Does coding feel like trying to read alien instructions? You’re not alone.
Building apps used to mean tons of complicated code and a lot of headaches.
Now, you hear about “no-code” tools like Glide vs Adalo.
They promise to let you build apps without coding. But which one’s actually easier?
Which one will get you to your app faster?
You don’t want to waste time on the wrong platform.
Let’s break down Glide vs Adalo. We’ll look at speed, ease of use, and what you can actually build with each.
Descripción general
To give you the best comparison, we’ve put both platforms to the test.
We built simple apps, explored their features, and timed how long each task took.
This hands-on experience lets us show you real differences, not just fancy words.
Glide’s pre-built templates help users launch apps 30% quicker. Discover how Glide transforms your spreadsheets into functional ones!
Precios: Free Trial Available. Premium plan starts at $19/month.
Características principales:
- Data-Driven Apps
- Spreadsheet Integration
- Mobile-First Design
60% of Adalo users launched their first app within 3 weeks. See if you can beat that time. Start building with Adalo now!
Precios: It has a free plan. The premium plan starts at $36/month.
Características principales:
- Native Mobile Apps
- Custom Actions
- Interfaz de arrastrar y soltar.
What is Glide?
Glide turns spreadsheets into mobile apps.
Yes, really. Just connect your Google Sheet or Mesa de aire, and Glide does the rest.
It’s fast. It’s clean. Think of it as instant app creation.
Desbloquea su potencial con nuestro Alternativas a Glide…
Nuestra opinión
¡Convierte hojas de cálculo en aplicaciones en minutos! El 95 % de los usuarios considera intuitiva la interfaz de Glide y el 70 % lanza su primera aplicación en un día. ¡Empieza tu experiencia con Glide ahora!
Beneficios clave
- Aplicaciones de Hojas de cálculo de Google.
- Implementación sencilla y rápida.
- Diseño que prioriza los dispositivos móviles.
- Actualizaciones de datos fáciles.
Precios
什么是反向链接分析工具？ 页面 SEO 是指直接优化网站页面上的元素，例如内容、标题和图片，以提高它们在搜索结果中的可见度。其目的是让您的内容对用户和搜索引擎都清晰可见。.
- Gratis: $0/mes.
- Explorador: 每年收费 70 美元/月。
- Fabricante: $49/mes.
Ventajas
Contras
What is Adalo?
Adalo helps you build native mobile apps. No code is needed.
Drag and drop components. Connect databases. It’s visual. It’s powerful.
Think of it as a design-first creador de aplicaciones.
Desbloquea su potencial con nuestro Adalo Alternatives…
Nuestra opinión
¡Crea apps móviles nativas un 75 % más rápido con Adalo! El 80 % de los usuarios lanza su primera app en cuestión de semanas. Empieza tu prueba gratuita y únete a los miles que crean con Adalo hoy mismo.
Beneficios clave
- Aplicaciones nativas para iOS y Android.
- Configuración de base de datos visual.
- Fácil publicación en la tienda de aplicaciones.
- Componentes comunitarios disponibles.
Precios
什么是反向链接分析工具？ 页面 SEO 是指直接优化网站页面上的元素，例如内容、标题和图片，以提高它们在搜索结果中的可见度。其目的是让您的内容对用户和搜索引擎都清晰可见。.
- Gratis: $0/mes.
- Woodpecker 与 Warmbox：2025 年最佳电子邮件预热工具 21 $36/mes.
- Profesional: $52/mes.
- Equipo: $160/mes.
- Lovo AI 与 Speechelo：哪款 AI 语音工具将在 2025 年胜出？ $200/mes.
Ventajas
Contras
Comparación de características
We’ve been hands-on with both no-code creador de aplicaciones herramientas.
Now, let’s see exactly how they compare on key features.
This will help you choose your own champion for your next app idea.
1. App Type
- Glide: Progressive web app (PWA) only. Runs in a browser. Not published to the app stores.
- Adalo: Builds native apps. You can publish to the Apple App Store and Google Play for a powerful app presence.
2. Data Source
- Glide: Using Glide, you connect directly to existing datos like Google Sheets or Airtable. Setup is simple.
- Adalo: Uses its own internal database. Connects to external APIs and services for more functionality.
3. Design Control
- Glide: Has sleek prebuilt components. It is less flexible.
- Adalo: Gives you more freedom. The visual interface is great for custom apps.
4. Complexity
- Glide: Best when your app idea is simple. Glide makes it happen fast.
- Adalo: Better for apps with complex negocio processes and many screens. Handles advanced logic with more ease.
5. App Publishing
- Glide: Only lets you share a link for your progressive web app. This is a double-edged sword: fast to publish but limited reach.
- Adalo: Lets you launch your app to the major app stores. This is a huge benefit.
6. User Experience
- Glide: Apps often feel faster. They are quick to load and update app’s data.
- Adalo: Apps can sometimes feel a little slower. This can affect the end-user license agreement satisfaction.
7. Media Capabilities
- Glide: Handles photos and basic video uploads well.
- Adalo: Strong for video chat and video messages. Offers features for rich media like watching live videos.
8. Custom Code
- Glide: Strictly no-code. You are limited to their powerful app features.
- Adalo: Allows for custom actions and some custom code integration. This extends what you can build.
9. AI Features
- Glide: Focuses on herramientas de IA, like those that help automate tasks and speed up app development. Leading in bringing AI into the no-code app builder space.
- Adalo: Focuses on its core drag-and-drop builder.
What to Look For When Choosing the Right AI App Builder?
- App Type and Reach: Do you need a mobile app for the Apple App Store or a web application (web app builder)? Will your own app be a progressive web app that works on every device?
- Design and Customization: Do you need total control over custom fonts and design versions? Do the app constructores offer cool filters or ways to customize the look and feel?
- Ease and Speed (for non-programmers): Can a developer or just two non-technical founders create apps quickly? Is the building process hassle-free for someone with no coding knowledge?
- Datos e integración: Can the software handle your existing data and integrate with other services? Does the builder offer custom integrations to link to the rest of the world?
- Functionality and Features: Can you enable video messaging, watch live videos, or stream live events? Can you create features like a QR code for easy access or a slide deck viewer?
- Platform Support and Community: Are there good Adalo app examples or a strong community where you can get help? Do the other app builders offer check-ins or support for pequeñas empresas?
Veredicto final
After testing both, we pick Glide. It’s the fastest way to make data-driven apps.
If you need a quick, clean app from your spreadsheets, Glide wins.
It’s powerful for simple projects. Adalo is great for complex native apps, but it takes more time.
Glide is efficient and user-friendly. We’ve shown you real tests and results.
If you want to build an app now, Glide is your best choice.
You’ll see your app live faster. Glide’s simplicity makes it a smart starting point.
Don’t get bogged down in design; focus on getting your idea out there quickly.
More of Glide
Let’s see how Glide stacks up against these other app builders:
- Glide vs Bubble: Glide is quick for making basic apps. Bubble can hacer really complicated web apps with lots of special features, but it takes longer to learn how to use it.
- Glide vs Buzzy: Glide makes apps mainly from spreadsheets. Buzzy uses AI to help you build apps faster and can connect to more different things.
- Glide vs Softgen: Glide makes apps mostly from spreadsheets in a simple way. Softgen also uses AI to help you create apps by just telling it what you want.
- Glide contra Adalo: Glide is great for turning spreadsheets into simple mobile apps. Adalo lets you build more advanced phone and web apps with more design choices, but it can be a bit harder to learn.
- Planeo vs Lovable AI: Lovable AI is an AI-first tool for rapid prototyping, often generating code. Glide is a mature, production-ready no-code platform better for real business use and scalability without needing to worry about AI hallucinations or token limits.
More of Adalo
- Adalo vs Bubble: Adalo offers an easier entry for mobile apps, but Bubble provides much greater flexibility and power for complex web applications.
- Adalo vs Buzzy: Adalo focuses on a visual drag-and-drop interface for mobile and web, whereas Buzzy emphasizes rapid mobile app prototyping with AI features.
- Adalo vs Glide: Adalo allows for more design customization and native app store publishing, while Glide quickly turns spreadsheets into simple mobile apps.
- Adalo vs Softgen: Adalo is known for its user-friendly mobile app development, while Softgen is a newer platform aiming for fast web and mobile app creation with AI.
- Adalo vs Lovable AI: Adalo is a full-featured visual builder for native mobile app projects. IA adorable focuses on very rapid, AI-powered prototyping, mainly for web apps, but offers less control and is not suitable for native app store deployment.
Preguntas frecuentes
¿Qué es más fácil de aprender, Glide o Adalo?
En general, Glide es más fácil de aprender. Su sencilla interfaz y la conexión con hojas de cálculo hacen que sea rápido de entender. Adalo tiene una curva de aprendizaje más pronunciada, pero ofrece un mayor control del diseño. Si la velocidad es su prioridad, Glide es el claro ganador.
¿Puedo crear aplicaciones móviles nativas con Glide?
No, Glide creates web apps, not native mobile apps. They run in a browser. Adalo builds true native apps for iOS and Android. If you need a real app store app, Adalo is the stronger choice.
Which platform is better for complex apps?
Adalo is better for complex apps. Its database integrations and design tools allow for more intricate builds. Glide excels at simple, data-driven apps. If you need extensive features, Adalo offers more robust capabilities.
How much does it cost to use Glide or Adalo?
Both offer free plans. Paid plans start around $50/month. Costs vary based on features and usage. Glide’s pricing is often seen as more straightforward, while Adalo’s can scale up quickly with added features. Make sure you check their latest pricing.
Which platform offers better data management?
Adalo’s database integrations provide more advanced data management. Glide, reliant on Google Sheets or Airtable, is simpler but less flexible. Adalo offers more powerful tools for complex data relationships.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean