Ever feel like your thoughts are a tangled mess?
Trying to organize ideas can be a real headache.
You jot things down, but they end up scattered across different apps and notebooks.
Finding what you need becomes a hunt.
Let’s dive into Capacities vs Obsidian.
We’ll compare these two powerful brainstorming tools to see which one might be your perfect match.
Descripción general
We’ve spent weeks testing both Capacities and Obsidian.
We explored their features, built knowledge bases, and pushed their limits.
This hands-on experience allows us to provide a practical comparison, not just a theoretical one.
Capacities is a rising star, with over 100,000 users discovering its unique approach.
Precios: Tiene un plan gratuito. El plan premium cuesta desde $23 al mes.
Características principales:
- Object-Based Organization
- Vista gráfica
- Content Linking
While Obsidian earns a high rank for its flexible plugin system.
Precios: It has a free plan. The premium plan starts at $4/month.
Características principales:
- Markdown-based notes.
- Extensive plugin library.
- Graph view for linked notes.
¿Qué es Capacidades?
Capacities? It’s all about connecting your ideas.
Think of it as a personal knowledge graph.
It helps you see how everything links together. It’s a fresh take on organization.
Capacities is a rising star, with over 100,000 users discovering its unique approach to knowledge management.
Beneficios clave
- Object-based structure for clear connections.
- Powerful graph view to visualize your knowledge.
- Content linking creates a network of information.
- Over 50+ content types to capture varied data.
Precios
- Básico: Primeros pasos, funciones básicas.
- Pro: $9.99/mes
- Creyente:$12.49/mes
Ventajas
Contras
What is Obsidian?
Obsidian is a powerful note-taking app. It uses Markdown.
You create a network of notes. It’s your knowledge base.
While Obsidian earns a high rank for its flexible plugin system. Ready to pick your productivity winner? Explore it now!
Beneficios clave
- Markdown power: Simple, flexible notes.
- Plugin ecosystem: 1000+ community plugins.
- Graph view: See connections visually.
- Fast searching through 1000s of notes.
- Local file storage for every note.
Precios
- Gratis: $0
- Commercial use: $50/ year
- Sincroniza: $4/month
- Publique: $8/month
- Catalyst:: $25+ (One-time payment)
Ventajas
Contras
Comparación de características
Let’s break down the key features of Obsidian and Capacities.
We’ll look at how they stack up, so you can decide which fits your needs best.
Toma de notas
Both Obsidian and Capacities excel at note-taking.
However, Obsidian focuses on plain texto markdown files, giving you full control.
Capacities, on the other hand, structure your notes around “objects” like people, projects, and ideas.
This object-based approach adds an extra layer of organization but might feel less flexible for some users.
Enlaces de retroceso
Backlinks are a core strength of both tools.
Obsidian visually shows how your notes connect.
Capacities also uses backlinks, but it integrates them with its object system, making connections more context-aware.
If you love seeing how ideas link together, you’ll appreciate both tools.
Folders and Tags
Folders are a classic way to organize files.
Obsidian relies heavily on folders and tags.
This gives users a familiar way to manage their notes.
Capacities leans more on tags and its object system, minimizing the need for complex folder structures.
If you prefer a tag-centric approach, Capacities might be your go-to.
Offline Functionality
Offline access is crucial for many users.
Both Obsidian and Capacities work offline. Obsidian stores your files locally, ensuring you can work anywhere.
Capacities also provide offline capabilities but require initial syncing.
If you need reliable offline access, both are solid choices.
Dataview Plugin
The dataview plugin is a powerful feature in Obsidian.
It lets you query and display information from your notes in dynamic tables and lists.
Capacities don’t have a direct equivalent.
If you need advanced data querying, Obsidian with the data view plugin is a strong contender.
Workflow Customization
Workflow is where these apps differ.
Obsidian is highly customizable, with a vast library of community plugins.
This lets you tailor your workflow to your exact needs.
Capacities offer a more opinionated workflow centered around its object system.
If you want maximum customization, Obsidian wins.
If you prefer a structured approach, Capacities is worth considering.
Object-Based System
Capacities uses an object-based system.
This means it treats your notes as interconnected objects, like people, projects, and resources.
This approach helps you see relationships between your notes.
Obsidian relies on a more traditional file-based system.
If you like the idea of organizing your knowledge around objects, Capacities might suit you well.
¿Qué hay que tener en cuenta al elegir una herramienta de brainstorming?
- Claridad visual: ¿Se pueden ver fácilmente las conexiones? ¿Ayuda la disposición a la comprensión?
- Flexibilidad: ¿Puedes adaptar la herramienta a tu flujo de trabajo? ¿Es compatible con varios formatos de ideas?
- Fuera de línea Capacidad: ¿Necesita trabajar sin Internet? ¿Le importa la privacidad de los datos?
- Curva de aprendizaje: ¿En cuánto tiempo se puede dominar? ¿Es sencilla la configuración inicial?
- Colaboración: ¿Es fácil compartir y trabajar juntos? ¿Son las funciones adecuadas para proyectos en equipo?
Veredicto final (nuestra elección)
So, which one wins? It depends on you!
If you love tinkering and total control, Obsidian is awesome.
You can build it just how you like it.
But, if you want a smart, organized space that connects your ideas for you, Capacities is great.
We used both a ton.
We really liked how Capacities made connections easy.
But Obsidian’s plugins are super powerful.
Pick the one that fits how your brain works best.
We tested these apps hard. You can trust our results.
More of Capacities
Let’s see how Capacities is different from these other apps:
- Capacidades vs Noción: Capacities uses objects and links to connect ideas in a visual way. Noción is like a big workspace for notes, projects, and databases.
- Capacidades frente a cualquier tipo: Both help you link ideas. Capacities has a more visual, block-based look, while Cualquier tipo keeps your info private on your computer.
- Capacidades frente a embarcaciones: Capacities focuses on connecting ideas through objects. Artesanía makes your notes look really good and lets you link them inside documents.
- Capacidades vs ClickUp: Capacidades te ayuda a ver las conexiones entre las notas. Haga clic hacia arriba sirve sobre todo para gestionar tareas, pero también tiene notas que puedes vincular a tu trabajo.
- Capacidades vs Coda: Capacities uses objects and links to build your knowledge. Coda lets you make documents that act like apps with tables and charts.
- Capacidades vs XTiles: Ambos te ayudan a conectar tus notas y a mantener tu información privada. Capacities tiene una forma visual, basada en bloques, de vincular las cosas.
- Capacidades vs AFFiNE pro: Capacities uses objects and links to connect your thoughts. AFFiNE pro tries to be like Notion and Obsidian, letting you see connections, too.
More of Obsidian
Let’s see how Obsidian stacks up against these other note-taking and knowledge management apps:
- Obsidian vs Notion: Obsidian keeps your notes as local text files and focuses on linking them together. Notion is a cloud-based workspace for notes, projects, and databases.
- Obsidian vs ClickUp: Obsidian is for your personal knowledge base with linked notes. ClickUp is mainly for teams to manage projects with note-taking features.
- Obsidian vs Anytype: Both Obsidian and Anytype keep your info private on your computer and let you link your thoughts. Anytype uses a different way to structure info with objects.
- Obsidian vs Coda: Obsidian uses linked text files to build your knowledge. Coda lets you make documents that act like apps with tables and buttons.
- Obsidian vs XTiles: Both Obsidian and XTiles focus on keeping your notes private and letting you connect them. Obsidian uses plain text files and has many extra tools you can add.
- Obsidian vs Craft: Obsidian uses simple text files to create linked notes. Craft focuses on making nice-looking documents that you can also link.
- Obsidian vs AFFiNE pro: Both Obsidian and AFFiNE pro let you keep your notes local and link them. AFFiNE pro also lets you edit in blocks like Notion and has a whiteboard.
Preguntas frecuentes
Is Obsidian or Capacities better for beginners?
Capacities might be easier for beginners. Its object-based system offers a structured approach. Obsidian, while powerful, has a steeper learning curve due to its customization options and plugin system. If you prefer a guided experience, Capacities is a good starting point.
Can I use Obsidian and Capacities offline?
Yes, both Obsidian and Capacities offer offline functionality. Obsidian stores files locally, ensuring access anywhere. Capacities also allow offline use but require initial syncing. Both are reliable for working without the Internet.
Does Capacities have a plugin system like Obsidian?
No, Capacities does not have a plugin system like Obsidian. Obsidian boasts a vast library of community plugins, enabling extensive customization. Capacities focus on its built-in object system, offering a more streamlined, less customizable experience.
Which tool is better for managing large amounts of data?
Obsidian, especially with the dataview plugin, is excellent for managing large datasets. Its ability to query and display information in dynamic tables makes it powerful. Capacities are more suited for interconnected ideas, not necessarily massive data sets.
How do Obsidian and Capacities handle backlinks?
Both Obsidian and Capacities use backlinks to connect notes. Obsidian visually displays connections, focusing on linked markdown files. Capacities integrate backlinks within its object system, adding contextual links between objects. Both enhance note connectivity but in slightly different ways.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean