Pika vs Fliki: Ultimate AI Video Comparison in 2025?

Creating videos used to be a long and complicated process. But now, thanks to AI, things are much simpler.

They both let you make high-quality videos quickly using the power of artificial intelligence.

But which one comes out on top?

In this head-to-head face-off, we’ll dive deep into Pika vs Fliki.

We’ll explore their features, ease of use, pricing, and more. By the end, you’ll know exactly which Vidéo IA generator is the perfect fit for your needs.

C'est parti !

Aperçu

To give you the most accurate comparison, we’ve spent weeks testing both Pika and Fliki.

We’ve explored their features, created videos with each platform, and compared their ease of use, pricing, and overall value.

Voyons maintenant comment ils se comparent !

Experience the future of video creation with Pika Labs! Explore their free plan or unlock advanced features with their affordable plan.

9sur 10

Tarifs : Il existe un plan gratuit. Le plan premium commence à $10/mois.

Caractéristiques principales :

• Texte en vidéo
• AI Avatars,
• Clonage de voix

Essayez Pika GRATUITEMENT Lire la critique complète

Want to create engaging videos with ease? Fliki offers a free plan with 5 minutes of video creation per month – enough to make a short video.

8sur 10

Tarifs : L'abonnement est gratuit. L'abonnement premium démarre à 21 $/mois.

Caractéristiques principales :

• AI Voiceovers
• Stock Media Library
• Article-to-Video Conversion

Essayez Fliki GRATUITEMENT Lire la critique complète

What is Pika?

Ever wished you could think a video into existence? Pika gets pretty close!

C'est un Vidéo IA generator that makes creating high-quality videos incredibly easy.

You give it text, images, or even music, and it does the rest. It’s like magic, but it’s real.

Découvrez également nos favoris Alternatives à Pika…

Long

9.0

Experience the future of video creation with Pika Labs! Explore their free plan or unlock advanced features with their affordable paid options.

Essayez Pika GRATUITEMENT Lire la critique complète

Principaux avantages

• Vitesse: Generate videos in as little as 3 minutes.
• Customization: Choose from 15+ video styles et 100+ languages.
• AI Avatars: Caractéristiques 40+ realistic AI avatars for diverse representation.

Tarifs

Pika offers a free trial to get you started. Paid plans start at 10 $ par mois. Here’s what you get:

• Gratuit: 150 monthly video credits, Access to Pika 1.5
• Standard: $10/month for 700 monthly video credits, Access to Pika 1.5 and 1.0
• Pro: $35/month for 2000 monthly video credits, Access to Pika 1.5 and 1.0
• Illimité: $95/month for Unlimited monthly video calls, Access to Pika 1.5 and 1.0

Qu'est-ce que Fliki ?

Need a quick and easy way to turn your ideas into videos? Fliki is here to help!

This AI video creation tool is all about simplicity. It lets you create videos from scripts, blog posts, and even audio.

Perfect for réseaux sociaux content, explainer videos, and more.

Découvrez également nos favoris Alternatives à Fliki…

Fliki AI

8.0

Explorez la vidéo IA avec Fliki ! Découvrez comme il est facile de créer des vidéos avec des voix réalistes dans plus de 75 langues. Fliki propose un abonnement gratuit généreux pour vous aider à démarrer.

Essayez Fliki GRATUITEMENT Lire la critique complète

Principaux avantages

• Versatilité: Créez des vidéos à partir d'articles, de tweets et d'audio dans Plus de 75 langues.
• Clonage de voix : Clonez votre voix ou choisissez parmi Plus de 850 voix réalistes.
• Affordable: L'une des IA les plus économiques générateurs vidéo disponible.

Tarifs

Fliki propose un abonnement gratuit avec des fonctionnalités limitées. Leurs abonnements payants commencent à seulement 21 $ par moisVoici la répartition :

• Gratuit: $0/mois - 300 voix, Générer des images AI.
• Standard: $21/mois - 1000+ voix, Générer des clips vidéo AI, Pas de filigrane.
• Prime: 66 $/mois – plus de 2 000 voix, clonage de voix, Avatar IA, Assistance prioritaire.

Comparaison des fonctionnalités

Let’s dive into the specifics and see how Pika and Fliki measure up feature-by-feature.

Both are strong contenders in the world of AI video generation, but they have distinct approaches.

1. AI Video Generation

• Pika: This AI video editor prioritizes speed and simplicity. Give it text, images, and music, and it handles the rest. Perfect for whipping up engaging videos quickly.
• Fliki: This AI video editor offers more ways to create engaging videos. Turn articles, tweets, and even audio recordings into videos—a great choice if you need to make educational videos from different content sources.

2. Free AI Video Generator

• Fliki takes the crown in this category with its free AI video générateur plan (though it has limitations).
• Pika has a free trial, allowing you to explore its advanced video generation technology.

3. Music Videos

• Pika is the better choice for creating music videos. Its AI is designed to sync visuals with your chosen tunes seamlessly.
• Fliki can create music videos, but its true strength lies in generating videos from spoken-word content, like turning a video script into a dynamic présentation.

4. YouTube Videos

• Both are excellent for creating YouTube videos! Pika is ideal for fast turnaround projects, like explainers or social media content.
• Fliki’s versatility allows you to produce a wider range of YouTube videos, including those made from articles and blog posts.

5. Advanced Video Generation Technology

• Pika has an edge when it comes to advanced video generation technology. Its AI avatars and ability to blend text, images, and music result in high-quality, realistic generated videos.

6. Video Script

• Fliki is the clear winner if you’re working with a video script. Its user-friendly interface makes it a breeze to input your script and generate a video complete with AI voices.
• Pika can handle video scripts, but it shines when generating videos from shorter text prompts and images.

7. Educational Videos

• Both are solid options for educational videos! Pika’s AI avatars can add a personal touch, making learning more engaging.
• Fliki makes it incredibly easy to repurpose existing educational materials, like articles and blog posts, into informative videos.

8. Generated Video

Fliki’s generated videos prioritize clear and concise information delivery.

The overall quality of the generated video is comparable between the two.

Pika’s output tends to have a more polished and professional feel.

What to Look For When Choosing the Right AI Video Generator?

• Tenez compte de votre budget : Pika and Fliki have different pricing structures. Fliki is more budget-friendly, while Pika offers more value on its higher-tier plans.
• Think about your video needs: What types of videos do you want to create? Pika excels at music videos and short, engaging content. Fliki is better for longer videos, educational content, and repurposing written material.
• Ease of use is key: Both platforms are user-friendly, but Pika might have a slightly gentler learning curve.
• Pay attention to video quality: Both generate high-quality videos, but Pika often produces a more polished result.
• Factor in AI voices: If you need a huge variety of voices, Fliki is the winner. If you prioritize natural-sounding voices, Pika is a strong contender.
• Remember customer support: Fliki is known for its excellent customer support. Pika’s support is good, but Fliki may offer a quicker response time.
• Check for updates and new features: Both platforms are constantly evolving. Keep an eye out for new features and updates that sway your decision.
• Try before you buy: Take advantage of Fliki’s free plan and Pika’s free trial to get a feel for each platform before committing to a paid subscription.

Verdict final

Choosing between Pika and Fliki is tough! Both are excellent AI générateurs vidéo with a lot to offer.

But for us, Pika takes the crown.

Why? It’s super easy to use. It makes high-quality videos fast. We love its AI avatars and diverse video styles.

Pika is a bit more expensive, but it’s worth it for the extra features and polished results.

Of course, the best choice for you depends on your needs and budget.

If you’re looking for a more affordable option with tons of voices, Fliki is still a fantastic choice.

We’ve spent weeks testing these platforms. We’ve made tons of videos.

We know what we’re talking about! This guide will help you find the perfect AI video générateur for your next project.

Essayez Pika GRATUITEMENT Lire la critique complète

Essayez Fliki GRATUITEMENT Lire la critique complète

More of Pika

• Pika contre Runway: Pika offers quick, user-friendly AI video generation, while Runway provides a comprehensive suite with more advanced features and creative control.
• Pika vs Sora: Pika focuses on accessible AI video creation for diverse skill levels, whereas Sora, by OpenAI, is noted for generating cinematic, high-fidelity videos often aimed at professional use.
• Long vs. Court: Pika specializes in generating short clips from text/images, while Luma excels at creating realistic 3D environments from existing video footage.
• Pika vs Kling: Pika prioritizes fast text-to-video generation, whereas Kling distinguishes itself by integrating AI avatars and offering more robust editing capabilities.
• Pika vs Assistive: Pika offers a simpler, more budget-friendly entry into AI video, contrasting with Assistive’s advanced features like AI scriptwriting and clonage de voix.
• Pika vs BasedLabs: Pika is a general AI video generator, while BasedLabs focuses on generating professional video content from prompts, emphasizing cinematic production.
• Pika contre Pixverse: Pika excels in speed and anime/2.5D styles, whereas Pixverse focuses on balanced model performance across various scenarios, including motion consistency.
• Pika vs InVideo: Pika concentrates on generating short, dynamic video clips from text, while InVideo is a broader editor that uses AI for templates and smart suggestions.
• Pika vs Veed: Pika excels at AI-powered script generation and rapid video creation, while Veed offers a more extensive template library and versatile editing tools.
• Pika contre Canva: Pika is designed for AI video generation from prompts, contrasting with Canva’s broader graphic design capabilities that include video editing.
• Pika contre sorcier: Pika generates videos from text/images, while Vizard primarily focuses on using AI to extract and optimize short, engaging clips from longer video content.

Plus de Fliki

• Fliki vs Runway: Fliki excelle dans la création de vidéos en synthèse vocale ; Runway offre des capacités vidéo d'IA générative plus étendues.
• Fliki vs Sora: Fliki se spécialise dans le script-vidéo avec voix ; Sora vise à générer des scènes très réalistes.
• Fliki vs Luma: Fliki crée des vidéos vocales à partir de textes ; Luma se concentre souvent sur la conversion d'images en vidéos et sur les environnements 3D.
• Fliki vs Kling: Fliki convertit des textes en vidéos vocales, tandis que Kling propose un studio complet de vidéo et d'images IA.
• Fliki vs Assistive: Fliki propose un texte-vidéo vocalisé par l'IA, tandis qu'Assistive transforme les idées/photos en vidéo et offre des possibilités d'édition plus avancées.
• Fliki vs BasedLabs: Fliki excelle dans les vidéos narrées à partir de textes ; BasedLabs génère des vidéos professionnelles à partir d'invites, avec des avatars d'IA forts.
• Fliki vs Pixverse: Fliki crée des vidéos vocales à partir de textes ; Pixverse crée un contenu vidéo diversifié à partir d'entrées variées, avec davantage d'options de personnalisation.
• Fliki vs InVideo: Fliki donne la priorité à la génération de vidéos par synthèse vocale ; InVideo propose un éditeur complet avec des fonctions avancées de conversion de scripts en vidéo par l'IA.
• Fliki vs Veed: Fliki met l'accent sur la conversion de texte en vidéo avec des voix IA, tandis que Veed propose un studio de production IA plus large, comprenant des avatars et de l'édition.
• Fliki vs Canva: Fliki convertit le texte en vidéos vocales ; Canva est un outil de conception plus large avec un montage vidéo de base.
• Fliki vs Vizard: Fliki génère de nouvelles vidéos à partir de textes, tandis que Vizard réutilise principalement des contenus vidéo de longue durée pour en faire des clips attrayants.

Questions fréquemment posées