Luma vs. InVideo: Welcher ist der beste AI Video Maker im Jahr 2024?

Want to create awesome videos without the hassle?

AI video generators are changing the game!

They can whip up professional-looking videos in minutes, even if you’re a total beginner.

But with so many options out there, how do you choose the right one?

In this post, we’ll dive into two popular contenders Luma vs InVideo & compare their features & pricing to help you decide which one is the best KI-Video maker.

Überblick

To give you the most accurate comparison, we’ve spent weeks testing both Luma and InVideo.

We’ve explored their features, created sample videos, and even compared their customer support. Now, we’re sharing our findings to help you make the best decision.

Want to give Luma a try? Start creating professional-quality videos today with their free trial! No credit card is required.

7.5von 10

Preise: It has a free plan. The paid plan starts at $9.99/month.

Hauptmerkmale:

• Depth estimation,
• 3D model generation,
• NeRF rendering

Try Luma AI for FREE Gesamte Rezension lesen

Ready to start creating? Head over to Luma or InVideo to try their free plans and see which platform best suits your video editing needs!

8von 10

Preise: It has a free plan. The paid plan starts at $25/month.

Hauptmerkmale:

• AI human presenters
• Voice-over generation
• Screen recording

Try Invideo For FREE Gesamte Rezension lesen

Was ist Luma?

Luma isn’t your typical video editing software.

It’s like having a creative assistant powered by AI! Instead of spending hours editing, Luma helps you create stunning videos in minutes.

Think quick, easy, and professional – even if you’re a total beginner.

Entdecken Sie auch unsere beliebtesten Luma Alternativen…

Front-KI

7.5

Ready to boost your email outreach? Don’t let another email get lost in spam. Try Sofort AI today and see the results for yourself.

Try Luma AI for FREE Gesamte Rezension lesen

Hauptvorteile

Luma AI stands out from the crowd with these awesome features:

• Unmatched realism: Capture incredibly detailed 3D environments from your videos.
• Intuitive Benutzeroberfläche: Easily navigate and edit your 3D scenes without any technical expertise.
• Versatile applications: Create anything from immersive virtual tours to stunning visual effects.

Preise

Ready to give Luma AI a try? Here’s what you can expect:

• Kostenlose Testversion: 30 Generationen pro Monat, Standardpriorität, nicht kommerzielle Nutzung.
• Lite ($9,99/Monat): 70 Generationen pro Monat, hohe Priorität, nicht kommerzielle Nutzung.
• Standard ($29,99/Monat): 150 Generierungen pro Monat, Hohe Priorität, Wasserzeichen entfernen.
• Plus ($64.99/Monat): 310 Generationen pro Monat, hohe Priorität, nicht kommerzielle Nutzung.
• Pro (99,99/Monat): 480 Generierungen pro Monat, Hohe Priorität, Wasserzeichen entfernen.
• Premier (499,99/Monat): 2430 Generierungen pro Monat, Hohe Priorität, Wasserzeichen entfernen.

What is InVideo?

InVideo is a powerful online video editor.

It’s perfect for creating all sorts of videos – from sozialen Medien posts to marketing content and even YouTube videos.

They have cool KI-Tools that make video creation a breeze.

And guess what? You don’t need any fancy editing skills to use it!

Entdecken Sie auch unsere beliebtesten InVideo alternatives…

Ich beneide

8.0

Ready to boost your email outreach? Don’t let another email get lost in spam. Try Instantly AI today and see the results for yourself.

Try Invideo For FREE Gesamte Rezension lesen

Hauptvorteile

Here’s what makes InVideo a solid choice for video creators:

• Massive template library: Over 5,000 templates for any video.
• iStock media library: Access millions of stock images and videos.
• Intuitive video editor: Easy to learn, even for beginners.
• Werkzeuge für die Zusammenarbeit: Work on videos with your team in real time.
• Brand presets: Keep your videos consistent with your brand.

Preise

InVideo has a free plan with limited features. Want more? They’ve got you covered:

• Free : Basic features and limited video creation.
• Plus ($25/month): Access to premium templates and features.
• Max ($60/month): Unlimited video creation and premium support.

Funktionsvergleich

Now, let’s get down to Geschäft!

We’ll compare Luma and InVideo head-to-head across key features to see which KI-Video Generator an der Spitze steht.

1. Benutzerfreundlichkeit

Both Luma and InVideo are designed with user-friendliness in mind.

Even if you’ve never used an KI-Video generator before, you’ll find them easy to navigate.

Luma’s interface is super intuitive, making it a great choice for beginners.

InVideo, while slightly more complex, offers a more extensive range of features for those who want to create videos with more advanced customization.

2. AI Capabilities

Luma’s AI video generation features are truly impressive.

Its Luma AI excels at generating scripts and converting Text to video, making it a dream machine for content creators who want to repurpose their written work.

InVideo, on the other hand, focuses on AI human presenters and voice-over generation, which is perfect for creating engaging marketing and explainer videos.

3. Schablonen

Both platforms offer a massive library of pre-made templates to get you started quickly.

Luma’s templates are sleek and modern, while InVideo prefer a longer variety of styles to choose from.

4. Anpassungsoptionen

While both platforms allow you to customize the videos you create, InVideo provides more flexibility.

You can fine-tune every element of your video, from text & images to animations & transitions.

Luma, while offering some customization, focuses more on speed and simplicity.

5. Video Generation Speed

Luma takes the crown when it comes to video generation speed.

Its streamlined process allows you to create videos in minutes.

InVideo, with its more advanced features, can take a bit longer to generate videos, especially if you’re using complex animations or effects.

6. Free Version

Both Luma and InVideo offer a free version to test out their features.

Luma’s free trial gives you a taste of their premium features, while InVideo’s free plan offers basic video editing with limited templates and branding.

Worauf ist bei der Auswahl eines AI-Video-Generators zu achten?

• Ihr Budget: Free plans are great for experimenting, but paid plans usually offer more features and remove branding.
• Ihr Qualifikationsniveau: Some tools are more intuitive than others. Choose a software that matches your comfort level with video editing.
• Your Video Needs: Do you need to make marketing videos, explainer videos or social media content? Different tools excel in different areas.
• KI-Funktionen: Consider which AI features are most important to you, such as scriptwriting, voice-over generation, or text-to-video conversion.
• Anpassungsoptionen: How much control do you need over the final product? Some tools offer more customization than others.
• Qualität der Ausgabe: Pay attention to the video resolution and rendering options.
• Kunden Unterstützung: If you’re new to AI video generation, good customer support can be invaluable.

Endgültiges Urteil

Choosing between Luma and InVideo depends on your priorities.

If you value speed, ease of use, and AI-powered scriptwriting, Luma is the way to go.

However, if you need more customization options, a wider range of templates, and a more budget-friendly option, InVideo takes the crown.

Remember it, the best choice depends on your individual needs and budget.

We’ve used both platforms extensively, and we’re confident that our insights will help you make the right decision. So, what are you waiting for?

Start creating amazing videos today!

Try Luma AI for FREE Gesamte Rezension lesen

Try Invideo For FREE Gesamte Rezension lesen

Mehr von Luma

• Luma gegen Landebahn: Luma zeichnet sich durch KI für Bild-zu-Video und Text-zu-Video aus, während Runway eine breitere generative KI-Suite für die Erstellung verschiedener Videos bietet.
• Luma gegen Pika: Luma ist auf die Animation von Bildern zu Videos zusammen mit Textaufforderungen spezialisiert, während Pika den Schwerpunkt auf die schnelle, qualitativ hochwertige Videoerstellung mit kreativer Kontrolle legt.
• Luma gegen Sora: Luma verwandelt Bilder und Texte in dynamische Videos; Sora ist das fortschrittliche Modell von OpenAI, das aus Texten äußerst realistische und fantasievolle Szenen erzeugt.
• Luma gegen Kling: Luma konzentriert sich auf Bild- und Text-zu-Video-Animation, während Kling ein KI-Studio für die Video- und Bilderzeugung, einschließlich der Bearbeitung, anbietet.
• Luma vs Assistive: Luma wandelt statisches Bildmaterial oder Text in Videos um; Assistive erstellt Videos aus Texteingaben oder durch Animation hochgeladener Fotos.
• Front vs BasedLabs: Luma emphasizes AI-driven image and text-to-video creation, while BasedLabs offers an AI studio for creating diverse video content from text and images.
• Luma gegen Pixverse: Luma konzentriert sich auf KI-gestützte Bild-zu-Video- und Text-zu-Video-Anwendungen; Pixverse ist eine KI-Suite zur Umwandlung von Fotos, Text und Videos in ansprechende Inhalte.
• Luma gegen Veed: Luma verwendet KI in erster Linie für Bild-/Text-zu-Video-Animationen; Veed ist ein umfassendes KI-Produktionsstudio mit Text-zu-Video, Avataren und umfangreichen Bearbeitungswerkzeugen.
• Luma vs. Canva: Luma konzentriert sich auf die Erstellung von KI-Videos aus Bildern/Texten; Canva ist eine umfassendere Grafikdesign-Plattform mit integrierter Videobearbeitung und KI-Funktionen.
• Luma gegen Fliki: Luma produziert Videos aus Bildern/Texten; Fliki wandelt Text in Videos mit lebensechten KI-Stimmen um und bietet die Umwandlung von Blogs in Videos.
• Luma gegen Eidechse: Luma erstellt mit Hilfe von KI Videos aus Bildern/Texten; Vizard ist darauf spezialisiert, mit Hilfe von KI kurze, ansprechende Clips aus längeren Videos zu extrahieren und zu optimieren.

More of InVideo

Here’s a comparison of InVideo with other video creation tools:

• InVideo vs Runway: InVideo offers a template-driven editing approach; Runway provides advanced generative AI for diverse video transformations.
• InVideo vs Pika: InVideo focuses on comprehensive online video editing, while Pika specializes in quickly generating high-quality videos from text.
• InVideo vs Sora: InVideo is a user-friendly editor for varied content; Sora emphasizes realistic and imaginative video scene generation from textual descriptions.
• InVideo vs Kling: InVideo provides a broad online editing platform, while Kling acts as a dedicated AI studio for generating professional videos and images.
• InVideo vs Assistive: InVideo is an established online editor; Assistive is an emerging platform for converting ideas into video, currently in its early stages.
• InVideo vs BasedLabs: InVideo offers extensive template-based editing; BasedLabs focuses on producing cinematic quality AI video content.
• InVideo vs Pixverse: InVideo provides robust editing and templating, while Pixverse specializes in swiftly converting photos, text, and videos into engaging content.
• InVideo vs Veed: InVideo is a general editor with AI assistance; Veed offers a complete AI production studio, including AI avatars and auto-subtitles.
• InVideo vs Canva: InVideo is a dedicated video creation tool, while Canva is a broader design platform with robust video editing capabilities.
• InVideo vs Fliki: InVideo creates videos from scripts or templates; Fliki specializes in text-to-video conversion with lifelike AI voices and blog integration.
• InVideo vs Vizard: InVideo supports diverse video production, while Vizard focuses on AI-powered extraction and optimization of short, engaging clips from longer videos.

Häufig Gestellte Fragen