¿Estás haciendo malabarismos con tu redes sociales and wishing there was an easier way?
Posting on different sites like Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter) can take up a lot of time, right?
What if there were tools to help you plan and post everything in one place?
Agorapulse vs Buffer are two popular options that promise to do just that.
¡Vamos a sumergirnos!
Descripción general
We’ve spent time exploring both Agorapulse and Buffer.
Getting a feel for how they work day-to-day.
Our hands-on testing involved scheduling posts, engaging with audiences, and analyzing results to compare their strengths and weaknesses clearly.
¿Quieres simplificar tu vida en redes sociales? Prueba Agorapulse gratis y descubre cómo te ahorra tiempo y mejora tus resultados.
Precios: Puedes probarlo gratis. El plan de pago empieza desde $79 al mes.
Características principales:
- Social intuitivo bandeja de entrada
- Potente calendario editorial
- Informes en profundidad
¿Listo para ahorrar tiempo en redes sociales? Buffer te ayuda a recuperar hasta 6 horas semanales. Prueba gratis por 14 días.
Precios: Tiene un plan gratuito. El plan de pago empieza desde $5 al mes.
Características principales:
- Programación intuitiva
- Herramientas de participación
- Análisis e informes
¿Qué es Agorapulse?
Bien, ¿y cuál es el problema con Agorapulse?
Think of it as a super-organized hub for all your redes sociales cosa.
It helps you manage posts, view comments, and check the performance of your content, all in one place.
Además, explora nuestros favoritos Alternativas a Agorapulse…
Nuestra opinión
Agorapulse es una opción fantástica para empresas que priorizan la gestión y la interacción con la comunidad. Es fácil de usar, asequible y ofrece una excelente atención al cliente.
Beneficios clave
- Características: Agorapulse ofrece programación, publicación, análisis, escucha social y una potente bandeja de entrada para gestionar conversaciones en múltiples redes sociales.
- Redes sociales compatibles: Se integra con Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn y YouTube.
- Facilidad de uso: La interfaz es limpia y sencilla, lo que hace que sea muy fácil comenzar incluso si eres nuevo en la gestión de redes sociales.
- Atención al cliente: Agorapulse tiene reputación de brindar una excelente atención al cliente, con opciones como correo electrónico y chat en vivo.
- Integraciones: Se conecta con algunas herramientas clave, como Slack, Canvay Google Drive.
- Escalabilidad: Agorapulse ofrece planes para empresas de todos los tamaños, desde pequeños equipos hasta grandes agencias.
Precios
- Estándar: $79/mes
- Profesional: $119/mes
- Avanzado: $149/mes
- Costumbre: Precios personalizados
Ventajas
Contras
¿Qué es Buffer?
So, what about Buffer?
It’s another tool that’s really good for scheduling your social media posts.
It’s known for being easy to use and helps you plan your content ahead of time.
Think of it as a straightforward way to keep your social media active without posting everything in the moment.
Además, explora nuestros favoritos Alternativas de buffer…
Beneficios clave
- Gestiona hasta 300 perfiles sociales.
- Opciones de marca blanca para agencias.
- Obtenga un 12% más de interacción con análisis.
- Asignar tareas a más de 80 miembros del equipo.
- Automatice el contenido con colas inteligentes.
Precios
- Gratis: $0/mes.
- Elementos esenciales: $5/mes por canal
- Equipo: $10/mes por canal
Ventajas
Contras
Comparación de características
Agorapulse and Buffer are powerful social media management tools, but they cater to different needs.
Agorapulse is the better fit for large marketing agencies needing a comprehensive CRM and social listening.
While Buffer account is ideal for pequeña empresa owners who prioritize easy scheduling and affordability on their social media account.
1. Unified Inbox and Engagement Tools
- Agorapulse: It is a superior social media management tool in this area, offering a truly unified inbox to manage all customer interactions, including brand mentions and ad comments, making it easy for a social media manager to respond and nurture a genuine connection with the community.
- Buffer: It’s engagement tools are more basic publishing tools, focusing primarily on replying to comments and messages on facebook pages and Instagram. It lacks the advanced features on multiple platforms, such as saved replies and labeling, that Agorapulse offers for managing high-volume customer interactions.
2. Social Listening and Monitoring
- Agorapulse: This platform includes robust social listening and social media monitoring tools, allowing users to track keywords, hashtags, & brand mentions across social media platforms and the wider web.
- Buffer: It has very limited social listening capabilities. If monitoring brand health and competitor activity is a key part of your social media strategy, Buffer will require additional channels or a separate, third party integrations to fill this gap.
3. Analytics and Social Media ROI
- Agorapulse: It provides more comprehensive analytics and detailed reports. It helps and assist you to track your social media performance and is one of the few platforms that actively helps you measure social media roi, making it excellent for data-driven social media marketing and marketing agencies.
- Buffer: However, the buffer review shows that its analytics are less in-depth and customizable compared to Agorapulse, especially when tracking social media roi. The Buffer Analyze allows you to monitor social media performance, track clicks, and create custom reports.
4. Publicación y programación
- Agorapulse: It offers a visual publishing calendar, queue management, and the ability to schedule posts to multiple social media platforms, including YouTube channels, facebook groups, and linkedin company pages.
- Buffer: The social media scheduling tools is highly reliable and buffer offers a straightforward process for publishing. Buffer Publish is renowned for its simplicity, featuring an easy-to-use content queue to schedule posts to multiple social media accounts.
5. Supported Social Accounts
- Agorapulse: It supports all major social media accounts, including facebook pages, LinkedIn company pages, facebook groups, and youtube channels. You pay per social account, and the cost scales based on the number of accounts you connect.
- Buffer: Its free plan allows you to connect up to three channels. Paid plans allow you to connect more social media accounts but you pay per social account added. Buffer also offers unique features like the ability to add custom video thumbnails.
6. Team Collaboration and User Limits
- Agorapulse: It has a strong focus on team features, offering advanced team collaboration features such as approval workflows, user roles, and task assignment, which is essential for marketing agencies.
- Buffer: It’s collaboration tools are simpler. Its higher-tier team plans are popular because buffer offers unlimited users on some plans, making it a very cost effective solution for a team where many members need to schedule content.
7. Pricing and Free Plan
- Agorapulse: It offers a free plan, but with limited functionality and a cap on the number of scheduled posts. Its paid tiers are generally priced higher than Buffer’s, but include more advanced features as standard.
- Buffer: It offers a straightforward pricing model based on a monthly or annual basis, making it highly transparent for a small negocio. Buffer’s free plan is more generous, allowing you to connect up to three channels and publish a higher number of posts.
8. Customization and Unique Features
- Agorapulse: The platform offers a range of unique features like a built-in CRM and the ability to track the performance of facebook groups, a great social media scheduling tool that’s often missed in other social media management tools.
- Buffer: It’s unique features include the Buffer Publish extension, which allows you to schedule posts from any website, and a Start Page (link in bio tool). The buffer review consistently praises its simplicity and user-friendly design.
9. Atención al cliente
- Agorapulse: It is consistently praised for its fast and personalized support team. Its commitment to customer service is a key factor cited in many social media manager reviews.
- Buffer: The advanced Buffer support is available 24/7, but is primarily through email or social media. While generally good, the response time may not be as fast or guaranteed as the dedicated assistance offered by Agorapulse.
What Should You Look For When Choosing a Social Media Scheduler?
- Think about the number of social media platforms you use.
- Consider if you need advanced features like automatización in their social media tools.
- Evaluate if team collaboration is important for your workflow.
- Check if the tool integrates with other marketing tools you use.
- Read reviews about the platform’s reliability.
- See if they offer a free trial to test the features yourself.
Veredicto final
Okay, so we looked at Buffer vs Agorapulse.
Both help with social media.
If it’s just you, and you want to plan posts easily, Buffer could work. It’s not too tricky and doesn’t cost much.
But if you have a team or lots of social media (more than 10), Agorapulse has cooler stuff.
The social inbox helps a lot. The reports tell you more, too, than Bufferr.
For teams and growing brands, Agorapulse gives you more for your money.
We tried both, so we know what we’re talking about.
Más de Agorapulse
- Agorapulse frente a Sprout Social: Agorapulse: bandeja de entrada intuitiva, a menudo más económica para pequeñas empresas. Sprout: análisis avanzados, atentos.
- Agorapulse frente a Metricool: Agorapulse: bandeja de entrada potente y herramientas de equipo. Metricool: análisis claros y enfoque en la competencia.
- Agorapulse frente a Socialpilot: Agorapulse: interacción sólida y escucha activa. Socialpilot: programación asequible.
- Agorapulse frente a Sendible: Agorapulse: bandeja de entrada eficiente, informes claros. Sendible: escucha atenta, informes personalizables.
- Agorapulse vs Content Studio: Agorapulse: bandeja de entrada optimizada y mayor interacción. Content Studio: descubrimiento de contenido con IA.
- Agorapulse frente a Heropost: Agorapulse: interacción sólida y escucha activa. Heropost: contenido de IA e información de la competencia.
- Agorapulse frente a Zoho Social: Agorapulse: bandeja de entrada robusta y siempre a la escucha. Zoho Social: rentable (usuarios de Zoho).
- Agorapulse frente a Buffer: Agorapulse: funciones más amplias (bandeja de entrada, escucha). Buffer: programación más sencilla.
- Agorapulse frente a Sprinklr: Agorapulse: potente solución todo en uno (para pequeñas y medianas empresas). Sprinklr: a nivel empresarial.
- Agorapulse vs. Later: Agorapulse: mayor compatibilidad con plataformas y enfoque en la interacción. Más adelante: contenido visual (Instagram).
- Agorapulse frente a Loomly: Agorapulse: bandeja de entrada eficiente y atractiva. Loomly: calendario de contenido y trabajo en equipo.
- Agorapulse contra Blaze: La bandeja de entrada y el engagement de Agorapulse son nuestra fortaleza clave.
Más de Buffer
- Buffer frente a Sprout Social: Es una plataforma integral con CRM social avanzado y análisis e informes detallados.
- Buffer frente a Metricool: Buffer: programación sencilla. Metricool – análisis más sólidos, información sobre la competencia.
- Buffer frente a Socialpilot: Buffer – programación básica. Piloto social – más funciones por el precio.
- Buffer vs. Sendible: Buffer: diseño simple y limpio. Enviable – funciones más amplias (escucha, análisis).
- Buffer frente a Content Studio: Buffer – programación sencilla. Estudio de contenido – descubrimiento de contenido, IA.
- Buffer frente a Heropost: Buffer: programación sencilla. Heropost – Contenido de IA, información de la competencia.
- Buffer frente a Agorapulse: Buffer – programación sencilla. Agorapulse – Bandeja de entrada unificada, escuchando.
- Buffer frente a Zoho Social: Buffer ofrece una programación sencilla. Zoho Social ofrece más funciones y es rentable (Zoho).
- Buffer frente a Sprinklr: Buffer – programación básica (pequeñas empresas). Rociador – nivel empresarial.
- Buffer vs. Later: Buffer: programación para muchas plataformas. Más tarde – contenido visual (Instagram).
- Buffer frente a Loomly: Buffer – calendario de programación simple. Loomly – calendario de contenidos, trabajo en equipo.
- Buffer contra Blaze: (Información limitada: la fortaleza de Buffer es la simplicidad de la programación).
- Buffer frente a Hootsuite: Es una herramienta de larga data conocida por su vista de panel integral y multiplataforma.
- Buffer vs. Planificable: Es una herramienta que prioriza la colaboración y se centra en la aprobación del contenido visual y la retroalimentación del cliente.
Preguntas frecuentes
What’s the main difference between Buffer and Agorapulse?
Buffer is often simpler and more affordable for a single user focused mainly on scheduling. Agorapulse is a more comprehensive social media management platform, offering advanced features like a unified inbox and detailed analytics, which is better for teams managing multiple (even 10 social accounts.
Which platform is better for a small team?
Agorapulse is generally better for small teams. Its collaboration features and unified inbox hacer it easier for multiple people to manage social media efficiently. While Buffer has team features, they are often more limited on lower-tier plans.
Can I manage all my social media channels with either tool?
Yes, both Buffer and Agorapulse allow you to connect and manage multiple social media channels. However, the number of channels you can connect often depends on the specific pricing plan you choose for each social media management platform.
Is Buffer or Agorapulse easier to learn for a beginner to learn?
Buffer is often considered easier to learn, thanks to its straightforward and user-friendly interface. Agorapulse, with its more extensive features, might have a slightly steeper learning curve initially, but it’s still generally well-designed.
¿Qué plataforma ofrece mejor atención al cliente?
Agorapulse is often praised for its responsive and helpful customer support. While Buffer also offers support, some users report that Agorapulse’s response times and the quality of support are generally higher.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean 
Italian 
Turkish 
Dutch 
Polish