لوما ضد InVideo: أيهما أفضل صانع فيديو بالذكاء الاصطناعي في عام 2024؟

Want to create awesome videos without the hassle?

AI video generators are changing the game!

They can whip up professional-looking videos in minutes, even if you’re a total beginner.

But with so many options out there, how do you choose the right one?

In this post, we’ll dive into two popular contenders Luma vs InVideo & compare their features & pricing to help you decide which one is the best فيديو الذكاء الاصطناعي maker.

لمحة عامة

To give you the most accurate comparison, we’ve spent weeks testing both Luma and InVideo.

We’ve explored their features, created sample videos, and even compared their customer support. Now, we’re sharing our findings to help you make the best decision.

What is Luma?

Luma isn’t your typical video editing software.

It’s like having a creative assistant powered by AI! Instead of spending hours editing, Luma helps you create stunning videos in minutes.

Think quick, easy, and professional – even if you’re a total beginner.

استكشف أيضاً Luma alternatives...

المزايا الرئيسية

Luma AI stands out from the crowd with these awesome features:

• Unmatched realism: Capture incredibly detailed 3D environments from your videos.
• واجهة سهلة الاستخدام: Easily navigate and edit your 3D scenes without any technical expertise.
• Versatile applications: Create anything from immersive virtual tours to stunning visual effects.

التسعير

Ready to give Luma AI a try? Here’s what you can expect:

• تجربة مجانية: 30 Generations per month, standard priority, non-commercial use.
• Lite ($9.99/month): 70 Generations per month, High priority, non-commercial use.
• Standard ($29.99/month): 150 Generations per month, High priority, Remove watermark.
• Plus ($64.99/month): 310 Generations per month, High priority, non-commercial use.
• Pro (99.99/month): 480 Generations per month, High priority, Remove watermark.
• Premier (499.99/month): 2430 Generations per month, High priority, Remove watermark.

What is InVideo?

InVideo is a powerful online video editor.

It’s perfect for creating all sorts of videos – from وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي posts to marketing content and even YouTube videos.

They have cool أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي that make video creation a breeze.

And guess what? You don’t need any fancy editing skills to use it!

استكشف أيضاً InVideo alternatives...

المزايا الرئيسية

Here’s what makes InVideo a solid choice for video creators:

• Massive template library: Over 5,000 templates for any video.
• iStock media library: Access millions of stock images and videos.
• Intuitive video editor: Easy to learn, even for beginners.
• أدوات التعاون: Work on videos with your team in real time.
• Brand presets: Keep your videos consistent with your brand.

التسعير

InVideo has a free plan with limited features. Want more? They’ve got you covered:

• Free : Basic features and limited video creation.
• Plus ($25/month): Access to premium templates and features.
• Max ($60/month): Unlimited video creation and premium support.

مقارنة الميزات

Now, let’s get down to الأعمال!

We’ll compare Luma and InVideo head-to-head across key features to see which فيديو الذكاء الاصطناعي generator comes out on top.

1. سهولة الاستخدام

Both Luma and InVideo are designed with user-friendliness in mind.

Even if you’ve never used an فيديو الذكاء الاصطناعي generator before, you’ll find them easy to navigate.

Luma’s interface is super intuitive, making it a great choice for beginners.

InVideo, while slightly more complex, offers a more extensive range of features for those who want to create videos with more advanced customization.

2. AI Capabilities

Luma’s AI video generation features are truly impressive.

Its Luma AI excels at generating scripts and converting النص to video, making it a dream machine for content creators who want to repurpose their written work.

InVideo, on the other hand, focuses on AI human presenters and voice-over generation, which is perfect for creating engaging marketing and explainer videos.

3. القوالب

Both platforms offer a massive library of pre-made templates to get you started quickly.

Luma’s templates are sleek and modern, while InVideo prefer a longer variety of styles to choose from.

4. Customization Options

While both platforms allow you to customize the videos you create, InVideo provides more flexibility.

You can fine-tune every element of your video, from text & images to animations & transitions.

Luma, while offering some customization, focuses more on speed and simplicity.

5. Video Generation Speed

Luma takes the crown when it comes to video generation speed.

Its streamlined process allows you to create videos in minutes.

InVideo, with its more advanced features, can take a bit longer to generate videos, especially if you’re using complex animations or effects.

6. Free Version

Both Luma and InVideo offer a free version to test out their features.

Luma’s free trial gives you a taste of their premium features, while InVideo’s free plan offers basic video editing with limited templates and branding.

