Are you feeling stuck with your current workflow 自动化工具?
Maybe it’s too pricey, too complicated, or doesn’t connect to the apps you need.
We’ve all been there. It’s frustrating to watch a simple task eat up your time, all because your automation tool isn’t quite right.
What if you could find a platform that saves you time and money and actually makes your work easier?
We’ve done the heavy lifting for you. In this article, we’ll dive into the best 制作 alternatives for 2025, so you can find the perfect fit and get back to what matters.
What is the Best Make Alternative?
Choosing the best automation tool can feel like a guessing game.
It’s a big decision that impacts your workflow every single day.
To help you find the perfect fit for your needs, we’ve put together a list of the top alternatives to Make.
Here are our recommendations for the 7 best Make alternatives in 2025.
1. n8n（⭐️4.8）
Do you need more control? n8n is an open-source automation platform.
This means you can host it yourself. That gives you more power and flexibility.
It uses a node-based system for building workflows.
While it’s great for developers and technical users, it might have a steeper learning curve than Zapier.
But for those who want to get under the hood, n8n is a strong choice.
通过我们的 n8n 教程释放其潜力。
Also, explore our Make vs n8n comparison!
主要优点
- 自托管： 您可以在自己的服务器上运行它。这完全免费，并且您拥有自己的数据所有权。
- 高级人工智能： 与 LangChain 等工具集成，实现高度复杂的 AI 工作流程。
- 代码友好： 您可以在工作流程中使用 JavaScript 或 Python。这开启了无限的可能性。
- 无限的工作流程： 与许多其他工具不同，n8n 不限制单个工作流中的步骤或任务的数量。
定价
- 起动机： 每月 20 美元
- 优点： 每月 50 美元。
- 企业：定制定价。
优点
缺点
2. Pabbly （⭐️4.5）
Pabbly is a simple and affordable option.
It’s often praised for its lifetime deals, which can save you a lot of money in the long run.
Unlike some other tools, it doesn’t charge for internal tasks or for checking for new 数据.
This can make it a very cost-effective alternative, especially for 小型企业 and individuals who have simple automation needs.
通过我们的 Pabbly 教程释放它的潜力。
Also, explore our Make vs Pabbly comparison!
主要优点
- 一次性付款： 这是 Pabbly 最大的卖点。一次付费，永久使用。
- 无内部任务费用： 它不收取过滤器或格式化程序等内部步骤的费用。这可以为您节省很多钱。
- 方便使用的： 该平台非常直观且易于导航。
- 2,000+ 种集成： 您可以连接到各种流行的应用程序。
定价
- 标准： 每月 249 美元。
- 优点： 每月 499 美元。
- 最终的： 每月 699 美元。
优点
缺点
3. MindStudio （⭐️4.0）
MindStudio is all about building with AI. It’s a no-code platform that lets you make and deploy AI agents.
You can use it to build mini-apps for things like content generation or data analysis.
If you want to put AI to work in your 商业 without writing code, this platform is a game-changer.
It’s a great fit for marketers and business owners who want to leverage AI’s power.
通过我们的 MindStudio 教程释放其潜力。
Also, explore our Make vs MindStudio comparison!
主要优点
- 无代码AI代理： 使用简单的可视化构建器构建强大的 AI 工作者。
- 自定义函数： 使用您自己的代码（JavaScript 或 Python）来扩展其功能。
- 人工智能自动化： 自动执行数据分析、内容创建和潜在客户生成等任务。
- 强大的安全性： 该平台符合 SOC II 和 GDPR 标准。
定价
所有计划都将 每年计费.
- 自由的： 0美元/月
- 起动机： 每月 16 美元。
- 优点： 每月 48 美元。
- 机构： 每月 140 美元。
- 风俗： 定制定价。
优点
缺点
4. Flowith （⭐️3.8）
Flowith is an 人工智能工具 that acts as a “second brain” for your projects.
It’s a smart whiteboard where you can organize your thoughts and turn them into finished projects.
Its core is an autonomous AI agent that can handle tasks like content creation and in-depth research.
It’s a specialized tool perfect for creators and researchers who need a unified space to manage their work.
通过我们的 Flowith 教程释放其潜力。
Also, explore our Make vs Flowith comparison!
主要优点
- 无限画布： 使用 2D 画布来可视化你的想法。它支持非线性思维和多线程对话。
- Neo特工： 这个自主的人工智能代理可以全天候连续运行，执行复杂的多步骤任务。
- 知识花园： 上传您的文档、笔记和链接。AI 会将其整理成一个可搜索的数据库，该数据库最多可存储 1000 万个标记。
- 各种AI模型： 在一个平台内访问各种模型，如 GPT-4o、Claude 3.5 和 DALL·E 3。
定价
所有计划都将 每年计费.
- 专业的： 每月 13.93 美元。
- 最终的： 每月 29.94 美元。
- 无限创造者： 每月 249.95 美元。
优点
缺点
5. Replit （⭐️3.7）
Replit is an online coding platform, but it’s much more than just a place to write code.
It’s a full-fledged development environment in the cloud.
You can use it to build and deploy applications, and it has powerful AI features to help you along the way.
If you’re a developer looking for an all-in-one solution that combines coding with automation, Replit is a serious contender.
通过我们的 Replit 教程释放其潜力。
Also, explore our Make vs Replit comparison!
主要优点
- 自然语言到应用程序： 它让你只需描述一下就能构建一个完整的应用程序。AI 负责处理代码、数据库和设计。
- 即时部署： 只需单击即可部署您的应用。它能够以极快的速度将项目从构思转化为实际产品。
- 实时协作： 与团队在同一环境中协作。您可以看到他们的光标并共同完成项目。
- 集成环境： 它包含您需要的一切：代码编辑器、控制台、数据库和托管。
定价
所有计划都将 每年计费.
- 起动机： 自由的。
- 重新分割核心： 每月 20 美元。
- 团队： 每月 35 美元。
- 企业： 定制定价。
优点
缺点
6. Zapier （⭐️3.6）
Zapier is a popular choice for a reason. It’s a no-code tool that connects thousands of apps.
Think of it as the ultimate middleman for your software. You can also automate tasks without writing a single line of code.
It’s super user-friendly and great for beginners. Zapier gets the job done.
Unlock its potential with our Zapier tutorial.
Also, explore our Make vs Zapier comparison!
主要优点
- Massive Integration Library: It connects to over 7,000 apps. You can link almost anything you use.
- Multi-Step Zaps: Go beyond a simple trigger and action. You can make complex workflows with many steps.
- AI-Powered Features: Use Zapier’s AI to summarize content, draft emails, or even create custom chatbots.
- 无需代码： You don’t need to be a programmer to build powerful automations. Everything is drag-and-drop.
定价
所有计划都将 每年计费.
- 自由的： 0美元/月
- 专业版: $19.99/month.
- 团队： 每月 69 美元。
- 企业: Contact Sales.
优点
缺点
7. Lutra (⭐️3.5)
Lutra is a modern AI-powered tool.
It’s an AI agent designed to automate tasks using plain English.
You can tell it what you want, and it writes the code to make it happen.
This makes it a great choice for both technical users and those who don’t want to code.
Lutra integrates with many apps to streamline your work.
通过我们的 Lutra 教程释放它的潜力。
Also, explore our Make vs Lutra comparison!
主要优点
- 自然语言自动化。 只需描述您希望 Lutra 执行的操作。它会处理剩下的事情。
- 自动执行复杂任务。 Lutra 可以处理多步骤指令，还可以管理数据丰富和电子邮件管理等功能。
- 制定剧本。 您可以将最频繁的任务保存为剧本。这样您就可以自动重复执行它们。
定价
- 起动机： 0美元/月
- 要点： 每月 23 美元。
- 专业的：每月 63 美元。
- 企业： 定制定价。
优点
缺点
买家指南
在研究寻找最佳产品时，我们根据以下因素进行确定：
- 定价: We examined the cost of each workflow automation platform and its scalability.
- 易于使用: We checked if the platform had a user-friendly interface, an intuitive interface, and a drag-and-drop interface. This is crucial for non-technical users who want to automate repetitive tasks without any needing coding skills or extensive technical knowledge. We also considered how easy it was to create custom integrations and workflows.
- Features & Integrations: We evaluated their automation features, including the ability to automate workflows, automate complex tasks, and handle multi-step workflows. We looked for advanced features like conditional logic, advanced automation capabilities, advanced data manipulation, and robotic process automation. We also checked for pre-built integrations and extensive integration capabilities with popular tools like Google Workspace and 客户关系管理 systems. We also considered how well they could manage complex workflows and their ability to create complex integrations.
- Performance: We assessed their ability to streamline processes, perform data processing, and ensure data accuracy. We also looked at how they handle complex processes and manual data entry. We considered their performance in handling complex workflows and complex tasks.
- 支持: We looked for the availability of customer support and a dedicated account manager. We also considered if they offered community support and resources.
- 使用案例: We evaluated each platform’s suitability for various purposes, including marketing automation, project management, business process automation, and task automation. We looked at their ability to streamline workflows, automate complex workflows, and handle business processes. We also considered if they were an effective alternative to make.com and how they compared to make alternatives, including Microsoft Power Automate and the Power Automate process. We checked if they could help users scale operations effectively.
- 总体价值: We looked at whether they could help users create seamless workflows and if they were a strong alternative to Make. We considered their ability to offer the best solution for the most common use cases and their overall value proposition compared to the most workflow automation tools available.
总结
Finding the right alternative to make is a big step toward better productivity.
We’ve explored some of the best make alternatives available.
You can make workflows that save you time and effort.
Whether you need a simple tool or a way to build complex workflows, there’s an option for you.
Tools range from a no-code automation platform to those that require more technical expertise or programming knowledge.
The key is finding one with the right apps and services for your needs, offering seamless integration and solid data integration.
By choosing the best tool, you can automate those routine tasks and manage your automation workflows across multiple platforms.
Forget about being stuck; it’s time to find the perfect fit for your business.
常见问题
What is a good alternative to make for beginners?
Zapier is a great alternative to make for beginners. Its drag-and-drop interface is very intuitive and it’s built for simplicity. It’s a great no-code automation platform for those with no programming knowledge.
Which Make alternatives are best for building custom workflows?
Platforms like n8n and Workato are excellent for custom workflows. They offer a higher degree of control & flexibility for creating complex, multi-step automations. This is ideal for users who need to go beyond basic, linear tasks.
How does Microsoft Power Automate compare to Make?
Microsoft Power Automate is a strong competitor, especially within the Microsoft ecosystem. It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft apps and offers robust features like Power Automate hosted process and business process automation. It is a powerful alternative to make for enterprises.
Are there any free or open-source Make alternatives?
Yes, n8n is a popular open-source alternative to make. It allows you to self-host and customize your platform, providing full control over your data and workflows. This makes it an attractive option for developers and those on a budget.
What are the key factors to consider when choosing a Make alternative?
When choosing a platform, consider its ease of use, pricing, and integration capabilities. Also, look at the type of workflows you need to create, whether simple or complex, and the level of technical expertise required to use the tool.
