Agorapulse 和 Buffer：哪款才是 2025 年最佳社交媒体日程安排工具？

优胜者

4.5

• 投资回报率
• 报告
• 人工智能写作助手
• 倡导
• Google Analytics
• 提供免费试用
• 付费计划，每月 79 美元起

Actuellement, Remaker AI se concentre davantage sur les photos que sur les vidéos. Il ne dispose pas encore d'une forte

亚军

3.5

• Idea Generation
• Publishing
• Analyze
• 参与
• 模板
• 提供免费计划
• 付费计划，每月 5 美元起

Actuellement, Remaker AI se concentre davantage sur les photos que sur les vidéos. Il ne dispose pas encore d'une forte

你在忙什么呢？ La machine and wishing there was an easier way?

Posting on different sites like Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter) can take up a lot of time, right?

What if there were tools to help you plan and post everything in one place?

Agorapulse vs Buffer are two popular options that promise to do just that.

让我们开始吧！

概述

We’ve spent time exploring both Agorapulse and Buffer.

Getting a feel for how they work day-to-day.

Our hands-on testing involved scheduling posts, engaging with audiences, and analyzing results to compare their strengths and weaknesses clearly.

4.5满分 5 分

想简化你的社交媒体生活吗？不妨试试 Agorapulse 的免费试用版，看看它如何帮你节省时间并提升效果！

定价： 您可以免费试用。付费计划起价为每月 79 美元。

主要特点：

• 直觉社交 收件箱
• 强大的出版日历
• 深度报道

免费试用 Agorapulse 阅读完整评论

3.5满分 5 分

Ready to save time on social media? Buffer can help you reclaim up to 6 hours per week. Check out for 14 days free trial

定价： It has a free plan. Paid plan starts at $5/month

主要特点：

• Intuitive Scheduling
• 参与工具
• 分析与报告

Try Buffer for FREE 阅读完整评论

什么是Agorapulse？

Okay, so what’s the deal with Agorapulse?

Think of it as a super-organized hub for all your La machine stuff.

It helps you manage posts, view comments, and check the performance of your content, all in one place.

此外，探索我们最喜欢的 Agorapulse替代品…

我们的观点

对于重视社区管理和参与的企业来说，Agorapulse 是一个绝佳的选择。它易于使用、价格实惠，并提供卓越的客户支持。

免费试用 Agorapulse 阅读完整评论 Agorapulse替代品

主要优点

• 特征： Agorapulse 提供调度、发布、分析、社交聆听和强大的收件箱，用于管理跨多个社交网络的对话。
• 支持的社交网络： 它与 Facebook、Twitter、Instagram、LinkedIn 和 YouTube.
• 易于使用： 界面简洁直观，即使您是社交媒体管理新手，也能轻松上手。
• 客户支持： Agorapulse 以其出色的客户支持而闻名，提供电子邮件和实时聊天等选项。
• 集成： 它与一些关键工具相连，例如 Slack， Puede proporcionar información inexacta.和 Google Drive。
• Se você precisa gerenciar diversas plataformas de mídia social além das principais, o Buffer pode ser uma escolha melhor. Agorapulse 为各种规模的企业提供计划，从小型团队到大型机构。

定价

• Cette fonctionnalité vous permet de supprimer ou de remplacer les objets indésirables des images. Remaker AI est une plateforme tout-en-un pour la création de contenu visuel, tandis que Picsart est une application mobile populaire pour l'édition d'images et de vidéos avec un générateur d'IA.
• 专业的： 每月 119 美元
• Cela permet de nettoyer facilement les photos et de se débarrasser de l'encombrement. 每月 149 美元
• 风俗： 定制定价

免费试用 Agorapulse

Você pode ter mais de um espaço de trabalho.

• 用户友好的界面。
• 非常适合社区管理和参与。
• 直观的界面。
• 管理一切社交事务。
• 深入的报道。
• 一个收件箱，满足所有人的需求。

缺点

• 功能不如其他一些工具那么多。
• 有限的整合。
• 对于大型团队来说，成本很高。
• 学习曲线陡峭。

免费试用 Agorapulse

What is Buffer?

So, what about Buffer?

It’s another tool that’s really good for scheduling your social media posts.

It’s known for being easy to use and helps you plan your content ahead of time.

Think of it as a straightforward way to keep your social media active without posting everything in the moment.

此外，探索我们最喜欢的 缓冲区替代品…

我们的观点

告别社交媒体的烦恼！Buffer 直观的平台和经济实惠的套餐，让您轻松安排和管理内容。见证它带来的改变！

免费试用缓冲液 阅读完整评论 缓冲替代品

主要优点

• 管理最多 300 个社交资料。
• 为代理机构提供白标选项。
• 分析参与度提高 12%。
• 将任务分配给 80 多名团队成员。
• 使用智能队列自动化内容。

定价

• 自由的： 每月 0 美元。
• 要点： 每个频道每月 5 美元
• 团队： 每个频道每月 10 美元

免费试用 Buffer

Você pode ter mais de um espaço de trabalho.

• 清潔的界頁。
• 易于导航。
• 实惠的选择。
• 可靠的调度。

缺点

• 功能有限。
• 高级功能价格昂贵。
• 没有内容建议。

免费试用 Buffer

功能比较

Agorapulse and Buffer are powerful social media management tools, but they cater to different needs.

Agorapulse is the better fit for large marketing agencies needing a comprehensive 客户关系管理 and social listening.

While Buffer account is ideal for 小型企业 owners who prioritize easy scheduling and affordability on their social media account.

1. Unified Inbox and Engagement Tools

• Agorapulse: It is a superior social media management tool in this area, offering a truly unified inbox to manage all customer interactions, including brand mentions and ad comments, making it easy for a social media manager to respond and nurture a genuine connection with the community.
• 缓冲: It’s engagement tools are more basic publishing tools, focusing primarily on replying to comments and messages on facebook pages and Instagram. It lacks the advanced features on multiple platforms, such as saved replies and labeling, that Agorapulse offers for managing high-volume customer interactions.

2. Social Listening and Monitoring

• Agorapulse: This platform includes robust social listening and social media monitoring tools, allowing users to track keywords, hashtags, & brand mentions across social media platforms and the wider web.
• 缓冲: It has very limited social listening capabilities. If monitoring brand health and competitor activity is a key part of your social media strategy, Buffer will require additional channels or a separate, third party integrations to fill this gap.

3. Analytics and Social Media ROI

• Agorapulse: It provides more comprehensive analytics and detailed reports. It helps and assist you to track your social media performance and is one of the few platforms that actively helps you measure social media roi, making it excellent for data-driven social media marketing and marketing agencies.
• 缓冲: However, the buffer review shows that its analytics are less in-depth and customizable compared to Agorapulse, especially when tracking social media roi. The Buffer Analyze allows you to monitor social media performance, track clicks, and create custom reports.

4. Publishing and Scheduling

• Agorapulse: It offers a visual publishing calendar, queue management, and the ability to schedule posts to multiple social media platforms, including YouTube channels, facebook groups, and linkedin company pages.
• 缓冲: The social media scheduling tools is highly reliable and buffer offers a straightforward process for publishing. Buffer Publish is renowned for its simplicity, featuring an easy-to-use content queue to schedule posts to multiple social media accounts.

5. Supported Social Accounts

• Agorapulse: It supports all major social media accounts, including facebook pages, linkedin company pages, facebook groups, and youtube channels. You pay per social account, and the cost scales based on the number of accounts you connect.
• 缓冲: Its free plan allows you to connect up to three channels. Paid plans allow you to connect more social media accounts but you pay per social account added. Buffer also offers unique features like the ability to add custom video thumbnails.

6. Team Collaboration and User Limits

• Agorapulse: It has a strong focus on team features, offering advanced team collaboration features such as approval workflows, user roles, and task assignment, which is essential for marketing agencies.
• 缓冲: It’s collaboration tools are simpler. Its higher-tier team plans are popular because buffer offers unlimited users on some plans, making it a very cost effective solution for a team where many members need to schedule content.

7. Pricing and Free Plan

• Agorapulse: It offers a free plan, but with limited functionality and a cap on the number of scheduled posts. Its paid tiers are generally priced higher than Buffer’s, but include more advanced features as standard.
• 缓冲: It offers a straightforward pricing model based on a monthly or annual basis, making it highly transparent for a small 商业. Buffer’s free plan is more generous, allowing you to connect up to three channels and publish a higher number of posts.

8. Customization and Unique Features

• Agorapulse: The platform offers a range of unique features like a built-in 客户关系管理 and the ability to track the performance of facebook groups, a great social media scheduling tool that’s often missed in other social media management tools.
• 缓冲: It’s unique features include the Buffer Publish extension, which allows you to schedule posts from any website, and a Start Page (link in bio tool). The buffer review consistently praises its simplicity and user-friendly design.

9.客户支持

• Agorapulse: It is consistently praised for its fast and personalized support team. Its commitment to customer service is a key factor cited in many social media manager reviews.
• 缓冲: The advanced Buffer support is available 24/7, but is primarily through email or social media. While generally good, the response time may not be as fast or guaranteed as the dedicated assistance offered by Agorapulse.

What Should You Look For When Choosing a Social Media Scheduler?

• Think about the number of social media platforms you use.
• Consider if you need advanced features like 自动化 in their social media tools.
• Evaluate if team collaboration is important for your workflow.
• Check if the tool integrates with other marketing tools you use.
• Read reviews about the platform’s reliability.
• See if they offer a free trial to test the features yourself.

最终裁决

Okay, so we looked at Buffer vs Agorapulse. 

Both help with social media.

If it’s just you, and you want to plan posts easily,  Buffer could work. It’s not too tricky and doesn’t cost much.

But if you have a team or lots of social media (more than 10), Agorapulse has cooler stuff.

The social inbox helps a lot. The reports tell you more, too, than Bufferr. 

For teams and growing brands, Agorapulse gives you more for your money.

We tried both, so we know what we’re talking about.

免费试用 Agorapulse 阅读完整评论 Agorapulse替代品

免费试用缓冲液 阅读完整评论 缓冲替代品

更多关于Agorapulse的信息

• Agorapulse 与 Sprout Social 的比较: Agorapulse——直观易用的收件箱，通常对小型企业来说价格更低。Sprout——高级分析和监听功能。
• Agorapulse 与 Metricool 的比较: Agorapulse——强大的收件箱和团队工具。Metricool——清晰的分析功能和竞争对手分析。
• Agorapulse 与 Socialpilot: Agorapulse——强大的互动和倾听功能。Socialpilot——经济实惠的日程安排平台。
• Agorapulse 与 Sendible 的对比: Agorapulse——高效的收件箱，清晰的报告。Sendible——强大的监听功能，可定制的报告。
• Agorapulse 与内容工作室: Agorapulse——简化收件箱，提升用户互动。Content Studio——内容发现，人工智能。
• Agorapulse 对比 Heropost: Agorapulse——强大的用户互动和倾听能力。Heropost——人工智能内容和竞争对手情报。
• Agorapulse 与 Zoho Social 对比: Agorapulse – 功能强大的收件箱和监听系统。Zoho Social – 经济实惠（Zoho 用户适用）。
• Agorapulse 与 Buffer 的比较: Agorapulse – 功能更丰富（收件箱、收听）。Buffer – 日程安排更简单。
• Agorapulse 与 Sprinklr: Agorapulse——功能强大的全能型解决方案（适用于中小型企业）。Sprinklr——企业级解决方案。
• 广场脉冲与后期: Agorapulse——更广泛的平台支持，注重用户互动。Later——视觉内容（Instagram）。
• Agorapulse 对比 Loomly: Agorapulse——高效收件箱，提升用户参与度。Loomly——内容日历，促进团队协作。
• Agorapulse 对阵 Blaze: Agorapulse 的收件箱/互动率是其关键优势。

More of Buffer

• Buffer vs Sprout Social: It is a comprehensive platform with advanced social CRM and detailed analytics and reporting.
• 缓冲区与 Metricool: Buffer – easy scheduling. Metricool – stronger analytics, competitor info.
• Buffer vs Socialpilot: Buffer – basic scheduling. 社会飞行员 – more features for the price.
• Buffer 与 Sendible: Buffer – simple, clean design. 可发送 – wider features (listening, analytics).
• Buffer 与 Content Studio: Buffer – simple scheduling. 内容工作室 - 内容发现、人工智能
• Buffer 与 Heropost: Buffer – straightforward scheduling. 英雄邮报 – AI content, competitor intel.
• 缓冲器 vs Agorapulse: Buffer – simple scheduling. Agorapulse – unified inbox, listening.
• 缓冲 vs Zoho Social: Buffer offers simple scheduling. Zoho 社交 offers more features and is cost-effective (Zoho).
• Buffer vs Sprinklr: Buffer – basic scheduling (small biz). 洒水器 - 企业级。
• 缓冲区 vs 稍后: Buffer – scheduling for many platforms. 之后 - 视觉内容（Instagram）。
• Buffer vs Loomly: Buffer – simple scheduling calendar. 洛姆利 – content calendar, teamwork.
• Buffer vs Blaze: (Info limited – Buffer’s strength is simplicity for scheduling).
• Buffer 与 Hootsuite: It is a long-standing tool known for its comprehensive, multi-platform dashboard view.
• Buffer vs Planable: It is a collaboration-first tool with a focus on visual content approval and client feedback.

常见问题