ما الذي يجب البحث عنه عند اختيار مولد فيديو بالذكاء الاصطناعي؟

• ميزانيتك: Free plans are great for experimenting, but paid plans usually offer more features and remove branding.
• Your Skill Level: Some tools are more intuitive than others. Choose a software that matches your comfort level with video editing.
• Your Video Needs: Do you need to make marketing videos, explainer videos or social media content? Different tools excel in different areas.
• ميزات الذكاء الاصطناعي: Consider which AI features are most important to you, such as scriptwriting, voice-over generation, or text-to-video conversion.
• خيارات التخصيص: How much control do you need over the final product? Some tools offer more customization than others.
• جودة المخرجات: Pay attention to the video resolution and rendering options.
• دعم العملاء: If you’re new to AI video generation, good customer support can be invaluable.

الحكم النهائي

Choosing between Luma and InVideo depends on your priorities.

If you value speed, ease of use, and AI-powered scriptwriting, Luma is the way to go.

However, if you need more customization options, a wider range of templates, and a more budget-friendly option, InVideo takes the crown.

Remember it, the best choice depends on your individual needs and budget.

We’ve used both platforms extensively, and we’re confident that our insights will help you make the right decision. So, what are you waiting for?

Start creating amazing videos today!

More of Luma

• Luma vs Runway: Luma excels at AI image-to-video and text-to-video, while Runway offers a broader generative AI suite for diverse video creation.
• Luma vs Pika: Luma specializes in animating images to video alongside text prompts, whereas Pika emphasizes rapid, high-quality video generation with creative control.
• Luma vs Sora: Luma turns images and text into dynamic videos; Sora is OpenAI’s advanced model, generating highly realistic and imaginative scenes from text.
• Luma vs Kling: Luma focuses on image and text-to-video animation, while Kling provides an AI studio for both video and image generation, including editing.
• Luma vs Assistive: Luma transforms static visuals or text into videos; Assistive creates videos from text input or by animating uploaded photos.
• لوما vs BasedLabs: Luma emphasizes AI-driven image and text-to-video creation, while BasedLabs offers an AI studio for creating diverse video content from text and images.
• Luma vs Pixverse: Luma focuses on AI-powered image-to-video and text-to-video; Pixverse is an AI suite for converting photos, text, and videos into engaging content.
• Luma vs Veed: Luma primarily uses AI for image/text-to-video animation; Veed is a comprehensive AI production studio with text-to-video, avatars, and extensive editing tools.
• Luma vs Canva: Luma concentrates on creating AI videos from images/text; Canva is a broader graphic design platform with integrated video editing and AI features.
• Luma vs Fliki: Luma produces videos from images/text; Fliki converts text into videos using lifelike AI voices and offers blog-to-video conversion.
• لوما ضد فيزارد: Luma creates videos from images/text using AI; Vizard specializes in using AI to extract and optimize short, engaging clips from longer videos.

More of InVideo

Here’s a comparison of InVideo with other video creation tools:

• InVideo vs Runway: InVideo offers a template-driven editing approach; Runway provides advanced generative AI for diverse video transformations.
• InVideo vs Pika: InVideo focuses on comprehensive online video editing, while Pika specializes in quickly generating high-quality videos from text.
• InVideo vs Sora: InVideo is a user-friendly editor for varied content; Sora emphasizes realistic and imaginative video scene generation from textual descriptions.
• InVideo vs Kling: InVideo provides a broad online editing platform, while Kling acts as a dedicated AI studio for generating professional videos and images.
• InVideo vs Assistive: InVideo is an established online editor; Assistive is an emerging platform for converting ideas into video, currently in its early stages.
• InVideo vs BasedLabs: InVideo offers extensive template-based editing; BasedLabs focuses on producing cinematic quality AI video content.
• InVideo vs Pixverse: InVideo provides robust editing and templating, while Pixverse specializes in swiftly converting photos, text, and videos into engaging content.
• InVideo vs Veed: InVideo is a general editor with AI assistance; Veed offers a complete AI production studio, including AI avatars and auto-subtitles.
• InVideo vs Canva: InVideo is a dedicated video creation tool, while Canva is a broader design platform with robust video editing capabilities.
• InVideo vs Fliki: InVideo creates videos from scripts or templates; Fliki specializes in text-to-video conversion with lifelike AI voices and blog integration.
• InVideo vs Vizard: InVideo supports diverse video production, while Vizard focuses on AI-powered extraction and optimization of short, engaging clips from longer videos.

الأسئلة الشائعة