Jonglieren Sie mit Ihren sozialen Medien and wishing there was an easier way?
Posting on different sites like Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter) can take up a lot of time, right?
What if there were tools to help you plan and post everything in one place?
Agorapulse vs Buffer are two popular options that promise to do just that.
Tauchen wir ein!
Überblick
We’ve spent time exploring both Agorapulse and Buffer.
Getting a feel for how they work day-to-day.
Our hands-on testing involved scheduling posts, engaging with audiences, and analyzing results to compare their strengths and weaknesses clearly.
Möchten Sie Ihr Social-Media-Leben vereinfachen? Testen Sie Agorapulse kostenlos und sehen Sie selbst, wie es Ihnen Zeit spart und Ihre Ergebnisse verbessert!
Preise: Sie können es kostenlos testen. Das kostenpflichtige Abo beginnt bei 79 $/Monat.
Hauptmerkmale:
- Intuitive soziale Posteingang
- Leistungsstarker Veröffentlichungskalender
- Ausführliche Berichterstattung
Ready to save time on social media? Buffer can help you reclaim up to 6 hours per week. Check out for 14 days free trial
Preise: It has a free plan. Paid plan starts at $5/month
Hauptmerkmale:
- Intuitive Scheduling
- Engagement Tools
- Analyse und Berichterstattung
Was ist Agorapulse?
Okay, so what’s the deal with Agorapulse?
Think of it as a super-organized hub for all your sozialen Medien stuff.
It helps you manage posts, view comments, and check the performance of your content, all in one place.
Entdecken Sie auch unsere beliebtesten Agorapulse-Alternativen…
Unsere Meinung
Agorapulse ist eine hervorragende Wahl für Unternehmen, die Wert auf Community-Management und -Engagement legen. Es ist benutzerfreundlich, erschwinglich und bietet hervorragenden Kundensupport.
Hauptvorteile
- Merkmale: Agorapulse bietet Planung, Veröffentlichung, Analyse, Social Listening und einen leistungsstarken Posteingang zum Verwalten von Unterhaltungen in mehreren sozialen Netzwerken.
- Unterstützte soziale Netzwerke: Es integriert sich mit Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn und YouTube.
- Benutzerfreundlichkeit: Die Benutzeroberfläche ist übersichtlich und unkompliziert, sodass der Einstieg auch für Neulinge im Bereich Social Media Management sehr einfach ist.
- Zugang zu Support: Agorapulse hat den Ruf eines hervorragenden Kundensupports mit Optionen wie E-Mail und Live-Chat.
- Integrationen: Es verbindet sich mit einigen wichtigen Tools wie Slack, Canvaund Google Drive.
- Skalierbarkeit: Agorapulse bietet Pläne für Unternehmen jeder Größe, von kleinen Teams bis hin zu großen Agenturen.
Preise
- Standard: 79 $/Monat
- Professional: 119 $/Monat
- Fortschrittlich: 149 $/Monat
- Brauch: Individuelle Preise
Pros
Nachteile
What is Buffer?
So, what about Buffer?
It’s another tool that’s really good for scheduling your social media posts.
It’s known for being easy to use and helps you plan your content ahead of time.
Think of it as a straightforward way to keep your social media active without posting everything in the moment.
Entdecken Sie auch unsere beliebtesten Buffer alternatives…
Hauptvorteile
- Verwaltet bis zu 300 soziale Profile.
- White-Label-Optionen für Agenturen.
- Steigern Sie Ihr Engagement mit Analysen um 12 %.
- Weisen Sie über 80 Teammitgliedern Aufgaben zu.
- Automatisieren Sie Inhalte mit Smart Queues.
Preise
- Frei: 0 $/Monat.
- Wesentliches: 5 $/Monat pro Kanal
- Team: 10 $/Monat pro Kanal
Pros
Nachteile
Funktionsvergleich
Agorapulse and Buffer are powerful social media management tools, but they cater to different needs.
Agorapulse is the better fit for large marketing agencies needing a comprehensive Recherche et vérification d'e-mails, préchauffage des e-mails. and social listening.
While Buffer account is ideal for Kleinunternehmen owners who prioritize easy scheduling and affordability on their social media account.
1. Unified Inbox and Engagement Tools
- Agorapulse: It is a superior social media management tool in this area, offering a truly unified inbox to manage all customer interactions, including brand mentions and ad comments, making it easy for a social media manager to respond and nurture a genuine connection with the community.
- Puffer: It’s engagement tools are more basic publishing tools, focusing primarily on replying to comments and messages on facebook pages and Instagram. It lacks the advanced features on multiple platforms, such as saved replies and labeling, that Agorapulse offers for managing high-volume customer interactions.
2. Social Listening and Monitoring
- Agorapulse: This platform includes robust social listening and social media monitoring tools, allowing users to track keywords, hashtags, & brand mentions across social media platforms and the wider web.
- Puffer: It has very limited social listening capabilities. If monitoring brand health and competitor activity is a key part of your social media strategy, Buffer will require additional channels or a separate, third party integrations to fill this gap.
3. Analytics and Social Media ROI
- Agorapulse: It provides more comprehensive analytics and detailed reports. It helps and assist you to track your social media performance and is one of the few platforms that actively helps you measure social media roi, making it excellent for data-driven social media marketing and marketing agencies.
- Puffer: However, the buffer review shows that its analytics are less in-depth and customizable compared to Agorapulse, especially when tracking social media roi. The Buffer Analyze allows you to monitor social media performance, track clicks, and create custom reports.
4. Publishing and Scheduling
- Agorapulse: It offers a visual publishing calendar, queue management, and the ability to schedule posts to multiple social media platforms, including YouTube channels, facebook groups, and linkedin company pages.
- Puffer: The social media scheduling tools is highly reliable and buffer offers a straightforward process for publishing. Buffer Publish is renowned for its simplicity, featuring an easy-to-use content queue to schedule posts to multiple social media accounts.
5. Supported Social Accounts
- Agorapulse: It supports all major social media accounts, including facebook pages, linkedin company pages, facebook groups, and youtube channels. You pay per social account, and the cost scales based on the number of accounts you connect.
- Puffer: Its free plan allows you to connect up to three channels. Paid plans allow you to connect more social media accounts but you pay per social account added. Buffer also offers unique features like the ability to add custom video thumbnails.
6. Team Collaboration and User Limits
- Agorapulse: It has a strong focus on team features, offering advanced team collaboration features such as approval workflows, user roles, and task assignment, which is essential for marketing agencies.
- Puffer: It’s collaboration tools are simpler. Its higher-tier team plans are popular because buffer offers unlimited users on some plans, making it a very cost effective solution for a team where many members need to schedule content.
7. Pricing and Free Plan
- Agorapulse: It offers a free plan, but with limited functionality and a cap on the number of scheduled posts. Its paid tiers are generally priced higher than Buffer’s, but include more advanced features as standard.
- Puffer: It offers a straightforward pricing model based on a monthly or annual basis, making it highly transparent for a small Geschäft. Buffer’s free plan is more generous, allowing you to connect up to three channels and publish a higher number of posts.
8. Customization and Unique Features
- Agorapulse: The platform offers a range of unique features like a built-in Recherche et vérification d'e-mails, préchauffage des e-mails. and the ability to track the performance of facebook groups, a great social media scheduling tool that’s often missed in other social media management tools.
- Puffer: It’s unique features include the Buffer Publish extension, which allows you to schedule posts from any website, and a Start Page (link in bio tool). The buffer review consistently praises its simplicity and user-friendly design.
9. Kundenbetreuung
- Agorapulse: It is consistently praised for its fast and personalized support team. Its commitment to customer service is a key factor cited in many social media manager reviews.
- Puffer: The advanced Buffer support is available 24/7, but is primarily through email or social media. While generally good, the response time may not be as fast or guaranteed as the dedicated assistance offered by Agorapulse.
What Should You Look For When Choosing a Social Media Scheduler?
- Think about the number of social media platforms you use.
- Consider if you need advanced features like Automatisierung in their social media tools.
- Evaluate if team collaboration is important for your workflow.
- Check if the tool integrates with other marketing tools you use.
- Read reviews about the platform’s reliability.
- See if they offer a free trial to test the features yourself.
Instantanément vs UpLead
Okay, so we looked at Buffer vs Agorapulse.
Both help with social media.
If it’s just you, and you want to plan posts easily, Buffer could work. It’s not too tricky and doesn’t cost much.
But if you have a team or lots of social media (more than 10), Agorapulse has cooler stuff.
The social inbox helps a lot. The reports tell you more, too, than Bufferr.
For teams and growing brands, Agorapulse gives you more for your money.
We tried both, so we know what we’re talking about.
Mehr von Agorapulse
- Agorapulse vs Sprout Social: Agorapulse – intuitiver Posteingang, oft günstiger für kleinere Unternehmen. Sprout – fortschrittliche Analysen, Zuhören.
- Agorapulse vs Metricool: Agorapulse – leistungsstarker Posteingang, Team-Tools. Metricool – übersichtliche Analysen, Fokus auf Wettbewerber.
- Agorapulse vs Socialpilot: Agorapulse – starke Interaktion, aktives Zuhören. Socialpilot – kostengünstige Terminplanung.
- Agorapulse vs Sendible: Agorapulse – effizienter Posteingang, übersichtliche Berichte. Sendible – effektives Zuhören, individuell anpassbare Berichte.
- Agorapulse vs Content Studio: Agorapulse – optimierter Posteingang, gesteigerte Interaktion. Content Studio – Content-Entdeckung, KI.
- Agorapulse vs Heropost: Agorapulse – hohe Interaktionsrate, aktives Zuhören. Heropost – KI-gestützte Inhalte, Wettbewerbsanalyse.
- Agorapulse vs Zoho Social: Agorapulse – leistungsstarker Posteingang, aufmerksamkeitsstark. Zoho Social – kostengünstig (für Zoho-Nutzer).
- Agorapulse vs Buffer: Agorapulse – erweiterter Funktionsumfang (Posteingang, Hörverstehen). Buffer – einfachere Terminplanung.
- Agorapulse vs. Sprinklr: Agorapulse – leistungsstarke Komplettlösung (für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen). Sprinklr – für Großunternehmen.
- Agorapulse vs Später: Agorapulse – breitere Plattformunterstützung, Fokus auf Nutzerinteraktion. Später – visuelle Inhalte (Instagram).
- Agorapulse vs Loomly: Agorapulse – effizienter Posteingang, Interaktion. Loomly – Redaktionsplan, Teamarbeit.
- Agorapulse gegen Blaze: Die Stärke von Agorapulse liegt im E-Mail-Posteingang und der Interaktionsrate.
More of Buffer
- Buffer vs Sprout Social: It is a comprehensive platform with advanced social CRM and detailed analytics and reporting.
- Buffer vs Metricool: Buffer – easy scheduling. Metriccool – stronger analytics, competitor info.
- Buffer vs Socialpilot: Buffer – basic scheduling. Sozialpilot – more features for the price.
- Buffer vs. Sendible: Buffer – simple, clean design. Sendbar – wider features (listening, analytics).
- Buffer vs Content Studio: Buffer – simple scheduling. Content Studio – content discovery, AI.
- Buffer vs Heropost: Buffer – straightforward scheduling. Heropost – AI content, competitor intel.
- Buffer vs Agorapulse: Buffer – simple scheduling. Agorapulse – unified inbox, listening.
- Puffer vs Zoho Social: Buffer offers simple scheduling. Zoho Social offers more features and is cost-effective (Zoho).
- Buffer vs Sprinklr: Buffer – basic scheduling (small biz). Sprinklr – enterprise-level.
- Puffer vs. Später: Buffer – scheduling for many platforms. Später – visual content (Instagram).
- Buffer vs Loomly: Buffer – simple scheduling calendar. Düster – content calendar, teamwork.
- Buffer vs Blaze: (Info limited – Buffer’s strength is simplicity for scheduling).
- Buffer vs Hootsuite: It is a long-standing tool known for its comprehensive, multi-platform dashboard view.
- Buffer vs Planable: It is a collaboration-first tool with a focus on visual content approval and client feedback.
Häufig Gestellte Fragen
What’s the main difference between Buffer and Agorapulse?
Buffer is often simpler and more affordable for a single user focused mainly on scheduling. Agorapulse is a more comprehensive social media management platform, offering advanced features like a unified inbox and detailed analytics, which is better for teams managing multiple (even 10 social accounts.
Which platform is better for a small team?
Agorapulse is generally better for small teams. Its collaboration features and unified inbox machen it easier for multiple people to manage social media efficiently. While Buffer has team features, they are often more limited on lower-tier plans.
Can I manage all my social media channels with either tool?
Yes, both Buffer and Agorapulse allow you to connect and manage multiple social media channels. However, the number of channels you can connect often depends on the specific pricing plan you choose for each social media management platform.
Is Buffer or Agorapulse easier to learn for a beginner to learn?
Buffer is often considered easier to learn, thanks to its straightforward and user-friendly interface. Agorapulse, with its more extensive features, might have a slightly steeper learning curve initially, but it’s still generally well-designed.
Welche Plattform bietet den besseren Kundensupport?
Agorapulse is often praised for its responsive and helpful customer support. While Buffer also offers support, some users report that Agorapulse’s response times and the quality of support are generally higher.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean