Are you tired of wondering where your work hours go?
Do you struggle to track your time on projects accurately?
It’s a common problem! Many Freiberufler, project managers, and even students struggle to stay on top of their time.
Two popular time-tracking tools, Timeular and Harvest, promise to solve this.
Aber welche ist die richtige für Du?
In this Timeular vs Harvest comparison, we’ll break down each platform’s features, pricing, and user experience.
Überblick
We’ve spent considerable time exploring Timeular and Harvest, testing their features in real-world scenarios.
We’ve analyzed how each platform performs, from tracking project hours to managing team time.
This comparison is based on our hands-on experience and aims to give you a clear picture of their strengths and weaknesses.
Timeular’s data-driven approach lets you understand exactly where your hours are going. Stop guessing where your time goes!
Preise: Free trial available. Paid plan starts at $7.50/month
Hauptmerkmale:
- Physical Tracker
- Integrationen
- Time Blocking
Ready to take control of your Zeiterfassung? Harvest boasts over 100,000 customers and integrates with dozens of popular Geschäft Werkzeuge.
Preise: Free plan available. Paid plan starts at $11/month
Hauptmerkmale:
- Zeiterfassung
- Invoicing
- Expense Tracking
Was ist Timeular?
Now, let’s explore Timeular. This time tracker takes a slightly different approach.
It uses a physical, geometric tracking device. You assign activities to each face of the die.
Then, you flip the die to track your time. It’s a tactile way to manage your day.
Entdecken Sie auch unsere beliebtesten Timeular alternatives…
Ready to take control of your time? Timeular’s data-driven approach lets you understand exactly where your hours are going.
Hauptvorteile
- Physical Tracker: Unique, hands-on time tracking. It makes time tracking more engaging.
- Integrationen: Connects with popular apps. Streamlines your workflow.
- Time Blocking: Visualize your schedule. Plan your day effectively.
Preise
Similar offers different subscription levels. The basic plan starts at $10 per month. This includes core tracking features and integrations. Upgrading unlocks more advanced features.
- Persönlich: $7.50/month –
- Personal Pro: $11.70/month –
- Team: $15.80/month –
- Unternehmen: Custom pricing –
Pros
Nachteile
What is Harvest?
Now, let’s switch gears and talk about Harvest.
It’s another popular time-tracking tool known for its clean interface and focus on simplicity.
Harvest is all about making time tracking effortless.
It’s designed to be user-friendly and integrates well with other tools.
Entdecken Sie auch unsere beliebtesten Harvest alternatives…
Ready to stop losing track of time and money? Millions of people use Harvest to simplify their work and get paid faster.
Hauptvorteile
- Effortless Time Tracking: Harvest makes logging your time a breeze. Its intuitive interface allows for quick and accurate time entries.
- Seamless Invoicing: Harvest simplifies the billing process. You can easily generate invoices based on tracked time.
- Powerful Integrations: Harvest plays nicely with other apps. Connect it to your project management, Buchhaltung, and communication tools.
Preise
Harvest offers straightforward pricing plans.
- Frei: $0 per user per month.
- Pro: $11 per user per month.
- Prämie: $14 per user per month.
Pros
Nachteile
Funktionsvergleich
Let’s dive into a head-to-head comparison of Timeular and Harvest, examining their key features to see how they stack up for effective time management.
1. Time Tracking Functionality
Timeular’s unique selling point is its physical, eight-sided die.
You assign activities to each side, flip the die, and Timeular automatically tracks the time spent.
Harvest relies on digital timers and manual entries within its interface.
While Timeular offers a tactile, distraction-free approach, Harvest provides more flexibility for detailed task breakdowns.
2. Timesheet Generation
Both platforms offer timesheet generation, but their approaches differ.
Timeular’s timesheets are based on the die flips, providing a visual overview of your day.
Harvest allows for more detailed timesheets, including notes and project codes, which can be useful for billable hours.
3. Project and Task Management
Harvest excels in project and task management.
You can create projects, assign tasks to team members, and track progress.
Timeular’s project management features are more basic, focusing primarily on activity tracking.
4. Reporting and Analytics
Harvest offers robust reporting and analytics, allowing you to visualize billable and non-billable time, project progress, and team performance.
Timeular’s reporting is simpler, focusing on time spent on different activities.
5. Budgeting and Invoicing
Harvest integrates budgeting and invoicing features, making it ideal for freelancers and agencies.
You can set project budgets, track expenses, and generate invoices based on tracked time.
Timeular does not offer built-in budgeting or invoicing.
6. Integrationen
Both platforms offer integrations with other tools.
Harvest integrates with project management software, Buchhaltung platforms, and more.
Timeular also offers integrations but focuses more on connecting with productivity and calendar apps.
7. User Interface and Experience
Timeular’s interface is minimalist and intuitive, centered around the physical die.
Harvest’s interface is more comprehensive, offering a wider range of features and options.
Your preferred interface depends on your needs and how you like to work.
What to Look for When Choosing a Time Tracker?
- Benutzerfreundlichkeit: Is the interface intuitive? Can your team easily adopt it?
- Skalierbarkeit: Will the time-tracking solution grow with your business?
- Mobile App: Does it offer a robust mobile experience for on-the-go tracking?
- Kunden Unterstützung: Is their support responsive and helpful?
- Anpassung: Can you tailor the tool to your specific workflows?
- Kostenlose Testversion: Does it offer a free trial to test before you commit?
- Budget: Does the pricing align with your budget and offer good value?
- Integrationen: Does it integrate with your existing software stack?
- Sicherheit: Ist die time clock software prioritize data security and privacy?
Endgültiges Urteil
Choosing between Timeular and Harvest depends heavily on your specific needs.
If you prioritize a distraction-free, tactile approach to time tracking and need basic reporting, Timeular is a great choice.
However, Harvest is the clear winner if you require robust project management, detailed timesheets, billable hour tracking, budgeting, and invoicing.
Our testing revealed Harvest’s superior Funktionalität for professional use.
We’ve used both extensively, and Harvest’s comprehensive feature set makes it our top recommendation for managing complex projects and budgets.
We believe our experience provides valuable insight to help you make the best decision.
More of Timeular
Let’s see how Timeular, with its unique physical tracking device, compares to these software-based alternatives:
- Timeular gegen Time Doctor: Timeular uses a physical cube to switch tasks. Zeit-Doktor is software-based and can offer more detailed monitoring like app usage.
- Timeular vs. Clockify: Timeular requires a physical action to track. Clockify is a straightforward software timer.
- Timeular vs. Clockit: Sie meinen wahrscheinlich Clockify. Timeular verwendet ein physisches Gerät, während Clockify softwarebasiert ist.
- Timeular vs. Toggl: Timeular uses a physical cube for task switching. Toggl is a simple software timer.
- Timeular vs. TrackingTime: Timeular is an individual physical tracker. TrackingZeit is software focused on team and project time management.
- Timeular vs. Memtime: Timeular requires manual physical interaction. Memtime aims for automatic software-based tracking.
More of Harvest
Let’s see how Harvest stacks up against these other time-tracking tools:
- Harvest vs Time Doctor: Harvest focuses on time tracking for invoicing and project costing. Time Doctor often includes more features for productivity monitoring, like app tracking and screenshots.
- Harvest vs Clockify: Harvest integrates time tracking with invoicing and expense management, making it ideal for billing. Clockify is a simpler, often free, tool mainly for tracking time.
- Harvest vs Clockit: You likely mean Clockify. Harvest has built-in invoicing, unlike the simpler time-tracking focus of Clockify.
- Harvest vs Toggl: Harvest is designed with invoicing and project budgeting in mind alongside time tracking. Toggl is known for its ease of use in just tracking time for productivity.
- Harvest vs TrackingTime: Harvest focuses on billing and project profitability with its time tracking. TrackingTime emphasizes team and project management features alongside time tracking.
- Harvest vs Memtime: Harvest requires manual or timer-based time entry for billing. Memtime attempts to automate time tracking based on your computer activity.
Häufig Gestellte Fragen
Is Timeular good for freelancers?
Timeular can be good for freelancers who want a simple way to track their time across different clients or projects. The physical die can be less distracting than digital timers. However, freelancers needing detailed invoices and billable hour tracking may find Harvest a better fit.
Does Harvest integrate with QuickBooks?
Yes, Harvest offers integration with QuickBooks, allowing you to transfer time-tracking data for invoicing and accounting purposes seamlessly. This is a huge benefit for freelancers and small businesses.
Can Timeular be used for team time tracking?
While Timeular can be used to track individual time, it’s not designed for robust team time management. Harvest’s features for project assignments, team progress tracking, and shared timesheets make it a more suitable choice for teams.
How much does Timeular cost?
Timeular offers different subscription plans, including a free trial. Their pricing is based on the number of users and features you need. Check their website for the most up-to-date pricing information.
Is Harvest suitable for large businesses?
Harvest’s scalable features, reporting capabilities, and integrations suit small businesses and larger organizations. It can handle complex projects, manage budgets, and track billable hours across multiple teams.
English 
Spanish 
Chinese 
German 
French 
Russian 
Portuguese 
Japanese 
Korean