWithPDF.
You upload papers, chat with them, and get AI generated summaries.
It pairs AI powered research with an AI writer and a reference manager.
Paperguide reads ユーチューブ videos too, which helps with lecture-heavy topics.
It pulls from academic databases like Semantic Scholar for easy access to research articles.
The user base passed 500,000, and it took #1 Product of the Day on Product Hunt.
Watch the walkthrough below to see the interface before you sign up.
Runner Up: Paperguide
One workspace for reading, citing, and writing. Start on the free plan and upgrade only when you outgrow it.
ペーパーガイド価格
Paperguide offers four tiers. Three carry a fixed price.
| プラン | 価格 | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| 無料 | 月額0ドル、年間請求 | Testing chat and AI search |
| プラス | 月額12ドル（年間請求） | Students writing papers all term |
| プロ | 月額24ドル（年間請求） | Heavy users who need unlimited storage |
| 企業 | カスタムプラン | Labs, departments, and companies |
価格は2026年7月に確定しました。
無料トライアル: The Free plan acts as the trial. No card is needed to test the core writing tools.
返金保証: No refund window is published. Downgrade to Free instead of letting a plan renew.
📌 注記： Every listed price is billed annually. Monthly billing is not shown in the CSV plan data, so treat these as yearly commitments.
⚠️ 警告： Plus and Pro are $12 apart. Check your monthly upload limits first, because storage caps drive most upgrades.
Paperguideの主な利点
Here is where Paperguide earns its place:
- 1つのワークスペース： Literature search, notes, citations, and academic writing sit in a single tab. That removes the jump between four separate tools.
- Chat with any PDF: Ask a paper a 質問 and get key points back with the source passage attached.
- Reference manager: Folders, tags, and multiple file formats give you efficient reference management without a separate app.
- Citations at scale: Generate citations in thousands of styles with AI-assisted formatting.
- 盗作チェッカー： A built-in check helps protect academic integrity before you submit.
- Chrome拡張機能： Save a paper from the browser and send it straight to your library.
- グローバル展開： Support for multiple languages opens it to academics outside English-only programs.
私たちのチームが気づいたこと
Note: We have not had extended hands-on time with Paperguide yet. Everything above comes from published documentation, the pricing page, and user reviews. We will add first-hand notes in a future update.
Paperguideの長所と短所
✅ メリット
- Free plan lets you test the writing process at no cost
- Covers reading, citing, and writing in one interface
- Summarizes PDFs and YouTube videos, not just academic articles
- Built-in plagiarism checker and thousands of citation styles
❌ デメリット
- No citation classification, so contrasting evidence stays hidden
- No retraction or editorial notice flags on sources
- All listed prices are billed annually, which locks you in
- Younger tool with a shorter track record than citation databases
機能比較
Both are AI powered tools, but they split the work differently. The summary table gives you the fast answer, then each feature gets a closer look.
| 特徴 | サイト | ペーパーガイド |
|---|---|---|
| 開始価格 | $12/month (yearly) | 0ドルの無料プラン |
| 無料プラン | ❌ | ✅ |
| スマート引用 | ✅ | ❌ |
| Retraction Flags | ✅ | ❌ |
| PDFでチャット | ❌ | ✅ |
| AIライター | ❌ | ✅ |
| 参照マネージャー | ❌ | ✅ |
| 盗作チェッカー | ❌ | ✅ |
| ブラウザ拡張機能 | ✅ | ✅ |
| 最適な用途 | Checking evidence | Writing papers |
1. Smart Citations and Citation Context
引用元: This is the core of the product. Every citing paper carries a label that provides supporting or contrasting signal, plus the sentence it came from. You read the evidence, not a tally.
ペーパーガイド: It auto-cites papers as you write and links each claim to its source. There is no classification describing agreement or dispute between studies.
⚠️ 警告： A high citation count is not proof of quality. Some of those citations may be disputing the finding.
2. AI研究アシスタント
引用元: その AIアシスタント answers questions and cites real papers from its indexed database. Reviewers rate the quality of results highly, though some have hit fabricated quotes.
ペーパーガイド: Chat with PDF lets you interrogate one paper or a folder of them. It explains complex topics in plain words and pulls key points into notes.
3. Literature Search and Discovery
引用元: Search runs across scientific literature and patents, so you catch applied work others miss. Forward and backward citation chaining make finding related work fast.
ペーパーガイド: AI search reads your question in natural language and returns academic content from multiple sources. Semantic Scholar supplies much of that pool of reliable sources.
⚠️ 警告： Some users found Scite weaker than Google Scholar for broad discovery. Run both for the first pass of a literature search.
4. Literature Review Workflow
引用元: Journal pages and rankings show where a publication sits in its field. That context shortens the screening stage of the literature review process.
ペーパーガイド: A dedicated literature review module walks you from question to draft. It groups papers by theme and drafts the synthesis for you to edit.
5. Reference Check and Citation Generation
引用元: Reference Check takes your manuscript and audits every source. It tells you if a cited paper was retracted, disputed, or given an editorial notice.
ペーパーガイド: The AI citation ジェネレータ formats references in thousands of styles. Traditional reference managers do this too, but few pair it with a writing assistant.
6. Data Extraction and Dashboards
引用元: Custom dashboards track a topic over time and surface the experts in it. Structured tables can hold PICO terms or biomarkers pulled from the papers.
ペーパーガイド: Extract data pulls sample sizes, methods, and findings into a comparison grid. It is the faster route to deeper insights across twenty papers.
7. AI Writing and Document Generation
引用元: There are no drafting tools here. Scite feeds the writing process with evidence, then you write elsewhere.
ペーパーガイド: Full document generation turns an outline and a folder of sources into a draft. Real time collaboration features let co-authors shape the same ideas together.
8. Deep Research Reports
引用元: Reports come as dashboards and email alerts rather than documents. You get told when new evidence lands on a topic you follow.
ペーパーガイド: Deep research reports process papers from several databases and return a sourced write-up. It is the closest thing here to a first draft of a review.
The AI version of the same report adds automatic structure and summaries.
9. Plagiarism and Academic Integrity
引用元: No plagiarism tool exists. Integrity here means source integrity, which is what Reference Check protects.
ペーパーガイド: A free plagiarism checker runs against your draft before submission. Students on tight deadlines rate this among its more powerful features.
10. Browser Extension and Research Tracking
引用元: The extension shows how an article has been cited while you read it online. Badges appear over open access pages and over paywalled content in your library.
Funding and institution views sit beside those dashboards for anyone tracking a field.
ペーパーガイド: The Chrome extension saves papers straight into your library from any site. G2 customers point to the user friendly interface as the reason they stayed.
11. 価格設定とコスト
Let’s put the plans side by side.
| プラン | サイト | ペーパーガイド |
|---|---|---|
| 無料 | ❌ | 月額0ドル、年間請求 |
| 入場料支払い済み | Yearly Plan — $12/month | Plus — $12/per month, billed annually |
| 上位層 | Monthly plan — $20 | Pro — $24/per month, billed annually |
| カスタム | ❌ | Enterprise Custom Plan |
引用元: One product, two ways to pay. At $12/month on the yearly plan you get every feature, which keeps the maths simple for grant budgets.
ペーパーガイド: The free plan is the real draw for students. Plus matches Scite at $12, and Pro doubles that for unlimited storage and heavier limits.
さまざまなシナリオ
| 必要な場合は | 選ぶ | なぜ |
|---|---|---|
| Zero budget | ペーパーガイド | 無料プラン、カード不要 |
| Evidence behind a claim | サイト | Supporting or contrasting labels |
| Drafting help | ペーパーガイド | Full document generation |
| Safe reference lists | サイト | Retraction and dispute flags |
| 何でもできる万能ツール | ペーパーガイド | Read, cite, and write in one place |
| Tracking a field | サイト | Custom dashboards and alerts |
💰 あなたの予算
Paperguide costs nothing to start, so casual users lose no money testing it. Scite bills from day one at $12/month on the yearly plan.
🔌 あなたの技術スタック
Scite offers API access, so a lab can pipe citation data into its own systems. Paperguide stays inside its own app and browser extension.
📝 あなたの文章スタイル
If you draft from scratch and only need sources, Scite fits. If you want the tool to describe your findings first, Paperguide fits.
🎓 あなたの経験レベル
Undergraduates get more from Paperguide, since it explains academic articles as it goes. Postdocs and professionals lean on Scite for source scrutiny.
🆓 無料トライアルとデモ
Test both on one scientific article you already know well. If the summaries and labels match your own reading, the tool will save hours later.
🛟 サポートオプション
Both ship help resources and email support. G2 reviewers call Scite indispensable for daily work, while billing tickets are the common complaint.
切り替えガイド
Already paying for one of these? Here is what changes if you move.
🔄 Switching from Scite to Paperguide?
✅ 得られるもの：
- A free plan and an AI writer for drafts
- A built-in reference manager with folders and tags
- Plagiarism checking and thousands of citation styles
❌ 失うもの：
- Smart Citations and contrasting evidence labels
- Retraction and editorial notice warnings
- Reference Check on full manuscripts
📋切り替え方法：
- Export your saved searches and reference list from Scite
- Open a Paperguide free plan account
- Upload papers into folders, then install the Chrome extension
🔄 Switching from Paperguide to Scite?
✅ 得られるもの：
- Over 1 billion citation statements with full context
- Reference Check before you submit a paper
- Custom dashboards and alerts on your own publication
❌ 失うもの：
- The free plan and unlimited storage on Pro
- Drafting, plagiarism checking, and citation formatting
- Chat with PDF and YouTube video summaries
📋切り替え方法：
- Export your library from Paperguide as a citation file
- Start a Scite yearly plan and install the extension
- Run Reference Check on your current draft first
私たちのレビューで取り上げられなかったこと
This comparison focused on individual students, academics, and small labs. We did not test Enterprise deployments, API rate limits, or how either tool handles non-English literature at scale. Our notes reflect the July 2026 versions and the pricing published at that date. If you manage a department licence, your priorities will differ from what we covered here.
最終評決
| カテゴリ | 勝者 |
|---|---|
| 💰価格 | ペーパーガイド |
| 🔍 Citation Intelligence | サイト |
| 📚 Literature Discovery | サイト |
| ✍️ AIライティングツール | ペーパーガイド |
| 🗂️ Reference Management | ペーパーガイド |
| 🛡️ Source Verification | サイト |
| 📊 Data and Dashboards | サイト |
| 🧩 Browser Extension | サイト |
| 🏆総合優勝 | サイト |
🏆 WINNER: SCITE
Scite wins 5 of the 8 scored categories.
最適な用途: Systematic reviews, manuscript reference checks, and tracking a field over time
Scite and Paperguide are not really rivals. They sit at different points of the same research process.
Scite is the evidence layer. It tells you whether the literature backs a claim or fights it, and it flags sources you should not cite at all.
Paperguide is the production layer. It reads your PDFs, stores your references, and drafts academic writing around them.
Paperguide is the better pick if you are writing papers on a 学生 budget. The free plan alone makes it worth an account.
But if your reputation rides on the sources in your reference list, Scite is the one to pay for.
More of Scite Compared
Here is how Scite lands against its closest neighbours:
Scite wins on: citation classification, retraction flags, journal-level dashboards
サイスペース 勝利したタイトル： paper explanation in plain language, free tier access, PDF chat for beginners
Scite wins on: source verification, evidence context, field tracking over time
ペーパーパル 勝利したタイトル： manuscript language editing, journal submission checks, Word integration
Scite wins on: citation statement depth, retraction warnings, API access for labs
ジェニー 勝利したタイトル： autocomplete drafting speed, in-editor citation insertion, lower entry cost
Paperguideの比較をもっと見る
And here is where Paperguide sits among the other research assistants:
Paperguideが受賞した点： document generation, video summarization, plagiarism checking
Elicitが勝利を収める条件： systematic screening workflows, trial-level data columns, methodology filters
Paperguideが受賞した点： reference manager depth, broad citation style support, writing plus reading in one app
SciSpaceが勝利した点： literature coverage breadth, equation and figure explanations, mobile reading
Paperguideが受賞した点： source-linked drafting, citation generation, literature search inside the editor
Grammarlyが優れている点： grammar accuracy, tone rewriting, coverage across every app you type in
よくある質問
サイトは何に使われますか？
It is used to check how a paper has been cited. Smart Citations show whether later studies support, contrast, or simply mention the original finding.
サイトは無料ですか、それとも有料ですか？
It is paid. Two plans exist: $20 month to month, or $12 per month on the yearly plan. No free tier appears in the published pricing.
What is the difference between Scite AI and チャットGPT?
One is built on a citation database of real papers with evidence labels. The other is a general チャットボット that can invent references if pushed.
PDFファイルと会話できるAIとは何ですか？
Paperguide, previously ChatWithPDF, does this. Upload a paper and ask questions in plain language. The free plan covers basic chat and AI search.
Scite AIは利用する価値があるのか？
Worth it for anyone publishing or writing a thesis. Reference Check alone can stop you citing a retracted study. Casual readers will find Paperguide cheaper.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 