Ever feel like time slips through your fingers?
Managing projects and knowing where your work hours go can be tough, right?
Especially when you’re juggling multiple tasks.
You need a simple way to track your time, but which tool is best?
In this Clockify vs Harvest showdown, we’ll break down these two popular time-tracking tools.
概要
We’ve put Clockify and Harvest through their paces, exploring their features, interface, and overall user experience.
Our hands-on testing involved tracking time on various projects, generating reports, and exploring integrations to clearly compare these two time-tracking titans.
Looking for a free and easy way to track your time? Clockify boasts over 10 million users.
価格: 14-day free plan. Paid plan starts at $5.49/month
主な特徴:
- Unlimited Users
- Project Tracking
- 統合
What is Clockify?
Now, let’s switch gears and talk about Clockify.
Clockify is known for being a free and simple time-tracking solution.
It’s a great option if you’re starting out or don’t need many bells and whistles.
It’s very user-friendly and easy to get the hang of.
Looking for a free and easy way to track your time? Clockify boasts over 10 million users and offers a generous free plan.
主なメリット
Clockify’s strengths lie in its simplicity and generous free plan. Here’s what we love:
- Unlimited users: Invite your entire team, no matter how large!
- Unlimited projects: Track time for all your projects, big or small.
- Cross-platform compatibility: Use it on the web, desktop, or mobile.
- Kiosk app: Perfect for teams who need to clock in and out from a shared device.
価格
Standard: $5.49/month
Pro: 月額7.99ドル
企業： 月額11.99ドル
Cake.com bundle: $12.99
長所
短所
What is Harvest?
Now, let’s switch gears and talk about Harvest.
It’s another popular time-tracking tool known for its clean interface and focus on simplicity.
Harvest is all about making time tracking effortless.
It’s designed to be user-friendly and integrates well with other tools.
また、 収穫の代替手段…
Ready to stop losing track of time and money? Millions of people use Harvest to simplify their work and get paid faster.
主なメリット
- Effortless Time Tracking: Harvest makes logging your time a breeze. Its intuitive interface allows for quick and accurate time entries.
- Seamless Invoicing: Harvest simplifies the billing process. You can easily generate invoices based on tracked time.
- Powerful Integrations: Harvest plays nicely with other apps. Connect it to your project management, 会計, and communication tools.
価格
Harvest offers straightforward pricing plans.
- Free: $0 per user per month.
- Pro: $11 per user per month.
- プレミアム: $14 per user per month.
長所
短所
機能比較
Let’s dive into a head-to-head comparison of Harvest and Clockify‘s features, seeing how they stack up in key areas of time-tracking software.
1. Timer
両方 Harvest and Clockify offer simple timer functionality.
Click to start, click to stop.
クロックファイ leans towards a minimalist approach, while 収穫 integrates the timer more deeply within its project management features.
2. Timesheet
Timesheets are central to both platforms.
収穫 provides a clean, calendar-like view, making it easy to see where your time is spent.
クロックファイ‘s timesheet view is also straightforward, focusing on daily and weekly summaries.
3. Time and Expenses
Beyond just time, 収穫 excels at time and expense tracking.
You can easily log expenses related to projects, which integrates nicely with invoicing.
クロックファイ primarily focuses on time-tracking software, with expense tracking being less prominent.
4. Timesheets Approval
For managing team member hours, both platforms offer timesheet approval workflows.
収穫 allows for more granular control over approvals, while クロックファイ provides a simpler, streamlined approach.
5. Project and Task Management
収穫 shines in project and task 管理。
あなたはできる assign tasks to team members and track progress.
クロックファイ also offers project management, but it’s less robust than 収穫.
6. Reporting
Harvest and Clockify offer detailed reports on billable hours and time spent across projects.
収穫 provides more visually appealing and customizable reports.
クロックファイ‘s reports are functional and informative.
7. Integrations & Desktop App
Both platforms have a desktop app for easy time tracking.
収穫 boasts a wider range of integrations with other business tools.
クロックファイ is quickly catching up and has many integrations of its own.
両方 Harvest and Clockify let you track manual time, too.
What to Look for When Choosing a Time Tracker?
- Ease of Use: Is the interface intuitive? Can your team easily adopt it?
- スケーラビリティ: Will the time-tracking solution grow with your business?
- Mobile App: Does it offer a robust mobile experience for on-the-go tracking?
- カスタマーサポート: Is their support responsive and helpful?
- カスタマイズ: Can you tailor the tool to your specific workflows?
- 無料トライアル: Does it offer a free trial to test before you commit?
- 予算： Does the pricing align with your budget and offer good value?
- Integrations: Does it integrate with your existing software stack?
- 安全： は time clock software prioritize data security and privacy?
最終評決
Choosing between Clockify and Harvest depends on your specific needs.
If robust project management and expense tracking are crucial, 収穫 is the stronger choice.
However, for teams prioritizing simplicity and a completely free solution, クロックファイ is a fantastic option.
Our testing revealed クロックファイ‘s ease of use and generous free plan make it ideal for smaller teams or フリーランサー on a budget.
Ultimately, both are excellent time tracking software options, and by understanding your priorities, you can choose the tool that best fits your workflow.
We’ve used both extensively, and this breakdown reflects our real-world experience.
More of Clockify
Here’s a quick look at how Clockify stacks up:
- Clockify vs clockit: Assuming you meant Clockify, it’s a popular free option.
- Clockify vs Time Doctor: Clockify is simpler, Time Doctor has more monitoring.
- Clockify vs toggl: Both are easy, Toggl can have more integrations.
- Clockify vs Memtime: Clockify needs you to start/stop, Memtime tries to do it for you.
- Clockify vs TrackingTime: Clockify is basic tracking, TrackingTime has more project tools.
- Clockify vs Timeular: Clockify is software, Timeular uses a physical tracker.
More of Harvest
Let’s see how Harvest stacks up against these other time-tracking tools:
- Harvest vs Time Doctor: Harvest focuses on time tracking for invoicing and project costing. タイムドクター often includes more features for productivity monitoring, like app tracking and screenshots.
- Harvest vs Clockit: You likely mean Clockify. Harvest has built-in invoicing, unlike the simpler time-tracking focus of Clockify.
- Harvest vs Toggl: Harvest is designed with invoicing and project budgeting in mind alongside time tracking. トグル is known for its ease of use in just tracking time for productivity.
- Harvest vs TrackingTime: Harvest focuses on billing and project profitability with its time tracking. 追跡時間 emphasizes team and project management features alongside time tracking.
- Harvest vs Memtime: Harvest requires manual or timer-based time entry for billing. メムタイム attempts to automate time tracking based on your computer activity.
- Harvest vs Timeular: Harvest is software-based with a focus on billing. タイムラー uses a physical device for individual time tracking.
よくある質問
Is Clockify completely free?
Yes, Clockify offers a generous free plan that includes unlimited users and projects. Paid plans are available for additional features like advanced reporting and team management.
Does Harvest track expenses?
Yes, Harvest excels at expense tracking. You can easily log expenses, categorize them, and even link them to specific projects for accurate billing.
Which platform is easier to use?
Both platforms are user-friendly, but Clockify’s interface is generally considered simpler and more intuitive, especially for basic time tracking.
Can I integrate Clockify/Harvest with other tools?
Yes, both platforms offer integrations. Harvest boasts a wider range, while Clockify continually expands its integrations with popular apps.
Which platform is better for large teams?
Both can handle large teams. However, Harvest’s robust project management and reporting features may make it a slightly better fit for complex team structures.
English 
Chinese 
French 
German 
Japanese 
Korean 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Spanish