Are you juggling your réseaux sociaux and wishing there was an easier way?
Posting on different sites like Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter) can take up a lot of time, right?
What if there were tools to help you plan and post everything in one place?
Agorapulse vs Buffer are two popular options that promise to do just that.
Plongeons-nous !
Aperçu
We’ve spent time exploring both Agorapulse and Buffer.
Getting a feel for how they work day-to-day.
Our hands-on testing involved scheduling posts, engaging with audiences, and analyzing results to compare their strengths and weaknesses clearly.
Want to simplify your social media life? Give Agorapulse a try with a free trial & see how it can save your time & boost your results!
Tarifs : You can try it for free. Paid plan starts at $79/month
Caractéristiques principales :
- Intuitive social boîte de réception
- Powerful publishing calendar
- In-depth reporting
Ready to save time on social media? Buffer can help you reclaim up to 6 hours per week. Check out for 14 days free trial
Tarifs : It has a free plan. Paid plan starts at $5/month
Caractéristiques principales :
- Intuitive Scheduling
- Engagement Tools
- Analyses et rapports
What is Agorapulse?
Okay, so what’s the deal with Agorapulse?
Think of it as a super-organized hub for all your réseaux sociaux stuff.
It helps you manage posts, view comments, and check the performance of your content, all in one place.
Découvrez également nos favoris Alternatives à Agorapulse…
Notre avis
Agorapulse est un excellent choix pour les entreprises qui privilégient la gestion et l'engagement communautaires. Facile à utiliser, abordable, il bénéficie d'un excellent support client.
Principaux avantages
- Caractéristiques: Agorapulse propose la planification, la publication, l'analyse, l'écoute sociale et une boîte de réception puissante pour gérer les conversations sur plusieurs réseaux sociaux.
- Réseaux sociaux pris en charge : Il s'intègre à Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn et YouTube.
- Facilité d'utilisation : L'interface est claire et simple, ce qui la rend très facile à démarrer, même si vous êtes nouveau dans la gestion des médias sociaux.
- Assistance clientèle : Agorapulse a la réputation d'offrir un excellent support client, avec des options telles que l'e-mail et le chat en direct.
- Intégrations : Il se connecte à quelques outils clés, tels que Slack, Canva, et Google Drive.
- Évolutivité : Agorapulse propose des plans pour les entreprises de toutes tailles, des petites équipes aux grandes agences.
Tarifs
- Standard: 79 $/mois
- Professionnel: 119 $/mois
- Avancé: 149 $/mois
- Coutume: Tarification personnalisée
Avantages
Inconvénients
What is Buffer?
So, what about Buffer?
It’s another tool that’s really good for scheduling your social media posts.
It’s known for being easy to use and helps you plan your content ahead of time.
Think of it as a straightforward way to keep your social media active without posting everything in the moment.
Découvrez également nos favoris Alternatives à Buffer…
Principaux avantages
- Gère jusqu'à 300 profils sociaux.
- Options en marque blanche pour les agences.
- Obtenez 12 % d'engagement supplémentaire grâce aux analyses.
- Attribuez des tâches à plus de 80 membres de l’équipe.
- Automatisez le contenu avec les files d'attente intelligentes.
Tarifs
- Gratuit: 0$/mois.
- Essentiel: 5 $/mois par chaîne
- Équipe: 10 $/mois par chaîne
Avantages
Inconvénients
Comparaison des fonctionnalités
Agorapulse and Buffer are powerful social media management tools, but they cater to different needs.
Agorapulse is the better fit for large marketing agencies needing a comprehensive CRM and social listening.
While Buffer account is ideal for petite entreprise owners who prioritize easy scheduling and affordability on their social media account.
1. Unified Inbox and Engagement Tools
- Agorapulse: It is a superior social media management tool in this area, offering a truly unified inbox to manage all customer interactions, including brand mentions and ad comments, making it easy for a social media manager to respond and nurture a genuine connection with the community.
- Tampon: It’s engagement tools are more basic publishing tools, focusing primarily on replying to comments and messages on facebook pages and Instagram. It lacks the advanced features on multiple platforms, such as saved replies and labeling, that Agorapulse offers for managing high-volume customer interactions.
2. Social Listening and Monitoring
- Agorapulse: This platform includes robust social listening and social media monitoring tools, allowing users to track keywords, hashtags, & brand mentions across social media platforms and the wider web.
- Tampon: It has very limited social listening capabilities. If monitoring brand health and competitor activity is a key part of your social media strategy, Buffer will require additional channels or a separate, third party integrations to fill this gap.
3. Analytics and Social Media ROI
- Agorapulse: It provides more comprehensive analytics and detailed reports. It helps and assist you to track your social media performance and is one of the few platforms that actively helps you measure social media roi, making it excellent for data-driven social media marketing and marketing agencies.
- Tampon: However, the buffer review shows that its analytics are less in-depth and customizable compared to Agorapulse, especially when tracking social media roi. The Buffer Analyze allows you to monitor social media performance, track clicks, and create custom reports.
4. Publishing and Scheduling
- Agorapulse: It offers a visual publishing calendar, queue management, and the ability to schedule posts to multiple social media platforms, including YouTube channels, facebook groups, and linkedin company pages.
- Tampon: The social media scheduling tools is highly reliable and buffer offers a straightforward process for publishing. Buffer Publish is renowned for its simplicity, featuring an easy-to-use content queue to schedule posts to multiple social media accounts.
5. Supported Social Accounts
- Agorapulse: It supports all major social media accounts, including facebook pages, linkedin company pages, facebook groups, and youtube channels. You pay per social account, and the cost scales based on the number of accounts you connect.
- Tampon: Its free plan allows you to connect up to three channels. Paid plans allow you to connect more social media accounts but you pay per social account added. Buffer also offers unique features like the ability to add custom video thumbnails.
6. Team Collaboration and User Limits
- Agorapulse: It has a strong focus on team features, offering advanced team collaboration features such as approval workflows, user roles, and task assignment, which is essential for marketing agencies.
- Tampon: It’s collaboration tools are simpler. Its higher-tier team plans are popular because buffer offers unlimited users on some plans, making it a very cost effective solution for a team where many members need to schedule content.
7. Pricing and Free Plan
- Agorapulse: It offers a free plan, but with limited functionality and a cap on the number of scheduled posts. Its paid tiers are generally priced higher than Buffer’s, but include more advanced features as standard.
- Tampon: It offers a straightforward pricing model based on a monthly or annual basis, making it highly transparent for a small entreprise. Buffer’s free plan is more generous, allowing you to connect up to three channels and publish a higher number of posts.
8. Customization and Unique Features
- Agorapulse: The platform offers a range of unique features like a built-in CRM and the ability to track the performance of facebook groups, a great social media scheduling tool that’s often missed in other social media management tools.
- Tampon: It’s unique features include the Buffer Publish extension, which allows you to schedule posts from any website, and a Start Page (link in bio tool). The buffer review consistently praises its simplicity and user-friendly design.
9. Customer Support
- Agorapulse: It is consistently praised for its fast and personalized support team. Its commitment to customer service is a key factor cited in many social media manager reviews.
- Tampon: The advanced Buffer support is available 24/7, but is primarily through email or social media. While generally good, the response time may not be as fast or guaranteed as the dedicated assistance offered by Agorapulse.
What Should You Look For When Choosing a Social Media Scheduler?
- Think about the number of social media platforms you use.
- Consider if you need advanced features like automation in their social media tools.
- Evaluate if team collaboration is important for your workflow.
- Check if the tool integrates with other marketing tools you use.
- Read reviews about the platform’s reliability.
- See if they offer a free trial to test the features yourself.
Verdict final
Okay, so we looked at Buffer vs Agorapulse.
Both help with social media.
If it’s just you, and you want to plan posts easily, Buffer could work. It’s not too tricky and doesn’t cost much.
But if you have a team or lots of social media (more than 10), Agorapulse has cooler stuff.
The social inbox helps a lot. The reports tell you more, too, than Bufferr.
For teams and growing brands, Agorapulse gives you more for your money.
We tried both, so we know what we’re talking about.
More of Agorapulse
- Agorapulse vs Sprout Social: Agorapulse – intuitive inbox, often cheaper for smaller businesses. Sprout – advanced analytics, listening.
- Agorapulse vs Metricool: Agorapulse – strong inbox, team tools. Metricool – clear analytics, competitor focus.
- Agorapulse vs Socialpilot: Agorapulse – robust engagement, listening. Socialpilot – affordable scheduling.
- Agorapulse vs Sendible: Agorapulse – efficient inbox, clear reporting. Sendible – strong listening, customizable reports.
- Agorapulse vs Content Studio: Agorapulse – streamlined inbox, engagement. Content Studio – content discovery, AI.
- Agorapulse vs Heropost: Agorapulse – strong engagement, listening. Heropost – AI content, competitor intel.
- Agorapulse vs Zoho Social: Agorapulse – robust inbox, listening. Zoho Social – cost-effective (Zoho users).
- Agorapulse vs Buffer: Agorapulse – wider features (inbox, listening). Buffer – simpler scheduling.
- Agorapulse vs Sprinklr: Agorapulse – strong all-in-one (small/medium biz). Sprinklr – enterprise-level.
- Agorapulse vs Later: Agorapulse – broader platform support, engagement focus. Later – visual content (Instagram).
- Agorapulse vs Loomly: Agorapulse – efficient inbox, engagement. Loomly – content calendar, teamwork.
- Agorapulse vs Blaze: Agorapulse’s inbox/engagement is are key strength.
More of Buffer
- Buffer vs Sprout Social: It is a comprehensive platform with advanced social CRM and detailed analytics and reporting.
- Buffer vs Metricool: Buffer – easy scheduling. Metricool – stronger analytics, competitor info.
- Buffer vs Socialpilot: Buffer – basic scheduling. Socialpilot – more features for the price.
- Buffer vs Sendible: Buffer – simple, clean design. Envoyable – wider features (listening, analytics).
- Buffer vs Content Studio: Buffer – simple scheduling. Studio de contenu – content discovery, AI.
- Buffer vs Heropost: Buffer – straightforward scheduling. Heropost – AI content, competitor intel.
- Buffer vs Agorapulse: Buffer – simple scheduling. Agorapulse – unified inbox, listening.
- Tampon vs Zoho Social: Buffer offers simple scheduling. Zoho Social offers more features and is cost-effective (Zoho).
- Buffer vs Sprinklr: Buffer – basic scheduling (small biz). Arroseur arrosé – enterprise-level.
- Buffer vs Later: Buffer – scheduling for many platforms. Plus tard – visual content (Instagram).
- Buffer vs Loomly: Buffer – simple scheduling calendar. Loomly – content calendar, teamwork.
- Buffer vs Blaze: (Info limited – Buffer’s strength is simplicity for scheduling).
- Buffer vs Hootsuite: It is a long-standing tool known for its comprehensive, multi-platform dashboard view.
- Buffer vs Planable: It is a collaboration-first tool with a focus on visual content approval and client feedback.
Questions fréquemment posées
What’s the main difference between Buffer and Agorapulse?
Buffer is often simpler and more affordable for a single user focused mainly on scheduling. Agorapulse is a more comprehensive social media management platform, offering advanced features like a unified inbox and detailed analytics, which is better for teams managing multiple (even 10 social accounts.
Which platform is better for a small team?
Agorapulse is generally better for small teams. Its collaboration features and unified inbox faire it easier for multiple people to manage social media efficiently. While Buffer has team features, they are often more limited on lower-tier plans.
Can I manage all my social media channels with either tool?
Yes, both Buffer and Agorapulse allow you to connect and manage multiple social media channels. However, the number of channels you can connect often depends on the specific pricing plan you choose for each social media management platform.
Is Buffer or Agorapulse easier to learn for a beginner to learn?
Buffer is often considered easier to learn, thanks to its straightforward and user-friendly interface. Agorapulse, with its more extensive features, might have a slightly steeper learning curve initially, but it’s still generally well-designed.
Which platform offers better customer support?
Agorapulse is often praised for its responsive and helpful customer support. While Buffer also offers support, some users report that Agorapulse’s response times and the quality of support are generally higher.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean