⚡ 簡単な評価:
- 価格: 引き出す AI has a free tier plus paid plans from $9. Paperguide has a free plan and Plus at $12 per month, billed annually.
- 最適な用途: Elicit AI suits systematic screening and data extraction. Paperguide suits people who also need writing tools.
- 主な違い： Elicit AI stops at analysis. Paperguide adds an AI 作家, a reference manager, and a plagiarism checker.
- 私たちのおすすめ： Elicit AI for most researchers, because it finds relevant papers and turns them into structured evidence tables.
Two names keep coming up when people search for an ai research アシスタント.
Elicit AI and Paperguide both promise to shorten the research process.
They were built for different jobs, though.
Elicit AI digs through research papers and pulls out key information.
Paperguide handles reading, references, and academic writing in one place.
Here is how the two match up against your research needs.
概要
This Elicit vs Paperguide comparison covers pricing, features, and ease of use.
また、それぞれが誰なのかも分析します AIツール 最適な効果を発揮します。
Our sources include published specs, product documentation, and public user reviews.
Our writer spent hands-on time with Elicit AI directly.
Notes on Paperguide come from its documentation and review sites.
Some links on this site are affiliate links, at no cost to you.
Elicit AIとは何ですか？
Elicit AI is an ai research assistant built by Ought.
It helps you find relevant papers and extract key information from them.
Elicit uses language models to read academic papers and summarize takeaways.
入力する 質問, and it surfaces the top papers in that field.
It pulls publications from Semantic Scholar and PubMed, so the sources stay reliable.
Many people use it to find seed articles before a wider literature search.
The short review below walks through the main screens.
🏆 Winner: Elicit AI
Built for literature review work at scale. Screen papers, extract data, and export to citation managers.
AIの価格設定を引き出す
Here is what Elicit AI costs, straight from its plan list.
| プラン | 価格 | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| ベーシック（無料） | $0 | Trying the searching features |
| 基本 | $9 | Solo students on a budget |
| 標準 | $12 | Regular literature review work |
| プロ | $19 | Heavy data extraction across many papers |
| 企業 | 営業担当者へのお問い合わせ | Labs and university teams |
価格は2026年7月に確定しました。
無料トライアル: No timed trial. The Basic (Free) plan stays free after you create an account.
返金保証: No published refund window. Test the free tier first.
📌 注記： The tiers differ mainly by data extraction limits. Higher plans let you process papers in larger batches and unlock more custom columns.
⚠️ Pricing conflict flagged: Some write-ups still describe Elicit AI as fully free after signup. Our data set lists a free tier plus paid plans at $9, $12, and $19. We have kept the plan table above as the reference and suggest checking the plan page before you buy.
Key Benefits of Elicit AI
Here is what makes Elicit AI worth a look:
- Semantic search: It reads the intent behind your question. You do not need a perfect keyword match to surface relevant papers.
- Paper screening: It checks thousands of academic papers against your inclusion and exclusion rules. Each decision comes with a short rationale.
- データ抽出: It pulls sample size, methodology, and other key information into one table. Custom columns let you add your own fields.
- Elicit Reports: This runs a rapid review on your topic. It can draft literature reviews of ten pages or more.
- Sentence-level citations: Every claim links to a specific sentence in the source paper. That cuts down on made-up references.
- Works with citation managers: You can import and export libraries with Zotero and EndNote.
- Gap finding: It flags thin spots in the evidence. That helps you shape future study plans.
The panel below shows those benefits inside the app.
私たちのチームが気づいたこと
Our writer signed up for Elicit AI and spent several days on a live review project. Here is what stood out from that hands-on time:
Elicit AI Pros & Cons
✅ メリット
- Free plan lets you test the searching features before paying
- Screens thousands of academic papers against custom criteria
- Sentence-level citations link every claim to source papers
- Data Extractor turns papers into a sortable research matrix
- Direct import and export with Zotero and EndNote
❌ デメリット
- No built-in ai writer or plagiarism checker
- Data extraction limits are tied to your plan tier
- Coverage depends on Semantic Scholar and PubMed indexing
Paperguide とは何ですか?
Paperguide is an ai research assistant that doubles as an ai writer.
It launched in 2023 and was previously ChatWithPDF.
You upload papers, chat with them, and get ai generated summaries.
Paperguide offers a reference manager, a citation ジェネレータ, and a plagiarism checker.
The company reports a user base above 500,000 students and academics.
It was also named #1 Product of the Day on Product Hunt.
The walkthrough below covers the main workspace.
Runner Up: Paperguide
Reading, references, and drafting under one roof. Good pick if your writing process starts right after the reading.
ペーパーガイド価格
Paperguide lists four tiers. All paid prices are billed annually.
| プラン | 価格 | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| 無料 | 月額0ドル、年間請求 | Casual users testing the free plan |
| プラス | 月額12ドル（年間請求） | Students who read and write in one app |
| プロ | 月額24ドル（年間請求） | Unlimited storage and heavy review work |
| 企業 | カスタムプラン | Labs needing real time collaboration features |
価格は2026年7月に確定しました。
無料トライアル: A free plan is available, and a trial of the paid tools is offered before you commit.
返金保証: No published refund window. Start on the free tier first.
📌 注記： Every listed price is the annual rate shown per month. Month-to-month billing usually costs more, so check the plan page before you pick a tier.
⚠️ 警告： Annual billing means one upfront charge. If you only need the tool for a single term, run the free plan first and upgrade later.
Paperguideの主な利点
Here is where Paperguide earns its place:
- PDFでチャット： Ask paper specific questions and get answers tied to the page. Good for complex topics you need to unpack fast.
- AI search: It taps academic databases such as Semantic Scholar. That gives easy access to scholarly articles from multiple sources.
- Reference manager: Folders, tags, and support for many file formats. This is closer to efficient reference management than most ai powered tools offer.
- Citation generator: It builds citations in thousands of styles. That can save hours across a long project.
- 盗作チェッカー： A built-in check keeps academic content honest before submission.
- Chrome拡張機能： Reach the writing tools from your browser while you read.
- Extra summaries: It condenses documents and ユーチューブ videos into short summaries. Multiple languages are supported too.
These benefits appear together on the product page below.
私たちのチームが気づいたこと
Note: We have not logged extended hands-on time with Paperguide yet. Everything above comes from published documentation, the plan pages, and public review sites. We will update this section once our writer has run a full project through it.
Paperguideの長所と短所
✅ メリット
- Reading, citing, and drafting live in one workspace
- Reference manager handles folders, tags, and many file formats
- Built-in plagiarism checker and citation generator
- Chrome extension brings the tools into your browser
- Summarizes documents and YouTube videos in several languages
❌ デメリット
- No public rating in our data set yet
- Paid prices are annual rates, so the upfront cost is higher
- Screening rationale is thinner than a dedicated review tool
機能比較
Now for the side-by-side view. We look at nine areas plus cost, so you can see where each ai tool pulls ahead.
| 特徴 | AIを引き出す | ペーパーガイド |
|---|---|---|
| 開始価格 | $0 free, paid from $9 | $0 free, paid from $12 |
| 無料プラン | ✅ | ✅ |
| Semantic paper search | ✅ | ✅ |
| Screening with rationale | ✅ | ❌ |
| Data extraction tables | ✅ | ✅ |
| PDFでチャット | ❌ | ✅ |
| AI writer for drafts | ❌ | ✅ |
| Built-in reference manager | ❌ | ✅ |
| 盗作チェッカー | ❌ | ✅ |
| Chrome拡張機能 | ❌ | ✅ |
| 最適な用途 | Systematic reviews | Research plus writing |
1. Literature Search and Paper Discovery
AIを引き出す: The Paper Researcher reads the meaning behind your query instead of matching strings. That means you can find relevant papers without guessing the exact wording an author used. It also suggests search terms and alternate questions when your first attempt comes back thin.
ペーパーガイド: Its ai search pulls from academic databases including Semantic Scholar. Results arrive with short summaries so you can judge fit before you open a paper. The searching features cover fewer filters than a dedicated review tool.
2. Data Extraction and Research Tables
AIを引き出す: The Data Extractor can pull sample size, methodology, and outcomes from hundreds of papers at once. Everything lands in one table you can sort and export. This is the fastest way we found to extract key information at volume.
ペーパーガイド: You can extract data from uploaded documents, including values inside tables. The output is useful, but batch sizes stay smaller. It fits a shortlist of twenty papers better than a screening run of two thousand.
⚠️ 警告： Always spot-check extracted numbers against the source. Both tools read tables well, but neither replaces a second pair of eyes.
3. Literature Review Workflow
AIを引き出す: The Notebook keeps your question, your criteria, and your matrix in one thread. It screens academic papers against inclusion and exclusion rules and explains each call. That structure suits the literature review process for systematic work.
ペーパーガイド: Its literature review module gathers sources and drafts a narrative around them. It moves faster from reading to first draft. It gives you less 監査 trail if a supervisor asks how a paper got included.
4. Reading Papers and Chat
AIを引き出す: Topic Finder maps a field before you commit to reading. You can filter an abstract summary by intervention, outcomes, and population. There is no free-form chat window, so answering questions happens through structured columns instead.
ペーパーガイド: Chat with PDF is the headline here. Upload papers, then ask paper specific questions and get key points with citations back. For casual users and complex topics, this is the friendlier route to deeper insights.
5. Automated Research Reports
AIを引き出す: Elicit Reports runs a rapid review end to end and returns ten pages or more. Custom columns let you decide which fields the report tracks. Sentence-level citations keep every claim linked to a real source.
ペーパーガイド: Deep research reports gather multiple sources and write a structured brief. The result reads more like a narrative essay than an evidence matrix.
報告書 ビルダー also lets you set the depth and length before it runs.
6. Citations and Reference Management
AIを引き出す: It does not try to replace traditional reference managers. Instead it exports straight into Zotero and EndNote, so your existing library stays the single home for references. If you already run one of those citation managers, that is the cleaner setup.
ペーパーガイド: It ships its own reference manager with folders, tags, and support for several file formats. Papers you cite while drafting get added on the spot.
A separate generator handles one-off citations when you only need a formatted entry.
7. Academic Writing and Drafting
AIを引き出す: There is no writing assistant here. It gives you evidence, ideas, and structure, then hands the writing process back to you. For some supervisors that separation is a feature rather than a gap.
ペーパーガイド: Full document generation drafts entire sections from your sources. The ai writer keeps your cited papers attached as you build out academic writing. You still edit heavily, but the blank page problem goes away.
⚠️ 警告： Many universities restrict ai powered research drafting. Check your department policy before you submit generated words as your own.
8. Plagiarism and Research Integrity
AIを引き出す: No plagiarism tool is included. Its integrity angle is different: sentence-level citations tie each statement to a source, which limits invented claims. Medical and clinical teams lean on that when they process papers for evidence reviews.
ペーパーガイド: A plagiarism checker is built in, which matters when the same app also drafts your 文章. Running the check before export is a sensible habit.
9. Ease of Use and Everyday Workflow
AIを引き出す: The layout is plain and needs little training. Research alerts watch your topic and flag new papers by date, so you can automate research workflows like ongoing monitoring. Other research tasks such as ブレインストーミング research questions sit in the same panel.
ペーパーガイド: The user friendly interface groups reading, citing, and writing in one sidebar. Fewer tabs mean fewer handoffs across the day. The trade-off is that its powerful features sit behind a busier screen.
10. 価格設定とコスト
Here are the published plans side by side.
| ティア | AIを引き出す | ペーパーガイド |
|---|---|---|
| 無料 | Basic (Free): $0 | Free $0/per month, billed annually |
| 入場料支払い済み | Basic: $9 | Plus $12/per month, billed annually |
| 中 | Standard: $12 | Pro $24/per month, billed annually |
| アッパー | Pro: $19 | — |
| カスタム | 法人向け：営業担当までお問い合わせください | Enterprise Custom Plan |
AIを引き出す: Four steps between free and Enterprise give you room to grow slowly. The $9 entry tier is the cheapest paid option in this matchup. What you buy at each step is mainly extraction volume, not new modules.
ペーパーガイド: Plus costs $3 more than the Elicit AI entry plan, and Pro doubles that again. In return you get a writing suite, a reference manager, and the plagiarism check in one bill. If you would otherwise pay for two apps, the maths can still favour it.
💡 Cost tip: Both list a free plan. Run the same research questions through each for a week before you pay anything.
さまざまなシナリオ
| 必要な場合は | 選ぶ | なぜ |
|---|---|---|
| The cheapest paid tier | AIを引き出す | $9 versus $12 entry |
| A systematic review audit trail | AIを引き出す | Screening rationale per paper |
| Drafting help after reading | ペーパーガイド | Built-in ai writer |
| One home for references | ペーパーガイド | Folders, tags, file formats |
| Data pulled from hundreds of papers | AIを引き出す | Batch data extraction |
| A plagiarism check before submission | ペーパーガイド | Checker included in plan |
💰 あなたの予算
Elicit AI opens at $9 and Paperguide at $12. Both keep a free plan, so nobody has to pay to start.
🔌 あなたの技術スタック
Already running Zotero or EndNote? Elicit AI slots in beside them. Starting from scratch? Paperguide gives you one place for everything.
📝 あなたの文章スタイル
Writers who draft from an evidence table will like Elicit AI. Writers who prefer to draft and refine in place will lean toward Paperguide.
🎓 あなたの経験レベル
New postgraduates often find Paperguide gentler on day one. Experienced reviewers usually want the control Elicit AI offers.
🆓 無料トライアルとデモ
Test both with a question you already know the answer to. That tells you fast whether each tool returns reliable sources.
🛟 サポートオプション
Both route standard help through email and documentation. Teams and professionals on custom plans get a named contact instead.
切り替えガイド
Already committed to one of them? Here is what moving actually costs you.
🔄 Switching from Elicit AI to Paperguide?
✅ 得られるもの：
- An ai writer that drafts sections from your own sources
- A built-in reference manager plus a plagiarism check
- A chrome extension and chat with PDF for daily reading
❌ 失うもの：
- Screening with a written rationale for every include or exclude
- Batch extraction across hundreds of academic papers
- The $9 entry price and sentence-level citation links
📋切り替え方法：
- Export your Elicit AI tables and library to Zotero or CSV
- Create a Paperguide account on the free plan
- Import the files, rebuild folders and tags, then install the browser add-on
🔄 Switching from Paperguide to Elicit AI?
✅ 得られるもの：
- Screening thousands of papers against your own criteria
- A research matrix built from real extracted fields
- Sentence-level citations and a cheaper entry plan
❌ 失うもの：
- The drafting tools and full document generation
- The plagiarism checker and citation generator
- Chat with PDF and the video summary feature
📋切り替え方法：
- Export your Paperguide library to BibTeX or RIS
- Load it into Zotero or EndNote as your reference home
- Open a free Elicit AI account and connect that library
私たちのレビューで取り上げられなかったこと
This comparison focused on individual students, academics, and small labs. We did not test institutional licences, single sign-on, or API access for either product. Paperguide carries no rating in our data set yet, so its scorecard entries rest on documentation rather than a scored review. Non-English literature and discipline-specific databases outside Semantic Scholar and PubMed also sit outside what we checked.
最終評決
| カテゴリ | 勝者 |
|---|---|
| 💰価格 | AIを引き出す |
| 🔎 Literature Search | AIを引き出す |
| 📊 データ抽出 | AIを引き出す |
| 🎯 Evidence Accuracy | AIを引き出す |
| ✍️ Academic Writing | ペーパーガイド |
| 📚 Reference Management | ペーパーガイド |
| 👶 使いやすさ | ペーパーガイド |
| 🏆総合優勝 | AIを引き出す |
🏆 WINNER: ELICIT AI
Elicit AI wins 4 out of 7 categories.
最適な用途: Systematic reviews, batch data extraction, evidence-first research workflows
These two tools overlap less than the category name suggests. Elicit AI is a research assistant for finding and judging evidence. Paperguide is a research and writing workspace built around the finished document.
Paperguide is the better buy if your bottleneck is drafting, citing, and keeping references tidy. It replaces two or three apps, and that alone can justify the higher tier.
For most academic work, though, the harder problem is deciding what to read and what to trust. Elicit AI answers that better, costs less to start, and leaves your reference setup alone.
More of Elicit AI Compared
Here is how Elicit AI lines up against its closest rivals:
Elicit AI vs サイスペース
Elicit AI wins on: Batch screening with a written rationale, custom extraction columns, and export into Zotero or EndNote.
SciSpaceが勝利した点： Acting as an AIアシスタント for reading, plain-language explanations of dense passages, and a larger paper library to browse.
Elicit AI vs scite
Elicit AI wins on: Turning a question into an evidence table, screening at volume, and suggesting search terms you had not tried.
scite wins on: Showing whether later work supports or disputes a claim, citation context statements, and journal-level 報告.
Elicit AI vs Consensus
Elicit AI wins on: Structured tables you control, longer automated reports, and reference manager export.
合意が得られた項目： Fast yes-or-no answers to clinical questions, a lighter free tier, and a simpler first-run experience.
Paperguideの比較をもっと見る
And here is where Paperguide sits against the writing-first crowd:
ペーパーガイド対 ジェニー
Paperguideが受賞した点： Reading and searching sources inside the same app, a proper reference library, and video plus document summaries.
ジェニが勝利した点： Tighter in-line autocomplete while drafting, a cheaper habit for pure writers, and a distraction-free editor.
ペーパーガイド対 ペーパーパル
Paperguideが受賞した点： Source discovery, deep research reports, and keeping citations attached from reading through to draft.
Paperpalが勝利した点： Journal-style language editing, a Word add-in for existing manuscripts, and submission readiness checks.
ペーパーガイド対 クイルボット
Paperguideが受賞した点： Working with full papers rather than pasted text, an ai search over academic databases, and a reference manager.
Quillbot wins on: Sentence-level paraphrasing modes, a generous free tier for short passages, and speed on quick rewrites.
よくある質問
Elicit AIは何をしますか？
It searches academic databases, screens papers against your criteria, and pulls findings into a table. You ask a research question and get sourced evidence back.
Elicit AIの無料版はありますか？
Yes. The Basic (Free) tier costs $0 and covers search and light extraction. Paid tiers start at $9 and raise the extraction limits.
Paperguideは、ChatPDFやHumataといったツールと比べてどうですか？
It covers the same chat-with-document ground, then adds source search, citations, drafting, and a plagiarism check. Those single-purpose apps stop at the conversation.
Paperguideは学術論文の引用に役立ちますか？
Yes. It generates citations in thousands of styles and stores them in its own library. Papers you cite while drafting are added automatically.
Elicitは研究に適していますか？
For evidence gathering, yes. Sources come from Semantic Scholar and PubMed, and claims link to specific sentences. It will not write your paper for you.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 