Ever feel like your thoughts are a tangled mess?
Trying to organize ideas can be a real headache.
You jot things down, but they end up scattered across different apps and notebooks.
Finding what you need becomes a hunt.
Let’s dive into Capacities vs Obsidian.
We’ll compare these two powerful „SE Ranking vs. Ubersuggest: Verbessern Sie Ihre SEO im Jahr 2025?“ – Fahim AI tools to see which one might be your perfect match.
概述
We’ve spent weeks testing both Capacities and Obsidian.
We explored their features, built knowledge bases, and pushed their limits.
This hands-on experience allows us to provide a practical comparison, not just a theoretical one.
Capacities 是一颗冉冉升起的新星，已有超过 100,000 名用户发现了它的独特方法。
定价： 它有免费计划。高级计划起价为每月 23 美元。
主要特点：
- 基于对象的组织
- 图表视图
- 内容链接
Join over 1 million users who’ve transformed their note-taking! Start today!
定价： It has a free plan. The premium plan starts at $4/month.
主要特点：
- Local Markdown files.
- Graph view.
- Extensive plugin ecosystem.
什么是能力？
Capacities? It’s all about connecting your ideas.
Think of it as a personal knowledge graph.
It helps you see how everything links together. It’s a fresh take on organization.
主要优点
- 网络笔记： 创建一个相互关联的想法和笔记的网络。
- 人工智能助手： 与您的笔记动态交互以回答问题并激发想法。
- 上下文反向链接： 为链接笔记提供丰富的上下文信息。
- 自定义对象类型： 创建类别来组织信息。
- 跨平台可用性： 在所有主要设备上访问您的笔记，包括离线模式。
定价
- 基本的： 开始使用，基本功能。
- 优点： Вам всегда нужны молоко, яйца и хлеб, верно?
- 贝利弗：每月 12.49 美元
Você pode ter mais de um espaço de trabalho.
缺点
What is Obsidian?
Obsidian is a powerful note-taking app. It uses Markdown.
You create a network of notes. It’s your knowledge base.
我们的观点
革新你的笔记方式。利用 Obsidian 的力量，连接彼此的想法。加入超过 10 万名正在构建数字“第二大脑”的用户。立即免费开启你的知识之旅。
主要优点
- 您的笔记存储在本地。
- 你可以把你的笔记连接在一起。
- 图形视图显示了这些连接。
- 它具有高度可定制性，并配有许多插件。
定价
- 同步：每位用户每月 4 美元，按年计费。
- 发布：每位用户每月 8 美元，按年计费。
Você pode ter mais de um espaço de trabalho.
缺点
功能比较
Let’s break down the key features of Obsidian and Capacities.
We’ll look at how they stack up, so you can decide which fits your needs best.
1. Note Taking
Both Obsidian and Capacities excel at note-taking.
However, Obsidian focuses on plain Es ist für eine persönliche Wissensdatenbank konzipiert. Ihre Notizen werden als einfache markdown files, giving you full control.
Capacities, on the other hand, structure your notes around “objects” like people, projects, and ideas.
This object-based approach adds an extra layer of organization but might feel less flexible for some users.
2. Backlinks
Backlinks are a core strength of both tools.
Obsidian visually shows how your notes connect.
Capacities also uses backlinks, but it integrates them with its object system, making connections more context-aware.
If you love seeing how ideas link together, you’ll appreciate both tools.
3. Folders and Tags
Folders are a classic way to organize files.
Obsidian relies heavily on folders and tags.
This gives users a familiar way to manage their notes.
Capacities leans more on tags and its object system, minimizing the need for complex folder structures.
If you prefer a tag-centric approach, Capacities might be your go-to.
4. Offline Functionality
Offline access is crucial for many users.
Both Obsidian and Capacities work offline. Obsidian stores your files locally, ensuring you can work anywhere.
Capacities also provide offline capabilities but require initial syncing.
If you need reliable offline access, both are solid choices.
5. Dataview Plugin
The dataview plugin is a powerful feature in Obsidian.
It lets you query and display information from your notes in dynamic tables and lists.
Capacities don’t have a direct equivalent.
If you need advanced Das bedeutet, dass Ihr querying, Obsidian with the data view plugin is a strong contender.
6. Workflow Customization
Workflow is where these apps differ.
Obsidian is highly customizable, with a vast library of community plugins.
This lets you tailor your workflow to your exact needs.
Capacities offer a more opinionated workflow centered around its object system.
If you want maximum customization, Obsidian wins.
If you prefer a structured approach, Capacities is worth considering.
7. Object-Based System
Capacities uses an object-based system.
This means it treats your notes as interconnected objects, like people, projects, and resources.
This approach helps you see relationships between your notes.
Obsidian relies on a more traditional file-based system.
If you like the idea of organizing your knowledge around objects, Capacities might suit you well.
选择头脑风暴工具时应注意什么？
- Platform and Access: The tool must provide seamless access across all your 设备. Look for a robust mobile app (ios app), a desktop app, and a functional web app. Check if it is a true competitor to 概念 and supports other note taking apps. Look for features like dark mode, source code access, and a free version or trial for a single month before committing to the full product and its new features.
- AI Features and Assistance: The tool should be a note taking application with strong ai features. Look for a powerful assistant right there to act as your ai assistant and developer in generating new ideas. This enables you to create amazing things.
- Idea Visualization and Flow: Seek a studio for your mind—an artist’s studio with mind map functionality to visualize structured content. The tool should help you log and write your thoughts, seeing the hidden connections between multiple notes and turning them into amazing things.
- Capture and Organization: The app needs quick capture features, like a share sheet save content function, to save new content from web pages and other apps. It must support markdown notes, and offer organization tools like folders, a calendar, and the ability to view daily notes and tasks. You can even use it as a personal knowledge base and a second brain.
- Search and Navigation: A powerful search find is key, allowing you to search and quickly find information, even across your whole account. This powerful search should also help you respond to complex queries. You should be able to manage your page and notes easily.
最终裁决
We choose Obsidian AI because its approach to personal knowledge management is superior.
The core strength lies in its AI-powered plugins like Smart Connections, which can run local models directly on your local machine learning setup.
This allows you to chat with your entire Obsidian vault and vault notes privately.
你可以 ask AI questions and get context-aware answers within the chat mode.
It uses language models to connect atomic notes, not just keywords, helping you discover hidden connections and enabling generating structured content.
This is far better than simply using an external ai chatbot like chat gpt or summarizing YouTube videos with a basic plug ins feature.
The plugins overview showed tools like date magic for adding metadata and maintaining an organized conversation history within your obsidian notes.
更多能力
- 能力与概念: Capacities uses objects and links to connect ideas in a visual way. Notion is like a big workspace for notes, projects, and databases.
- Capacities vs Anytype: Both help you link ideas. Capacities has a more visual, block-based look, while Anytype keeps your info private on your computer.
- 能力与工艺: Capacities focuses on connecting ideas through objects. Craft makes your notes look really good and lets you link them inside documents.
- 容量与 ClickUp: Capacities helps you see connections between notes. 点击 is mostly for managing tasks, but it also has notes you can link to your work.
- Capacities vs Coda: Capacities uses objects and links to build your knowledge. Coda lets you make documents that act like apps with tables and charts.
- Capacities vs XTiles: Both help you connect your notes and keep your info private. Capacities has a visual, block-based way of linking things.
- Capacities vs AFFiNE pro: Capacities uses objects and links to connect your thoughts. AFFiNE pro tries to be like Notion and Obsidian, letting you see connections, too.
- Capacities vs Obsidian: Capacities connect ideas with objects and links in a visual way. Obsidian uses plain text files and shows connections between your notes like a map.
More of Obsidian
Let’s see how Obsidian stacks up against these other note-taking and knowledge management apps:
- Obsidian vs Notion: Obsidian keeps your notes as local text files and focuses on linking them together. Notion is a cloud-based workspace for notes, projects, and databases.
- Obsidian vs ClickUp: Obsidian is for your personal knowledge base with linked notes. 点击 is mainly for teams to manage projects with note-taking features.
- Obsidian vs Anytype: Both Obsidian and Anytype keep your info private on your computer and let you link your thoughts. Anytype uses a different way to structure info with objects.
- Obsidian vs Coda: Obsidian uses linked text files to build your knowledge. Coda lets you make documents that act like apps with tables and buttons.
- Obsidian vs XTiles: Both Obsidian and XTiles focus on keeping your notes private and letting you connect them. Obsidian uses plain Es ist für eine persönliche Wissensdatenbank konzipiert. Ihre Notizen werden als einfache files and has many extra tools you can add.
- Obsidian vs Capacities: Obsidian uses linked text files to show how your ideas connect. Capacities uses a more visual way with objects and links to build your knowledge graph.
- Obsidian vs Craft: Obsidian uses simple text files to create linked notes. Craft focuses on making nice-looking documents that you can also link.
- Obsidian vs AFFiNE pro: Both Obsidian and AFFiNE pro let you keep your notes local and link them. AFFiNE pro also lets you edit in blocks like Notion and has a whiteboard.
常见问题
Is Obsidian or Capacities better for beginners?
Capacities might be easier for beginners. Its object-based system offers a structured approach. Obsidian, while powerful, has a steeper learning curve due to its customization options and plugin system. If you prefer a guided experience, Capacities is a good starting point.
Can I use Obsidian and Capacities offline?
Yes, both Obsidian and Capacities offer offline functionality. Obsidian stores files locally, ensuring access anywhere. Capacities also allow offline use but require initial syncing. Both are reliable for working without the Internet.
Does Capacities have a plugin system like Obsidian?
No, Capacities does not have a plugin system like Obsidian. Obsidian boasts a vast library of community plugins, enabling extensive customization. Capacities focus on its built-in object system, offering a more streamlined, less customizable experience.
Which tool is better for managing large amounts of data?
Obsidian, especially with the dataview plugin, is excellent for managing large datasets. Its ability to query and display information in dynamic tables makes it powerful. Capacities are more suited for interconnected ideas, not necessarily massive data sets.
How do Obsidian and Capacities handle backlinks?
Both Obsidian and Capacities use backlinks to connect notes. Obsidian visually displays connections, focusing on linked markdown files. Capacities integrate backlinks within its object system, adding contextual links between objects. Both enhance note connectivity but in slightly different ways.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean