Are you tired of wondering where your work hours go?

Do you struggle to bill clients accurately or manage your team’s time effectively?

You’re not alone. Many businesses and autónomos face this challenge. 

Two popular options, SeguimientoTiempo y Cosecha, often come up in the conversation.

But which is mejor para usted en 2025?

This post dives deep into a TrackingTime vs Harvest comparison, exploring their features, pricing, and overall value to help you make the smartest choice.

Visión general

We’ve tested TrackingTime and Harvest, exploring their features, ease of use, and overall performance in real-world scenarios. 

Our hands-on testing and in-depth analysis have led us to this comprehensive comparison, designed to help you choose the perfect time-tracking solution.

What is TrackingTime?

Alright, let’s talk about TrackingTime. This tool focuses on making time tracking simple and efficient.

It’s designed for individuals and teams who want a clear overview of their work hours.

Explore también nuestros TrackingTime alternatives…

Beneficios clave

• Visual Reports: Get clear, colorful charts showing how you spend your time across different projects.
• Colaboración en equipo: See what your team is working on in real time. Great for managing projects together.
• Gestión de proyectos: Create projects, assign tasks, and track progress all within TrackingTime.
• Integraciones: Connect with tools you already use, like Asana or Trello.
• Expense Tracking: Keep track of project-related expenses.

Precios

Gratis: $0
Freelancer: $8/mes
Pro: $5.75/month
Negocio: $10/month

¿Qué es la cosecha?

Now, let’s switch gears and talk about Harvest.

It’s another popular time-tracking tool known for its clean interface and focus on simplicity.

Harvest is all about making time tracking effortless.

It’s designed to be user-friendly and integrates well with other tools.

Explore también nuestros Harvest alternatives…

Beneficios clave

• Sin esfuerzo Time Tracking: Harvest makes logging your time a breeze. Its intuitive interface allows for quick and accurate time entries.
• Seamless Invoicing: Harvest simplifies the billing process. You can easily generate invoices based on tracked time.
• Powerful Integrations: Harvest plays nicely with other apps. Connect it to your project management, contabilidad, and communication tools.

Precios

Harvest offers straightforward pricing plans.

• Gratis: $0 per user per month.
• Pro: $11 per user per month.
• De primera calidad: $14 per user per month.

Comparación de funciones

Let’s compare feature-by-feature to see how TrackingTime and Harvest stack up.

We’ll examine key aspects, from basic time tracking to more advanced functionalities, to help you understand which time tracking app best suits your needs.

1. Time Tracking

Both platforms offer straightforward time tracking.

TrackingTime allows for manual entries and a timer, similar to Toggl.

Harvest focuses on a clean timer interface and project-based tracking.

Both handle facturable y non-billable hours, but their implementation differs slightly.

2. Reporting and Analytics

Harvest excels in its reporting capabilities, offering detailed insights into project progress, team performance, and hoja de horas summaries.

TrackingTime provides solid reporting, but it’s not as extensive.

If in-depth analytics are crucial, Harvest might be the better choice.

3. Project Management Integration

Both platforms integrate with popular project management tools.

Harvest’s integration with Asana is particularly strong, allowing seamless task management and time tracking.

TrackingTime also integrates with various platforms, but the depth of integration can vary.

4. Invoicing and Billing

Harvest shines when it comes to invoicing.

It lets you generate professional invoices directly from tracked time, streamlining the billing process. 

TrackingTime also offers invoicing features, but they might not be as robust as Harvest’s.

5. Gestión de equipos

Both platforms allow you to manage teams, track individual performance, and assign tasks.

Harvest provides more advanced team management features, such as setting hourly rates and managing team capacity.

6. Mobile Apps

Both TrackingTime and Harvest offer mobile apps for iOS and Android, allowing you to track time on the go.

Harvest’s mobile app is generally considered more polished and feature-rich, while TrackingTime provides core time-tracking functionalities.

7. User Interface and Experience

Both platforms are user-friendly, but their interfaces differ.

Harvest is known for its clean, intuitive design. 

TrackingTime’s interface is also straightforward, but some users might find it slightly less polished.

Ultimately, UI preference is subjective.

¿Qué hay que tener en cuenta al elegir un cronómetro?

• Tamaño del equipo: Some tools are better suited for small teams, while others are designed for larger organizations. Consider your current and future team size.
• Necesidades específicas: Do you need project management, client billing, or employee time tracking? Identify your must-have features.
• Presupuesto: Free time tracking tools are excellent for basic needs, but paid plans offer more advanced features.
• Ease of Adoption: How easily will your team adapt to the new software? If your team is less tech-savvy, a simple time-tracking app might be preferable.
• Atención al cliente: Reliable customer support can be a lifesaver when facing issues.
• Integraciones: Check regularly whether the time-tracking software integrates with your other tools. This can save you significant time and effort.
• Informar: What kind of reports do you need? Make sure the software can generate the reports that are important to your business.
• Prueba gratuita: Use free trials to test different time-tracking software before committing to a paid plan. This allows you to track employee time and get a feel for how the time clock functions.

Veredicto final

Choosing between TrackingTime and Harvest depends heavily on your specific needs.

If detailed reporting, robust invoicing, and advanced team management are paramount, Harvest is likely the better, though pricier, choice.

However, for simpler time tracking, budget-conscious users, or those needing basic project integrations.

TrackingTime offers excellent value. 

Our hands-on testing revealed Harvest’s superior reporting and invoicing, making it our overall pick for businesses prioritizing these features.

We’ve explored these platforms extensively, and our insights can guide you to the perfect time-tracking solution.

More of TrackingTime

Let’s see how TrackingTime measures up against these alternatives:

• TrackingTime vs Time Doctor: TrackingTime focuses on team and project management alongside time tracking. Doctor Tiempo often emphasizes individual productivity monitoring with features like app tracking.
• TrackingTime vs Clockify: TrackingTime offers more project and task management features in its free plan compared to Clockify’s basic time tracking.
• TrackingTime vs Clockit: You likely mean Clockify. TrackingTime has more built-in project management tools than the simpler time-tracking focus of Clockify.
• TrackingTime vs Toggl: TrackingTime includes features like task management and planning alongside time tracking, whereas Toggl is primarily known for its ease of use in just tracking time.
• TrackingTime vs Memtime: TrackingTime relies on manual or timer-based input with project context. Memtime tries to automate tracking based on your computer activity.
• TrackingTime vs Timeular: TrackingTime is software-based with a focus on team and project organization. Timeular uses a physical device for individual time tracking.

More of Harvest

Let’s see how Harvest stacks up against these other time-tracking tools:

• Harvest vs Time Doctor: Harvest focuses on time tracking for invoicing and project costing. Time Doctor often includes more features for productivity monitoring, like app tracking and screenshots^.
• Harvest vs Clockify: Harvest integrates time tracking with invoicing and expense management, making it ideal for billing. Clockify is a simpler, often free, tool mainly for tracking time.
• Harvest vs Clockit: You likely mean Clockify. Harvest has built-in invoicing, unlike the simpler time-tracking focus of Clockify.
• Harvest vs Toggl: Harvest is designed with invoicing and project budgeting in mind alongside time tracking. Toggl is known for its ease of use in just tracking time for productivity.
• Harvest vs Memtime: Harvest requires manual or timer-based time entry for billing. Memtime attempts to automate time tracking based on your computer activity.
• Harvest vs Timeular: Harvest is software-based with a focus on billing. Timeular uses a physical device for individual time tracking.

Preguntas frecuentes