Does coding feel like trying to read alien instructions? You’re not alone.
Building apps used to mean tons of complicated code and a lot of headaches.
Now, you hear about “no-code” tools like Glide vs Adalo.
They promise to let you build apps without coding. But which one’s actually easier?
Which one will get you to your app faster?
You don’t want to waste time on the wrong platform.
Let’s break down Glide vs Adalo. We’ll look at speed, ease of use, and what you can actually build with each.
Überblick
To give you the best comparison, we’ve put both platforms to the test.
We built simple apps, explored their features, and timed how long each task took.
This hands-on experience lets us show you real differences, not just fancy words.
Glide’s pre-built templates help users launch apps 30% quicker. Discover how Glide transforms your spreadsheets into functional ones!
Preise: Free Trial Available. Premium plan starts at $19/month.
Hauptmerkmale:
- Data-Driven Apps
- Spreadsheet Integration
- Mobile-First Design
60% of Adalo users launched their first app within 3 weeks. See if you can beat that time. Start building with Adalo now!
Preise: Es gibt einen kostenlosen Plan. Der Premium-Plan beginnt bei $36/Monat.
Hauptmerkmale:
- Native Mobile Apps
- Custom Actions
- Drag-and-Drop-Schnittstelle.
What is Glide?
Glide turns spreadsheets into mobile apps.
Yes, really. Just connect your Google Sheet or Lufttabelle, and Glide does the rest.
It’s fast. It’s clean. Think of it as instant app creation.
Entfesseln Sie sein Potenzial mit unserem Glide Alternatives…
Unsere Meinung
Konvertieren Sie Tabellenkalkulationen in Minutenschnelle in Apps! 95 % der Nutzer finden die Benutzeroberfläche von Glide intuitiv und 70 % starten ihre erste App innerhalb eines Tages. Starten Sie jetzt Ihre Glide-Reise!
Hauptvorteile
- Apps von Google Sheets.
- Einfache, schnelle Bereitstellung.
- Mobile-First-Design.
- Einfache Datenaktualisierungen.
Preise
Alle Pläne werden jährliche Abrechnung.
- Frei: 0 $/Monat.
- Forscher: 19 $/Monat.
- Hersteller: 49 $/Monat.
Pros
Nachteile
Was ist Adalo?
Adalo helps you build native mobile apps. No code is needed.
Drag and drop components. Connect databases. It’s visual. It’s powerful.
Think of it as a design-first App-Builder.
Entfesseln Sie sein Potenzial mit unserem Adalo-Alternativen…
Unsere Meinung
Erstellen Sie native mobile Apps 75 % schneller mit Adalo! 80 % der Nutzer starten ihre erste App innerhalb weniger Wochen. Starten Sie noch heute Ihre kostenlose Testversion und schließen Sie sich Tausenden an, die mit Adalo entwickeln.
Hauptvorteile
- Native iOS- und Android-Apps.
- Visuelle Datenbankeinrichtung.
- Einfache Veröffentlichung im App Store.
- Community-Komponenten verfügbar.
Preise
Alle Pläne werden jährliche Abrechnung.
- Frei: 0 $/Monat.
- Anlasser: 36 $/Monat.
- Professional: 52 $/Monat.
- Team: 160 $/Monat.
- Geschäft: 200 $/Monat.
Pros
Nachteile
Funktionsvergleich
We’ve been hands-on with both no-code App-Builder Werkzeuge.
Now, let’s see exactly how they compare on key features.
This will help you choose your own champion for your next app idea.
1. App Type
- Glide: Progressive web app (PWA) only. Runs in a browser. Not published to the app stores.
- Adalo: Builds native apps. You can publish to the Apple App Store and Google Play for a powerful app presence.
2. Data Source
- Glide: Using Glide, you connect directly to existing Daten like Google Sheets or Airtable. Setup is simple.
- Adalo: Uses its own internal database. Connects to external APIs and services for more functionality.
3. Design Control
- Glide: Has sleek prebuilt components. It is less flexible.
- Adalo: Gives you more freedom. The visual interface is great for custom apps.
4. Complexity
- Glide: Best when your app idea is simple. Glide makes it happen fast.
- Adalo: Better for apps with complex Geschäft processes and many screens. Handles advanced logic with more ease.
5. App Publishing
- Glide: Only lets you share a link for your progressive web app. This is a double-edged sword: fast to publish but limited reach.
- Adalo: Lets you launch your app to the major app stores. This is a huge benefit.
6. User Experience
- Glide: Apps often feel faster. They are quick to load and update app’s data.
- Adalo: Apps can sometimes feel a little slower. This can affect the end-user license agreement satisfaction.
7. Media Capabilities
- Glide: Handles photos and basic video uploads well.
- Adalo: Strong for video chat and video messages. Offers features for rich media like watching live videos.
8. Custom Code
- Glide: Strictly no-code. You are limited to their powerful app features.
- Adalo: Allows for custom actions and some custom code integration. This extends what you can build.
9. AI Features
- Glide: Konzentriert sich auf AI-Tools, like those that help automate tasks and speed up app development. Leading in bringing AI into the no-code app builder space.
- Adalo: Focuses on its core drag-and-drop builder.
Worauf ist bei der Auswahl des richtigen AI App Builders zu achten?
- App Type and Reach: Do you need a mobile app for the Apple App Store or a web application (web app builder)? Will your own app be a progressive web app that works on every device?
- Design and Customization: Do you need total control over custom fonts and design versions? Do the app Bauherren offer cool filters or ways to customize the look and feel?
- Ease and Speed (for non-programmers): Can a developer or just two non-technical founders create apps quickly? Is the building process hassle-free for someone with no coding knowledge?
- Daten und Integration: Can the software handle your existing data and integrate with other services? Does the builder offer custom integrations to link to the rest of the world?
- Functionality and Features: Can you enable video messaging, watch live videos, or stream live events? Can you create features like a QR code for easy access or a slide deck viewer?
- Platform Support and Community: Are there good Adalo app examples or a strong community where you can get help? Do the other app builders offer check-ins or support for kleine Unternehmen?
Instantanément vs UpLead
After testing both, we pick Glide. It’s the fastest way to make data-driven apps.
If you need a quick, clean app from your spreadsheets, Glide wins.
It’s powerful for simple projects. Adalo is great for complex native apps, but it takes more time.
Glide is efficient and user-friendly. We’ve shown you real tests and results.
If you want to build an app now, Glide is your best choice.
You’ll see your app live faster. Glide’s simplicity makes it a smart starting point.
Don’t get bogged down in design; focus on getting your idea out there quickly.
More of Glide
Let’s see how Glide stacks up against these other app builders:
- Glide vs Bubble: Glide is quick for making basic apps. Bubble can machen really complicated web apps with lots of special features, but it takes longer to learn how to use it.
- Glide vs Buzzy: Glide makes apps mainly from spreadsheets. Buzzy uses AI to help you build apps faster and can connect to more different things.
- Glide vs. Softgen: Glide makes apps mostly from spreadsheets in a simple way. Softgen also uses AI to help you create apps by just telling it what you want.
- Glide gegen Adalo: Glide is great for turning spreadsheets into simple mobile apps. Adalo lets you build more advanced phone and web apps with more design choices, but it can be a bit harder to learn.
- Gleiten vs Lovable AI: Lovable AI is an AI-first tool for rapid prototyping, often generating code. Glide is a mature, production-ready no-code platform better for real business use and scalability without needing to worry about AI hallucinations or token limits.
Mehr von Adalo
- Adalo vs. Blase: Adalo bietet einen einfacheren Einstieg für mobile Anwendungen, aber Bubble bietet viel mehr Flexibilität und Leistung für komplexe Webanwendungen.
- Adalo gegen Buzzy: Adalo konzentriert sich auf eine visuelle Drag-and-Drop-Oberfläche für Mobilgeräte und das Web, während Buzzy den Schwerpunkt auf schnelles Prototyping von Mobilgeräten mit KI-Funktionen legt.
- Adalo vs. Glide: Adalo bietet mehr Möglichkeiten zur Designanpassung und zur Veröffentlichung in nativen App-Stores, während Glide Tabellenkalkulationen schnell in einfache mobile Anwendungen verwandelt.
- Adalo vs. Softgen: Adalo ist für seine benutzerfreundliche Entwicklung von mobilen Apps bekannt, während Softgen eine neuere Plattform ist, die auf die schnelle Erstellung von Web- und mobilen Apps mit KI abzielt.
- Adalo vs Lovable AI: Adalo is a full-featured visual builder for native mobile app projects. Liebenswerte AI focuses on very rapid, AI-powered prototyping, mainly for web apps, but offers less control and is not suitable for native app store deployment.
Häufig Gestellte Fragen
Which is easier to learn, Glide or Adalo?
Glide is generally easier to learn. Its simple interface and spreadsheet connection make it quick to grasp. Adalo has a steeper learning curve, but it offers more design control. If speed is your priority, Glide is the clear winner.
Can I build native mobile apps with Glide?
No, Glide creates web apps, not native mobile apps. They run in a browser. Adalo builds true native apps for iOS and Android. If you need a real app store app, Adalo is the stronger choice.
Which platform is better for complex apps?
Adalo is better for complex apps. Its database integrations and design tools allow for more intricate builds. Glide excels at simple, data-driven apps. If you need extensive features, Adalo offers more robust capabilities.
How much does it cost to use Glide or Adalo?
Both offer free plans. Paid plans start around $50/month. Costs vary based on features and usage. Glide’s pricing is often seen as more straightforward, while Adalo’s can scale up quickly with added features. Make sure you check their latest pricing.
Which platform offers better data management?
Adalo’s database integrations provide more advanced data management. Glide, reliant on Google Sheets or Airtable, is simpler but less flexible. Adalo offers more powerful tools for complex data relationships.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Arabic 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean