⚡ Quick Verdict:
- 価格: Buffer starts at $5/channel/month vs Loomly at $32/month (Base, billed annually)
- 最適な用途: Buffer for solo entrepreneurs and 中小企業, Loomly for marketing teams and agencies
- 主な違い： Buffer charges per channel and supports more platforms (Threads, Bluesky, Mastodon); Loomly charges flat tiers and adds approval workflows
- Our pick: Buffer for most users — the free plan, lower entry cost, and broader platform support fit individual creators and small businesses better
Choosing between Loomly and Buffer comes down to one question.
Are you a solo creator or a marketing team with approval workflows?
Both tools schedule posts to multiple ソーシャルメディア accounts from a single dashboard.
But Buffer leans toward simplicity, while Loomly focuses on team collaboration.
This comparison breaks down pricing, features, and use cases to help you pick.
概要
This Loomly vs Buffer comparison covers pricing, features, ease of use, and team workflows.
We also break down who each social media management tool fits best.
Our writers spent hands-on time with both platforms across several projects.
Those observations appear in the “What Our Team Noticed” sections below.
By the end, you’ll know which social media management platform fits your needs.
バッファとは何ですか?
Buffer is a social media management tool for scheduling posts across multiple platforms.
Facebook、Instagram、 リンクトイン, Twitter, TikTok, Threads, Bluesky, and Mastodon.
The platform helps users plan, schedule, and track post performance from a single dashboard.
Most users pick Buffer for its clean, user friendly interface and affordable per-channel pricing.
Solo entrepreneurs, small 仕事 owners, and startups make up the bulk of Buffer’s users. It helps them maintain a consistent online presence without hiring an agency.
バッファ
Buffer simplifies post scheduling across various social media platforms. It’s perfect for solo creators, small businesses, and marketing teams who want quick scheduling. The free plan covers up to three social accounts.
バッファ価格設定
Here’s what Buffer costs in 2026. The pricing scales with the number of channels you connect, not users.
| プラン | 価格 | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| 無料 | $0 | Solo users with 3 channels or fewer |
| 必需品 | チャンネルあたり5ドル | Single user managing multiple platforms |
| チーム | チャンネルあたり10ドル | コラボレーションを必要とする小規模チーム |
Pricing verified May 2026.
無料トライアル: The free plan works as an indefinite period trial — no credit card required, up to 3 channels, 10 scheduled posts per channel.
返金保証: Buffer offers a 14-day free trial on paid plans. Cancel anytime — Buffer does not lock you into annual contracts.
📌 注記： Buffer charges per channel, not per user. The Essentials plan covers a single user but unlimited posts. The Team plan unlocks unlimited team members, approval workflows, and draft collaboration.
⚠️ 警告： If you manage 10+ social channels, Buffer’s per-channel pricing climbs fast. At that scale, flat-tier alternatives like Loomly may cost less per month.
Bufferの主な利点
Here’s what makes Buffer worth considering:
- Strong Free Plan: Buffer has a free plan that allows users to connect up to three accounts without any payment. That makes it accessible for small businesses with limited budgets.
- 幅広いプラットフォーム対応： Buffer supports Threads, Bluesky, and Mastodon — three platforms Loomly does not currently support. Standard channels include Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, TikTok, Pinterest, ユーチューブ、Google ビジネス プロフィール。
- 無料AIアシスタント： The AI Assistant is available on every plan, including the free tier. It generates post ideas, repurposes content for various social media platforms, and adjusts tone.
- Simple Scheduling: Buffer is known for its simplicity and effectiveness in social media scheduling. The clean dashboard lets you queue, schedule, and reschedule posts in minutes — making it one of the easiest social media tools to learn.
- チームプランではユーザー数が無制限です。 Adding teammates does not cost extra on the Team plan. That makes Buffer attractive for small teams who want collaboration without paying per seat. Both unlimited users and unlimited publishing capabilities ship with the Team tier.
- Audience Insights & Analytics: Buffer provides analytics tools for tracking performance across social channels. The reports cover post performance, engagement rates, and best times to post — giving you valuable insights for informed decisions.
- モバイルアプリ iOS & Android: Buffer has mobile apps for both iOS and Android. You can schedule, post, and track from your phone — a real time-saving win for busy creators.
What Our Team Noticed
私たちの 作家 signed up for Buffer and used it daily for several weeks. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
バッファーのメリットとデメリット
✅ メリット
- Strong free plan with 3 social accounts at no cost
- Supports Threads, Bluesky, and Mastodon (Loomly does not)
- Free AI Assistant on every plan, including the free tier
- Unlimited users on Team plan — no per-seat fees
❌ デメリット
- No social 受信トレイ or listening tools — Loomly offers these
- Per-channel pricing climbs fast at 10+ channels
- No RSS feeds or content suggestion engine for finding trending topics
Buffer also lacks deep RSS feeds integration for surfacing news and curated articles — a limitation if content curation matters to your workflow.
Loomlyとは何ですか？
Loomly is a social media management platform built for teams and agencies.
It integrates all major social platforms into one dashboard for scheduling and analytics.
Loomly provides a content calendar that offers a bird’s-eye view of upcoming posts.
Teams use it for post mockups, approval workflows, and automated post ideas.
Social media marketing teams, content creators, and any social media marketer working at scale make up most of Loomly’s user base.
ルームリー
Loomly is built for marketing teams that need approval workflows and content collaboration. It excels at content management, planning, and advanced scheduling. The 15-day free trial requires no credit card.
Loomlyの価格設定
Here’s what Loomly costs in 2026. Loomly uses flat-tier pricing with annual billing discounts of around 25%.
| プラン | 価格（年間） | 最適な用途 |
|---|---|---|
| ベース | 月額32ドル | ユーザー2名、ソーシャルアカウント10件 |
| 標準 | 月額60ドル | ユーザー6人、ソーシャルアカウント20件 |
| 高度な | $131/month | ユーザー14人、ソーシャルアカウント35件 |
| プレミアム | $277/month | ユーザー30人、ソーシャルアカウント50件 |
| 企業 | カスタム | Agencies with 60+ accounts |
Pricing verified May 2026. Monthly billing rates are higher than the annual rates shown above.
無料トライアル: Loomly offers a 15-day free trial. No credit card required to start.
返金保証: Loomly does not advertise a refund policy publicly. Annual billing saves about 25% versus monthly.
📌 注記： Loomly’s base price starts at $32/month (billed annually) and accommodates 2 users and 10 social accounts. Adding more collaborators requires upgrading tiers — each extra seat is not a flat add-on.
⚠️ 警告： The pricing gap between tiers is significant. Jumping from Standard ($60) to Advanced ($131) more than doubles the cost. Plan tier upgrades carefully based on your user count.
Loomlyの主な利点
Here’s what makes Loomly worth considering:
- 高度な承認ワークフロー： Loomly is known for its intuitive interface and high ease-of-use rating, especially for team workflows. The approval flow lets stakeholders review posts before publishing — one of Loomly’s standout features.
- Automated Analytics Reports: Loomly can automatically send analytics reports to stakeholders. Buffer cannot. That single feature saves marketing teams hours per week and delivers in depth analytics straight to client inboxes.
- Content Library & Post Mockups: Loomly offers post mockups, approval workflows, a content library, and automated post ideas. The mockup view shows exactly how a post will appear before it goes live.
- Facebook Reels & Carousel Posts: Loomly provides advanced features for scheduling specific formats like Facebook Reels and carousel posts that Buffer does not match.
- Unlimited Posts Per Profile: Loomly allows users to schedule posts without restrictions on the number of posts from one profile. Buffer has limitations on scheduled posts per profile on certain plans.
- コミュニティ管理: Loomly includes a social inbox and listening capabilities. Buffer lacks social inbox or listening features.
- 迅速なカスタマーサポート: Loomly provides responsive customer support through contact forms, email, phone, and chat support.
What Our Team Noticed
Our writer spent time inside Loomly building a content calendar across several social channels. Here’s what stood out:
Loomlyの長所と短所
✅ メリット
- Best-in-class approval workflows for marketing teams
- Automated analytics reports to stakeholders (Buffer cannot)
- Advanced scheduling for Facebook Reels and carousel posts
- クレジットカード不要の15日間無料トライアル
❌ デメリット
- 無料プランはありません。15日間の無料トライアルのみです。
- Does not support Threads, Bluesky, or Mastodon
- Setting up and editing posts takes too many steps
機能比較
Ready to dive into a detailed comparison of Loomly vs Buffer?
We’ll explore nine key features to help you determine which social media management platform best suits your needs.
| 特徴 | バッファ | ルームリー |
|---|---|---|
| 開始価格 | 1チャンネルあたり月額5ドル | $32/month (Base, annual) |
| 無料プラン | ✅ 3チャンネル | ❌ Only 15-day trial |
| Threads, Bluesky, Mastodon | ✅ | ❌ |
| 承認ワークフロー | ✅（チームプラン） | ✅ |
| Social Inbox / Listening | ❌ | ✅ |
| AIアシスタント | ✅ 全プランで無料 | Limited (post ideas only) |
| Automated Reports to Stakeholders | ❌ | ✅ |
| Facebook Reels & Carousels Scheduling | 基本 | ✅ 上級者向け |
| ユーザー数無制限 | ✅（チームプラン） | ❌ Tier-limited |
| 最適な用途 | Solo creators, small businesses | Agencies, marketing teams |
1. 投稿スケジュール
バッファ： Buffer is known for its simplicity and effectiveness in social media scheduling. Buffer stands out for queue-based publishing — set time slots and drop posts into them to schedule content fast. The free plan supports 10 scheduled posts per channel, while paid plans unlock unlimited scheduling.
ルームリー： Loomly provides a content calendar that offers a bird’s-eye view of upcoming social media posts. It allows users to schedule posts without restrictions on the number of posts from one profile. The post planning interface also supports first comment scheduling and time-zone-aware publishing.
2. Content Creation & Management
バッファ： Buffer’s content management is built around the queue and a shared calendar view. Buffer excels at letting you post content fast — the AI Assistant generates post ideas, repurposes content, and adjusts tone. When you compare Buffer with Loomly here, Buffer favors simplicity over deep content libraries.
ルームリー： Loomly offers post mockups, approval workflows, a content library, and automated post ideas drawn from trending topics. The mockup view shows the exact look of a post on each platform before it goes live. Teams use the suggestions to find which formats drive the most engagement.
3. チームコラボレーション
バッファ： Buffer’s Team plan includes unlimited users, draft collaboration, approval workflows, and branded reports. Adding teammates does not increase the price — Buffer charges per channel, not per user. That structure suits small teams that want to collaborate effectively without per-seat fees.
ルームリー： Loomly is designed to enhance collaboration among teams working on social media content. The approval system, comment threads, and role-based permissions make it ideal for agencies or teams with more than 3 members. User count is tier-locked, so adding seats often means upgrading plans.
4. 分析とレポート
バッファ： Buffer provides analytics tools to track performance metrics across social media accounts. Reports cover post performance, engagement rates, audience growth, and best times to post. The reports are solid but don’t include automated delivery to stakeholders.
ルームリー： Loomly offers advanced analytics features that help refine social media strategies. It can automatically send analytics reports to stakeholders, while Buffer cannot. That makes Loomly the better fit for agencies that need to share in-depth analytics with clients on a regular cadence.
5. プラットフォームサポート
バッファ： Buffer supports a wide range of platforms including Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, TikTok, Pinterest, YouTube, Google Business Profile, Threads, Bluesky, and Mastodon. The last three are not supported by Loomly — a clear win for users active on various platforms and emerging social channels. As a social media tool, Buffer’s coverage is among the broadest.
ルームリー： Loomly integrates all major social platforms — Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X, LinkedIn, Pinterest, TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat, and Google Business Profile. The gap is in emerging platforms: no Threads, Bluesky, or Mastodon as of 2026.
6. AI & Content Assistance
バッファ： Buffer’s AI Assistant is free on every plan, including the free tier. It generates post ideas, repurposes content for different platforms, and adjusts tone. It runs on OpenAI’s GPT-4 technology but cannot generate images or videos.
ルームリー： Loomly offers automated post ideas based on trending topics, events, and holidays. It surfaces suggestions but does not generate full post copy the way Buffer’s AI Assistant does. Loomly users typically pair the tool with an external AI writer.
7. Mobile Apps & Cross-Device Use
バッファ： Both Buffer and Loomly have mobile apps available for iOS and Android users. Buffer’s mobile app supports the full publishing workflow — composing, scheduling, and analytics. The browser extension also lets you queue links from any page.
ルームリー： Loomly’s mobile app covers post creation, approval, and basic analytics. It’s particularly useful for approving content on the go when a team member submits a draft. Heavy editing still works better on desktop.
8. カスタマーサポート
バッファ： Buffer offers customer support via email, social media, and a detailed Help Center. There is no phone support on any plan. Response times are reasonable but not as fast as Loomly’s chat support.
ルームリー： Loomly provides responsive customer support through various channels including contact forms, email, phone, and chat support. The chat option is rare in this category and is a real benefit for marketing teams under deadline pressure.
⚠️ 警告： Phone support is typically limited to higher Loomly tiers. Confirm support channels on the plan you intend to buy before subscribing.
9. Community Management & Engagement
バッファ： Buffer’s engagement features cover Instagram and Facebook comment management but lack a full social inbox for Twitter/X, LinkedIn, or TikTok. There are no social listening tools on any plan. For users seeking inbox unification, this is a notable gap.
ルームリー： Loomly includes community management features — a social inbox covering multiple channels and basic listening. Buffer lacks social inbox or listening capabilities, which Loomly provides. That makes Loomly a closer fit for teams that handle audience engagement at scale.
価格とコスト
料金プランを並べて比較してみましょう。
| プランの種類 | バッファ | ルームリー |
|---|---|---|
| 無料 | 0ドル（3チャンネル） | ❌ 15-day trial only |
| 入門／初心者向け | 5ドル/チャンネル（エッセンシャルズ） | $32/month (Base, annual) |
| 中級クラス | 1チャンネルあたり10ドル（チーム向け） | $60/month (Standard, annual) |
| 高度な | 該当なし | $131/month (Advanced, annual) |
| Premium / Agency | カスタム | $277/month (Premium, annual) |
| 企業 | カスタム | カスタム |
バッファ： Buffer’s pricing structure is based on the number of channels, with the Essentials plan costing $5 per month per channel (annual billing). That keeps entry costs low — 3 channels on Essentials runs $15/month — but the bill rises fast at 10+ channels.
ルームリー： Loomly’s base price starts at $32/month (billed annually) and accommodates 2 users and 10 social accounts. The flat-tier model can save money at higher channel counts but charges more for small setups. The big jump from Standard to Advanced is the most-cited complaint in user reviews.
さまざまなシナリオ
| 必要な場合は | 選ぶ | なぜ |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan for testing | バッファ | Loomly has no free tier |
| Approval workflows for agencies | ルームリー | Built specifically for team review |
| Threads / Bluesky / Mastodon | バッファ | Loomly does not support these |
| Automated reports to clients | ルームリー | Buffer cannot auto-send reports |
| Solo user with 3-5 channels | バッファ | Cheaper at small scale |
| Social inbox & listening | ルームリー | Buffer lacks these features |
| 初心者向け | バッファ | よりシンプルなインターフェース、より迅速なセットアップ |
💰 あなたの予算
Buffer has a generous free plan and affordable paid options, making it accessible for small businesses with limited budgets. Loomly’s entry tier starts at $32/month annually, which is steeper for solo creators but better value at higher channel counts.
🔌 あなたの技術スタック
Both social media management tools integrate with major social media platforms and offer mobile apps for iOS and Android. Buffer adds Threads, Bluesky, and Mastodon. Loomly does not support those three but covers all the standard channels including Snapchat and Google Business Profile — enough to build a strong social media presence.
📝 コンテンツワークフロー
Buffer favors quick scheduling — draft, queue, done. Loomly excels in content collaboration, planning, and advanced scheduling for teams and agencies. If you need post mockups, content libraries, and trending-topic suggestions, Loomly fits better.
🎓 あなたの経験レベル
Buffer’s user-friendly interface makes it easy for beginners to plan and schedule social media posts. Loomly’s design is also intuitive for new users but has more steps to set up posts. A single user can master Buffer in an afternoon.
🆓 無料トライアルとデモ
Loomly offers a 15-day free trial without entering credit card details. Buffer goes further — its free plan lets you test the dashboard for an indefinite period across 3 social accounts. Both options let you try before paying.
🛟 サポートオプション
Loomly provides phone and chat support alongside email — rare in this category and a real win for saving time on urgent issues. Buffer offers customer support via email, social media, and a detailed Help Center but no phone support. For teams making informed decisions under deadline pressure, Loomly’s faster channels matter.
切り替えガイド
既にこれらのツールのいずれかをご利用ですか？切り替える場合、どのような変更が予想されますか？
🔄 Switching from Buffer to Loomly?
✅ 得られるもの：
- Built-in approval workflows and content library for team collaboration
- Automated analytics reports sent to stakeholders on a schedule
- Advanced scheduling for Facebook Reels and carousel posts
❌ 失うもの：
- The free plan — Loomly only offers a 15-day trial
- Threads, Bluesky, and Mastodon support
- Free AI Assistant for full post generation
📋切り替え方法：
- Export your Buffer post history from Account Settings > Data Export — you can save the file to Google Drive for backup
- Loomlyの15日間無料トライアルに登録して、ソーシャルメディアアカウントを連携させましょう。
- Rebuild your content calendar in Loomly using post mockups and approval flows — this step can be time consuming if you have many recurring posts
🔄 Switching from Loomly to Buffer?
✅ 得られるもの：
- A free plan covering 3 social channels for an indefinite period
- Threads, Bluesky, and Mastodon scheduling
- Lower entry pricing for solo users with 3-5 channels
❌ 失うもの：
- Automated reports to stakeholders
- Social inbox and listening capabilities
- Advanced Facebook Reels and carousel scheduling
📋切り替え方法：
- Export your Loomly content calendar via the dashboard’s export tool
- Sign up for Buffer’s free plan and connect your social accounts
- Set up your posting queues per channel and import scheduled posts
What Our Review Didn’t Cover
This comparison focused on individual creators, small businesses, and mid-sized marketing teams. We didn’t test enterprise SSO, custom API integrations, or bulk client management at the 50+ account level. Our pricing is based on May 2026 plans — both tools update tiers regularly. If you’re running a large agency or need custom workflows, your priorities may differ from what we’ve covered.
最終評決
| カテゴリ | 勝者 |
|---|---|
| 💰 価格（エントリーレベル） | バッファ |
| 🚀 Platform Coverage | バッファ |
| 👶 使いやすさ | バッファ |
| 🎯 Team Collaboration | ルームリー |
| 📊 分析とレポート | ルームリー |
| 🤖 AI機能 | バッファ |
| 🛟 カスタマーサポート | ルームリー |
| 📱 モバイル体験 | ネクタイ |
| 🏆総合優勝 | バッファ |
🏆 優勝：バッファー
Buffer wins 4 out of 8 categories — and ties one.
最適な用途: Solo entrepreneurs, small businesses, content creators, and startups looking for a straightforward solution to their social media management.
Buffer and Loomly are two very different products at first glance.
Buffer is built for simplicity and quick scheduling across multiple social media platforms.
Loomly is designed for collaborative content management and approval workflows.
Loomly is excellent for agencies and marketing teams that need post mockups, content libraries, and automated stakeholder reports. If you have a marketing team with three or more members, Loomly’s collaboration features are worth the higher cost.
However, for most users — solo entrepreneurs, small businesses, and creators — Buffer is the better choice. It costs less, supports more platforms, and includes a free AI Assistant on every plan. The free tier alone makes it the obvious starting point.
バッファーの比較
Bufferが他の競合他社と比べてどうなのか、以下に示します。
Bufferが優れている点： Lower entry pricing for small teams, free plan with 3 channels, broader emerging-platform support (Threads, Bluesky)
スプラウトソーシャルが勝利した点： Deep social listening tools, CRM-style audience profiles, large-team 報告
Bufferが優れている点： Cleaner interface, far lower starting price ($5/channel vs Hootsuite’s flat tiers), free plan availability
フーツーイト 勝利したタイトル： OwlyWriter AI for full content generation, deeper analytics, social listening on higher tiers
Bufferが優れている点： Cleaner publishing UX, free AI Assistant on all plans, support for Bluesky and Mastodon
ソーシャルパイロット 勝利したタイトル： Bulk scheduling, lower flat-rate pricing for 10+ accounts, white-label client reports
Bufferが優れている点： Broader platform coverage (including X/Twitter and LinkedIn focus), free AI features, unlimited users on Team plan
その後の勝利： Visual-first Instagram and TikTok planning, link-in-bio tool, drag-and-drop media calendar
Loomlyの比較をもっと見る
Loomlyが他の競合他社と比べてどうなのか、以下に示します。
Loomlyが勝利した点： Lower starting price ($32 vs Hootsuite’s $99+), better post mockups, chat and phone customer support
Hootsuiteが優れている点： Built-in AI content generation, social listening, larger integration library
Loomlyが勝利した点： Far cheaper entry tier, post mockups for client review, simpler onboarding
スプラウトソーシャルが勝利した点： Stronger social listening, CRM-style profiles, advanced analytics across enterprise teams
Loomly vs センディブル
Loomlyが勝利した点： Cleaner UI for content collaboration, better post mockups, automated stakeholder reporting
Sendibleが以下の点で勝利しました： Lower pricing for client-heavy agencies, broader RSS-feed support, more native integrations
Loomly vs アゴラパルス
Loomlyが勝利した点： Lower entry pricing, simpler approval flow, faster onboarding for new users
Agorapulseが勝利した点： Stronger social inbox, native team-inbox collaboration, more refined reporting features
よくある質問
LoomlyはBufferより優れていますか？
It depends on your use case. Loomly is better for marketing teams that need approval workflows and stakeholder reporting. Buffer is better for solo creators and small businesses on tighter budgets.
Loomlyより優れたものって何？
For solo users on a budget, Buffer is better thanks to its free plan and per-channel pricing. For agencies needing deeper analytics, Sprout Social and Hootsuite are stronger options at higher price points.
LoomlyはHootsuiteと同じくらい優れていますか？
For content collaboration and post mockups, yes. Loomly costs less at the entry tier. Hootsuite wins on built-in AI generation, social listening, and integration depth on higher plans.
Loomlyは何に役立つのですか？
Loomly is good for marketing teams, content creators, and agencies that need approval workflows, content libraries, post mockups, and automated analytics reports sent to clients on a schedule.
Loomlyの目的は何ですか？
The purpose of Loomly is to simplify social media content creation, planning, scheduling, and analysis for teams. It integrates major social channels into a single dashboard with collaboration tools.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 