Play ht vs ReadSpeaker: Transform Your Text to Speech in 2025?

Choosing the right text-to-speech software can be a game-changer.

Whether creating content, learning a new language, or listening to reading, the right tool can make all the difference. 

But with so many options available, how do you pick the best one for your needs?

This post will dive deep into two popular choices: Play ht vs ReadSpeaker. 

We’ll explore their key features, weigh their pros and cons, and help you decide which one comes out on top. 

Let’s get started!

Play ht vs ReadSpeaker Overview

We’ve spent weeks testing both Play.ht and ReadSpeaker to give you the most accurate comparison. 

We’ve explored their features, experimented with their voices, and put their ease of use to the test.

Now, we’re sharing our findings to help you make the right choice.

What is Play ht?

Ever wished you could have professional voiceovers without hiring a voice actor?

That’s where Play.ht comes in. It’s an AI-powered text-to-speech platform that transforms written words into lifelike audio. 

You can use it to create voiceovers for videos, eLearning courses, audiobooks, and more.

They have a huge library of incredibly realistic voices.

You can even fine-tune the pronunciation and pacing. It’s super easy to use, even for beginners.

Also, explore our favourite Play ht alternatives…

Key Benefits

• Huge Voice Library: Access over 900+ expressive AI voices with diverse accents and languages.
• Realistic Voices: Play.ht uses advanced AI to generate incredibly natural-sounding voices.
• Podcast-Ready Audio: Create high-quality audio with podcast-specific features like intro/outro music and separate tracks for each speaker.

Pricing

Play.ht offers a free trial to test out the platform. Paid plans start at $31.20 per month. Here’s what you get:

• Free Trial: $0/month
• Creator: $39/month
• Unlimited: $99/month

What is ReadSpeaker?

Need a solution that goes beyond basic text-to-speech? ReadSpeaker might be what you’re looking for.

It’s not just about creating voiceovers. ReadSpeaker focuses on making online content more accessible.

Think websites, documents, and even eLearning platforms.

They offer many tools to help people with disabilities access information more easily.

But that’s not all. ReadSpeaker also has some powerful customization options.

You can tweak the voices, add pauses, and embed audio players on your website.

Also, explore our favourite ReadSpeaker alternatives…

Key Benefits

• Customizable Voice Skins: Tweak voices to match your brand identity.
• Speech-to-Text Capabilities: Easily convert spoken audio into written text.
• Embedded Speech: Integrate AI voices directly into your website or applications.
• Neural Voices: Access incredibly natural and expressive AI voices.
• Extensive Language Support: Create content in various languages and accents.

Pricing

Have to Contact for The Pricing.

Play ht vs ReadSpeaker Feature Comparison

Let’s get down to the nitty-gritty and compare the most important features.

From AI voices to language support, we’ll see how Play.ht and ReadSpeaker stack up against each other.

AI Voice Quality

Both Play.ht and ReadSpeaker leverage the power of AI voice generators, but there’s a noticeable difference in quality.

Play.ht’s voices are incredibly natural and expressive, making them some of the best AI voices available.

ReadSpeaker’s voices are good, but they can sometimes sound a bit more robotic, especially with longer passages of written text.

If you’re looking for the most human-like AI voice generator, Play.ht has the edge.

Voice Options

Regarding voice options, Play.ht boasts a massive library of over 1,000+ voices in 142 languages and accents.

You can find everything from deep, resonant voices for narration to friendly, upbeat voices for e-learning content.

ReadSpeaker offers a decent selection of voices, with support for over 50 languages and 200+ voices. 

However, Play.ht’s sheer variety gives it an advantage in this category.

Ease of Use

Play.ht is designed with simplicity in mind. Its user-friendly interface makes it a breeze to convert text to speech, even for beginners.

You can simply paste your written text, choose your preferred voice, and generate audio content within minutes.

ReadSpeaker, while still user-friendly, has a slightly steeper learning curve.

Its interface is more complex, which can be overwhelming for first-time users.

Custom Voice

Want to create a truly unique voiceover? Play.ht offers a voice cloning feature that lets you create a custom voice based on your own recordings.

This is a game-changer for content creators and businesses looking to establish a distinct brand identity.

While ReadSpeaker offers some voice customization options, it doesn’t have a full-fledged voice cloning feature like Play.ht.

API Access

For developers and businesses looking to integrate text-to-speech capabilities into their own applications, both Play.ht and ReadSpeaker offer API access.

This allows you to convert text to speech seamlessly within your existing workflows.

However, Play.ht’s API is generally considered more developer-friendly, with better documentation and support.

Free Plan

Play.ht offers a free plan with limited usage, allowing you to experiment with the platform and test its features like voice quality and ease of use before committing to a paid subscription.

This is a great way to get started and see if Play.ht fits you.

ReadSpeaker, on the other hand, doesn’t offer a free plan. You’ll need to contact their sales team for a custom quote.

Advanced Features

Beyond basic text-to-speech capabilities, Play.ht offers several advanced features like podcast.ht integration, audio player customization, and support for SSML tags.

These features give you more control over your audio content and allow you to create truly professional-sounding voiceovers.

ReadSpeaker also has advanced features, including speech-enabled websites, embedded audio players, and support for multiple audio formats.

The best choice for you will depend on your specific needs and priorities.

What to Look for When Choosing a Voice Generator?

• Natural-Sounding Voices: The most important factor is how realistic the voices sound. Listen to samples and choose a generator that offers truly human-like voices.
• Language Support: Consider the languages and accents you need. Some generators offer a wider selection than others.
• Ease of Use: Choose a platform that’s easy to navigate and use, especially if you’re new to text-to-speech.
• Customization Options: Look for features that allow you to customize the voice, speed, and pronunciation to match your needs.
• Pricing: Compare pricing plans and choose one that fits your budget and usage requirements.
• Integrations: Check for integrations if you plan to use the voice generator with other tools or platforms.
• Customer Support: Make sure the platform offers reliable customer support in case you need help.
• Specific Use Case: Consider how you’ll use the voice generator. Do you need it for e-learning, IVR systems, audiobooks, or something else? This will help you narrow down your options.

Final Verdict (Our Pick)

So, which tool comes out on top? For us, it’s Play ht. It just offers so much for the price.

The voices are incredibly realistic, and it’s super easy to use. You get tons of voice options and languages. Plus, you can even try it for free.

ReadSpeaker is a solid choice, too, especially for businesses that need advanced accessibility features. But it can be a bit pricey and complex.

We’ve spent a lot of time testing these platforms.

We want to help you make the best decision for your needs.

Whether you want to create amazing voiceovers, read-aloud documents, or make your content more accessible, Play.ht and ReadSpeaker can help.

Try them out and see which one you prefer!

More of Play ht

Here’s a brief comparison of Play ht against its alternatives, highlighting standout features:

