⚡ สรุปโดยย่อ:
- ตัวประกอบ: Make starts at $9/month. Flowith starts at $17.91/month. Both have a free plan.
- เหมาะสำหรับ: Make for app-to-app business อัตโนมัติ. Flowith for AI research and content work on a canvas.
- ความแตกต่างที่สำคัญ: Make moves data between 2,000+ apps. Flowith runs AI agents inside its own workspace.
- ตัวเลือกที่เราแนะนำ: Make for most people. It costs less and handles real ธุรกิจ workflows end to end.
Make vs Flowith both promise to automate tasks with AI.
แต่พวกมันไม่ได้ถูกสร้างมาเพื่อทำงานเดียวกัน
Make connects your favorite apps and moves data between them.
Flowith gives you an AI agent and an infinite canvas for thinking work.
Picking the wrong one wastes money and weeks of setup.
ภาพรวม
เราได้ตรวจสอบเอกสารประกอบ ราคา และรีวิวจากผู้ใช้สำหรับทั้งสองเครื่องมือแล้ว
นอกจากนี้ นักเขียนของเรายังได้ใช้เวลาทดลองใช้งานจริงกับแต่ละผลิตภัณฑ์ด้วย
บันทึกเหล่านั้นจะปรากฏอยู่ในส่วน "สิ่งที่ทีมของเราสังเกตเห็น" ด้านล่างนี้
We cover key features, pricing plans, ease of use, and who each tool suits.
Want to dig deeper? Each CTA box links to our full reviews.
Make คืออะไร?
Make is a no code automation platform.
It was called Integromat before its rebrand.
You build workflows by linking app modules on a visual canvas.
Each workflow is called a scenario.
It lets you automate workflows across various applications.
It handles everything from simple workflows to complex automation with branches and loops.
ฟรีแลนซ์ ธุรกิจเล็กๆ, and large enterprises all use it.
Here’s a quick video walkthrough of how Make works.
🏆 Winner: Make
Connect over 2,000 apps without writing code. Build branching scenarios on a visual canvas. Start free and upgrade only when you need more.
กำหนดราคา
Make uses an operations-based pricing model. Each step a scenario runs counts toward your monthly limit.
| วางแผน | ราคา | เหมาะสำหรับ |
|---|---|---|
| ฟรี | 0 ดอลลาร์ต่อเดือน | Learning and testing basic features |
| แกนกลาง | 9 ดอลลาร์ต่อเดือน | Solo users with steady workflows |
| โปร | 16 ดอลลาร์ต่อเดือน | ผู้ใช้งานระดับสูงที่ต้องการคุณสมบัติขั้นสูง |
| ทีม | 29 ดอลลาร์ต่อเดือน | Teams sharing scenarios |
| องค์กร | ราคาตามสั่ง | Large enterprises with ความปลอดภัย ความต้องการ |
Pricing verified October 2026.
ทดลองใช้งานฟรี: No separate trial. The free plan works as a permanent trial, and no card is needed.
รับประกันคืนเงิน: No default refunds. Make reviews refund requests case by case.
📌 บันทึก: The prices above are for annual billing. Monthly billing costs $10.59 for Core, $18.82 for Pro, and $34.12 for Teams.
⚠️ คำเตือน: Operations add up fast. Looping over 500 rows in Google Sheets can burn 500+ operations per run. Watch your usage dashboard to avoid surprise upgrades.
Key Benefits of Make
Here’s what makes Make worth a look:
- Extensive integration capabilities: Make links over 2,000 apps. You can chain as many apps as you like in a single scenario.
- Visual workflow builder: You see every step as a bubble on a canvas. That visual approach makes data flow easy to follow.
- Advanced logic tools: Iterators, aggregators, routers, and filters come built in. You get conditional logic without writing code.
- Custom API calls: Can’t find an app? The HTTP module sends http requests to almost any service.
- Cost effective plans: Most paid plans sit between $9 and $29. That’s cheaper than many automation platforms.
- Strong community: Make has deep documentation, tutorials, and an active forum. Help is easy to find when you’re stuck.
สิ่งที่ทีมของเราสังเกตเห็น
ของเรา นักเขียน signed up for Make and built scenarios for real content and lead tasks. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Make Pros & Cons
✅ ข้อดี
- Connects over 2,000 apps in one platform
- Drag and drop interface shows every step visually
- Routers, filters, and error handling built in
- Paid plans start at just $9 per month
- HTTP module covers apps without a native connector
❌ ข้อเสีย
- Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
- Operations count can climb quickly on loops
- No refunds by default
Flowith คืออะไร?
Flowith is an AI creation and workflow tool.
It swaps the usual chat window for an infinite canvas.
You can run many AI threads side by side on that canvas.
Its AI agent, Agent Neo, handles long multi-step jobs for you.
It also stores your notes as a searchable second brain.
Creators, researchers, and developers are its main audience.
Its whole ขว้าง is better productivity through AI.
This video shows the Flowith canvas in action.
Runner Up: Flowith
Research, write, and create on one infinite canvas. Agent Neo runs long tasks for you. Try it with 1,000 free credits.
การกำหนดราคาของ Flowith
Flowith charges in unified credits. One credit pool covers ข้อความ, image, and video models.
| วางแผน | ราคา | เหมาะสำหรับ |
|---|---|---|
| สตาร์ทเตอร์ | 0 ดอลลาร์/เดือน | Trying basic models and Agent Neo |
| โปร | $17.91/month | Individual creators and students |
| สุดยอด | $44.91/month | Heavy daily research and content generation |
| อนันต์ | $399.92/month | Studios and teams with huge credit needs |
Pricing verified October 2026.
ทดลองใช้งานฟรี: The forever-free Starter plan gives 1,000 one-time credits. It includes basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo.
รับประกันคืนเงิน: We couldn’t confirm a standard refund window. Check the billing terms before you upgrade.
📌 บันทึก: Paid plans refresh credits every month. You can top up anytime if you run short.
⚠️ คำเตือน: Unused credits expire at the end of each monthly cycle. They don’t roll over, so size your plan carefully.
Key Benefits of Flowith
Here’s where Flowith earns its place:
- Intuitive canvas: Ideas branch out visually instead of scrolling away. Big projects stay easy to navigate.
- เอเจนท์นีโอ: This AI agent runs multi-step creative tasks. Flowith says it works without context limits.
- Oracle mode: It breaks a big job into subtasks. Then it pulls the right tools for each part.
- Many models, one place: You pick different AI models for different content tasks. No tab-switching between apps.
- สวนแห่งความรู้: Flowith stores and links your info automatically. You skip manual tagging and still find things later.
- Live collaboration: Team members can work on the same canvas at the same time.
สิ่งที่ทีมของเราสังเกตเห็น
Our writer signed up for Flowith and used it for research and draft outlines. Here’s what stood out from that hands-on time:
Flowith Pros & Cons
✅ ข้อดี
- Infinite canvas keeps research threads organized
- Agent Neo handles long, multi-step jobs
- One credit pool for text, image, and video
- Real-time collaboration on shared canvases
❌ ข้อเสีย
- Some reviewers call it pricey for what it does
- Weak for scripting or การซื้อขาย งาน
- Unused credits expire each month
- Few direct app integrations
เปรียบเทียบคุณสมบัติ
Make is an automation tool. Flowith is an AI workspace. Below, we compare ten areas so you can see where each one fits.
| คุณสมบัติ | ทำ | ฟลอวิธ |
|---|---|---|
| ราคาเริ่มต้น | 9 ดอลลาร์ต่อเดือน | $17.91/month |
| แผนฟรี | ✅ | ✅ (1,000 one-time credits) |
| เอージェนต์ AI | ✅ | ✅ Agent Neo |
| Visual Builder / Canvas | ✅ Scenario canvas | ✅ Infinite canvas |
| การผสานรวมแอปพลิเคชันมากกว่า 2,000 รายการ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Custom API Calls (HTTP) | ✅ | ❌ |
| Image & Video Creation | ❌ (via third party services) | ✅ |
| ฐานความรู้ | ❌ | ✅ สวนแห่งความรู้ |
| การทำงานร่วมกันแบบเรียลไทม์ | Teams plan | ✅ |
| เหมาะสำหรับ | Business workflows | AI research and content |
1. AI Agents
ทำ: Make AI Agents sit inside your scenarios. They decide which step to run next based on goals you set. Because they live in a workflow, they can act on real apps and data.
โฟลวิธ: Agent Neo is the star here. It’s built for limitless creative and research jobs that run across many steps. You give it a goal, and it keeps completing steps without hitting context limits.
2. Visual Builder and Interface
ทำ: The workflow builder is a drag-and-drop canvas of connected modules. You can watch data move through each bubble as a scenario runs. It’s clear, but it takes time to learn.
โฟลวิธ: Flowith calls its layout a smart framework for deep work. Each idea becomes a node you can branch from. The goal is fewer distractions and more time in a flow state.
3. Integrations and API Access
ทำ: This is Make’s home turf. It supports over 2,000 apps, from Google Sheets to CRMs and e-commerce stores. The HTTP module handles API integrations for any tool that offers one.
โฟลวิธ: Flowith connects AI models, not business apps. You won’t find triggers for Slack, Gmail, or Shopify here. Its strength stays inside its own canvas.
⚠️ คำเตือน: If you need syncing data between apps in real time, Flowith can’t do that job. Make can.
4. Complex Logic and Error Handling
ทำ: Routers split paths. Filters stop bad data. Iterators and aggregators handle lists. Error handlers catch failures and show clear error messages. One broken step doesn’t kill the whole run.
โฟลวิธ: Oracle mode handles complexity in a different way. It splits a big request into subtasks and picks tools for each. You steer with prompts, not with if-then rules.
5. การสร้างเนื้อหา
ทำ: Make doesn’t write content itself. It calls แอป AI like OpenAI and then posts the output. สื่อสังคมออนไลน์ automation is a common use, such as drafting and scheduling posts.
โฟลวิธ: The Flowith Composer is built for writing. You can draft long pieces with several models in one view.
It also has an AI-powered photo editor for quick visuals.
https://fahimai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ai-powered-photo-editor-980×532.pngv
Video generation runs on the same credit pool.
6. Business Process Automation
ทำ: Make shines at repetitive tasks across departments. Lead capture, contract routing, and invoice processing are all common scenarios. Marketing, inventory, and customer support teams use it too.
Contract workflows can send, sign, and file documents without manual steps.
Invoice scenarios pull numbers from emails and push them into การบัญชี เครื่องมือ
โฟลวิธ: Flowith isn’t built for back-office work. It can plan a process or write a report about it. But it won’t move a record from one system to another.
7. Knowledge and Research
ทำ: Make has no built-in note system. You can pipe research into แนวคิด or a database. But the storage and search happen in another tool.
โฟลวิธ: The Knowledge Garden turns your files into a searchable base. It links ideas without manual tagging. Some reports claim up to 40% faster task completion and 78% faster retrieval. Treat those numbers as claims, not guarantees.
8. Templates and Community
ทำ: The Templates Gallery gives you ready-made scenarios to copy. A large forum and tutorial library back it up. That makes creating automations easier แต่แรก in your automation journey.
โฟลวิธ: Flowith has an Agent Community where people share agents. Its Knowledge Market lets creators trade knowledge bases.
Here’s a look at the Knowledge Market.
9. ใช้งานง่าย
ทำ: Simple tasks take minutes. But more complex workflows bring a steep learning curve around APIs and data mapping. Expect some trial and error before you build workflows with confidence.
โฟลวิธ: If you can type a prompt, you can ใช้ Flowith. Reviewers praise how its interface supports deep work. The canvas does take a short adjustment if you’re used to chat apps.
💡 เคล็ดลับสำหรับมืออาชีพ: New to Make? Copy a template first. Editing a working scenario teaches faster than starting from a blank canvas.
10. การกำหนดราคาและต้นทุน
| ชั้น | ทำ | ฟลอวิธ |
|---|---|---|
| ฟรี | Free: $0 per month | Starter: $0/month |
| รายการ | Core: $9 per month | Pro: $17.91/month |
| กลาง | Pro: $16 per month | Ultimate: $44.91/month |
| Team / Top | Teams: $29 per month | Infinite: $399.92/month |
| องค์กร | ราคาตามสั่ง | ❌ |
ทำ: Make is the cheaper paid plan at every step. Its operations-based pricing has no hidden fees, but heavy loops raise your bill. It’s priced below ภาษาซาเปียร์Name for similar volume.
โฟลวิธ: Credits work across every model, which keeps things simple. The catch is expiry. Credits you don’t spend vanish at the end of each cycle.
สถานการณ์ต่างๆ
| หากคุณต้องการ... | เลือก | ทำไม |
|---|---|---|
| งบประมาณจำกัด | ทำ | Paid plans start at $9 |
| Connect business apps | ทำ | 2,000+ integrations |
| AI research and writing | ฟลอวิธ | Canvas plus Composer |
| Long อิสระ AI jobs | ฟลอวิธ | Agent Neo |
| Custom API calls | ทำ | HTTP module |
| Fast start for beginners | ฟลอวิธ | Prompt-driven, no mapping |
💰 งบประมาณของคุณ
Make’s paid plan costs about half of Flowith’s entry plan. If money is tight, Make gives more for less.
🔌 อุปกรณ์เทคโนโลยีของคุณ
Already run on Google Sheets, a CRM, and email? Make ties them together, while Flowith stays a separate workspace.
📝 สไตล์การทำงานของคุณ
Writers and researchers who think visually will feel at home in Flowith. Ops people who think in steps will prefer Make.
🎓 ระดับประสบการณ์ของคุณ
Flowith needs no coding expertise or setup. Make needs some patience, but you never have to touch code.
🆓 ทดลองใช้งานและเดโมฟรี
Both have a free plan, so test with a real task. Make’s free tier never ends, while Flowith’s credits are one-time.
🛟 ตัวเลือกการสนับสนุน
Make has a big forum, docs, and video guides. Flowith’s community is smaller and newer, so answers can take longer.
คู่มือการสลับใช้งาน
กำลังใช้เครื่องมือเหล่านี้อยู่แล้วใช่ไหม? นี่คือสิ่งที่คุณควรคาดหวังหากเปลี่ยนมาใช้เครื่องมืออื่น
🔄 Switching from Make to Flowith?
✅ สิ่งที่คุณจะได้รับ:
- An infinite canvas for research and การระดมความคิด
- Built-in image and video creation
- A searchable knowledge base for your notes
❌ สิ่งที่คุณจะสูญเสีย:
- Triggers and actions across 2,000+ apps
- Routers, filters, and scheduled scenarios
- Custom HTTP and API connections
📋 วิธีการเปลี่ยน:
- List which Make scenarios are content or research jobs
- Create a free Flowith account and test those jobs
- Keep Make running for anything that moves app data
🔄 Switching from Flowith to Make?
✅ สิ่งที่คุณจะได้รับ:
- Real automation between your business apps
- แพ็คเกจแบบชำระเงินราคาถูกกว่า
- Detailed error handling and run history
❌ สิ่งที่คุณจะสูญเสีย:
- The visual research canvas
- Agent Neo’s long-running AI tasks
- Built-in image and video tools
📋 วิธีการเปลี่ยน:
- Export your Flowith notes and outputs
- Sign up for Make’s free plan
- Rebuild repeat jobs from a template and connect your apps
สิ่งที่บทวิจารณ์ของเราไม่ได้กล่าวถึง
This comparison focused on solo users and small teams. We didn’t test Make’s Enterprise plan or Flowith’s $399.92 Infinite tier. We also didn’t build a mobile app with either tool. Searched “make app” hoping to build one? Try AI or no-code app ผู้สร้าง instead. They suit beginners and fast prototypes.
คุณสมบัติสุดท้าย
| หมวดหมู่ | ผู้ชนะ |
|---|---|
| 💰 ราคา | ทำ |
| 🔌 การผสานรวม | ทำ |
| 🧠 Complex Logic | ทำ |
| 🤖 เอเจนต์ AI | ฟลอวิธ |
| ✍️ การสร้างเนื้อหา | ฟลอวิธ |
| 📚 เทมเพลตและชุมชน | ทำ |
| 👶 ใช้งานง่าย | ฟลอวิธ |
| 🏆 ผู้ชนะเลิศโดยรวม | ทำ |
🏆 WINNER: MAKE
Make wins 4 out of 7 categories.
เหมาะสำหรับ: Business automation, app syncing, budget-conscious teams
Make is a powerful automation platform for moving work between apps. It costs less and gives you tight control over every step.
Flowith is a strong pick for research, writing, and AI-heavy creative work. Its canvas and Agent Neo do things Make simply wasn’t built for.
For most readers, the job is cutting manual work across tools. That’s why Make takes the win. Many people will happily use both.
More of Make Compared
Weighing both Zapier and Make? Start with the first card below.
คว้าชัยชนะได้ที่: Lower prices for similar volume, branching routers, and finer control over data parsing.
Zapier ชนะการประมูลในด้าน: A larger app library, a simpler linear setup, and a faster start for beginners.
Make vs n8n
คว้าชัยชนะได้ที่: Fully hosted setup, friendlier for non-coders, and more ready-made app modules.
n8n ชนะด้วยคะแนน: Self-hosting, custom code nodes, and source-available licensing.
Make vs Pabbly เชื่อมต่อ
คว้าชัยชนะได้ที่: Deeper logic tools, a bigger app catalog, and built-in AI agents.
แพ็บลี่ Connect wins on: Lifetime-deal pricing, free internal steps, and lower long-term cost.
Make vs กัมลูป
คว้าชัยชนะได้ที่: Wider app support, mature error handling, and cheaper entry plans.
กัมลูปชนะใน: AI-first nodes, built-in web scraping, and LLM steps without your own API key.
More of Flowith Compared
Here’s how Flowith compares with other AI workspaces:
Flowith vs Notion
Flowith wins on: Multi-model AI on a canvas, อิสระ agent tasks, and auto-linked knowledge.
Notion ชนะด้วย: Docs and databases, mature team wikis, and wider app connections.
โฟลวิธ ปะทะ มายด์สตูดิโอ
Flowith wins on: Free-form research canvas, image and video creation, and a personal knowledge base.
MindStudio wins on: Building custom AI apps, sharing agents with clients, and structured agent workflows.
Flowith wins on: Visual thinking space, long-running Agent Neo jobs, and built-in note storage.
กัมลูปชนะใน: App integrations, scheduled automations, and web scraping nodes.
ถาม บ่อย ๆ
Make.com ใช้ทำอะไร?
It connects apps and automates workflows without code. Common uses include lead capture, invoices, and social posts. It also syncs records between Google Sheets and a CRM.
Make ดีกว่า Zapier หรือไม่?
For complex logic and lower cost, yes. Zapier is simpler and has more apps. Unlike Zapier’s linear steps, Make supports branching paths and loops.
flowith.io ฟรีหรือไม่?
Yes, partly. The Starter plan is free forever with 1,000 one-time credits. It includes basic models, the Composer, and Agent Neo. Paid plans start at $17.91/month.
Flowith สามารถทำงานร่วมกับแอปพลิเคชันอื่นได้หรือไม่?
Only in a limited way. It connects many AI models inside one interface. For moving data between business apps, a tool like Make is the better fit.
AI ชนิดใดเหมาะสมที่สุดสำหรับการทำงานอัตโนมัติ?
For app-to-app automation, Make offers the best value here. For research and content tasks run by an AI agent, Flowith is the stronger choice.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish 
Indonesian 
Thai 
Vietnamese 