⚡ حكم سريع:
- الأسعار: Make has a free plan, then paid plans from $9 per month. Google Opal lists “Contact us for pricing.”
- الأفضل لـ: Make for عمل workflows across many apps. Google Opal for quick AI mini apps and prototypes.
- الفرق الرئيسي: Make connects your favorite apps and moves بيانات. Opal builds small تطبيقات الذكاء الاصطناعي من خلال مطالبات بسيطة.
- اختيارنا: Make for most users. It handles real work that Opal can’t touch yet.
Make and Google Opal both make big promises about automation without writing code.
But they are not built for the same job.
Make is a powerful automation platform that links apps and moves data.
Google Opal turns a plain idea into a small AI app.
One runs your عمل workflows. The other helps you test AI ideas fast.
Here’s how to pick the right أداة الأتمتة شكراً لجهودكم.
ملخص
This Make vs Google Opal comparison covers pricing, key features, ease of use, and integrations.
We also explain who each tool fits best.
ملكنا الكاتب spent hands-on time with Make directly.
Observations on Google Opal come from Google’s documentation and published reviews.
By the end, you’ll know which one fits your automation journey.
ما هو "صنع"؟
Make is a no code automation platform for connecting apps.
It was called Integromat before its rebrand.
Today it belongs to Celonis, a process mining company.
You build workflows on a visual canvas with a drag and drop interface.
Each workflow is called a scenario.
The Make app links actions between more than 2,000 apps.
That lets you automate tasks across various applications in one place.
It helps everyone from المستقلين to large enterprises automate repetitive tasks.
If an app is missing, the HTTP module handles custom API calls.
إليكم نظرة سريعة على كيفية عملها.
يصنع
Build multi step workflows across thousands of apps. Start free and scale as you grow.
تحديد الأسعار
Make uses a pricing model based on operations. Each step a scenario runs counts toward your monthly limit.
| يخطط | السعر (يتم إصدار الفاتورة سنوياً) | Billed Monthly | الأفضل لـ |
|---|---|---|---|
| حر | 0 دولار شهرياً | $0 | Simple workflows and testing |
| جوهر | 9 دولارات شهرياً | $10.59/month | Solo users with steady automations |
| محترف | 16 دولارًا شهريًا | $18.82/month | Advanced workflows and priority runs |
| الفرق | 29 دولارًا شهريًا | $34.12/month | الشركات الصغيرة sharing scenarios |
| مَشرُوع | تسعير مخصص | تسعير مخصص | Large companies needing control |
Pricing verified October 2026.
تجربة مجانية: No separate trial. The free plan works as a permanent trial, and no card is needed.
ضمان استرداد الأموال: Make doesn’t offer refunds by default. It reviews requests case by case.
📌 ملحوظة: Most users pay between $9 and $29 a month. That keeps Make cost effective next to زابير, which bills by tasks.
⚠️ تحذير: Watch your operation count. Polling triggers and loops burn operations fast, and that’s where surprise upgrades come from.
Key Benefits of Make
Here’s what makes Make worth a look:
- أداة الإنشاء المرئي: You see every step as a bubble on a map. That makes complex automation easier to follow.
- Extensive Integration Capabilities: Over 2,000 apps connect out of the box. You can link as many apps as you want in one scenario.
- الميزات المتقدمة: Iterators, aggregators, routers, and filters come standard. You get fine control over how and when tasks run.
- Custom API Calls: The HTTP app sends HTTP requests to any service. No native module? No problem.
- معالجة الأخطاء: Built-in handlers catch failures and reroute data. Error messages show exactly which step broke.
- Strong Community: Detailed docs and tutorials help you navigate every feature. An active forum means you’ll rarely get stuck alone.
ما لاحظه فريقنا
Our writer signed up for Make and built scenarios for everyday content and lead tasks. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Make Pros & Cons
✅ المزايا
- Visual workflow builder makes complex logic easy to see
- Connects 2,000+ apps, plus custom API calls through HTTP
- Free plan to start, with paid plans from $9 per month
- Routers, filters, iterators, and error handling built in
❌ سلبيات
- Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
- Operations-based billing takes time to understand
- No refunds by default, only case-by-case
ما هو جوجل أوبال؟
Google Opal is an experimental no-code AI منشئ التطبيقات from Google Labs.
You describe an app in natural language.
Opal turns that description into a visual workflow.
Each app uses nodes for input, generate, and output steps.
It chains prompts, AI model calls, and tools into one flow.
نص comes from Gemini, and images come from Imagen.
When you finish, Opal gives you a shareable link.
Others open it with their own Google accounts.
It started as a US-only public beta.
Google later expanded it to more than 160 countries.
Google pitches it as a lighter option than Microsoft Power Apps.
Power Apps targets large enterprises with far more setup.
By 2026, 75% of new applications are projected to use low-code tools.
Opal is Google’s bet on that shift.
This review video walks through the basics.
جوجل أوبال
Turn simple prompts into AI powered mini apps. Great for testing AI ideas before you build them for real.
أسعار أوبال من جوجل
Opal doesn’t publish a paid plan list. Here’s what the listing shows.
| يخطط | سعر | الأفضل لـ |
|---|---|---|
| التسعير | تواصل معنا لمعرفة الأسعار | Anyone testing AI mini apps and prototypes |
Pricing verified October 2026.
تجربة مجانية: You can try Opal by signing in with a Google account.
ضمان استرداد الأموال: No paid tier is listed, so there’s nothing to refund.
📌 ملحوظة: All mini apps and their settings save to your Google Drive. You don’t need separate hosting.
⚠️ Price check: Opal is a Google Labs experiment. It’s currently free to use during its beta. Google could add paid tiers later, so confirm on the Opal site.
⚠️ Watch out: Opal apps can’t be exported, so you stay tied to Google. Apps built outside IT oversight can also create shadow IT and technical debt.
Key Benefits of Google Opal
Here’s why Opal gets attention:
- Vibe Coding: You build app logic through simple conversation. No coding expertise is needed.
- Two Ways to Build: Chat with Opal or edit nodes in the visual editor. Switch any time.
- زيادة الإنتاجية: Experts can build custom internal tools without waiting for IT. That saves days of back-and-forth.
- Starter Templates: A gallery of ready apps covers blogs, research, and more. Use them as-is or remix them.
- Google Workspace Ties: Opal works with Docs, Sheets, Gmail, and Drive. That helps small businesses automate simple tasks.
- Live Debugging: Run a workflow step by step. Real-time errors show where it went wrong.
- Instant Hosting: Every app gets a link right away. Anyone can test it within minutes.
ما لاحظه فريقنا
Note: We haven’t had extended hands-on time with Google Opal yet. The details above come from Google’s documentation and published reviews.
Google Opal Pros & Cons
✅ المزايا
- Build AI mini apps by describing them in natural language
- Runs on Gemini for text and Imagen for images
- Share any app with a link that works with Google accounts
- Starter templates help beginners begin in minutes
❌ سلبيات
- Experimental Google Labs tool, so features can change without notice
- Weak fit for real business automation beyond prototypes
- Few integrations outside Google Workspace
مقارنة الميزات
Make and Opal both use a visual approach. But one builds automations and the other builds AI apps. Here are nine features, plus pricing, side by side.
| ميزة | يصنع | جوجل أوبال |
|---|---|---|
| السعر المبدئي | 9 دولارات شهرياً | تواصل معنا لمعرفة الأسعار |
| خطة مجانية | ✅ | ✅ (free during beta) |
| أداة إنشاء سير العمل المرئي | ✅ | ✅ |
| Build From Natural Language | ❌ | ✅ |
| أكثر من 2000 عملية تكامل مع التطبيقات | ✅ | ❌ |
| Custom API Calls (HTTP) | ✅ | ❌ |
| Conditional Logic & Routers | ✅ | أساسي |
| Built-in AI Models | Via AI Agents | ✅ Gemini & Imagen |
| Starter Templates | ✅ | ✅ |
| الأفضل لـ | Business automation | AI prototypes |
1. Visual Workflow Builder
يصنع: Make’s canvas shows each module as a دائرة linked by lines. You drag in apps, set filters, and watch real time data move through each step. The visual builder makes complex workflows easy to read.
جوجل أوبال: Opal’s visual workflow editor shows input, generate, and output nodes. You can view and modify each step without writing code. It feels lighter, because each app does one focused job.
2. AI and Natural Language
يصنع: Make AI Agents let you add AI reasoning to scenarios. You still design the flow yourself, though. Make doesn’t build a whole workflow from one prompt.
جوجل أوبال: This is where Opal shines. You describe what you want, and Opal drafts a functional app. It runs on generative AI from Gemini and Imagen. You can also experiment with different model combinations.
3. Complex Logic and Multi Step Workflows
يصنع: Unlike Zapier’s linear Zaps, Make supports branching paths and repeated steps. Rules route data, iterators split lists, and aggregators merge them back. This is what makes Make strong for more complex workflows.
جوجل أوبال: Opal chains AI prompts into multi-step flows. That works well for research and content tasks. But deep conditional logic and data processing are limited.
⚠️ تحذير: Opal is easier to start than Bubble or أدالو. But it’s far less capable for anything past simple prototypes.
4. Integrations and API Calls
يصنع: Make connects Google Sheets, CRMs, e-commerce stores, and thousands more. The HTTP app handles api integrations with third party services. You can keep syncing data between tools all day.
جوجل أوبال: Opal integrates deeply with Google Workspace, including Docs, Sheets, Gmail, and Drive. Outside Google, options are thin. You can’t plug it into most outside apps yet.
5. Social Media and Marketing
يصنع: Make can post content, track mentions, and move leads between tools. It works with every major social network. You set it up once and let it continue on its own.
جوجل أوبال: Opal’s templates create social posts and marketing copy from a topic. It writes the content, but it doesn’t publish it for you. You still copy and post by hand.
6. Lead Generation and Sales
يصنع: Make captures form leads, enriches them, and pushes them to your إدارة علاقات العملاء. Sales teams use it to cut manual work. It also handles customer interactions like follow-up emails.
جوجل أوبال: Opal can draft sales videos, scripts, and research briefs. HR, marketing, and sales teams can build internal tools without waiting for IT. But it won’t manage a pipeline.
7. Document and Invoice Automation
يصنع: Make can create contracts from templates and send them for signing. It also handles inventory management and other back-office jobs.
Invoice automation works the same way. Make pulls order data, builds the invoice, and emails it.
جوجل أوبال: Opal can automate repetitive tasks like summarizing content and writing reports. It’s good for one-off documents. It isn’t built for recurring billing workflows.
8. Templates Gallery
يصنع: Make’s template gallery covers marketing, sales, IT, and finance. You pick one, connect your accounts, and adjust the steps. It’s a fast way into creating automations.
جوجل أوبال: Opal’s gallery has starter templates like book picks and product research. You can run them as-is or remix them. Here’s one example.
Another template builds a custom playlist from a short prompt.
9. Ease of Use and Error Handling
يصنع: Make looks beginner friendly, but advanced workflows take real effort. You need some technical know how for APIs and data mapping. Its error handling tools are strong once you learn them.
جوجل أوبال: Opal is easier for non technical users. You type, test, and share. Live debugging runs workflows step by step and shows errors in real time.
💡 نصيحة احترافية: New to automation? Start with a Make template, not a blank scenario. You’ll learn the logic faster.
10. التسعير والتكلفة
لنقارن خطط الأسعار جنبًا إلى جنب.
| يخطط | يصنع | جوجل أوبال |
|---|---|---|
| حر | 0 دولار شهرياً | — |
| جوهر | 9 دولارات شهرياً | — |
| محترف | 16 دولارًا شهريًا | — |
| الفرق | 29 دولارًا شهريًا | — |
| مَشرُوع | تسعير مخصص | — |
| التسعير | — | تواصل معنا لمعرفة الأسعار |
يصنع: Make’s pricing plans are clear, and the free plan covers basic features. Annual billing saves money over monthly billing. Just track operations so a busy month doesn’t push you up a tier.
جوجل أوبال: Opal lists no paid plans right now. That makes it cheap to try. But usage-based no-code tools can bring hidden fees as you scale. Plan ahead.
سيناريوهات مختلفة
| إذا كنت بحاجة إلى | يختار | لماذا |
|---|---|---|
| ميزانية محدودة | جوجل أوبال | Free to try during beta |
| Automate workflows across many apps | يصنع | 2,000+ integrations |
| Quick AI prototypes | جوجل أوبال | Builds apps from prompts |
| Complex logic and routing | يصنع | Routers, iterators, filters |
| Google Workspace only | جوجل أوبال | Deep Docs, Sheets, Gmail ties |
| Long-term business automation | يصنع | Stable, proven product |
💰 ميزانيتك
Opal costs nothing to try right now. Make is cheap too, with a free plan and paid tiers from $9.
🔌 مجموعة أدواتك التقنية
If you live inside Google tools, Opal fits. If you use many apps, Make connects them all in one platform.
🛠️ Your Use Case
Make runs real processes like leads, invoices, and posts. Opal is best for testing AI ideas and building mini apps.
🎓 مستوى خبرتك
Opal is easier for total beginners. Make rewards people willing to learn and dig deeper.
🆓 تجارب وعروض توضيحية مجانية
Both let you start free. Build the same small task in each before you commit.
🛟 خيارات الدعم
Make has paid customer support plus a big community. Opal relies mostly on Google’s docs and forum.
دليل التبديل
هل تستخدم إحدى هذه الأدوات بالفعل؟ إليك ما يمكن توقعه إذا قمت بالتبديل.
🔄 Switching from Make to Google Opal?
✅ ما ستجنيه:
- Build apps by describing them in plain English
- Built-in Gemini and Imagen models
- Instant hosting with shareable links
❌ ما ستخسره:
- Access to 2,000+ app integrations
- Routers, iterators, and error handlers
- Scheduled scenarios that run on their own
📋 كيفية التبديل:
- Note which Make scenarios use AI steps
- Sign in to Opal with your Google account
- Rebuild those AI steps from a template or prompt
🔄 Switching from Google Opal to Make?
✅ ما ستجنيه:
- Connections to thousands of apps
- Advanced logic and data processing
- A stable product with clear paid plans
❌ ما ستخسره:
- Natural language app building
- Free use during the beta
- Easy sharing of mini apps via link
📋 كيفية التبديل:
- List the steps each Opal app performs
- Create a free Make account
- Rebuild the flow with modules and an AI step
ما لم تتناوله مراجعتنا
This comparison focused on small teams and solo users. We didn’t test Make’s Enterprise plan or Opal’s behavior with large data sets. We also skipped governance gaps like missing version control and مراجعة سجلات. حماية deserves a look too, since misconfigured apps can leak data. Our notes reflect October 2026 versions, and Opal’s features may shift fast.
الحكم النهائي
| فئة | الفائز |
|---|---|
| 🎨 Visual Builder | يصنع |
| 🤖 AI and Natural Language | جوجل أوبال |
| 🧠 Complex Logic | يصنع |
| 🔌 عمليات التكامل | يصنع |
| 📣 أتمتة التسويق | يصنع |
| 👶 سهولة الاستخدام | جوجل أوبال |
| 💰 الأسعار | جوجل أوبال |
| 📄 Templates | يصنع |
| 🏆 الفائز الإجمالي | يصنع |
🏆 WINNER: MAKE
Make wins 5 out of 8 categories.
الأفضل لـ: Business automation, multi-app workflows, small businesses scaling up
Make and Google Opal solve different problems. Make is an automation tool that connects apps and keeps work moving.
Opal is a fast way to turn AI ideas into working prototypes. Developers also use it to check UX or logic before writing production code.
Opal is great for startups testing a concept in an afternoon. Need workflows that run your business every day in the real world? Make is the better choice.
More of Make Compared
Both Zapier and Make lead most lists of automation platforms. But Make has other rivals too. Here’s how it stacks up:
Make wins on: branching logic, cheaper operations at scale, a visual canvas you can read at a glance.
Zapier wins on: faster setup, a larger app library, simpler linear Zaps for quick jobs.
Make wins on: no hosting to manage, friendlier visuals, more ready-made modules.
n8n يفوز في: self-hosting, code nodes for developers, more control over your data.
Make vs حصوي
Make wins on: deeper data tools, stronger error handling, a bigger community.
Pabbly Connect wins on: lifetime deals, free internal steps, simpler pricing for small users.
Make vs غاملوب
Make wins on: wider app coverage, mature scheduling, more templates.
Gumloop wins on: AI-first design, easier scraping flows, faster AI pipeline setup.
More of Google Opal Compared
Here’s how Google Opal compares in the wider competitive landscape:
جوجل أوبال مقابل زابير
Opal wins on: prompt-based app building, free beta access, built-in Gemini models.
Zapier wins on: thousands of app connections, reliable triggers, real business workflows.
Opal wins on: zero setup, no coding needed, instant share links.
n8n wins on: self-hosting, custom code, complex data handling.
Google Opal vs مايند ستوديو
Opal wins on: simpler start, Google Drive storage, a free price tag today.
MindStudio wins on: many AI model choices, deploy options, more business features.
Google Opal vs رد
Opal wins on: no code to read, faster mini apps, easier for non-developers.
Replit wins on: full web apps, real code you own, hosting for production projects.
الأسئلة الشائعة
ما هو جوجل أوبال؟
Google Opal is a no-code منشئ تطبيقات الذكاء الاصطناعي from Google Labs. Describe an app in plain words. It creates a visual workflow you can edit and share.
هل خدمة جوجل أوبال مجانية؟
Yes, for now. Opal is free to use during its beta with a Google account. Google may add paid plans later, so check before you build anything critical.
هل برنامج Make أفضل من برنامج Zapier؟
Make is better for complex logic and lower costs at scale. Zapier is faster for simple, linear automations. Pick based on how complicated your workflows are.
كم تبلغ تكلفة موقع Make.com؟
Make has a free plan. Paid plans run $9, $16, and $29 per month billed annually, with custom Enterprise pricing. Monthly billing costs a bit more.
هل موقع Make.com صعب الاستخدام؟
Simple scenarios are easy to build. Advanced workflows with APIs, routers, and data mapping have a steep learning curve. Templates and tutorials help a lot.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 