• Play ht vs Murf AI: Murf AI offers diverse, natural voices with strong customization for professional voiceovers, unlike Play ht’s focus on affordability and quality.
• Play ht vs Speechify: Speechify excels in accessibility and speed reading with natural voices, differentiating from Play ht’s versatile voice cloning capabilities.
• Play ht vs Lovo ai: Lovo ai provides emotionally expressive AI voices and extensive multilingual support, contrasting with Play ht’s focus on lifelike and accurate voices.
• Play ht vs Descript: Descript uniquely edits audio/video through text and offers Overdub voice cloning, a different approach than Play ht’s text-to-speech emphasis.
• Play ht vs ElevenLabs: ElevenLabs generates highly natural AI voices with advanced cloning and emotional range, setting it apart from Play ht’s balance of quality and cost.
• Play ht vs Listnr: Listnr offers podcast hosting and AI voice cloning alongside natural voiceovers, while Play ht focuses on versatile and low-latency text-to-speech.
• Play ht vs Podcastle: Podcastle provides AI-powered podcast recording and editing tools, a different niche compared to Play ht’s general text-to-speech applications.
• Play ht vs Dupdub: Dupdub specializes in expressive talking avatars with strong multilingual features, a broader offering than Play ht’s voice generation focus.
• Play ht vs WellSaid Labs: WellSaid Labs delivers consistently professional-grade AI voices with detailed customization, contrasting with Play ht’s accessible high-quality voices.
• Play ht vs Revoicer: Revoicer offers advanced AI voice cloning and customization with SSML control, going beyond Play ht’s user-friendly voice generation.
• Play ht vs NaturalReader: NaturalReader supports more languages and offers OCR functionality, distinguishing it from Play ht’s emphasis on lifelike voice quality.
• Play ht vs Notevibes: Notevibes provides AI voice agents for customer service with low latency, a specific application different from Play ht’s wider text-to-speech use.
• Play ht vs Altered: Altered offers innovative AI voice cloning and real-time voice changing, a unique feature set compared to Play ht’s natural voice generation.
• Play ht vs Speechelo: Speechelo focuses on natural-sounding AI voices with punctuation awareness for marketing, unlike Play ht’s general high-quality text-to-speech.
• Play ht vs TTSOpenAI: TTSOpenAI achieves high human-like voice clarity with customizable pronunciation, differing from Play ht’s balance of quality and affordability.
• Play ht vs Hume AI: Hume AI specializes in analyzing emotion in voice, video, and text, a distinct capability from Play ht’s text-to-speech conversion.

More of ReadSpeaker

Here’s a brief comparison of ReadSpeaker against the listed alternatives, highlighting their standout features:

• ReadSpeaker vs Murf AI: Murf AI offers diverse voices with customization, while ReadSpeaker focuses on accessibility and seamless integration.
• ReadSpeaker vs Speechify: Speechify excels in speed and multi-platform accessibility, unlike ReadSpeaker’s emphasis on website and enterprise integration.
• ReadSpeaker vs Descript: Descript integrates audio/video editing with voice cloning, a broader scope than ReadSpeaker’s text-to-speech focus for accessibility.
• ReadSpeaker vs ElevenLabs: ElevenLabs generates highly natural and expressive AI voices, differing from ReadSpeaker’s focus on website and platform integration for accessibility.
• ReadSpeaker vs Lovo ai: Lovo ai offers emotionally expressive AI voices with versatile multilingual support, unlike ReadSpeaker’s emphasis on accessibility across languages.
• ReadSpeaker vs Podcastle: Podcastle provides AI-powered recording and editing specifically for podcasts, a more niche application than ReadSpeaker’s accessibility focus.
• ReadSpeaker vs Listnr: Listnr offers podcast hosting with AI voiceovers, while ReadSpeaker specializes in website and platform integration for accessibility.
• ReadSpeaker vs WellSaid Labs: WellSaid Labs delivers consistently professional-grade AI voices, contrasting with ReadSpeaker’s focus on website and digital content accessibility.
• ReadSpeaker vs Revoicer: Revoicer offers realistic AI voices with detailed emotion and speed control, a different focus than ReadSpeaker’s accessibility-driven text-to-speech.
• ReadSpeaker vs NaturalReader: NaturalReader provides versatile text-to-speech with customizable voice settings, similar to ReadSpeaker, but with a different emphasis on features.
• ReadSpeaker vs Notevibes: Notevibes offers AI voice agents for customer service applications, a specific use case compared to ReadSpeaker’s broader accessibility solutions.
• ReadSpeaker vs Altered: Altered provides real-time voice changing and voice morphing, a unique feature set compared to ReadSpeaker’s focus on website and content accessibility.
• ReadSpeaker vs Speechelo: Speechelo generates natural-sounding AI voices for marketing, while ReadSpeaker specializes in making online content accessible through text-to-speech.
• ReadSpeaker vs TTSOpenAI: TTSOpenAI offers high-quality text-to-speech with customizable pronunciation, differing from ReadSpeaker’s focus on website and platform integration.
• ReadSpeaker vs Hume AI: Hume AI specializes in understanding and analyzing human emotions in voice and other modalities, unlike ReadSpeaker’s focus on accessibility.

Frequently Asked Questions