Pika vs Sora: AI Video Generator Comparison in 2025?

Creating marketing videos can be a real pain. It would be best if you had something quick, easy, and professional.

That’s where AI 비디오 생성기 come in! Two of the biggest names right now are Pika and 소라, and they both do amazing things.

But which one is right for 너?

In this post, we’ll break down the key differences between Pika vs 소라.

Looking at their features, ease of use, and pricing.

By the end, you’ll know exactly which tool is the best fit for your video needs. Let’s dive in!

개요

To give you the most accurate comparison, we’ve spent weeks testing both Pika and Sora, creating a variety of videos with each.

We’ve explored their features, pushed their limits, and evaluated their overall performance.

This hands-on experience allows us to provide you with real-world insights & help you make an informed decision.

Experience the future of video creation with Pika Labs! Explore their free plan or unlock advanced features with their affordable plan.

8.510점 만점에

가격: It has a free plan. The premium plan starts at $10/month.

주요 특징:

• 텍스트-비디오
• 이미지-비디오
• AI 아바타 generation

Pika를 무료로 사용해 보세요 전체 리뷰 읽기

Want to be at the forefront of AI 비디오 generation? Join the waitlist for Sora AI and experience the next generation of creative tools.

910점 만점에

가격: Currently in closed beta; pricing has not been released yet.

주요 특징:

• Realistic animation
• Complex scene generation
• Extended video length capabilities

Try sora for free 전체 리뷰 읽기

What is Pika?

Ever wished you could just 말하다 컴퓨터로 어떤 종류의 비디오를 만들고 싶은지, 그리고 컴퓨터가 그걸 만들어 줄 수 있는지 알고 싶으신가요?

That’s basically what Pika does! You give it some 텍스트 or an image, and it uses AI to create a cool video.

It’s super easy to use and can make some pretty impressive stuff.

Think of quick 소셜 미디어 content, eye-catching visuals, or even presentations with a bit of flair.

또한 우리가 가장 좋아하는 것을 탐색하세요 피카 대안…

긴

8.5

Experience the future of video creation with Pika Labs! Explore their free plan or unlock advanced features with their affordable paid options.

Pika를 무료로 사용해 보세요 전체 리뷰 읽기

주요 이점

• 속도: Generate videos in as little as 3 minutes.
• 사용자 정의: There are tons of templates and styles to choose from.
• AI 아바타: Create unique AI characters for your videos.
• 사용 편의성: Simple interface, no technical skills required.

가격

• 무료: 150 monthly video credits, Access to Pika 1.5
• 기준: $10/month for 700 monthly video credits, Access to Pika 1.5 and 1.0
• 찬성: $35/month for 2000 monthly video credits, Access to Pika 1.5 and 1.0
• 제한 없는: $95/month for Unlimited monthly video calls, Access to Pika 1.5 and 1.0

What is Sora?

Imagine creating videos that look like they came from a Hollywood studio, but without the Hollywood budget!

That’s what Sora aims to do. It uses some seriously advanced AI to generate incredibly realistic and detailed videos.

We’re talking stunning visuals, complex scenes, and smooth animation.

It’s still in its early stages, but Sora has the potential to revolutionize how we make videos.

또한 우리가 가장 좋아하는 것을 탐색하세요 Sora alternatives…

소라

9.0

Forget cameras and editing! Sora turns your words into videos. Check out now to see what it can do.

Try sora for free 전체 리뷰 읽기

주요 이점

• Unmatched realism: Generates incredibly lifelike videos.
• Creative freedom: Produce complex scenes with multiple characters and objects.
• Longer video length: Create videos that are up to a minute long (and potentially longer in the future).
• High-quality output: Render videos in resolutions up to 4K.

가격

• Currently in Closed Beta: Sora AI is not yet publicly available. Pricing details have not been released.

기능 비교

Let’s get down to the nitty-gritty and compare the core features of Pika and Sora.

While both are AI 비디오 생성기, they have distinct strengths and weaknesses.

This head-to-head comparison will help you see which of these video tools aligns best with your video creation needs.

1. Video Quality and Style

• Pika: Produces stylized videos that often have a cartoonish or illustrative feel. This can be a great option for creating engaging social media content or explainer videos. The video generated may not be as realistic as other video tools.
• Sora: Generates incredibly realistic videos with impressive detail and lifelike animation. OpenAI’s Sora output is closer to what you’d expect from traditional CGI animation. The video generated is often indistinguishable from real-world footage.

2. Video Length

• Pika: Currently limited to shorter videos, typically under a minute. This might be a limitation if you need to create longer-form content.
• Sora: It Can generate videos up to a minute long, with the potential for longer durations in the future. If you need to create more extended video content, Sora vs Pika is the clear winner in this category.

3. Customization Options

• Pika: Offers a good range of customization options, including templates, styles, and the ability to generate AI avatars. You can tweak the video generated to a certain extent.
• Sora: Provides more fine-grained control over elements like camera angles, lighting, and character movements. This gives you greater creative freedom to achieve your desired vision with the video generated.

4. 사용 편의성

• Pika: Designed with user-friendliness in mind. Its simple interface makes it so easy to generate videos, even with limited technical experience. You can quickly create a video generated from a text prompt.
• Sora: Has a steeper learning curve due to its more advanced features and controls. However, the results can be worth then the extra effort when you see the video generated.

5. Text Prompts

• Pika: Excels at generating videos from text prompts. Describe what you want to see, and Pika will bring it to life. The video generated closely matches the generated text.
• 소라 Also supports text prompts, but its true strength lies in its ability to make complex scenes with detailed descriptions. You have more control over the video generated beyond the initial text prompt.

6. Consistency and Stability

• Pika: Can sometimes produce inconsistent results, especially with complex prompts. It would help if you experimented with different prompts or adjust the first frame to achieve the desired outcome for the video generated.
• Sora: Generally produces more stable and predictable results, although it’s still under development and can have occasional glitches. The video generated is usually stable.

7. Editing and Iteration

• Pika: Offers basic editing tools to refine your videos after they’re generated. You can make minor adjustments to the video generated.
• Sora: Provides more advanced editing capabilities, allowing for greater control over the final product. You can refine camera angles, adjust lighting, and make other modifications to perfect the video you generate.

AI 비디오 생성기를 선택할 때 고려해야 할 사항은 무엇입니까?

• Consider your budget: Pika offers more affordable pricing plans, while Sora’s pricing still needs to be discovered.
• Think about your video needs: Do you need short, stylized videos or longer, realistic ones?
• Factor in your technical skills: Pika is easier to use, while Sora has a steeper learning curve.
• Evaluate the level of creative control you need: Sora offers more advanced customization options.
• Check for ongoing development and updates: Both Pika and Sora are constantly evolving, so stay informed about new features and improvements.
• Consider the specific use case: Will you be creating videos for social marketing, media, education, or another purpose?
• Read user reviews and compare outputs: See what other users are saying and look at examples of videos generated by each tool.
• Experiment with free trials or demos: Get hands-on experience with both Pika and Sora to see which one you prefer.

최종 판결

For most people, we recommend starting with Pika. It’s easy to use, affordable and makes great videos.

Sora is awesome, but it may be too complicated (and expensive!) for beginners.

Remember, both generative AI 도구 are still learning and improving. What works best today might change tomorrow!

Keep experimenting with different text prompts and settings in both Pika and Sora to see what awesome results you can achieve.

Feel free to combine them with other tools to really unleash your creativity.

We’ve tested these tools extensively, pushing their limits and comparing their results with the same prompt.

We’ve also dug deep into their features, training data, and updates to give you the most accurate information.

Pika를 무료로 사용해 보세요 전체 리뷰 읽기

Try sora for free 전체 리뷰 읽기

More of Pika

• 피카 vs 런웨이: Pika offers quick, user-friendly AI video generation, while Runway provides a comprehensive suite with more advanced features and creative control.
• 긴 vs. 짧은: Pika specializes in generating short clips from text/images, while Luma excels at creating realistic 3D environments from existing video footage.
• Pika vs Kling: Pika prioritizes fast text-to-video generation, whereas Kling distinguishes itself by integrating AI avatars and offering more robust editing capabilities.
• 피카 vs 어시스트: Pika offers a simpler, more budget-friendly entry into AI video, contrasting with Assistive’s advanced features like AI scriptwriting and voice cloning.
• Pika vs BasedLabs: Pika is a general AI video generator, while BasedLabs focuses on generating professional video content from prompts, emphasizing cinematic production.
• 피카 vs 픽스버스: Pika excels in speed and anime/2.5D styles, whereas Pixverse focuses on balanced model performance across various scenarios, including motion consistency.
• Pika vs InVideo: Pika concentrates on generating short, dynamic video clips from text, while InVideo is a broader editor that uses AI for templates and smart suggestions.
• Pika vs Veed: Pika excels at AI-powered script generation and rapid video creation, while Veed offers a more extensive template library and versatile editing tools.
• 피카 대 캔바: Pika is designed for AI video generation from prompts, contrasting with Canva’s broader graphic design capabilities that include video editing.
• 피카 vs 플리키: Pika excels at concise, engaging videos and AI avatars, whereas Fliki is optimized for converting text, articles, or scripts into longer videos with AI voices.
• 피카 vs 마법사: Pika generates videos from text/images, while Vizard primarily focuses on using AI to extract and optimize short, engaging clips from longer video content.

More of Sora

Here’s a brief comparison of Sora with alternative video generation software:

• Sora vs Runway: Sora generates highly realistic scenes from text, while Runway offers a broader creative suite with diverse AI 비디오 generation tools.
• Sora vs Luma: Sora generates new, realistic videos from text; Luma often animates existing images into dynamic, usually 3D visuals.
• Sora vs Kling: Sora prioritizes realistic, consistent video; Kling specializes in short-form content with strong motion performance, often for social media.
• Sora vs Assistive: Sora creates original videos from text prompts, while Assistive helps streamline video production with scriptwriting and voiceovers for existing media.
• Sora vs BasedLabs: Sora delivers highly realistic, complex videos, while BasedLabs focuses on stylized AI video generation with unique artistic filters.
• Sora vs Pixverse: Sora generates realistic video from text, while Pixverse turns multi-modal inputs into artistic, engaging videos.
• Sora vs InVideo: Sora creates highly realistic videos from text; InVideo is a versatile editor with AI 도구 that convert scripts into videos using templates.
• Sora vs Veed: Sora excels at AI-powered video generation from text, while Veed provides comprehensive video editing features with some AI enhancements.
• Sora vs Canva: Sora generates original videos from text, while Canva is a versatile design platform with basic video editing capabilities using templates.
• Sora vs Fliki: Sora focuses on visual realism, while Fliki excels at turning text into video with realistic AI voices and avatars, and less on visual photorealism.
• Sora vs Vizard: Sora creates new videos from text, while Vizard specializes in repurposing long-form video into short, engaging clips for social media.

자주 묻는 질문